Welcome to NGC. Skip directly to: Search Box, Navigation, Content.


Brief Summary

GUIDELINE TITLE

Decision making within the EMS system: dispatch, scene, transportation, and destination. In: Guidelines for the prehospital management of severe traumatic brain injury, second edition.

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Decision making within the EMS system: dispatch, scene, transportation, and destination. In: Badjatia N, Carney N, Crocco TJ, Fallat ME, Hennes HM, Jagoda AS, Jernigan S, Lerner EB, Letarte PB, Moriarty T, Pons PT, Sasser S, Scalea TM, Schleien C, Wright DW. Guidelines for prehospital management of traumatic brain injury. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Brain Trauma Foundation; 2007. p. 79-89. [27 references]

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Brain Trauma Foundation. Guidelines for prehospital management of traumatic brain injury. New York (NY): Brain Trauma Foundation; 2000. 81 p.

BRIEF SUMMARY CONTENT

 
RECOMMENDATIONS
 EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS
 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY
 DISCLAIMER

 Go to the Complete Summary

RECOMMENDATIONS

MAJOR RECOMMENDATIONS

Strength of recommendations (strong or weak) and quality of evidence (Class I-III) are defined at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

Strength of Recommendations: Weak

Quality of Evidence:  Low, from Class III studies, contradictory findings, and indirect evidence.

Adult

  1. All regions should have an organized trauma care system.
  2. Protocols are recommended to direct Emergency Medical Service (EMS) personnel regarding destination decisions for patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI).
  3. Patients with severe TBI should be transported directly to a facility with immediately available computed tomography (CT) scanning, prompt neurosurgical care, and the ability to monitor intracranial pressure (ICP) and treat intracranial hypertension.
  4. The mode of transport should be selected so as to minimize total prehospital time for the patient with TBI.

Pediatric

  1. In a metropolitan area, pediatric patients with severe TBI should be transported directly to a pediatric trauma center if available.
  2. Pediatric patients with severe TBI should be treated in a pediatric trauma center or in an adult trauma center with added qualifications to treat children in preference to a Level I or II adult trauma center without added qualifications for pediatric treatment.

Definitions:

Quality of Evidence

Class of Evidence Study Design Quality Criteria
I Good quality randomized controlled trial (RCT) Adequate random assignment method.

Allocation concealment.

Groups similar at baseline.

Outcome assessors blinded.

Adequate sample size.

Intention-to-treat analysis.

Follow-up rate >85%.

Differential loss to follow-up.

Maintenance of comparable groups.
II Moderate quality RCT Violation of one or more of the criteria for a good quality RCT.1
II Good quality cohort Blind or independent assessment in a prospective study, or use of reliable2 data in a retrospective study.

Comparison of two or more groups must be clearly distinguished.

Non-biased selection.

Follow-up rate >85%.

Adequate sample size.

Statistical analysis of potential confounders.3
II Good quality case-control Accurate ascertainment of cases.

Nonbiased selection of cases/controls with exclusion criteria applied equally to both.

Adequate response rate.

Appropriate attention to potential confounding variables.
III Poor quality RCT Major violations of the criteria for a good or moderate quality RCT.1
III Moderate or poor quality cohort Violation of one or more criteria for a good quality cohort.1
III Moderate or poor quality case-control Violation of one or more criteria for a good quality case-control.1
III Case Series, Databases or Registries Prospectively collected data that is purely observational, and retrospectively collected data.

1Assessor needs to make a judgment about whether one or more violations are sufficient to downgrade Class of study, based upon the topic, the seriousness of the violation(s), their potential impact on the results, and other aspects of the study. Two or three violations do not necessarily constitute a major flaw. The assessor needs to make a coherent argument why the violation(s) either do, or do not, warrant a downgrade.

2Reliable data are concrete data such as mortality or re-operation.

3Publication authors must provide a description of robust baseline characteristics, and control for those that are unequally distributed between treatment groups.

Strength of Recommendation

Strong recommendations are derived from high quality evidence that provide precise estimates of the benefits or downsides of the topic being assessed.

With weak recommendations, (1) there is lack of confidence that the benefits outweigh the downsides, (2) the benefits and downsides may be equal, and/or (3) there is uncertainty about the degree of benefits and downsides.

CLINICAL ALGORITHM(S)

None provided

EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

TYPE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

The type of supporting evidence is identified and graded for each recommendation (see the "Major Recommendations" field).

IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AND AVAILABILITY

BIBLIOGRAPHIC SOURCE(S)

  • Decision making within the EMS system: dispatch, scene, transportation, and destination. In: Badjatia N, Carney N, Crocco TJ, Fallat ME, Hennes HM, Jagoda AS, Jernigan S, Lerner EB, Letarte PB, Moriarty T, Pons PT, Sasser S, Scalea TM, Schleien C, Wright DW. Guidelines for prehospital management of traumatic brain injury. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Brain Trauma Foundation; 2007. p. 79-89. [27 references]

ADAPTATION

Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.

DATE RELEASED

2000 (revised 2007)

GUIDELINE DEVELOPER(S)

Brain Trauma Foundation - Disease Specific Society
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration - Federal Government Agency [U.S.]

SOURCE(S) OF FUNDING

Brain Trauma Foundation

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

GUIDELINE COMMITTEE

Not stated

COMPOSITION OF GROUP THAT AUTHORED THE GUIDELINE

Authors: Neeraj Badjatia, MD; Nancy Carney, PhD; Todd J. Crocco, MD; Mary Elizabeth Fallat, MD, FACS; Halim M. A. Hennes, MD, FAAP; Andy S. Jagoda, MD, FACEP; Sarah Jernigan, MD; E. Brooke Lerner, PhD; Peter B. Letarte, MD, FACS; Thomas Moriarty, MD; Peter T. Pons, MD, FACEP; Scott Sasser, MD; Thomas M. Scalea, MD, FACS; Charles Schleien, MD; David W. Wright, MD

Participants: John E. Campbell, MD, FACEP; Pamela Drexel, Brain Trauma Foundation; Jamshid Ghajar, MD, PhD; Lauren Post, MD; Andrew W. Stern, NREMT-P, MPA, MA

Review Committee: P. David Adelson, MD, FACS, FAAP; Arthur Cooper, MD, FACS; Thomas J. Esposito, MD, MPH, FACS; John William Jermyn, DO, FACEP; Tom Judge, CCT-P; Carsten Kock-Jensen, MD, Chair, Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee; Jon R. Krohmer, MD, FACEP; Anthony Marmarou, PhD; Lawrence Marshall, MD; Stephan Mayer, MD; Connie A. Meyer, MICT; Robert E. O'Connor, MD, MPH, FACEP; Jeffrey P. Salomone, MD, FACS; Snorre Sollid, MD, Scandinavian Neurotrauma Committee; Andreas Unterberg, MD; Alex B. Valadka, MD, FACS; Walter Videtta, MD; Robert K. Waddell II, NAEMT; Beverly Walters, MD, FACS

Education Subcommittee: Cathy Case, EMT-P; Debra Cason, RN; John Gosford; Joseph A. Grafft; Jon R. Krohmer, MD

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES/CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Not stated

GUIDELINE STATUS

This is the current release of the guideline.

This guideline updates a previous version: Brain Trauma Foundation. Guidelines for prehospital management of traumatic brain injury. New York (NY): Brain Trauma Foundation; 2000. 81 p.

GUIDELINE AVAILABILITY

Electronic copies: Available in Portable Document Format (PDF) from the Brain Trauma Foundation Web site.

Print copies: Available from the Brain Trauma Foundation, 708 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017

AVAILABILITY OF COMPANION DOCUMENTS

None available

PATIENT RESOURCES

None available

NGC STATUS

This NGC summary was completed by ECRI Institute on June 4, 2008.

COPYRIGHT STATEMENT

This is a limited license granted to NGC, AHRQ and its agent only. It may not be assigned, sold, or otherwise transferred. BTF owns the copyright. For any other permission regarding the use of these guidelines, please contact the Brain Trauma Foundation.

DISCLAIMER

NGC DISCLAIMER

The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.

All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.

Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria which may be found at http://www.guideline.gov/about/inclusion.aspx .

NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.

Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.


 

 

   
DHHS Logo