[Accessibility Information]
Welcome Current Issue Index How to Subscribe Archives
Monthly Labor Review Online

Related BLS programs | Related articles

EXCERPT

April, 2000, Vol. 123, No.4

The characteristics of small-business employees

Brian Headd


One characterization of the U.S. economy is that it begins with the formation of small businesses, some of which then grow into large businesses, with both kinds ultimately perishing in a process referred to as "creative destruction" that necessitates a reallocation of resources.1  Be that as it may, certainly small firms are a dynamic force in the economy, bringing new ideas, processes, and vigor to the marketplace. They fill niche markets and locations not served by large businesses. (Consider, for example, the rural "general store.") Large firms, on the other hand, generally provide stability to the economy.

The differences in the small- and large-business workforces are, at least in part, a result of the inherent differences in small and large firms. Small firms are often younger (indeed, they are sometimes recent startups), more likely to be in rural areas, and more apt to be in industries with lower economies of scale, such as services. 2  Small firms can represent a life stage before economies of scale are reached (or hoped-for future growth is attained), or they can be a stable anchor in the marketplace. These age, location, and industry effects constitute the basic differences between small and large firms and can lead to different workforce needs and different resources to attract workers of various education levels and occupations.


This excerpt is from an article published in the April 2000 issue of the Monthly Labor Review. The full text of the article is available in Adobe Acrobat's Portable Document Format (PDF). See How to view a PDF file for more information.

ArrowRead abstract  ArrowDownload full article in PDF (40K)


Footnotes
1 Joseph Schumpeter’s Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (1962) coined the phrase "creative destruction" to characterize the evolution of the economy through technological change leading to the opening, growing, shrinking, and closing of firms. See also The New American Evolution (U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy, June 1998); The State of Small Business: A Report of the President, 1998 (U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy, forthcoming; on the Internet at http://www.sba.gov/advo/stats/); W. A. Brock and D. S. Evans, The Economics of Small Firms (New York: Holmes and Meier, 1986); and G. S. Becker, "Make the World Safe for ‘Creative Destruction,’" Business Week, Feb. 23, 1998.

2 See Small Business Growth by Major Industry, 1988–1995 and Rural and Urban Areas by Firm Size, 1990–1995 (U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy, 1998); on the Internet at http://www.sba.gov/advo/stats/.


Related BLS programs
Current Population Survey

Related Monthly Labor Review articles
Small businesses and their employees.Oct. 1994. 


Within Monthly Labor Review Online:
Welcome | Current Issue | Index | Subscribe | Archives

Exit Monthly Labor Review Online:
BLS Home | Publications & Research Papers