skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
September 23, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > Davis-Bacon Act
USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Ben H. Graves, d/b/a Ben's Home Center, 98-SCA-6 (ALJ Dec. 17, 1997)


UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
800 K STREET, NW, SUITE 400N
WASHINGTON, DC 20001-8002

Date: December 17, 1997
Case No.: 98-SCA-6

In the Matter of:

BEN H. GRAVES, an individual,
d/b/a BEN'S HOME CENTER
    Respondent.

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

   On December 9, 1997, this Office mistakenly docketed the above-captioned case as arising under the McNamara-O'Hara Service Contract Act ("Act"), 41 U.S.C. § 351, and the implementing regulations at 29 C.F.R. Parts 4, 6. After further consideration and review of the file, it is clear that this matter arises under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.

   On December 3, 1997, Respondent filed an appeal to the Summary of Unpaid Wages as issued by the Department of Labor, Employment Standards Administration (a copy of which is affixed). Generally, in such cases, the Associate Solicitor for Fair Labor Standards or a Regional Solicitor institutes enforcement proceedings by issuing and serving a complaint on the Respondent. 29 C.F.R. § 6.15(a). The complaint must contain a clear and concise factual statement sufficient to inform the Respondent of the violations of the Act. 29 C.F.R. § 6.15(b).

   Respondent must answer the complaint within 30 days after service. 29 C.F.R. § 6.16(a). The answer must contain a statement of the facts which constitute the grounds for defense and shall specifically admit, explain, or deny any or all of the allegations of the complaint unless the Respondent is without knowledge, in which case the answer shall so state, or state that the Respondent admits all the allegations of the complaint. 29 C.F.R. § 6.16(b). Failure to file an answer shall constitute grounds for waiver of hearing and entry of a default judgment unless the respondent shows good cause for his failure to file. 29 C.F.R. § 6.16(c); see also 29 C.F.R. § 18.6(d)(2)(v).

   It appears from the information presently before this Office that the investigatory process has not yet concluded, and that Respondent's request for a hearing is premature. Accordingly, the parties are directed to file a statement of points on the ripeness of this matter for adjudication by this Office. Such statements shall be filed in time to reach this


[Page 2]

Office within five (5) days from the above date, on or before the close of business (5:00 p.m. EST). Prior permission to file by facsimile (202) 565-5325) is granted pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 18.3(f)(1).

   SO ORDERED

      JOHN M. VITTONE
      Chief Administrative Law Judge

JMV/pmb



Phone Numbers