Related BLS programs | Related articles
Measuring the complexity of hours at work: the weekly work grid
John P. Robinson, Alain Chenu, and Anthony S. AlvarezAccurate measures of time spent at work are becoming more crucial in the information societies of the 21st century. Variations in the number of hours that individuals spend working provide important evidence in comparisons of the quality of employment across occupations, countries, and time.
Thus, considerable academic and policy debate has centered on whether American workers, or workers in other countries are working more hours than workers did in the past.1 Similar controversies have arisen about how work hours generate differential time pressures on women, versus men. Precise measures of work hours are also an important factor in determining worker productivity levels and trends梐s in a recent study by the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Bureau of Economic Analysis, which indicates that productivity measures constructed from surveys of employees showed similar growth rates to those constructed from employees' records.2
This excerpt is from an article published in the April 2002 issue of the Monthly Labor Review. The full text of the article is available in Adobe Acrobat's Portable Document Format (PDF). See How to view a PDF file for more information.
Read abstract Download full article in PDF (80K)
Footnotes
1 John P.
Robinson and Ann Bostrom, "The overestimated workweek? What time diary
measures suggest," Monthly Labor Review, 1994 August, pp. 11�;
J. Jacobs, Measuring time at work: are self-reports accurate?
Monthly Labor
Review, 1998 December, pp. 42�; and J. Schor, The Overworked American
(New York, Basic Books, 1991).
2 Lucy Eldridge and others, "Hours Data in Productivity Measures," a paper presented at the Federal Economic Statistics Advisory Committee meetings, June 7�2001.
Within Monthly Labor Review Online:
Welcome | Current Issue | Index | Subscribe | Archives
Exit Monthly Labor Review Online:
BLS Home | Publications & Research Papers