skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
September 23, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > USDOL/OALJ Reporter
USDOL/OALJ Reporter

CHATTAHOOCHEE WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT, WAB No. 77-03 (WAB Apr. 18, 1977)


CCASE: CHATTAHOOCHEE WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT DDATE: 19770418 TTEXT: ~1 [1] [ 77-03.WAB ] TELEGRAPHIC MESSAGE NAME OF AGENCY: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY ACCOUNTING CLASSIFICATION: 7165-1-1-M-002-71002-2330-000 DATE PREPARED: 4/18/77 NAME: CRAIG BULGER TO: ALL PERSONS ON THE ATTACHED LIST DECISION AND ORDER WAGE APPEALS BOARD RE: CHATTAHOOCHEE WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT WAB CASE NO. 77-03 THE PREVAILING WAGE RATES APPLICABLE TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF CHATTAHOOCHEE WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION EPA PROJECT NO. C-130470, COBB COUNTY, GEORGIA BEFORE: ALFRED L. GANNA, CHAIRMAN, WILLIAM T. EVANS, MEMBER, THOMAS PHELAN, MEMBER THE BOARD FINDS THAT HEAVY CONSTRUCTION HAS TRADITIONALLY BEEN CONSIDERED TO BE CONSTRUCTION THAT WAS NEITHER BUILDING, HIGHWAY NOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION. HOWEVER, THE PRACTICE OF ISSUING A SEPARATE SCHEDULE OF WATER AND SEWER LINE WAGE RATES WHERE IT WAS DETERMINED THAT SUFFICIENT WAGE INFORMATION WAS AVAILABLE TO SUPPORT SUCH A SCHEDULE HAS EXISTED SINCE THE PASSAGE OF THE FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT AMENDMENTS IN 1961. THE BOARD FINDS NO REASON TO DEVIATE FROM THIS PRACTICE IN THIS CASE SINCE NEITHER THE PETITIONER NOR THE RECORD HAVE SHOWN ANY REASON WHY THE DEPARTMENT SHOULD NOT HAVE [1] ~2 [2] ISSUED SEPARATE WATER AND SEWER LINE RATES IN COBB COUNTY. WITH REFERENCE TO THE HEAVY RATES ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT ADMINISTRATOR, THE PETITIONER HAS RAISED SERIOUS QUESTIONS AS TO WHETHER ALL THE RATES ARE PREVAILING. STATEMENTS BY THE PETITIONER AND COUNSEL FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR INDICATE A POSSIBLE DEPARTURE FROM ESTABLISHED PRACTICES IN THE APPLICATION OF REGULATIONS, PART 1, IN FINDING PREVAILING WAGE RATES. SECTION 1.2 (a) REGULATIONS, PART 1 (29 CFR) PROVIDES: THE TERM "PREVAILING WAGE RATE" FOR EACH CLASSIFICATION OF LABORERS AND MECHANICS WHICH THE ADMINISTRATOR SHALL REGARD AS PREVAILING IN AN AREA SHALL MEAN: (1) THE RATE OF WAGES [*] PAID [*] IN THE AREA IN WHICH THE WORK IS TO BE PERFORMED, TO THE MAJORITY OF THOSE EMPLOYED IN THAT CLASSIFICATION IN CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA SIMILAR TO THE PROPOSED UNDERTAKING [* Emphasis in original *]; [2] ~3 (2) IN THE EVENT THAT THERE IS NOT A MAJORITY [*] PAID [*] AT THE SAME RATE, THEN THE RATE [*] PAID [*] TO THE GREATER NUMBER [* Emphasis in original *]: PROVIDED, SUCH GREATER NUMBER CONSTITUTES 30 PERCENT OF THOSE EMPLOYED; OR (3) IN THE EVENT THAT LESS THAN 30 PERCENT OF THOSE SO EMPLOYED RECEIVE THE SAME RATE, THEN THE AVERAGE RATE. THE ADMINISTRATOR IS INSTRUCTED TO REVIEW WAGE DECISION NO. 77-GA-65 TO ASSURE THAT THE WAGE DATA IN THE FILES OF THE WAGE & HOUR DIVISION DO IN FACT SHOW THAT THE WAGES CONTAINED IN THIS WAGE DECISION WERE BASED ON WAGES PAID TO LABORERS AND MECHANICS IN COBB COUNTY, GEORGIA, AND ARE PREVAILING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ABOVE QUOTED REGULATIONS. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD CRAIG BULGER, ACTING EXECUTIVE SECRETARY WAGE APPEALS BOARD [3]



Phone Numbers