Skip navigation and jump second-level navigation.Skip navigation and jump to main content of the page.
 Home | Site Map | Glossary | FAQs | LibraryInside NWFSC

  
 

NOAA logo: go to NOAA web site

NWFSC home
NMFS home


salmon
 


   
    
   Home   Research   Publications   Resources   Events   Education   Contact Us  
     Research Publications      Brochures      Issue Papers      Research Plans      Survey Results    
            

Display All Information

Document Type: Journal Article
Center: NWFSC
Document ID: 6720
Author: M. J. Ford, J. J. Hard, B. Boelts, E. LaHood, J. Miller
Year: 2008
Title: Estimates of natural selection in a salmon population in captive and natural environments
Journal: Conservation Biology
Volume: 22
Issue: 3
Pages: 783-794
Date: 06/01/2008
Keywords: Domestication, artificial propagation, captive breeding, selection, parentage analysis
Abstract: Captive breeding is a commonly used strategy for species conservation. One risk of captive breeding is domestication selectionselection for traits that are advantageous in captivity but deleterious in the wild. Domestication selection is of particular concern for species that are bred in captivity for many generations and that have a high potential to interbreed with wild populations. Domestication is understood conceptually at a broad level, but relatively little is known about how natural selection differs empirically between wild and captive environments. We used genetic parentage analysis to measure natural selection on time of migration, weight, and morphology for a coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) population that was subdivided into captive and natural components. Our goal was to determine whether natural selection acting on the traits we measured differed significantly between the captive and natural environments. For males, larger individuals were favored in both the captive and natural environments in all years of the study, indicating that selection on these traits in captivity was similar to that in the wild. For females, selection on weight was significantly stronger in the natural environment than in the captive environment in 1 year and similar in the 2 environments in 2 other years. In both environments, there was evidence of selection for later time of return for both males and females. Selection on measured traits other than weight and run timing was relatively weak. Our results are a concrete example of how estimates of natural selection during captivity can be used to evaluate this common risk of captive breeding programs.
Divisions: CB
Programs:
Projects:
Official Citation: Ford MJ, Hard JJ, Boelts B, LaHood E, Miller J. 2008. Estimates of natural selection in a salmon population in captive and natural environments. Conservation Biology 22:783-794

Back | Publications Home


last modified 01/06/2007

                   
   
Inside NWFSC       NOAA       NMFS       OHH       Library       CB       FE       EC       FRAM       REUT       OMI       SD
Home     About Us     Site Map     Privacy Policy     Copyright Policy     Disclaimer     Accessibility     Feedback Form