skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
September 23, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > USDOL/OALJ Reporter
USDOL/OALJ Reporter

CANTEEN FOOD AND VENDING SERVICE, 85-SCA-WD-30 (Under Sec'y May 16, 1986)


CCASE: CANTEEN FOOD AND VENDING V. DOL DDATE: 19860516 TTEXT: ~1 [1] THE UNDER SECRETARY OF LABOR WASHINGTON, D.C. 20210 In the Matter of CANTEEN FOOD AND VENDING SERVICE, Petitioner, and 85-SCA-WD-30 ADMINISTRATOR, WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION, EMPLOYMENT STANDARDS ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent. ORDER OF DISMISSAL This case arises under the provisions of the McNamara-O'Hara Service Contract Act of 1965, as amended (the Act), 41 U.S.C. [secs] 351-358 (1982), and the regulations at 29 C.F.R. Parts 4 and 8 (1985), and was initiated by a petition filed with the Board of Service Contract Appeals on behalf of the captioned firm, on November 12, 1985. /FN1/ An amended petition was filed on February 20, 1986. At issue is the Deputy Wage and Hour Administrator's /FN2/ denial of Petitioner's request for a variance hearing, pursuant to Section 4(c) of the Act and the regulation at 29 C.F.R. [sec] 4.10 (1995). [1] ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ /FN1/ Section 8.0 of 29 CFR (1985) provides that the Secretary's designee shall perform the functions of the Board of Service Contract Appeals during the interim period prior to the appointment of a duly constituted Board. On February 24, 1984, the Secretary assigned this responsibility to the Under Secretary. /FN2/ The position of Wage and Hour Administrator has been vacant all times relevant to this proceeding. [1] ~2 [2] Counsel for the Deputy Administrator has moved to dismiss both the petition and the amended petition on the ground that the Deputy Administrator has reversed his position and agreed to schedule the hearing Petitioner seeks. A copy of the letter from the Deputy Administrator stating that the hearing was being scheduled was submitted in support of the motion. Petitioner's counsel has filed a response stating that it does not oppose dismissal once a hearing has been set. Petitioner requests that its Amended Petition "remain on file ... until such time as the Deputy Administrator in fact schedules a substantial variance hearing pursuant to Section 4(c) of the Service Contract Act." It appears that the Deputy Administrator has agreed to provide the relief Petitioner seeks in this proceeding. Accordingly, the Deputy Administrator's motion to dismiss the original and amended petitions for review is GRANTED without prejudice to Petitioner's right to renew its petition if the substantial variance hearing is not scheduled within 30 days from the date of this order. So ORDERED. [Dennis E. Whitfield] Under Secretary of Labor Dated: MAY 16 1986 Washington, D.C. [2]



Phone Numbers