[Deschler's Precedents]
[From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access]
[DOCID:52093pl_txt-6]
[Page ix-x]
PREFACE
Need for Publication
The publication of the precedents of the House has tended not only
to expedite the routine business of the House, but has also affected
its conception of parliamentary equity and, indirectly, its prestige as
a branch of government. Among other advantages to be derived from the
publication of the House precedents, the saving of time alone will be
invaluable. I can remember instances in which as much as a half hour or
more was spent in debate on a question of House procedure. Clarence
Cannon estimated that prior to the publication of the precedents in
1907, a third of the time of the House was consumed in discussions of
purely procedural matters. Most such questions had come up in prior
sessions and had been authoritatively decided. But in the absence of
the precedents in published form, former decisions were forgotten, and
the same questions were again lengthily debated. The publication of the
precedents has thus not only reduced the number of points of order that
are presented, but also avoids unwarranted and time-consuming
excursions on purely procedural questions.(21)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
21. 6 Cannon's Precedents at p. v.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A more significant benefit to flow from the publication of these
volumes is that they provide Members with the tools to
[[Page x]]
become more effective legislators. The axiom that knowledge is power
applies with special pertinence to the awareness of Members of the
parliamentary procedures needed to expedite House business. In the
past, the older and more experienced Members have held an obvious
advantage over the younger Members who had not yet mastered the
necessary parliamentary skills. The publication and distribution
of the precedents makes the knowledge of parliamentary techniques
accessible to all Members.(22)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
22. Asher Hinds, in his introduction to his work on the precedents
of the House, commented on the desirability that the knowledge
of the precedents extend to all Members: ``In the House of
Representatives, as in other legislative bodies, the memories
of the older Members, as they might be corroborated by the
journals, had been the favorite and most readily accessible
repository of the precedents. . . . It is manifestly desirable,
on the floor where high interests and great passions strive
daily, that the rules of action should be known definitely, not
only by the older Members, but by all. Not only will the
Speaker be enabled to make his decisions with more confidence
and less fear that he may be swayed by the interests of the
moment, but the Members, understanding the rules of his action,
will sustain with commendation what they might have criticized
with asperity.'' 1 Hinds' Precedents at p.iii.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Asher Hinds considered it a national necessity that the powers and
privileges of the House and its Members be preserved, and believed that
there was no surer way to that end than perfect information on the part
of every Member of the House as to the extent of those powers and
privileges. He believed that the precedents should be published and
classified in such a way that they would always be clearly before the
membership. If the prerogatives of the House were well understood, he
wrote, other branches of government would be less likely to encroach on
them; and if there was encroachment, it would be more likely to be met
with promptness, intelligence, and firmness.(23)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
23. 1 Hinds' Precedents at p. iv.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------