USDOL v. BELLA ENTERPRISES, 1985-SCA-69 (Dep. Sec'y Feb. 26, 1988)
CCASE:
DOL V. R. BALSAMA
DDATE:
19880226
TTEXT:
~1
[1] U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPUTY SECRETARY OF LABOR
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20210
DATE: February 26, 1988
CASE NO. 85-SCA-69
IN THE MATTER OF
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROBERT BALSAMA, INDIVIDUALLY
AND DOING BUSINESS AS BELLA
ENTERPRISES,
RESPONDENT.
BEFORE: THE DEPUTY SECRETARY OF LABOR /FN1/
NOTICE TO PARTIES
On February 9, 1988, I granted the motion of counsel for the
Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, for an extension of time
until February 11, 1988, in which to file a Petition for Review of
the Decision of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) issued on
December 3, 1987. On February 9, 1988, counsel for the
Administrator filed a Notice Of Intention Not To Petition For
Review and requested that the case be removed from the Deputy
Secretary's docket. Accordingly, pursuant to the [1]
/FN1/ The Deputy Secretary has been designated by the Secretary to
perform the functions of the Board of Service Contract Appeals
pending the appointment of a duly constituted Board. 29 C.F.R.
[sec] 8.0 (1987); Department of Labor Executive Level Conforming
Amendments of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-619 (November 6, 1986). [1]
~2
[2] provisions of 29 C.F.R. [sec] 6.19-6.21 (1987), the decision of
the ALJ has become final and this case is closed.
SO ORDERED.
[Dennis E. Whitfield]
Deputy Secretary of Labor
Washington, D. C. [2]
