[Accessibility Information]
Welcome Current Issue Index How to Subscribe Archives
Monthly Labor Review Online

Related BLS programs | Related articles

EXCERPT

December, 1986, Vol. 109, No. 12

U.S. productivity growth since 1982:
the post-recession experience

Lawrence J. Fulco


Productivity in the business sector has grown at an average annual rate of 2.3 percent since 1947.1 Growth was more rapid before 1973 (3.0 percent) than after (0.9 percent), but throughout the postwar period, the business cycle has had pronounced effects on productivity growth in the business, nonfarm business, and manufacturing sectors.

There have been eight business cycle troughs since the end of World War II, the most recent of which occurred in the fourth quarter of 1982.2 (See exhibit 1.) The business cycle exerts an accelerating influence on productivity growth during recoveries and retards it during contractions. Since the 1982 trough, the BLS has analyzed movements in labor productivity—output per hour of all persons—for purposes of comparing this recovery with similar periods in the past.

The cycle's effect on productivity is often explained in terms of the fixed nature of some inputs in the short run. Because the stocks of capital plant and equipment and the number of available skilled employees are not instantaneously adjustable, they remain to some extent fixed over the course of the cycle. Thus, when product demand increases after a trough, firms are able to increase output more rapidly than capital and labor inputs, thereby inducing a swift rise in productivity. During a contraction the opposite occurs, giving rise to a procyclical pattern in productivity.


This excerpt is from an article published in the December 1986 issue of the Monthly Labor Review. The full text of the article is available in Adobe Acrobat's Portable Document Format (PDF). See How to view a PDF file for more information.

ARROWRead abstract  ARROWDownload full article in PDF (375K)


Footnotes

1The BLS labor productivity measures use labor input statistics derived primarily from two monthly BLS survey. Output and compensation measures are based on quarterly data prepared by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, U.S. Department of Commerce, as part of the National Income and Product Accounts. For the most recent quarters, the manufacturing output measure reflects movements in the monthly index of industrial production for durable and nondurable manufactures prepared by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Further information on the computation of BLS productivity and cost measures can be found in Chapter 13 of the BLS Handbook of Methods, Bulletin 2134-1 (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1982).


Related BLS programs

Industry Productivity

Multifactor Productivity

Quarterly Labor Productivity

Related Monthly Labor Review articles

Federal Productivity Measurement Program: final results, The.May 1997.

Productivity growth improves in housefurnishings industry.Mar. 1996.

Measurement of productivity growth in U.S. manufacturing.July 1995.

Manufacturing costs, productivity, and competitiveness: 1979-93.Oct. 1994.

Productivity in hardwood dimension and flooring.Oct. 1994.

Industry productivity in natural and processed cheese.Apr. 1993.

Productivity continues to rise in many industries during 1987.Mar. 1989.


Within Monthly Labor Review Online:
Welcome | Current Issue | Index | Subscribe | Archives

Exit Monthly Labor Review Online:
BLS Home | Publications & Research Papers