skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
September 23, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > WIA/JTPA/CETA Collection
USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Grand Rapids Inter-Tribal Council v. USDOL, 92-JTP-20 (ALJ Mar. 29, 1994)


UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
800 K STREET, N.W., SUITE 400N
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20001-8002

Dated: March 29, 1994

Case No.: 92-JTP-20

In the Matter of

GRAND RAPIDS INTER-TRIBAL COUNCIL
Complainant

v.

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Respondent

DECISION AND ORDER

    This matter arises under the Job Training Partnership Act (JTPA), 29 U.S.C. §1501, and the applicable regulations set forth at 20 C.F.R. Part 636.

    On June 24, 1992, the United States Department of Labor (DOL) issued a final determination notifying Grand Rapids Inter-Tribal Council that they would no longer be funded for the Job Training Partnership Act as a result of DOL's audit of Complainant's programs under the JTPA. By letter filed July 13, 1992, Complainant requested a hearing before this Office. On July 22, 1992, this Office issued a Notification of Receipt of Request for Hearing and Prehearing Order which required both parties to file certain information relating to this matter. On September 4, 1992, Complainant filed its Notice of Intent to Participate and on September 24, 1992, DOL filed its Administrative File. On October 9, 1992, DOL filed their response to the Prehearing Exchange.

    On December 9, 1993, this Office issued an Order to Show Cause to Complainant instructing them to show cause why a default judgment should not be entered in this case. To date, Complainant has failed to respond to Prehearing Order or the Show Cause Order. The regulations provide at 29 C.F.R. §18.6(d)(2)(v) that:

If a party or an officer or agent of a party fails to comply with a subpoena or with an order, . . . or any other order of the administrative law judge, the administrative law judge, for the purpose of permitting resolution of the relevant issues and disposition of the proceeding without unnecessary delay despite such failure, may . . . [r]ule that a pleading, or part of a pleading, or a motion or other submission by the non-complying party; concerning which the order or subpoena was issued, be stricken, or that decision of the proceeding be rendered against the non-complying party, or both.

    After reviewing the record and considering


[Page 2]

Complainant's failure to participate in this matter, I hereby ORDER that a Judgment by Default is entered against Complainant. I adopt the findings of fact as set forth in the Final Determination.

    In light of the foregoing, Complainant's request for hearing is DISMISSED and the Final Determination is AFFIRMED.

      JOHN M. VITTONE
      Deputy Chief Judge

Washington, D.C.
JMV/yw



Phone Numbers