• May 2, 2007, Antidepressant drugs: Update to the existing black box warning on the prescribing information on all antidepressant medications to include warnings about the increased risks of suicidal thinking and behavior in young adults ages 18 to 24 years old during the first one to two months of treatment.

Assessment and Treatment Algorithm

1. Person Encountering the Veterans Health Administration/Department of Defense (VHA/DoD) Health Care Delivery Systems

   Definition

   Any person (age greater than 12 years) who is eligible for care in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or the Department of Defense (DoD) health care delivery system should be screened for tobacco use as defined in this guideline.

2. Ask About Tobacco Use

   Objective

   Identify tobacco users.

   Recommendations

   1. Patients should be asked about tobacco use at most visits, as repeated screening increases rates of clinical intervention. [A]
      • Screening for tobacco use in primary care should occur at least three times/year. [Expert Consensus]
      • Screening for tobacco use by other specialties or disciplines should be done at least once per year. [Expert Consensus]
      • Screening adolescents should include assessment of environmental tobacco exposure (see Annotation Q-1 - Children and Adolescents)

QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix B)

3. Advise to Quit

   Objective

   Promote motivation to quit tobacco use.

   Recommendations

   1. Tobacco users should be advised to quit at every visit because there is a dose response relationship between number of contacts and abstinence. [A]
   2. Physicians should strongly advise tobacco users to quit, as physician advice increases abstinence rates. [A]
   3. Health care team members should strongly advise all tobacco users to quit. [B]

QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix B)

4. Assess Willingness to Quit

   Objective

   Determine the individual's level of interest to quit tobacco use.

   Recommendations

   1. Tobacco users should be assessed for willingness to quit at every visit. [C]
      • Willingness to quit should be assessed at least three times/year. [Expert Consensus]

5. Educate about Treatment Options; Arrive at Shared Decision for Choice of Treatment; Determine and Document Treatment Plan

   Objective

   Provide the tobacco user who desires to quit choices and a variety of treatment modalities.

   Recommendations

   1. Providers and patients should discuss the range of available treatment options and arrive at a mutually agreeable treatment plan. Discussion should address [Expert Consensus]:
      • Individually relevant information regarding effectiveness, availability, suitability, and contraindications of different treatment options
      • Patient's individual preferences and concerns about the treatment options/combinations
      • Tailoring treatment for patients with special needs (pregnancy, adolescents, comorbid conditions) (see Annotations Q1- 6 - Special Populations)
      • Choosing the most intensive treatment option that the patient is willing to use/attend
   2. Patient education and a treatment plan should be documented in the patient's record. [Expert Consensus]

QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix B)

6. Assist Tobacco User to Quit

   Objective

   Initiate intervention to assist the tobacco user to quit tobacco use.

   Recommendations

   1. All tobacco users who are willing to quit should be offered an effective tobacco cessation intervention, including:
      • Pharmacotherapy
      • Counseling
      • Follow-up
   2. All tobacco users must have reasonable access to minimal counseling and to either an intermediate or intensive cessation program. [A]
   3. Cessation treatment may include the following components:
      • Tobacco use cessation pharmacotherapy [A]
      • Counseling techniques that have been shown to be effective (problem solving, skill training, intra and extra treatment support) [A]
      • Multiple treatment sessions [A]
      • Multiple formats, proactive telephone counseling, and group or individual counseling [A]
      • Multiple types of counselors (e.g., physicians, psychologists, nurses, pharmacists, health educators) [B]
      4. Aversive smoking interventions (rapid smoking, rapid puffing, other aversive smoking techniques) increase abstinence rates and may be used with smokers who desire such treatment or who have been unsuccessful using other interventions. [B] Although aversive smoking has been demonstrated to be effective, it is rarely used due to the availability of medication.
      5. There is insufficient evidence to recommend for or against the use of the following interventions:
         • Acupuncture [C]
         • Hypnosis [C]
         • Physiological feedback and restricted environmental stimulation therapy[C]
         • "Harm reduction" products [C]
      6. There is insufficient evidence to support the following strategies: relaxation/breathing, contingency contracting, weight/diet, cigarette fading, exercise, and negative affect. Exercise may be considered to help prevent the weight gain associated with tobacco cessation. [I]

   Strategies for Tobacco Use Cessation

   Strategy	Counseling	Pharmacotherapy (e.g., nicotine replacement therapy [NRT] or bupropion)	Typical Setting (individual or group)	Follow-up
   Minimal	1 session less than 3 min	YES + Instructions print-out	Primary care provider and/or Other health care team members	Next routine visit
   Intermediate	2 to 3 sessions 3 to 10 min	YES + Instructions print-out	Telephone Quitline* and/or Primary care provider	1 to 2 weeks after quit date
   Intensive program	Greater than or equal to 4 sessions greater than 10 min	YES + Instructions print-out	Cessation program or Telephone Quitline* and/or Primary care provider	1 to 2 weeks after quit date

   *Medication may be prescribed by the primary care provider or other providers.

   	Evidence	Sources of Evidence	QE	Overall Quality	R
   1	Smoking cessation counseling can assist smokers to quit.	Lancaster & Stead, 2002	I	Good	A
   2	There is a dose response relationship between number of contacts and abstinence.	U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., 2000	I	Good	A
   3	Pharmacotherapy increases abstinence rates.	See Annotation H (below)	I	Good	A
   4	Brief counseling increases abstinence rates.	Silagy & Stead, 2001	I	Good	A

   QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix B)

   7. Initiate Counseling

      Objective

      Facilitate abstinence through counseling and behavioral interventions.

      Recommendations

      Counseling in the Clinic

      1. Tobacco users who are willing to quit should receive some form of counseling. There is a dose response relationship in counseling and rate of abstinence. [A]
         • Minimal counseling (lasting <3 minutes) increases overall tobacco abstinence rates. [A]
         • Intensive counseling (>10 minutes) increases abstinence rates. [A]
         • Multiple counseling sessions increase abstinence rates. [A]
      2. Effective counseling can be delivered in multiple formats (e.g., group counseling, proactive telephone counseling, and individual counseling) and may be more effective when combined. [A]
      3. Counseling should be provided by a variety of clinician types (physicians or nonphysician clinicians, such as nurses, dentists, dental hygienists, psychologists, pharmacists, and health educators) to increase quit rates. [A]
      4. All patients who are willing to quit should have access to intensive counseling (Quitlines or intensive cessation program).

      Quitlines

      5. Tobacco users who are willing to quit may receive counseling via telephone Quitlines, as proactive telephone counseling has been demonstrated to be effective. Pharmacotherapy still needs to be coordinated by the primary care provider. [A]

   	Evidence	Sources of Evidence	QE	Overall Quality	R
   1	Dose response relationship between extent of counseling contact and rate of abstinence	U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., 2000	I	Good	A
   2	Minimal tobacco use cessation counseling (<3 minutes) is effective	U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., 2000 Silagy & Stead, 2001	I	Good	A
   3	Proactive telephone counseling is effective.	U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., 2000 Hopkins et al., "Reviews" 2001; Stead, Lancaster & Perera, 2001	I	Good	A
   4	Multiple formats (e.g., group, telephone, individual) are effective.	U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., 2000	I	Good	A
   5	Counseling by a variety of clinician types is effective. Counseling by nurses is effective.	U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., 2000; Rice & Stead, 2001	I	Good	A

   QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix B)

   8. Initiate Pharmacotherapy to Assist Quit

      Objective

      Facilitate tobacco abstinence through pharmacotherapy to treat tobacco dependence.

      Recommendations

      1. Tobacco users attempting to quit should be prescribed one or more effective first-line pharmacotherapies for tobacco use cessation. [A]
         • First-line therapies include five nicotine replacement therapies (NRT) (transdermal patch, gum, nasal spray, lozenges, or vapor inhaler) and non-nicotine replacement (bupropion immediate release [IR] or sustained release [SR]). [A]
         • Pharmacotherapy should be combined with minimal counseling (less than 3 minutes). [A]
         • Patient should be strongly advised not to use tobacco while using NRT
         • Selection of an agent should be based on patient characteristics, relative contraindications, and patient preferences. [Expert Consensus]
         • Typical duration for NRT is 8 to 12 weeks, and for bupropion 7 to 12 weeks [Expert Consensus]
      2. Tobacco users who do not respond to first-line therapies should:
         • Continue the same agent for a longer duration
         • Switch to a different first-line agent or
         • Consider combination of two agents.
      3. Combination therapy may be effective for patients unable to quit with a single first-line agent. [B]
         • Combining the nicotine patch with a self-administered form of NRT (gum or nasal spray) is more efficacious than a single form of NRT. [B]
         • There is some suggestive evidence for combining bupropion SR with NRT, but it is inconclusive. [B]
      4. If patient has not responded after 2 courses of treatment, re-evaluate to assess the need of referral to intensive cessation program
      5. Pharmacotherapies NOT recommended for tobacco cessation: antidepressants other than bupropion SR and nortriptyline; anxiolytics/benzodiazepines/beta-blockers; silver acetate; and mecamylamine.
      6. Special consideration should be given to the potential risks versus benefits in the presence of special circumstances (e.g., adolescents, pregnant women, mental health comorbidity, and populations with special military duties). [Expert Consensus]
      7. Patient who responded to therapy and successfully quit the use of tobacco and then relapsed should be treated in same manner as the initial therapy. (See also Annotation K - Initiate/Reinforce Relapse Prevention)
      8. Insufficient evidence exists to recommend the use of extended pharmacotherapy for relapse prevention. [I]
      9. Consider referral for intensive behavioral modification counseling for tobacco users with multiple relapses. [Expert Consensus]

      First Line-NRT

      Treatment of nicotine dependence with NRT should adhere to the three guiding principles of substance use disorder pharmacotherapy:

      • Dose to effect: The initial dose should be sufficient to provide the patient with a nicotine dose similar to that seen prior to cessation of tobacco. Providers should always assess the patient's nicotine dependence before prescribing cessation aids.
      • Treat withdrawal symptoms: The nicotine replacement dose should be sufficient to prevent or minimize craving for tobacco products.
      • Avoid adverse reactions: The nicotine replacement dose should be small enough that signs and symptoms of over medication (i.e., headache, nausea, and palpitations) do not occur.

      Five types of NRT products are available in the U.S. for pharmacological treatment of tobacco dependence.

      1. Transdermal delivery system (patches)
      2. Polacrilex resin (gum)
      3. Polacrilex resin (lozenge)
      4. Nasal spray
      5. Oral vapor inhaler

      First Line Non-NRT

      There are a number of factors to be considered when determining whether a person desiring help in tobacco cessation would be a candidate for bupropion SR, including:

      1. Nicotine dependence
      2. Motivation to quit
      3. Inability or disinclination to use nicotine replacement
      4. Contraindicated drugs or disease states [e.g., seizures, alcohol dependency]

   	Evidence	Sources of Evidence	QE	Overall Quality	R
   1	Pharmacotherapy (NRT, bupropion) are effective in increasing abstinence rates.	U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., 2000; Hughes, Stead, & Lancaster, 2002; Silagy et al., 2002	I	Good	A
   2	NRT (gum, patch, nasal spray, oral inhaler, lozenge) is an effective first-line medication for smoking cessation.	U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., 2000; Silagy et al., 2002	I	Good	A
   3	Bupropion SR is an effective first-line medication for smoking cessation.	U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., 2000; Hughes, Stead, & Lancaster, 2002	I	Good	A
   4	Pharmacotherapy is more effective when combined with counseling.	Silagy et al., 2002; Stead & Lancaster, 2002	I	Poor	C
   5	Combination of two forms of NRT (nicotine patch with self-administered form of NRT) is more efficacious than single form.	U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., 2000; Jorenby et al., 1999; Silagy et al., 2002	II; I; I	Fair	B
   6	Bupropion SR and nortriptyline are effective in treating tobacco dependence in patients with current/past history of depression.	U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., 2000; Hughes, Stead, & Lancaster, 2002; Hayford et al., 1999	I	Good	A
   7	Prescriptions for effective pharmacotherapies for smoking cessation should be considered in adolescents with higher degrees of dependence and willingness to quit.	Hurt et al., 2000; Smith et al., 1996; Sussman et al., 1999	II; II; III	Fair; Fair; Poor	C
   8	Extended pharmacotherapy may reduce cravings but not prevent relapse.	Durcan et al., 2002; Hays et al., 2001; Shiffman et al., 2000	I	Fair	C

   QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix B)

   9. Offer Self-Help Material

      Recommendations

      1. Consider offering a variety of effective self-help educational materials to motivate and aid in the quitting process (e.g., pamphlets/booklets/mailings/manuals, videotapes, audiotapes, Internet Web pages, and computer programs). [Expert Consensus]

   	Evidence	Sources of Evidence	QE	Overall Quality	R
   1	Self-help materials are more effective than no interventions.	Lancaster & Stead, 2002	I	Fair	B
   2	Additional benefits of self-help when combined with other interventions	Lancaster & Stead, 2002	I	Poor	C

   QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix B)

   10. Arrange Follow-Up

       Objective

       Develop a follow-up plan for patients interested in quitting tobacco use.

       Recommendations

       1. Tobacco users who receive a tobacco cessation intervention should be scheduled for ongoing follow-up for abstinence. [B]

          Follow-up should be documented and should:

          • Establish contact with the tobacco user 1 to 2 weeks after quitting date to assess abstinence [B]
          • Assess effectiveness of pharmacotherapy and appropriate use [Expert Consensus]
          • Assess for abstinence at the completion of the treatment and during subsequent clinical contact for the duration of at least 6 months [Expert Consensus]
          • Provide relapse prevention to tobacco users who remain abstinent (see Annotation K - Initiate/Reinforce Relapse Prevention)
       2. Tobacco users who relapse should be assessed for willingness to make another quit attempt and offered repeated interventions (see Annotation D - Assess Willingness To Quit). [B]
       3. Tobacco users should be tracked to increase the systematic delivery of interventions for tobacco cessation and increase the likelihood of long-term abstinence. [B]

   	Evidence	Sources of Evidence	QE	Overall Quality	R
   1	Follow-up contact 1 to 2 weeks after quit date increases the likelihood of long-term abstinence.	Kenford et al., 1994; Reid & Pipe, 1999	I	Fair	B
   2	Assessment for abstinence at the completion of treatment	U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., 2000	III	Poor	I
   3	Provider reminder systems increase the systematic delivery of minimal clinical interventions and may increase abstinence.	Hopkins et al., "Evidence," 2001	I	Fair	B

   QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix B)

   Prevention Algorithm

   11. Initiate/Reinforce Relapse Prevention

       Objective

       Prevent relapse to nicotine.

       Recommendations

       1. Relapse prevention should be addressed with every former tobacco user. [Expert Consensus]
       2. Providers should address individual, environmental, and biopsychosocial factors associated with relapse (see Appendix A-5 in the original guideline document). [Expert Consensus].
       3. Providers should address weight gain after quitting, as tobacco use cessation is often followed by weight gain. Consider bupropion SR or NRT, in particular, nicotine gum, which have been shown to delay weight gain after quitting.
       4. Patients with multiple relapses or who are having trouble in a current quit attempt in a clinical setting should be directed to more intense counseling programs or medication should be adjusted. [B]

   	Evidence	Sources of Evidence	QE	Overall Quality	R
   1	Assessment of patients who have relapsed to determine whether they are willing to make another quit attempt	Brandon et al., 1990; "Smoking cessation," 1993; Westman et al., 1997; Zhu et al., 1996	III	Fair	C
   2	Individuals who have been abstinent for less than 3 months at the time of the visit are at higher risk for relapse and are candidates for relapse prevention counseling.	Brownell et al., 1998	III	Poor	I
   3	Long-term pharmacotherapy, as indicated, for patient's expressing difficulty	U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (USDHHS), 2000	III	Fair	B
   4	More intense counseling programs for patients with multiple relapses or who having trouble in a current quit attempt in a clinical setting	USDHHS, 2000	II	Fair	B
   5	Treatment of weight gain in prevention of relapse	Dale et al., 2002; Leischow & Stitzer, 1991	I	Fair	B

   QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix B)

   12. Promote Motivation to Quit

       Objective

       Motivate tobacco users who are presently unwilling to quit tobacco to do so in the future.

       Motivational strategies include, but are not limited, to the following:

       • Avoid confrontation.
       • Remain neutral.
       • Acknowledge the tobacco user's ambivalence about quitting.
       • Elicit the tobacco user's view of the pros and cons of smoking and smoking cessation.
       • Correct the tobacco user's misperceptions about health risks of smoking and the process of quitting smoking.
       • Formulate an agenda; make it explicit.
       • Avoid conflict of agendas (e.g., "I can't talk to anybody" = "I can't talk to you.").
       • Negotiate.
       • Summarize.

       Recommendations

       1. Tobacco users who are not willing to quit at this time should receive brief, non-judgmental motivational counseling designed to increase their motivation to quit, to include discussion about [Expert Consensus]:
          • Relevance: connection between tobacco use and current symptoms, disease and medical history
          • Risks: risks of continued tobacco use and tailor the message to individual risk/relevance of cardiovascular disease or exacerbation of preexisting disease
          • Rewards: potential benefits for quitting tobacco use to their medical, financial, and psychosocial well-being
          • Roadblocks: barriers to quitting and discuss options and strategies to address patient's barriers
          • Repetition: Reassess willingness to quit at subsequent visits; repeat intervention for unmotivated patients at every visit.
       2. Use of motivational intervention should be considered. This technique has been shown to be beneficial in motivating and changing behaviors of individuals with other substance use dependencies, including some evidence in cessation of smoking. [B]

   	Evidence	Sources of Evidence	QE	Overall Quality	R
   1	Use of brief motivational interventions.	Cigrang, Severson, & Peterson, 2002; Colby et al., 1998; Emmons et al., 2001; Ershoff et al., 1999; Hajek et al., 2001; McHugh et al., 2001; Smith et al., 2001; Stotts, DiClemente, & Dolan-Mullen, 2002; Tappin et al., 2000	II-2; I; I; II-2; II; II; II; II; II	Fair	B

   QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix B)

   13. Congratulate and Encourage Continued Abstinence

       Objective

       Congratulate non-users for changing a difficult behavior and encourage continued abstinence.

       Recommendations

       1. All tobacco non-users should be congratulated for not using tobacco ("Good for you") and advised to avoid initiation of tobacco. ("The single best thing you can do for your health is to avoid all tobacco products.") [B]

   	Evidence	Sources of Evidence	QE	Overall Quality	R
   1	Congratulate all non-tobacco users and advise all non-tobacco users to avoid initiation of tobacco products.	Fidler & Lambert, 2001	II	Good	B

   QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix B)

   14. Assess Risk for Relapse

       Objective

       Assess the risk for relapse for patients who have recently quit.

       Recommendations

       1. Tobacco users who have been abstinent for less than three months should be assessed for relapse. [B]
       2. Tobacco users attempting to quit should be screened for a history of depression or a presentation of depressive symptoms predating the quit attempt as these factors strongly predict relapse. [B]
       3. Psychosocial and environmental risk factors for relapse should be assessed to include stress, depression, withdrawal symptoms, previous quit attempts, close presence of other tobacco users, history of substance use disorder, and/or other risky behaviors. [C]
       4. Patients who have relapsed should be assessed to determine whether they are willing to make another quit attempt. [C]

   	Evidence	Sources of Evidence	QE	Overall Quality	R
   1	Assessment for relapse in patients abstinent for less than 3 months	Brandon et al., 1990; Hatziandreu et al., 1990; Westman et al., 1997; Zhu et al., 1996	II	Fair	B
   2	Assessment of history of depression or depressed mood predating quit attempt	Niaura et al., 2001	II	Good	B
   3	Assessment of psychosocial and environmental risk factors for relapse	Brownell et al., 1998	III	Poor	I
   4	Assessment for willingness for another quit attempt in relapsed patients	Brandon et al., 1990; Westman et al., 1997; Zhu et al., 1996; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., 2000	III	Poor	C

   QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix B)

   15. Assess Risk for Starting Tobacco Use

       Objective

       To assess the potential for tobacco use in persons who have never used tobacco, based on existing risk factors.

       Recommendation

       1. Providers should ask non-users about their intention to smoke in the future, as this predicts the likelihood of initiation of tobacco use. [B]
       2. Providers should be aware of the following risk factors for initiation of tobacco use in order to closely follow non-users with a proclivity toward initiation of tobacco use: [C]
          • Individual (e.g., low self-esteem, susceptibility to peer pressure, rebelliousness, depression, anxiety)
          • Family (e.g., family member who uses tobacco, especially parent, sibling, or spouse)
          • Educational level (e.g., less than 12 years of education, poor school performance, anticipated dropping out of school)
          • Societal/cultural/environmental (e.g., peers who use tobacco, exposure to tobacco advertising and products, white females with concerns of body image)
          • Military recruits (e.g., during special assignments with high stress or long periods of down time with access to tobacco)
       3. Providers should be aware of the following protective factors that make tobacco use less likely: [B]
          • Individual (high self-esteem, assertiveness, social competence)
          • Family (positive parental support, close communication with parents)
          • Educational (school success, future goals)
          • Social/cultural/environmental (nonsmoking peer group, social competence, strong sense of right and wrong, religious observance)

   	Evidence	Sources of Evidence	QE	Overall Quality	R
   1	Intention to smoke in the future predicts tobacco use.	Adelman et al., 2001; Ary & Biglan, 1998	I; II	Fair	B
   2	Provider awareness of the risks for tobacco use initiation	American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Substance Abuse, 1998; American Academy of Pediatrics, 2001; Lynch & Bonnie, 1994; Elders et al., 1994	III; II-3; III	Poor; Fair; Poor	C
   3	Provider recognition of protective factors against initiation of tobacco	Belcher & Shinitzky, 1998	II-2	Fair	B

   QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix B)

   16. Initiate Prevention (Primary Prevention)

       Objective

       Promote strategies that are most effective to prevent initiation of tobacco use among adolescents and young adults who have not started smoking (primary prevention).

       Recommendations

       1. Health care providers should be aware of, and support, community and school-based tobacco prevention programs, as they are effective in the short-term. [B]
       2. Health care providers who treat children, adolescents, and young adults should reinforce community prevention messages and may consider brief prevention interventions delivered in a developmentally appropriate manner. [C]

   	Evidence	Sources of Evidence	QE	Overall Quality	R
   1	Community efforts are easy to implement, improve short-term outcomes, and have a broad effect.	Biglan et al., 2000; "Guidelines for school health programs," 1994; "Reducing tobacco use," 2000; Dent, 1998; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., 2000; Schinke, Gilchrist, & Snow, 1985; Sowden, Arblaster, & Stead, 2003; Sussman et al., 1999	I; III; II-2; III; II; I; II-3	Fair; Poor; Fair; Poor; Fair; Fair; Fair	B
   2	Office-based reinforcement and primary prevention may be beneficial.	Fidler & Lambert, 2001; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., 2000; Stevens et al., 2002; USDHHS, 1994	I; III; I; III	Good; Poor; Fair; Fair	C

   QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix B)

   17. Address Individual Conditions in Special Populations

       Q-1. Children and Adolescents

       Objective

       Describe unique issues relevant to the health care provider who comes in contact with children and adolescents.

       Recommendations

       1. Pediatric and adolescent patients and their parents should be screened by health care providers for tobacco use and provided a strong message regarding the importance of total abstinence from tobacco use. [Expert Consensus]
       2. Health care providers in a pediatric setting should advise parents to quit smoking to limit their children's exposure to second-hand smoke. [A]
       3. Health care providers in a pediatric setting should offer smoking cessation advice and interventions to parents to improve the parent's chance of quitting use of tobacco. [C]
       4. Adolescents who use tobacco and are interested in quitting should be offered counseling and behavioral interventions that were developed for adolescents. [A]
       5. Counseling and behavioral interventions shown to be effective with adults may be considered for use with adolescents. [Expert Consensus]
       6. When treating adolescents, providers may consider prescriptions for bupropion SR or NRT when there is evidence of nicotine dependence and desire to quit tobacco use. [Expert Consensus]

       	Evidence	Sources of Evidence	QE	Overall Quality	R
       1	Smoking cessation for parents to limit exposure of children to tobacco smoke	Emmons et al., 2001; Greenberg et al., 1994; Hovell et al., 2002, 1994, 2000; Severson et al., 1997	I	Good	A
       2	Smoking cessation for parents to improve quit	Severson et al., 1997; Wall et al., 1995; Winickoff et al., 2003	II	Good	C
       3	Adolescent specific group intervention	Adelman et al., 2001; Sussman, 2001; Sussman et al., 1999	I; II-1; III	Good	A

       QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix B)

       Q-2. Pregnant Women

       Objective

       Encourage all health care team members to advise pregnant tobacco users to quit and provide tobacco cessation treatment.

       Recommendations

       1. Refer to the VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Uncomplicated Pregnancy.

       Q-3. Military Recruits and Trainees

       Objective

       Prevent relapse of basic trainees who quit using tobacco as a result of their participation in basic military training.

       Recommendations

       1. Relapse prevention should be addressed with every former tobacco user (see Annotation K - Initiate/Reinforce Relapse Prevention). [Expert Consensus]

       Q-4. Hospitalized Patients

       Objective

       Encourage all health care team members to advise hospitalized tobacco users to quit and provide tobacco cessation treatment.

       Recommendations

       1. All patients admitted to hospitals should have tobacco use status identified in the medical record. [A]
       2. Tobacco users who are hospitalized should be given advice to quit. [B]
       3. Tobacco users who are hospitalized should be given tobacco cessation treatment including medication and counseling. [B]
       4. Whenever possible, augmented smoking cessation treatment should be provided to tobacco users who are hospitalized. [Expert Consensus]
       5. Tobacco users should be referred for continuing treatment and support upon discharge. [Expert Consensus]

       	Evidence	Sources of Evidence	QE	Overall Quality	R
       1	Augmented interventions among hospitalized tobacco users are effective.	U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., 2000	I	Fair	B

       QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix B)

       Q-5. Older Patients

       Objectives

       Encourage all health care team members to advise older tobacco users to quit and provide tobacco cessation treatment.

       Recommendations

       1. Tobacco users who are older should be given advice to quit. [A]
       2. Tobacco users who are older should be given tobacco cessation treatment, including medication and counseling. [A]
       3. There are insufficient data to support or refute variations on smoking cessation interventions among the elderly. Assessment and treatment of tobacco users who are older should follow the recommendations included in the guideline. [I]

       	Evidence	Sources of Evidence	QE	Overall Quality	R
       1	Assessment and treatment of older tobacco users are effective.	Burton et al., 1995; Cohen & Fowlie, 1992; Hermanson et al., 1988; Morgan et al., 1996; Rogers et al., 1985	I	Good	A

       QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix B)

       Q-6. Psychiatric/Mental Health Patient

       Objective

       Provide effective tobacco cessation services to patients with psychiatric comorbidities

       Recommendations

       1. Tobacco users with comorbid psychiatric and substance abuse conditions should be provided tobacco cessation treatment. [B]
       2. Tobacco users receiving treatment for chemical dependency should be provided tobacco cessation treatments to include counseling and pharmacotherapy. [C]
       3. Tobacco users with other comorbidities may have a low rate of successful treatment. The optimal treatment for tobacco users with current/past depression is uncertain, but they may require longer and more intensive treatment. [B]

       	Evidence	Sources of Evidence	QE	Overall Quality	R
       1	Smoking cessation in psychiatric patients is recommended.	Brown et al., 2001; Dalack & Meador-Woodruff, 1999; Evins et al., 2001; George et al., 2002, 2000; Hayford et al., 1999; Hertzberg et al., 2001; Hughes, Stead, & Lancaster, 2002; Thorsteinsson et al., 2001	I	Fair	B
       2	Bupropion SR and nortriptyline are effective in treating tobacco dependence in patients with current/past history of depression.	U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al., 2000; Hughes, Stead, & Lancaster, 2002; Hayford et al., 1999	I	Good	A
       3	Smoking cessation for substance abuse patients is recommended.	Bobo et al., 1998; Burling, Burling, & Latini, 2001; Ellingstad et al., 1999; Hurt et al., 1993; Patten et al., 2002, 2000, 2001; Shoptaw et al., 2002	I	Fair	C

       QE = Quality of Evidence; R = Recommendation (see Appendix B)

   Definitions:

   Quality of Evidence (QE)

   I: Evidence obtained from at least one properly randomized controlled trial
   II-1: Evidence obtained from well-designed controlled trails without randomization
   II-2: Evidence obtained from well-designed cohort or case-control analytic studies
   II-3: Evidence obtained from multiple time series, dramatic results in uncontrolled experiments
   III: Opinions of respected authorities; case reports, and reports of expert committees

   Overall Quality

   Good: High grade evidence (I or II-1) directly linked to health outcome
   Fair: High grade evidence (I or II-1 linked to intermediate outcome or moderate grade evidence (II-2 or II-3) directly linked to health outcome
   Poor: Level III evidence or no linkage of evidence to health outcome

   Net Effect of Intervention

   Substantial:

   • More than a small relative impact on a frequent condition with a substantial burden of suffering, or
   • A large impact on an infrequent condition with a significant impact on the individual patient level

   Moderate:

   • A small relative impact on a frequent condition with a substantial burden of suffering, or
   • A moderate impact on an infrequent condition with a significant impact on the individual patient level

   Small:

   • A negligible relative impact on a frequent condition with a substantial burden of suffering, or
   • A small impact on an infrequent condition with a significant impact on the individual patient level

   Zero or Negative:

   • Negative impact on patients, or
   • No relative impact on either a frequent condition with a substantial burden of suffering, or
   • An infrequent condition with a significant impact on the individual patient level

   Grade of Recommendation

   A: A strong recommendation that the intervention is always indicated and acceptable
   B: A recommendation that the intervention may be useful/effective
   C: A recommendation that the intervention be considered
   D: A recommendation that a procedure may be considered not useful/effective, or may be harmful
   I: Insufficient evidence to recommend for or against; the clinician will use clinical judgment

   Abbreviations

   AAP - American Academy of Pediatrics
   CDC - Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
   DHHS - Department of Health and Human Services
   DoD - Department of Defense
   NRT - Nicotine replacement therapy
   QE - Quality of evidence
   SR - Strength of recommendation
   U.S. PSTF - U.S. Preventive Service Task Force
   VA - Veterans Affairs
   VAMC - Veterans Affairs Medical Center

• Algorithm A: Assessment and Treatment
• Algorithm B: Prevention

References open in a new window

Electronic copies: Available from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Web site.

Print copies: Available from the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration (VHA), Office of Quality and Performance (10Q), 810 Vermont Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20420.

Electronic copies: Available from the Department of Veterans Affairs Web site.

Print copies: Available from the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration (VHA), Office of Quality and Performance (10Q), 810 Vermont Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20420.

The following is also available:

• Putting clinical practice guidelines to work [online tutorial]. Available from the Department of Veterans Affairs Web site.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.