Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Adjuvant radiotherapy in women with stage I endometrial cancer: a clinical practice guideline.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Lukka H, Chambers A, Fyles A, Thephamongkhol K, Elit L, Fung-Kee-Fung M, Kwon J, Oliver T, Gynecology Cancer Disease Site Group. Adjuvant radiotherapy in women with stage I endometrial cancer: a clinical practice guideline. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2006 Mar 9. 24 p. (Evidence-based series; no. 4-10). [21 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

There is a lack of consistent well-conducted randomized controlled trial evidence related to the clinical questions. Based on the interpretation of evidence from the available randomized data and expert consensus opinion, the Gynecology Cancer Disease Site Group recommends the following:

  • Regardless of surgical staging, adjuvant external beam radiotherapy:
    • is recommended for patients at high risk of recurrence
    • is not recommended in patients at low risk of recurrence
    • is a reasonable treatment option for patients at intermediate risk of recurrence
      • Two randomized trials detected that adjuvant external beam radiotherapy improved pelvic control, but not survival, when compared to no further treatment.
      • In patients with no adjuvant therapy, salvage radiotherapy may be effective upon vaginal recurrence.
      • When considering adjuvant radiotherapy, the potential improvement in pelvic control needs to be weighed against the toxicity of radiotherapy.
      • Radiotherapy was associated with a low incidence of severe acute and late adverse effects; however, many patients experienced mild (grade 1 or 2) side effects. The long-term effects of radiotherapy are unknown at this time.
  • There is insufficient evidence to reliably inform the use of intracavitary radiotherapy either alone or in combination with external beam radiotherapy.
    • One randomized trial detected improvements in pelvic control with combined radiotherapy; however, that trial was published in 1980, toxicity was not well reported, and subsequent trials with similar comparisons have not been identified.
    • There were no randomized trials directly comparing external beam radiotherapy alone versus intracavitary treatment alone.
  • Complete surgical staging provides additional pathological information and may help guide treatment decisions involving adjuvant therapies.
  • With the potential for substantial grade changes upon pathology review, which may influence decisions regarding adjuvant radiotherapy, it may be important for each jurisdiction to establish a level of quality assurance with specific indications for pathology review. However, the extent to which quality assurance can be determined is outside of the scope of this report.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The recommendations are supported by randomized controlled trials and systemic reviews.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Lukka H, Chambers A, Fyles A, Thephamongkhol K, Elit L, Fung-Kee-Fung M, Kwon J, Oliver T, Gynecology Cancer Disease Site Group. Adjuvant radiotherapy in women with stage I endometrial cancer: a clinical practice guideline. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2006 Mar 9. 24 p. (Evidence-based series; no. 4-10). [21 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2006 Mar 9

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Program in Evidence-based Care - State/Local Government Agency [Non-U.S.]

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER COMMENT

The Program in Evidence-based Care (PEBC) is a Province of Ontario initiative sponsored by Cancer Care Ontario and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Cancer Care Ontario
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Provincial Gynecology Cancer Disease Site Group

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

No potential conflicts of interest were declared.

GUIDELINE STATUS

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on June 9, 2006. The information was verified by the guideline developer on June 26, 2006.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo