September 23, 2008 DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection |
USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Office of Administrative Law Judges 1111 20th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Case No. 84-ERA-29 In the Matter of
SARGENT PODWORNY
v.
HARTFORD STEM BOILER INSURANCE
AND INSPECTION
APPEARANCES: On behalf of Complainant
DOUGLAS CASSEL, Esq.
On behalf of the Employer
ROBERT F. CASEY, Esq.
[Page 2]
Before: GLENN ROBERT LAWRENCE
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law This is a proceeding under the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended (42 U.S.C. § 5851), hereafter called the Act. The Act (42 U.S.C. § 5851 (a)) prohibits a Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensee from discharging or discriminating against an employee who has commenced a proceeding to carry out the purposes of the Act. The Act is implemented by regulations designed to protect so-called "whistle-blower" employees from retaliatory or discriminatory actions by their employers. 45 Fed. Reg. 1836 (January 8, 1980) (29 C.F.R. Part 24). An employee who believes that he or she has been discriminated against in violation of that section may file a complaint within 30 days of the alleged act. In a discrimination complaint filed May 15, 1984 under 10 CFR 50.7 with area Director of the Wage and Hour Division Madison, Wisconsin, complainant alleges: On March 6, 1984, while working as Atomic Nuclear Inspector (ANI) for H.S.B. I & I Company at the Byron Nuclear Plant, (Contractor, Hunter Corporation) he contacted Mr. J.M. Hinds Jr., Senior Resident Inspector, Nuclear Regulatory Commissioner (NRC). He arranged a meeting to discuss, and turn over to him facts and documentation, whereas he felt the intent of the Atomic Safety Mechanical Engineering Code, Section 3 was not being met. Nine other A.N.I's felt this way also. They did not want to come forward, for fear of losing their jobs. The meeting took place on March 13, 1984. On April 16, 1984 he was terminated. On April 17, 1984 the Chicago branch office of H.S.B., assistant regional manager, Mr. Bob Rainery called the Byron site where he had formerly worked. He asked if anyone knew if Mr. Sargent Podworny had contacted the N.R.C,, and if so, what documentation had been turned over. The office personel who were contacted by Mr. Rainey were: The lead A.N.I., Jeff Hendricks and A.N.I., David Reynolds. Mr. Reynolds then contacted complainant to inform him of this matter. [Page 3]
On May 14, 1984 he called the chief at the Chicago Branch office, as to reconsideration of his returning to employment of H.S.B. His answer was "No". On June 12, 1984, the Area Director of the United States Department of Labor Wage and Hour office denied the complaint and stated in part:
By telegraph received on June 18, 1984, Complainant appealed the determination. The matter came on for hearing in Chicago, Illinois on December 12, 1984. Complainant did not appear contending that he had a broken leg (T 7). An offer to reconvene at the house of the complainant was declined (T 7). Counsel for the Complainant stated that if the parties are unable to settle this case within 30 days than the complaint would be withdrawn (T. 14). Inasmuch as no settlement has been reported, it is recommended that the matter dismissed with prejudice based on the voluntary withdrawal.
GLENN ROBERT
LAWRENCE
Dated: MAR 28 1985
|
||||||||
|