skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
September 23, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > USDOL/OALJ Reporter
USDOL/OALJ Reporter

SEALTITE CORP., 1985-DBA-136 (ALJ Oct. 30, 1986)


CCASE: SEALTITE CORPORATION DDATE: 19881030 TTEXT: ~1 [1] [87-06.WAB ATTACHMENT] U.S. Department of Labor Office of Administrative Law Judges (513) 684-3252 304A U.S. Post Office and Courthouse Cincinnati, Ohio 45203 In the Matter of Date Issued: October 30, 1986 Disputes concerning the payment of prevailing wage rates and overtime and proper classification by: SEALTITE CORPORATION, Contractor Case No. 85-DBA-136 Proposed debarment for labor standards violations by: SEALTITE CORPORATION, Contractor and MILES S. FIRNHABER, President With respect to laborers and mechanics employed by the contractor under U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Contract No. DACA45-83-C-0124 (Iowa Army Ammunition Plant) Middleton, Iowa DECISION AND RECOMMENDED ORDER Pursuant to Notice, the above-captioned matter was scheduled for hearing before the undersigned on July 29, 1986, at Burlington, Iowa. After neither Sealtite Corporation, nor its President, Miles S. Firnhaber, nor any representative thereof, appeared at the scheduled hearing, the undersigned issued an order permitting Sealtite Corporation and Miles S. Firnhaber to show cause why the Secretary's Motion for Default Entry should not be granted. On August 13, 1986, Miles S. Firnhaber, on behalf of himself and Sealtite Corporation, responded that his failure to appear was due to a severe illness suffered while on a business venture in Florida. He requested a new hearing date. On August 14, 1986, the undersigned issued an order permitting the Secretary of Labor to comment on the request for a new hearing date. Based on due consideration of the Secretary's response, on September 12, 1986, the undersigned granted his Motion for Default Entry. This order was issued in accordance with the applicable regulations found in 29 C.F.R. [sec] 18.39(b) and [1] ~2 [2] [sec] 8.5(b). These regulations provide that a default decision may be entered against a party failing, without good cause, to appear at a scheduled hearing. Upon granting of the Secretary's Motion for Default Entry, the undersigned ordered that the Secretary submit, within 30 days, a proposed Decision and Order, with findings of fact, conclusions of law and recommended remedy. The Secretary submitted Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order on October 6, 1986. It was further ordered that the period of filing a Petition for Review of that order be tolled, to commence on the date of issuance of my recommended order so as to prevent multiple appeals. On October 9, 1986, Sealtite Corporation and Miles S. Firnhaber submitted their opposition to the Proposed Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order. Based on the entire record, including Request for Admissions served on Respondents on May 27, 1986, and June 11, 1986, which were not denied and by operation of 29 CFR [sec] 18.20 are deemed admitted, evidence presented at the hearing, and with due consideration to the arguments of the parties, applicable statutory provision, regulations and relevant case law, I hereby make the following: FINDINGS OF FACT Sealtite Corporation, through Miles Firnhaber, President, (the "Contractor"), on or about July 6, 1983, entered into a contract with the U.S. Government, Contract No. DACA45-C-0124, for the insulation of buildings at the Iowa Army Ammunitions Plant, Middleton, Iowa. The contract incorporated Wage Determination IA82-4030, which includes negotiated wage rates for each of the unions representing the listed job classifications in the wage determination. There is no classification for insulation workers. The Wage Determination specifies a rate of pay of $17.93 per hour for employees performing carpenter's work in the area of Des Moines County, Iowa, in which the Iowa Army Ammunitions Plant is located. Prior to the bid opening and the contract award, the contractor did not challenge the job classifications or wage rates contained in Wage Determination IA82-4030. The Contractor did not submit a Request for Authorization of Additional Classification and Rate, although furnished with these forms. The work on the project was in two phases. The first phase consisted of blowing insulation into the attics of two wood frame office buildings, cutting ridges in the roofs of these buildings for installation of sheet metal ridge fences, and cutting slots in the overhangs for the installation of soffit vents. The second phase involved installation of wood railers, ridge insulation, board plywood sheeting, felt paper and fiberglass [2] ~3 [3] shingles on the uninsulated roofs of production buildings. In the geographic area of the project, the work in these two phases was considered the work of carpenters. There is no recognized union for insulators. The Contractor had 13 employees performing the abovedescribed work. The Contractor classified them as insulation workers at hourly wage rates ranging from $6.00 to $8.50 per hour, instead of the rate of $17.93 paid to carpenters under the Wage Determination. These employees were misclassified as insulation workers when, in fact, they performed carpenters' work and should have been paid at the rate of $17.93 per hour. Two employees installed blown-in type of insulation during part of the period. A conforming wage classification of insulation worker for persons engaged in blowing-in of insulation was added by letters dated November 30, 1984, signed by Raymond L. Kamrath, Chief, Branch of Construction Contract Wage Determinations, and dated March 1, 1985, signed by James Valin, Assistant Administrator. The conforming wage classification provides for a rate of $15.20, that includes $13.50 plus $1.70 in fringe benefits for insulation workers. The Contractor offered no objection to either the conforming wage classification or its established rate of payment. Based on the foregoing, the two employees who installed blown-in insulation, Ronald Estes and Louis Fisher, should have received $15.20 per hour instead of $6.00 per hour for their work. Ronald Estes performed this work from October 6, 1983, through October 21, 1983. Louis Fisher performed this work from October 10, 1983, through October 21, 1983. In the work weeks ending October 14, 1983, and October 21, 1983, Louis Fisher worked 10-1/4 hours of overtime work and was underpaid for his overtime hours by an amount of $38.44. In addition, each of the following 13 employees were misclassified as insulation workers when, in fact, they performed carpenters' work and should have been paid at the rate of $17.93 per hour instead of at the rates of $6.00 through $8.50 per hour. Included are: Ronald Craver $6.00 Louis Fisher $6.00 Eugene Higdon $6.00 Walter Knotts $7.00 Allen Putnam $7.50 Ronald Estes $7.00 Robert Glick $6.00 Bud Hollenbeck $6.00 Fredric Odaffer $8.50 Rick Robinson $7.00 [3] ~4 [4] The above mentioned were underpaid for each work week from October 3, 1983, to February 17, 1984. A recalculation is necessary for the periods during which the Compliance Officer calculated back wages at roofers' rates set out in Wage Determination IA82-4030. Later testimony by the carpenter's business agent established that all of the activities, including installation of fiberglass shingles, were customarily performed by carpenters. The Compliance Officer calculated back wages for two of the above-mentioned employees based on roofers' rates instead of carpenters' rates. Robert Glick worked 392-1/2 hours installing fiberglass shingles at the rate of $6.00 per hour instead of $17.63 per hour from November 18, 1983, through February 17, 1984. Accordingly, he is entitled to a total of $6,069.39, not the $4,577.89 calculated by the Compliance Officer. Similarly, Armin Schafer worked 288-1/2 hours at the rate of $6.00 per hour from November 11, 1983, through February 17, 1984. He is entitled to $3,441.81, not the $2,345.50 calculated by the Compliance Officer. In total, Sealtite Corporation underpaid its employees for their work on this project a total of $34,156.98. An amount of $31,569.17 was withheld from the contract, as authorized under 40 U.S.C. [sec] 276a(a). CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Contract No. DACA45-83-C-0124 is subject to the Davis-Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 276a, et seq.), the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 327 et seq.) and applicable regulations issued thereunder. (29 CFR Part 5) The contract contains an effective Wage Determination for the period covered therein. On July 6, 1983, Sealtite Corporation and its President, Miles Firnhaber, entered Contract No. DACA 45-83-C-0124. Sealtite Corporation is bound by the Special Conditions Relating to Labor incorporated in the contract and by the terms of the contract that require Sealtite Corporation to comply with both the recordkeeping regulations of 29 CFR Part 3 and the labor standards regulations of 29 CFR Part 5. Incorporated in the contract is Wage Determination IA82- 4030, which reflects prevailing wages paid to various trades, including carpenters and laborers, under negotiated arrangements in the organized sector of the construction industry in the area of Middleton, Iowa. Where the Secretary of Labor determines that the prevailing wage for a particular craft is derived from experience with negotiated arrangements, the Department of Labor must classify work in the Wage Determination according to the job content upon which the rates are based. A contractor is not free to classify persons performing carpentry work as laborers on the ground that such action is in accordance with local practice in nonunion contracts. A challenge to the use of union rates must [4] ~5 [5] be raised before the enforcement stage of proceedings. See Fry Brothers Corp., CCH Labor Law Rpts, Administrative Rulings [par] 31,113 (1977). In that case, the agency found that a contractor could not rely on an oral statement by a local official of a contracting agency that a particular practice complied with required labor standards. Similarly without merit is the Contractor's position that it reached an accord and satisfaction with a local official. Based on the foregoing, I find that the Contractor misclassified the 13 employees listed on payroll records as "insulation workers" paid at rates from $%6.00 to $8.50 per hour. Each of these employees engaged in work within the scope of the carpenter's craft and are entitled to be paid at the rate of $17.93 per hour, including fringe benefits. An exception to the above is the time spent by two employees installing blown-in insulation, which is to be paid at the rate of $15.20 per hour, including fringe benefits, as provided by the two above discussed letters of March 1, 1985, and November 30, 1984. The Contractor's violation of labor standards has resulted in an underpayment totalling $34,156.98 due to employees for work on the project. As authorized under 40 U.S.C. [sec] 276a(a), a total of $31,569.17 was withheld on the contract for payment of back wages due to these employees. I hereby direct that these funds be released for payment to the employees in accordance with the amounts above set out. The Contractor failed to comply with the recordkeeping regulations of 29 CFR [sec] [5.5]. Subsection (b) of that section requires that payroll records accurately and completely set out the name and address of each employee, the correct classification and the correct rate of pay. The contractor also failed to comply with the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act by failing to pay appropriate amounts to Louis Fisher for overtime work. Debarment sanctions may be applied against a contractor for repeated and willful violations of the law. Failure to submit certified payroll records and repeated underpayment of employees provides a sufficient basis for debarment, despite a contractor's claims of inexperience in government contract matters and his cooperation in a wage underpayment investigation. Matter of National Electro-Coatings, Inc., Labor Law Rptr., CCH [par] 31,455, Wage-Hour Administrator, 1985. Two prior cases are pending against the Contractor in this case, in which he is alleged to have misclassified employees as ~insulation workers" and to have paid rates not contained in and far below the applicable wage determinations. (Nos. 84-DBA-48, 85-DBA-54). This Contractor has had extensive experience with government contracts and cannot claim a lack of familiarity with the requirements and terms of Contract No. DACA45-83-C-0124. [5] ~6 [6] RECOMMENDED ORDER Based upon the foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, I hereby ORDER the following: 1. That Sealtite Corporation and its President, Miles S. Firnhaber, have their names forwarded to the Comptroller General of the United States and placed on the list of ineligible bidders on government contracts for a three year period. 2. That the Department of Labor recover from Sealtite Corporation the amount of $34,156.98 in back wages owed to the above-named employees. 3. That the Department of Labor distribute the recovered funds as follows: Ronald Craver $4,449.89 Ronald Estes 760.55 Louis Fisher 5,441.88 Robert Glick 6,069.39 Eugene Higdon, Jr. 1,550.90 Bud Hollenbeck 662.12 Walter Knotts 579.29 Frederic Odaffer 3,098.37 Allen Putnam 3,780.33 Rick Robinson 120.23 Armin Schafer 3,441.81 Charles Wasson 3,972.69 Rod Whitaker 229.53 Total $34,156.98 DANIEL J. ROKETENETZ Administrative Law Judge pal [6]



Phone Numbers