|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Phase III Randomized Study of Intravenous (IV) Paclitaxel and Cisplatin versus IV Paclitaxel, Intraperitoneal (IP) Cisplatin, and IP Paclitaxel in Patients with Optimal Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Carcinoma or Primary Peritoneal Carcinoma
Alternate Title Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Primary Peritoneal or Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Objectives I. Compare pathological response, recurrence-free interval, and survival in patients with optimal stage III epithelial ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal carcinoma receiving intravenous (IV) paclitaxel and cisplatin vs IV paclitaxel and intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin plus IP paclitaxel. II. Compare the toxic effects and complications of these 2 treatment regimens in these patients. III. Determine the frequency and prognostic significance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in these patients. IV. Determine the effect of non-genetic risk factors on the course of disease in BRCA1- and BRCA2-related ovarian cancer or primary peritoneal carcinoma. V. Compare the quality of life of these patients receiving these treatments. Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics: Histologically proven primary peritoneal carcinoma or optimal (no greater than 1 cm residual disease) stage III epithelial ovarian carcinoma with the following epithelial cell types: Serous adenocarcinoma Endometrioid adenocarcinoma Mucinous adenocarcinoma Undifferentiated carcinoma Clear cell adenocarcinoma Mixed epithelial carcinoma Transitional cell carcinoma Malignant Brenner's Tumor Adenocarcinoma NOS Prior surgery for ovarian/peritoneal carcinoma required No epithelial ovarian carcinoma of low malignant potential (borderline carcinoma) Prior/Concurrent Therapy: Biologic therapy: Not specified Chemotherapy: No prior chemotherapy Endocrine therapy: Not specified Radiotherapy: No prior radiotherapy Surgery: See Disease Characteristics No more than 6 weeks since prior surgery Patient Characteristics: Age: Not specified Performance status: GOG 0-2 Life expectancy: Not specified Hematopoietic: WBC at least 3,000/mm3 Platelet count at least 100,000/mm3 Hepatic: Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 times normal SGOT no greater than 3 times normal Alkaline phosphatase no greater than 3 times normal No acute hepatitis Renal: Creatinine no greater than 2.0 mg/dL Cardiovascular: No unstable angina No myocardial infarction within prior 6 months Patients with abnormal cardiac conduction are eligible if disease stable for at least 6 months Other: No septicemia or severe infection No severe gastrointestinal bleeding No other invasive malignancy within past 5 years except nonmelanoma skin cancer Any previous cancer treatment must not contraindicate this protocol therapy Expected Enrollment 384Approximately 384 patients will be accrued for this study within 16 months. Outline This is a randomized study. Patients are stratified according to gross residual disease (present vs absent) and whether second-look surgery will be performed at the end of treatment (yes vs no). Blood is drawn for BRCA mutation analysis and DNA extraction before the start of chemotherapy, but after randomization. Patients are randomized to one of two treatment arms. Patients in arm I receive IV paclitaxel by 24-hour infusion on day 1 followed by IV cisplatin on day 2. Patients in arm II receive IV paclitaxel by 24-hour infusion on day 1 followed by intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin on day 2, plus IP paclitaxel on day 8. Treatment for both arms repeats every 3 weeks for a total of 6 treatment courses. Following chemotherapy, second look surgery is performed if selected by the patient. Quality-of-life assessments are performed prior to randomization, prior to course 4, 3-6 weeks after the completion of course 6 and prior to second look surgery if selected, 6 months after treatment is completed, and 12 months after treatment is completed. Patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, then every 6 months thereafter.Published Results Armstrong DK, Bundy BN, Baergen R, et al.: Randomized phase III study of intravenous (IV) paclitaxel and cisplatin versus IV paclitaxel, intraperitoneal (IP) cisplatin and IP paclitaxel in optimal stage III epithelial ovarian cancer (OC): a Gynecologic Oncology Group trial (GOG 172). [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 21: A-803, 2002. Armstrong DK, Bundy B, Wenzel L, et al.: Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 354 (1): 34-43, 2006.[PUBMED Abstract] DeLoia JA, Krivak T, Darcy KM, et al.: Relationship between the C8092A polymorphisms in ERCC1 and clinical outcome in optimally-resected, stage III epithelial ovarian cancer treated with intraperitoneal or intravenous cisplatin and paclitaxel: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. [Abstract] American Association for Cancer Research: 98th Annual Meeting, April 14-18, 2007, Los Angeles, CA. A-1674, 2007. Krivak TC, Darcy KM, Tian C, et al.: Relationship between polymorphisms in cordon 118 and C8092A in ERCC1 and clinical outcome in optimally-resected, stage III epithelial ovarian cancer treated with intraperitoneal or intravenous cisplatin and paclitaxel: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 25 (Suppl 18): A-21050, 733s, 2007. Krivak TC, Darcy KM, Tian C, et al.: Relationship between ERCC1 polymorphisms, disease progression, and survival in the Gynecologic Oncology Group Phase III Trial of intraperitoneal versus intravenous cisplatin and paclitaxel for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 26 (21): 3598-606, 2008.[PUBMED Abstract] Krivak T, Darcy K, Tian C, et al.: Relationship between polymorphisms in ERCC1 and clinical outcome in optimally resected stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. [Abstract] Society of Gynecologic Oncologists, 2007 Annual Meeting on Women's Cancer, March 3-7, 2007, San Diego, CA. A-146, 2007. Seamon LG, Carlson MJ, Richardson DL, et al.: Improved intraperitoneal chemotherapeutic toxicity profile for ovarian cancer: A modification of the taxane-platinum protocol in GOG-172. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 26 (Suppl 15): A-5583, 2008. Thrall M, Gallion HH, Kryscio R, et al.: BRCA1 expression in a large series of sporadic ovarian carcinomas: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 16 (Suppl 1): 166-71, 2006 Jan-Feb.[PUBMED Abstract] Walker JL, Armstrong D, Huang H, et al.: Intraperitoneal catheter outcomes on GOG 172: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study in women with optimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer. [Abstract] Int J Gynecol Cancer 14 (Suppl 1): A-062, 19, 2004. Walker JL, Armstrong DK, Huang HQ, et al.: Intraperitoneal catheter outcomes in a phase III trial of intravenous versus intraperitoneal chemotherapy in optimal stage III ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Gynecol Oncol 100 (1): 27-32, 2006.[PUBMED Abstract] Wenzel LB, Huang HQ, Armstrong DK, et al.: Baseline quality of life (QOL) as a predictor of tolerance to intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC): a Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study. [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 24 (Suppl 18): A-5007, 257s, 2006. Wenzel LB, Huang HQ, Armstrong DK, et al.: Health-related quality of life during and after intraperitoneal versus intravenous chemotherapy for optimally debulked ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 25 (4): 437-43, 2007.[PUBMED Abstract] Wenzel L, Huang HQ, Cella D, et al.: Validation of FACT/GOG-AD subscale for ovarian cancer-related abdominal discomfort: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol 110 (1): 60-4, 2008.[PUBMED Abstract] Related PublicationsHavrilesky LJ, Secord AA, Darcy KM, et al.: Cost effectiveness of intraperitoneal compared with intravenous chemotherapy for women with optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 26 (25): 4144-50, 2008.[PUBMED Abstract] Bristow RE, Santillan A, Salani R, et al.: Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel versus intravenous carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy for Stage III ovarian cancer: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Gynecol Oncol 106 (3): 476-81, 2007.[PUBMED Abstract] Winter WE 3rd, Maxwell GL, Tian C, et al.: Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol 25 (24): 3621-7, 2007.[PUBMED Abstract] Alberts DS, Delforge A: Maximizing the delivery of intraperitoneal therapy while minimizing drug toxicity and maintaining quality of life. Semin Oncol 33 (6 Suppl 12): S8-17, 2006.[PUBMED Abstract] Armstrong DK, Brady MF: Intraperitoneal therapy for ovarian cancer: a treatment ready for prime time. J Clin Oncol 24 (28): 4531-3, 2006.[PUBMED Abstract] Markman M: Clinical efficacy supporting the role of intraperitoneal drug delivery in the primary chemotherapeutic management of small-volume residual advanced ovarian cancer. Semin Oncol 33 (6 Suppl 12): S3-7, 2006.[PUBMED Abstract] Singhal P, Lele S: Intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer: where are we now? J Natl Compr Canc Netw 4 (9): 941-6, 2006.[PUBMED Abstract] Baysal BE, DeLoia JA, Willett-Brozick JE, et al.: Analysis of CHEK2 gene for ovarian cancer susceptibility. Gynecol Oncol 95 (1): 62-9, 2004.[PUBMED Abstract] Trial Lead Organizations Gynecologic Oncology Group
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. |
NCI Home |
Images Version |
Contact Us |
Policies |
Accessibility |
Viewing Files |
FOIA |
Site Help |
Site Map
|
A Service of the National Cancer Institute |