[Accessibility Information]
Welcome Current Issue Index How to Subscribe Archives
Monthly Labor Review Online

Related BLS programs | Related articles

EXCERPT

December, 1986, Vol. 109, No. 12

Problems encountered in measuring
single- and multifactor productivity

Jerome A. Mark


The slowdown in productivity growth since the early 1970's in many countries has stimulated and renewed interest in the causes of productivity change. The observation that there has been a slowdown has generally centered on the traditional indicator of productivity—output per unit of labor input, or labor productivity.

Labor productivity—the relationship between output and labor input—has been the most prevalent measure of productivity for a variety of reasons. First, labor is involved in all aspects of production and generally has been the most important factor in the production process. Second, labor input is the most readily measurable of the various production factors.

Labor productivity measures are useful in that they provide quantitative indicators of the amount of change in labor expended to produce real goods and services of an enterprise, industry, or economy. Changes in output per hour, however, do not measure the specific contribution of labor or any other factor of production. Instead, they reflect the joint effects of many influences which affect the use of labor, including changes in technology, capital investment, utilization of capacity, economies of scale, energy substitution, organization of production, and managerial skills, as well as changes in the characteristics and efforts of the work force.


This excerpt is from an article published in the December 1986 issue of the Monthly Labor Review. The full text of the article is available in Adobe Acrobat's Portable Document Format (PDF). See How to view a PDF file for more information.

ARROWRead abstract  ARROWDownload full article in PDF (956K)


Related BLS programs

Industry Productivity

Multifactor Productivity

Related Monthly Labor Review articles

The accuracy of the BLS productivity measures.Feb. 1999.

Possible measurement bias in aggregate productivity growth.Feb. 1999.

BLS completes major expansion of industry productivity series.Sep. 1998.

Improvements to the quarterly productivity measures.Oct. 1995.

BLS modernizes industry labor productivity program.July 1995.

Measurement of productivity growth in U.S. manufacturing.July 1995.

Difficulties in the measurement of service outputs.Mar. 1994.


Within Monthly Labor Review Online:
Welcome | Current Issue | Index | Subscribe | Archives

Exit Monthly Labor Review Online:
BLS Home | Publications & Research Papers