|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Phase III Randomized Study of Leucovorin and Fluorouracil Versus Continuous-Infusion Fluorouracil Versus ICI D1694 as Palliative Therapy for Advanced Colorectal Cancer, With a Second Randomization in Stable and Responding Patients for Continued Chemotherapy Versus Observation
Alternate Title Palliative Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Advanced Colorectal Cancer
Objectives I. Compare the survival and quality of life of patients with metastatic or recurrent colorectal cancer receiving palliative therapy with leucovorin/fluorouracil vs. continuous-infusion fluorouracil vs. ICI D1694. II. Compare the survival and quality of life of patients with stable or responding disease after 12 weeks of initial treatment randomized to receive 12 additional weeks of chemotherapy vs. no further treatment. Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics: Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum in one of the following categories: Locally advanced, metastatic, or recurrent disease suitable only for palliative chemotherapy Evaluable disease outside prior radiotherapy field Patients with disease confined to the liver are referred to protocol MRC-CR05 Prior/Concurrent Therapy: No prior systemic chemotherapy except fluorouracil-based adjuvant regimen (e.g., QUASAR) At least 6 months since chemotherapy Patient Characteristics: Age: Not specified Performance status: WHO 0-2 Life expectancy: Greater than 3 months Hematopoietic: WBC at least 4,000 ANC at least 2,000 Platelets at least 100,000 Hepatic: Not specified Renal: Creatinine no greater than 1.25 times normal OR Creatinine clearance greater than 65 mL/min Cardiovascular: No uncontrolled heart failure No uncontrolled angina Other: No uncontrolled medical illness (including infection) Able and willing to complete quality-of-life questionnaires No prior or concurrent malignancy likely to interfere with protocol treatment or evaluation Expected Enrollment 900A total of 900 patients will be entered. Outline This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified by participating institution. Patients are randomized to one of three treatment regimens. The first group receives leucovorin followed by fluorouracil every 14 days for a total of 6 courses. The second group receives continuous-infusion fluorouracil for 12 weeks. The third group receive ICI D1694 every 21 days for a total of 4 courses. Patients without progressive disease or excessive toxicity after 12 weeks of treatment are then randomized to receive continuing chemotherapy in 12 weekly cycles of their assigned chemotherapy or to proceed to observation with no further therapy, until evidence of disease progression. Patients are followed every 6 weeks.Published Results Maughan TS, James RD, Kerr DJ, et al.: Comparison of survival, palliation, and quality of life with three chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 359 (9317): 1555-63, 2002.[PUBMED Abstract] Maughan T: Continous versus intermittent chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: preliminary results of the MRC CR06b randomised trial. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 85 (suppl 1): A-CT1, 1, 2001. Maughan TS, James RD, Kerr DJ, et al.: Continous vs intermittant chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: preliminary results of the MRC Cr06b randomised trial. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 20: A-498, 2001. Maughan TS, James RJ, Kerr DJ, et al.: Continous versus intermittent chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: preliminary results of the MRC CR06B randomised trial. [Abstract] Eur J Cancer 37 (suppl 6): A-1001, s271, 2001. Maughan T, James R, Kerr D, et al.: Excess treatment related deaths and impaired quality of life show raltitrexed is inferior to infusional 5FU regimens in the palliative chemotherapy of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC): final analysis of the MRC CR06. [Abstract] Ann Oncol 11 (suppl 4): A-185o, 43, 2000. Lederman JA, Maughan TS, James RD, et al.: Preliminary results of a multicentre randomised trial comparing 3 chemotherapy regimens (de Gramont, Lokich and Raltitrexed) in metastatic colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 80 (suppl 2): A-4.10, 20, 1999. Maughan TS, James RD, Kerr D, et al.: Preliminary results of a multicentre randomised trial comparing three chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 18: A1007, 1999. Maughan TS, Robbe IJ, Parsons C: Outcomes regarding patient needs in comparing infusional 5FU regimens versus raltitrexed in a MRC multicenter randomised trial of advanced colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 80 (suppl 2): A-P112, 56, 1999. Maughan TS, Stephens RJ, Hopwood P, et al.: The value of quality of life outcomes in comparing 3 chemotherapy regimens (de Gramont. Lokich and Raltitrexed) in a multicentre randomised trial of metastatic colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 80 (suppl 2): A-P113, 57, 1999. Maughan TS, Stephens RJ, Hopwood T, et al.: The value of quality of life in comparing 3 chemotherapy regimens (de Gramont, Lokich & Raltitrexed) in a multicentre randomised trial of metastatic colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 80 (suppl 2): A-P113, 57, 1999. Stephens RJ, Hopwood P, Johnston C, et al.: The value of quality of life (QL) outcomes in comparing 3 chemotherapy regimens (de Gramont, Lokich, and Raltitrexed) in a multicentre randomised trial of metastatic colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 18: A2220, 1999. Related PublicationsHale JP, Cohen DR, Maughan TS, et al.: Costs and consequences of different chemotherapy regimens in metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer 86 (11): 1684-90, 2002.[PUBMED Abstract] Hale JP, Cohen DR, Maughan TS, et al.: Comparative total societal costs of 3 alternative chemotherapy treatments for patients with advanced colorectal cancer. [Abstract] Br J Cancer 80 (suppl 2): A-P111, 56, 1999. Trial Lead Organizations Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Unit
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. |
NCI Home |
Images Version |
Contact Us |
Policies |
Accessibility |
Viewing Files |
FOIA |
Site Help |
Site Map
|
A Service of the National Cancer Institute |