National Institute for Literacy
 

[FocusOnBasics 490] Re: Low Self-esteem: Myth or Reality?

robinschwarz1 at aol.com robinschwarz1 at aol.com
Tue Sep 26 01:44:21 EDT 2006


Judith-- an interesting take on the literacy and self-esteem issue--and
one I do not think was intended in this discussion. Literacy in
English as opposed to no literacy at all are rather different
situations. Of course it boosts an English learner's self esteem in
the language learning and use situation when their English improves,
but I do not think it is wise to make this analogous to self esteem
issues of those who have never gained literacy in their native language
and have remained, perhaps, marginalized as a result. Robin Lovrien
Schwarz

-----Original Message-----
From: j-p-sinclair at worldnet.att.net
To: focusonbasics at nifl.gov
Sent: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 10:26 AM
Subject: [FocusOnBasics 483] Re: Low Self-esteem: Myth or Reality?

Hello, All:
 
With great interest I am reading and learning from the postings,
including Ms. Lipnevich, regarding the community's perception of the
relationship of self-esteem to literacy.  I would like to add my own
experience.  For many years I have worked as a teacher, tutor, and
advocate with people of all ages and backgrounds, in groups and in
individual consultation, who are struggling in some way with issues of
literacy.  Sometimes they are new arrivals to the USA, with English
language skills ranging from emergent through expert.  At other times
they are long time residents or citizens of this country, and again
with varying degrees of American English language accomplishment.  And
sometimes they are native-born Americans, who struggle with our
language in some way, from the basics to a more advanced
understanding.  From the onset of this work it was my idea that there
was a direct relationship between self-esteem and literacy.
 
During my years in graduate school, I remained interested in the
relationship between self-esteem and literacy, yet found in my research
and that of others that opinions regarding this relationship widely
varied. Nevertheless, from my own ongoing work including my final
research and dissertation I found again that there was a direct
relationship between self-esteem and literacy, and that this
relationship existed across all populations, cultures, and ages.
 
Now, as a practicing cognitive psychologist and educator, and as a life
and career management services consultant, with more experienced and
education gained, I have found no instance where these two
variables are not present in some critical relationship, at least to
some degree.  The evidence of this relationship presents in a variety
of forms, and with a variety of forces: economic, social, political,
cultural, and so on.  The presentation may be explicit, in that my
client(s) tell me and demonstrate that they have low self esteem, or
implicit, but there is, in my opinion, always evidence for this
relationship. The evidence also takes many forms, but most simply can
be seen in their change of self-perspective as they improve their
communication and English language skills and go on to accomplish their
goals.  The model that I have established for my practice is also based
to some degree on this idea: that there is a direct relationship
between self-esteem and literacy. 
 
Low literacy denies to people of all ages and backgrounds many aspects
of life and career management.  Moderate-to-high literacy allows people
to negotiate American society's processes and institutions with at
least some quantifiable measure of success.  Are there other variables
that assist in determining life and career success?  Of course, and
they are integrated into my own practice, and reviewed in my other
professiorial activities.  But the relationship does exist, and occurs
in my experience with many people over many years.
 
Thanks for providing this forum. I enjoy the discussions and hope to
hear from anyone interested.

Judith Sinclair, PhD
Cognitive Psychologist & Educator
Life & Career Management Services Consultant
The Sinclair Center
3003 Van Ness Street NW
Suite 411 West
Washington, DC  20008
Phone: 202-364-3893
Mobile: 202-236-9822
email: j-p-sinclair at att.net
www.sinclairsystem.com
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Anastasiya A. Lipnevich
To: focusonbasics at nifl.gov
Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2006 4:15 PM
Subject: [FocusOnBasics 480] Low Self-esteem: Myth or Reality?


Dear All,
First of all, I would like to thank everyone for very insightful
comments concerning issues addressed in the article. I was very pleased
that my work sparked such a lively discussion. As I noted in the paper,
I did expect some skepticism since the findings run counter to what
seems to be a commonly accepted belief in the field. I will try to
dissolve it to the best of my ability; it is not my main goal, however.
 Let me quickly describe the premises of the research and what these
findings mean to me.

 Since my very first encounter with the adult literacy literature, I
noticed that many writers had described adult basic education learners
as having detrimentally low self esteem. Similarly, many researchers
showed that teachers saw their role as that of raising students self
esteem. Being a student in an educational psychology program with a
heavy emphasis on statistics, I always seek empirical evidence for
every claim made. In the case of adult literacy students’ low self
esteem, I found none. Therefore, I suggested conducting a study that
would shed some light on the matter. This study was going to be a part
of a larger study, so it was decided to administer a self-esteem
questionnaire along with other measures.

 I agree with those of you who pointed at the possible flaws of the
self-report. Ideally, I would back up my findings with other methods
(e.g. interviews, observations). In case converging results are found,
such triangulation would solidify my conclusions. I haven’t gotten to
it quite yet. However, careful construction of the questionnaire under
the supervision of savvy adult education researchers and good
psychometric characteristics of the measure suggest that this way of
measuring self-esteem is at the very least acceptable. Students seem to
have provided meaningful answers to the questions.

 I do agree that self-esteem is influenced by many variables, e.g.
economic status. This is an important factor to consider, but it
doesn’t change the way we interpret the findings. In psychological
research, we measure self-esteem, motivation, self-regulation and what
not, keeping in mind that they do not operate in isolation. However, it
does give us useful information about the level of certain phenomena
and helps us refine ways we interact with our students. Therefore, I do
not necessarily see why difficulty with measuring self-esteem should
deter us from doing it.

 For those of you who wondered why PhD students were chosen for
comparison, here is my rationale. In the absence of self-esteem norms
for the adult students’ population, I needed a comparison group. PhD
students are similar to adult learners in that they have voluntarily
enrolled in their respective educational programs. Even though doctoral
students and adult learners are at different educational levels, they
had to believe they could succeed when they joined the program and they
may have the same doubts about their potential success as they progress
in the program. Additionally, societal views on PhD and adult literacy
students as being a sea apart on the SE vector served as a good
concurrent validity estimate.

 Having found no differences, Hal Beder and I concluded that those who
work with adult basic education students should reevaluate any
preconceived notions they may have about their students. Adult learners
need no more praise than PhD students, and teachers’ focus should be on
helping learners acquire skills, strategies and knowledge, rather than
working on the elusive goal of raising self-esteem. Again, my findings
do not mean that adult students have high SE – it means only that they
do not differ from PhD students in the levels they have.

 Having said this, I am looking forward to your comments. I will try to
address your comments every night – my schedule prevents me from doing
it more often. Thank you so much!


Ana Lipnevich.





--------


----------------------------------------------------
National Institute for Literacy
Focus on Basics mailing list
FocusOnBasics at nifl.gov
To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/focusonbasics
----------------------------------------------------
National Institute for Literacy
Focus on Basics mailing list
FocusOnBasics at nifl.gov
To unsubscribe or change your subscription settings, please go to
http://www.nifl.gov/mailman/listinfo/focusonbasics

________________________________________________________________________
Check out the new AOL. Most comprehensive set of free safety and
security tools, free access to millions of high-quality videos from
across the web, free AOL Mail and more.



More information about the FocusOnBasics mailing list