|
|
Phase IV Randomized Study of Rasburicase Alone Versus Rasburicase and Allopurinol Versus Allopurinol Alone in Patients With Leukemia, Lymphoma, or Solid Tumor Malignancy at Risk for Hyperuricemia and Tumor Lysis Syndrome
Alternate Title Basic Trial Information Objectives Entry Criteria Expected Enrollment Outcomes Outline Trial Contact Information Registry Information
Alternate Title
Rasburicase and/or Allopurinol in Controlling High Levels of Uric Acid in the Blood and Tumor Lysis Syndrome in Patients With Leukemia, Lymphoma, or Solid Tumors
Basic Trial Information
|
Phase
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
|
|
Status
|
|
|
|
Age
|
|
|
|
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
Protocol IDs
|
|
|
|
Phase IV
|
|
|
|
Supportive care
|
|
|
|
Closed
|
|
|
|
18 and over
|
|
|
|
Pharmaceutical / Industry
|
|
|
|
PROLOGUE-EFC4978 UCLA-0403071-01, NCT00230178
|
|
|
Objectives Primary - Compare the adequacy of plasma uric acid concentration control in patients with leukemia, lymphoma, or solid tumor malignancy at risk for hyperuricemia and tumor lysis syndrome treated with rasburicase alone vs rasburicase and allopurinol vs allopurinol alone.
Secondary - Compare plasma uric acid area under the curve from within 4 hours before first treatment through 48 hours after the last treatment with these regimens in these patients.
- Determine the incidence, duration, and type of immune responses (immunoglobulin [Ig]G, IgE, and neutralizing antibody) in patients treated with rasburicase.
- Determine the efficacy and safety of rasburicase, in terms of antibody generation and antibody titer, in these patients.
Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics:
- Meets 1 of the following risk criteria for tumor lysis syndrome:
- At high-risk, with any of the following diagnoses:
- Hyperuricemia of malignancy (plasma uric acid > 7.5 mg/dL)
- Very aggressive lymphoma or leukemia
- Acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
- Chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast crisis
- High-grade myelodysplastic syndromes (refractory anemia with excess blasts [RAEB], chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, or RAEB in transformation) AND ≥ 10% bone marrow blast involvement AND receiving aggressive treatment similar to AML
- At potential-risk AND a diagnosis of aggressive lymphoma or leukemia AND meets at least one of the following criteria:
- Lactic dehydrogenase ≥ 2 times upper limit of normal
- Stage III or IV disease
- Stage I or II disease with at least 1 lymph node or tumor measuring > 5 cm in diameter
- No relapsed or refractory leukemia, lymphoma, or solid tumor
Prior/Concurrent Therapy:
Biologic therapy - Concurrent rituximab allowed
Chemotherapy Endocrine therapy Radiotherapy Surgery Other - No prior uricolytic therapy (e.g., rasburicase or nonrecombinant urate oxidase [Uricozyme®])
- No other concurrent investigational drug
- No other concurrent hyperuricemic agent
Patient Characteristics:
Age Performance status Life expectancy Hematopoietic - No history of hemolysis indicative of G6PD deficiency
Hepatic - See Disease Characteristics
Renal Pulmonary - No established diagnosis of asthma
Other - No severe, life-threatening atopic allergy
- No hypersensitivity attributed to uricases or any of their excipients
- No known G6PD deficiency
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception during and for 30 days after study participation
Expected Enrollment 276A total of 276 patients (92 per treatment arm) will be accrued for this study within 25 months. Outcomes Primary Outcome(s)Plasma uric acid concentration measured by the area under the curve (AUC) at baseline through 48 hours after the last dose of chemotherapy Safety profile as measured by laboratory tests and adverse events at baseline through day 35
Secondary Outcome(s)Immune response to rasburicase as measured by plasma immunoassay (IgG, IgE, and neutralizing antibody) at baseline through 6 months after treatment or until negative after 6 months Pharmacokinetics of rasburicase as measured by plasma levels at baseline through day 14
Outline This is a randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to risk for tumor lysis syndrome (high risk vs potential risk). Patients are randomized to 1 of 3 treatment arms. - Arm I: Patients receive rasburicase IV over 30 minutes on days 1-5.
- Arm II: Patients receive rasburicase IV over 30 minutes on days 1-3 and oral allopurinol once daily on days 3-5.
- Arm III: Patients receive oral allopurinol once daily on days 1-5.
In all arms, treatment continues in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. All patients receive cytoreductive chemotherapy off-study beginning 4-24 hours after the first dose of rasburicase and/or allopurinol. Patients are followed at 14 days after the first dose of study treatment). After completion of study treatment, patients are followed at 30 days, at 3 and 6 months, and then every 6 months thereafter.
Trial Contact Information
Trial Lead Organizations Prologue Research International, Incorporated | | | Richard Gams, MD, Protocol chair | | Ph: 614-324-1500; 800-906-6565 |
| |
Registry Information | | Official Title | | Evaluation of Single Agent Rasburicase for 5 Days Versus Sequential Treatment with Rasburicase from Day 1 Through 3 Followed by Oral Allopurinol from Day 3 Through 5 (Overlap on Day 3) Versus Single Agent Oral Allopurinol for 5 Days in the Management of Plasma Uric Acid in Adult Patients with Leukemia, Lymphoma, and Solid Tumor Malignancies at Risk for Hyperuricemia and Tumor Lysis Syndrome | | Registered in ClinicalTrials.gov | | NCT00230178 | | Date Submitted to PDQ | | 2004-05-17 | | Information Last Verified | | 2008-01-09 |
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. Back to Top |
|