Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 14: brace therapy as an adjunct to or substitute for lumbar fusion.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

The grades of recommendations (standards, guidelines, and options) and classes of evidence (I–III) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Standards. There is insufficient evidence to recommend a treatment standard.

Guidelines. The short-term use of a rigid lumbar support (1 to 3 weeks) is recommended as a treatment for low-back pain of relatively short duration (<6 months). The use of a lumbar brace for patients with chronic low-back pain is not recommended because there is no pertinent medical evidence of any long-term benefit or evidence that brace therapy is effective in the treatment of patients with chronic (> 6 months) low-back pain.

Options. 1) Lumbar braces are recommended as a means of decreasing the number of sick days lost due to low-back pain among workers with a previous lumbar injury. They are not recommended as a means of decreasing low-back pain in the general working population. 2)The use of lumbar brace therapy as a preoperative diagnostic tool to predict outcome following lumbar fusion surgery is not recommended. 3) The use of transpedicular external fixation as a tool to predict outcome following lumbar fusion surgery is not recommended.

Summary

Although conflicting reports have been presented in the literature regarding the utility of lumbar braces for the prevention of low-back pain, most Class III medical evidence suggests that these supports used prophylactically do not reduce the incidence of low-back pain or decrease the amount of time lost from work in the general working population. Among workers with a history of a back injury, their use appears to decrease the number of work days lost due to back pain. Lumbar braces appear to be an effective treatment for acute low-back pain in some populations. They do not appear to be effective in the chronic low-back pain population. If a brace is used, rigid braces offer some benefit over soft braces.

There are no data to suggest that relief of low-back pain with preoperative external bracing predicts a favorable outcome following lumbar spinal fusion. No information is available on the benefit of bracing for improving fusion rates or clinical outcomes following instrumented lumbar fusion for degenerative disease.

Definitions:

Grades of Recommendation

Standards Recommendations of the strongest type, based on Class I evidence reflecting a high degree of clinical certainty

Guidelines Recommendations based on Class II evidence reflecting a moderate degree of clinical certainty

Options Recommendations based on Class III evidence reflecting unclear clinical certainty

Classes of Evidence

Class I Evidence from one or more well-designed, randomized controlled clinical trials, including overviews of such trials

Class II Evidence from one or more well-designed comparative clinical studies, such as nonrandomized cohort studies, case-control studies, and other comparable studies, including less well-designed randomized controlled trials

Class III Evidence from case series, comparative studies with historical controls, case reports, and expert opinion as well as significantly flawed randomized controlled trials

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see "Major Recommendations").

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2005 Jun

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

American Association of Neurological Surgeons - Medical Specialty Society
Congress of Neurological Surgeons - Professional Association

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

This project was funded entirely by a grant from AANS/CNS Section on Disorders of the Spine. No funding was received from any commercial entity to support the production or publication of these guidelines.

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Guidelines Committee of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS)

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Primary Authors: Daniel K. Resnick, MD; Tanvir F. Choudhri, MD; Andrew T. Dailey, MD; Michael W. Groff, MD; Larry Khoo, MD; Paul G. Matz, MD; Praveen Mummaneni, MD; William C. Watters III, MD; Jeffery Wang, MD; Beverly C. Walters, MD, MPH; Mark N. Hadley, MD

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

ENDORSER(S)

North American Spine Society - Medical Specialty Society

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the AANS/CNS Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves Web site.

Print copies: Available from Daniel K. Resnick, M.D., Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin Medical School, K4/834 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53792; Email: Resnick@neurosurg.wisc.edu.

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

The following are available:

Print copies: Available from Daniel K. Resnick, M.D., Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin Medical School, K4/834 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53792; Email: Resnick@neurosurg.wisc.edu.

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on January 8, 2007. The information was verified by the guideline developer on January 29, 2007.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo