Case No. 84-ERA-24

Robert Seraiva,
    Complainant

    v.

Bechtel Power Corporation,
    Respondent

    The Recommended Decision and Order of Administrative Law Judge Robert J. Feldman issued July 5, 1984, in this matter, arising under Section 210 of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974 (ERA), 42 U.S.C. § 5851, is before me for review pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 24.6(b). After careful consideration of the evidence in this case in accordance with the principles of law set forth in Dartey v. Zack Company of Chicago, 82-ERA-2 (April 25, 1983), I adopt Judge Feldman's factual findings¹ and accept his conclusion that Complainant Seraiva failed to establish that Respondent Bechtel Power Corporation violated Section 210 of the ERA when it terminated Complainant Seraiva from employment.

    Accordingly, the complaint is DISMISSED.

       BILL BROCK
       Secretary of Labor

Dated: NOV 5 1985
Washington, D.C.

¹ I do not accept Judge Feldman's finding "that Complainant did not in fact make any complaint to the NRC" (Nuclear Regulatory Commission)