[Accessibility Information]
Welcome Current Issue Index How to Subscribe Archives
Monthly Labor Review Online

Related BLS programs | Related articles

EXCERPT

February 1982, Vol. 105, No. 2

Tracking youth joblessness:
persistent or fleeting?

Norman Bowers


Many studies have focused on differences between youth and adults in job and labor force turnover in attempts to account for the fact that youth unemployment is always higher than that of adults. However, some recent research suggests that the observed age-related differences in the incidence of joblessness are misleading indicators of the dynamics of youth unemployment. While frequent turnover is admittedly a feature of the youth labor market, the core of joblessness may in fact be accounted for by a relatively small number of persons who search for jobs for very long periods.1

A new study of matched data from the Current Population Survey examines the unemployment experience of selected individuals in the course of a year, and over 2 consecutive years. The findings suggest that:

The analysis exploits the short-run longitudinal capabilities of the Current Population Survey, which permit construction of a 2-year retrospective labor force history of persons in the sample. This previously untapped data set allows some examination of the following important questions: Is the experience of extensive unemployment in one year associated with extensive unemployment in the following year? How important are repeat spells of unemployment? And, are persons with multiple spells of unemployment in one year more likely than others to experience spells in the subsequent year?

Of course, 2 years is a relatively short time in terms of labor force history, and no definitive analysis of what has been called the "scarring effect" of persistent youth joblessness is possible.2 Still, the questions that can be addressed are of interest in their own right.

This excerpt is from an article published in the February 1982 issue of the Monthly Labor Review. The full text of the article is available in Adobe Acrobat's Portable Document Format (PDF). See How to view a PDF file for more information.

ARROWRead abstract  ARROWDownload full article in PDF (1,204K)


Footnotes

1 A critique of much of the relevant literature is contained in Norman Bowers, "Young and marginal: an overview of youth employment," Monthly Labor Review, October 1979, pp. 4-16. A turnover perspective and an implicit critique of that approach can be found in Jacob Mincer and Linda Leighton, "Labor Turnover and Youth Unemployment," and Kim Clark and Lawrence Summers, "The Dynamics of Youth Unemployment" in Richard Freeman and David Wise, eds., The Youth Unemployment Problem: Its Nature, Causes, and Consequences (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1981). Also see Joseph Antos and Wesley Mellow, "The Youth Labor Market: A Dynamic Overview," BLS Staff Paper II (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1979).

2 For example, this article will not discuss the potential impact of unemployment on subsequent wages (and growth in wages) or career prospects. See Brian e. Becker and Stephen M. Hills, "Teenage Unemployment: Some Evidence of the Long Run Effects on Wages," Journal of Human Resources, Summer 1980, pp. 354-72; David Ellwood, Teenage Unemployment: Permanent Scars or Temporary Blemishes," in Richard Freeman and David Wise, eds., The Youth Unemployment Problem: Its Nature, Causes, and Consequences (Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1981). Also see Joseph Antos and Wesley Mellow, "The Youth Labor Market: A Dynamic Overview," BLS Staff Paper II (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1979).


Related BLS programs

Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey

National Longitudinal Surveys

Related Monthly Labor Review articles

Young men and the transition to stable employment.Aug. 1994.


Within Monthly Labor Review Online:
Welcome | Current Issue | Index | Subscribe | Archives

Exit Monthly Labor Review Online:
BLS Home | Publications & Research Papers