publications > paper > application of carbonate cyclostratigraphy and borehole geophysics to delineate porosity and preferential flow in the karst limestone of the Biscayne aquifer, SE Florida > evidence for flow-zone continuity
EVIDENCE FOR FLOW-ZONE CONTINUITY
In conjunction with the April 2003 conservative tracer test,
fluid-temperature and fluid-conductivity borehole measurements
were collected in the G-3772 observation well, located
~66 m from injection well G-3773 and ~34 m from the S-3164
production well (Fig. 1D). Borehole temperature and conductivity
profiles were collected within the open-hole section of the
G-3772 observation well at 102-322 min intervals as the tracer
plume moved toward the production well (Fig. 8). An anomalous
temperature change of ~0.8 °C was observed 3 h and 22 min (12:52 p.m. local time) after the completion of the tracer injection (Fig. 8). We assumed, for purposes of this discussion,
that the liquid tracer (~210 L) had equilibrated to the average
ambient air temperature (26 °C) on the day of the injection.
Groundwater temperature on 22 April 2003 ranged from 22.5
to 23.5 °C. The observed 0.8 °C increase in fluid temperature at
the observation well G-3772 was attributable to movement of
the tracer pulse as it passed the G-3772 well bore. This temperature
anomaly was recorded ~3 h prior to peak breakthrough of
the tracers at pumping well S-3164 and at about the same time
the leading edge of the tracer pulse was first detected at well
S-3164 (Fig. 9). The change in fluid temperature appears to
have been greatest at a depth interval of ~12.2-12.8 m below
land surface (Fig. 8). This depth corresponds to an apparent high-permeability flow zone characterized by touching-vug
porosity. This zone is located at the base of high-frequency
cycle HFC2e2 (Fig. 7), which is just above the flooding surface
bounding the top of high-frequency cycle HFCd2 (Fig. 4). This
observation corroborates our conceptual karst aquifer model,
which links most high-permeability zones to the lower part of
high-frequency cycles. A fluid-temperature anomaly in the
G-3772 observation well (Fig. 1D) strongly suggests that a substantial
part of the tracer moved through a relatively thin
(0.6 m) flow zone at the base of high-frequency cycle HFC2e2
(Fig. 7 and Fig. 8). A comparison of fluid-temperature data with
fluid-conductivity profiles is less persuasive. Conductivity of
the Rhodamine tracer was greater than ambient groundwater at
12:52 and 14:33 p.m. local time, and appeared to be dispersed
within the borehole section that includes high-frequency cycles
HFC2a to HFC2g1 (Fig. 8), but it is unclear what controlled the
measured changes in conductivity during the tracer test.
Stationary and trolling electromagnetic flow-meter data obtained during ambient and pumping measurements at injection well G-3773 (Fig. 8) were collected in October 2003. Results suggest that under stressed conditions, significant movement of groundwater occurs at the base of high-frequency cycle HFC2e2, which is consistent with the borehole fluid temperatures collected during the tracer test. Uncertainty of the amount of fluid flow bypassing the flexible-disk diverter on the flow meter limits the accuracy of the measurements (Paillet, 2004).
< Pore Classes | Discussion > |
U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/publications/papers/porosity_flow/evidence.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 12 April, 2007 @ 11:59 AM(TJE)