Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Chemotherapy for relapsed small cell lung cancer: a clinical practice guideline.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Cheng S, Evans WK, Stys-Norman D, Shepherd FA, Lung Cancer Disease Site Group. Chemotherapy for relapsed small cell lung cancer: a clinical practice guideline. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2006 Aug 2. 21 p. (Evidence-based series; no. 7-17). [13 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

  • The evidence for the clinical benefit of second-line chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is limited. The selection of patients for treatment with second-line therapy should be dependent on the treatment-free interval, the extent of response to first-line therapy, residual toxicity from first-line therapy, and the performance status of the patient.
  • There is insufficient evidence to recommend a specific chemotherapy regimen. However, in the opinion of the Lung Cancer Disease Site Group, patients who relapse three or more months following the completion of first-line chemotherapy may benefit from retreatment with the same regimen that induced their initial response. This would generally mean retreatment with etoposide-cisplatin. Alternative regimens may include cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine (CAV) or carboplatin and etoposide.
  • Oral topotecan is a possible alternative for patients who initially responded to chemotherapy and had a response duration of 45 days or longer.
  • There is insufficient evidence to determine whether one mode of administration of topotecan is superior to any other mode of administration. Oral administration is more convenient and may be a treatment option for patients not suitable for intravenous therapy. Oral administration is associated with a higher incidence of grade 3/4 diarrhea, whereas intravenous administration may result in a higher frequency of grade 3/4 neutropenia.
  • There is currently no standard second-line chemotherapy regimen for patients who fail to respond to or who relapse shortly after first-line therapy. Clinical trials are needed to determine the optimal treatment regimen.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The recommendations are supported by randomized trials.

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Cheng S, Evans WK, Stys-Norman D, Shepherd FA, Lung Cancer Disease Site Group. Chemotherapy for relapsed small cell lung cancer: a clinical practice guideline. Toronto (ON): Cancer Care Ontario (CCO); 2006 Aug 2. 21 p. (Evidence-based series; no. 7-17). [13 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2006 Aug 2

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Program in Evidence-based Care - State/Local Government Agency [Non-U.S.]

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER COMMENT

The Program in Evidence-based Care (PEBC) is a Province of Ontario initiative sponsored by Cancer Care Ontario and the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care.

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Cancer Care Ontario
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Provincial Lung Cancer Disease Site Group

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The members of the Lung Disease Site Group (DSG) declared that there were no potential conflicts of interest relating to the topic of this evidence-based series.

GUIDELINE STATUS

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on October 26, 2006. The information was verified by the guideline developer on November 24, 2006.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo