The grades of recommendations (A, B, and C) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.
Recommendation 1: Women with one previous cesarean delivery with a low transverse incision are candidates for and should be offered a trial of labor (TOL). (Level A)
Recommendation 2: Patients desiring trial of labor after previous cesarean (TOLAC) should be counseled that their chance for a successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) is influenced by the following: (Level B)
Positive Factors (increased likelihood of successful VBAC)
- Maternal age <40 years
- Prior vaginal delivery (particularly prior successful VBAC)
- Favorable cervical factors
- Presence of spontaneous labor
- Nonrecurrent indication that was present for prior cesarean delivery
Negative Factors (decreased likelihood of successful VBAC)
- Increased number of prior cesarean deliveries
- Gestational age >40 weeks
- Birth weight >4,000 g
- Induction or augmentation of labor
Recommendation 3: Prostaglandins should not be used for cervical ripening or induction as their use is associated with higher rates of uterine rupture and decreased rates of successful vaginal delivery. (Level B)
Recommendation 4: TOLAC should not be restricted only to facilities with available surgical teams present throughout labor since there is no evidence that these additional resources result in improved outcomes. (Level C)
At the same time, it is clinically appropriate that a management plan for uterine rupture and other potential emergencies requiring rapid cesarean section should be documented for each woman undergoing TOLAC. (Level C)
Recommendation 5: Maternity care professionals need to explore all the issues that may affect a woman's decision including issues such as recovery time and safety. (Level C). No evidence-based recommendation can be made regarding the best way to present the risks and benefits of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery (TOLAC) to patients.
Definitions:
Grade of Recommendations
- Recommendation based on consistent and good-quality, patient-oriented evidence*
- Recommendation based on inconsistent or limited-quality, patient-oriented evidence*
- Recommendation based on consensus, usual practice, opinion, disease-oriented evidence, or case series for studies of diagnosis, treatment, prevention, or screening*
*Patient-oriented evidence reflects outcomes that matter to patients: morbidity, mortality, symptoms, costs, and quality of life. Disease-oriented evidence reports intermediate, physiologic, or surrogate end points that may or may not reflect outcomes of importance to patients (e.g., blood pressure, blood chemistry, physiologic function, and pathologic findings).