.
D. PHASE III: PUBLIC
REVIEW AND COUNCIL ADOPTION
Background
This phase involves the
review of the draft FMP and other related documents (draft NEPA
documents, draft RIR, IRFA, including ESA analysis) by the public
and NOAA/NMFS, the transformation of the draft FMP to a final
FMP, and the adoption of the FMP by the Council. Councils must
identify the preferred alternative to address the identified
problems (see Sections 5.1 and 5.2).
Public hearings, as required under the Magnuson-Stevens Act,
are conducted during this phase. A regularly scheduled Council
meeting may be used to schedule public hearings. NMFS participates
as necessary under NEPA and RFA, as requested by the Council.
Councils must conduct public hearings at appropriate times and
locations so as to allow interested persons to be heard during
FMP preparation. The number of hearings will vary from fishery
to fishery, depending on the level of public interest and the
issues considered.
Because the management measures as expressed in the regulations
represent the essence of an FMP's intended effect, early familiarity
with these regulations will avoid misunderstandings by the public
and by government reviewers. Councils are particularly urged
to work with the RA and GCRA to have draft proposed regulations
for each significant alternative available to the public and
to submit them for NMFS informal review at the earliest possible
time.
Once NMFS has determined
that all necessary components of the draft FMP package have
been completed by the Council, NMFS will begin its informal
advance review of all draft documents. If a DEIS is required,
NMFS will determine whether the DEIS is adequate for filing.
If the DEIS is determined to be inadequate, it will be returned
to the Council by the RA, identifying the deficiencies and suggesting
modifications. If an EA will satisfy NEPA requirements, the
draft EA will be reviewed and commented on by NMFS as part of
the draft FMP/amendment package.
Once the Notice of Availability
of the DEIS is published by EPA, NMFS will provide the Council
with comments (by letter from the RA, including critical and
substantive issues) by the 60th day after the start of the public
review period for the DEIS. If the action does not involve filing
of an EIS and subsequent public review, NMFS will provide comments
by the 60th day after the draft FMP/amendment package is distributed
to Regional and HQ reviewers. For those FMPs/amendments that
involve complex issues comprising establishment of new policy,
drafting legal opinions, or resolving substantive internal differences
of opinion, comments may occasionally be delayed beyond the
60th day. However, 60 days for NMFS review and comment is a
reasonable maximum time period to accomplish all the actions
involved, and is an investment of time that should help to avoid
substantive difficulties once the formal review period has begun.
However, a Council has the option of requesting NMFS consultation
and/or advance review of its draft FMP/amendment and associated
documents prior to public hearings.
Event Schedule
III-1. Council submits draft package to Region
and F/SF3. Package should include the following elements, some
of which may be combined:
a. D(S)EIS/EA (50 copies);
b. Draft FMP/amendment
(50 copies);
c. Draft RIR, including
IRFA if applicable (20 copies);
d. Draft discussion and
supporting statement for new or revised recordkeeping/reporting
requirements (6 copies);
e. Draft proposed regulations,
including preamble (6 copies); and
f. Source documents, if
any (4 copies).
III-2.
Region, GCRA/GCF, and F/SF3 begin review of draft package for
critical and substantive issues, including ESA, and adequacy
of supporting analytic documents. F/SF3 coordinates review with
HQ, NOAA, and other agencies, as appropriate. F/SF provides
a consolidated Office comment to RA; individual reviewer's comments
are provided to the Region as available. If the DEIS is acceptable,
F/SF3 prepares necessary transmittal letters (including letter
to agencies and public groups), obtains OP/SP final clearance,
and files the DEIS with EPA. F/SF3 provides the Council with
filing, publication, and comment period information and the
original signed letter. The Council distributes the DEIS (with
the letter to agencies and public groups) concurrent with EPA
filing. EPA publishes the Notice of Availability of the DEIS
in the FR. The Council schedules public hearings and, through
F/SF, publishes the Notice of Hearings in the FR.
III-3. Region prepares draft issues letter
from the RA to the Council, and sends a copy to F/SF3 for review.
III-4. Region calls joint issues meeting with
F/SF, GCRA, and GCF (in person or by conference call), if necessary,
using the draft issues letter as a focus, and attempt to resolve
differences, if any. If significant differences are not resolved,
F/SF3 prepares a comment memo to the Region. F/SF3 informally
transmits any technical comments to the Region.
III-5. Region revises draft issues letter to
the Council, based on (a) the issues meeting, (b) any F/SF comment
memo, and (c) technical comments. Region transmits the revised
draft issues letter to F/SF for concurrence.
III-6. F/SF3 reviews the revised issues letter.
If F/SF concurs, it notifies the Region. If F/SF does not concur,
F/SF3 prepares a dissent memo (F/SF3 to F/SF), and transmits
it, with the draft issues letter, to F/SF for resolution of
differences. F/SF reviews the documents; confers with RA, GCF,
and F/SF3, as necessary, advises of HQ position on issues, and
informs the RA.
III-7. Region prepares the final issues letter
to the Council, with a copy to F/SF and F/SF3. The target date
for Council to receive the issues letter is 60 days after publication
of the DEIS Notice of Availability, or, if there is no EIS,
60 days after the starting date of HQ and Regional review of
the draft package.
III-8. If endangered or threatened species
or critical habitat may be affected, NMFS consults with itself
and/or FWS, depending on the species involved. The Council receives
an informal consultation letter or biological opinion from NMFS
and/or FWS.
III-9. Council revises FMP/amendment, NEPA
document, and regulations, as appropriate, adopts by Council
vote, and submits them for formal Secretarial review. If the
Council's revision to the preferred alternative identified for
public hearings is substantive, and may or will differ in context
or intensity from the alternatives that were analyzed and subjected
to public comment, a revised DEIS or DSEIS, with the required
comment period, may be necessary (see Background above). Another
vote by the Council would then be necessary. The Council is
encouraged to submit the draft proposed rule to the RA for an
informal review prior to submission of the FMP/amendment package
for formal Secretarial review. The Council advises state(s)
with approved coastal management programs whether the proposed
management activity will affect any land or water use or natural
resource of the coastal zone. Copies of the letter(s) to the
state(s) and responses, if any, will be included in the submission
of documents to the RA for Phase IV.
|