| Patents > Search Colections > MPEP > 2267 Handling of Inappropriate or Untimely Filed Papers [R-5] - 2200 Citation of Prior Art and Ex Parte Reexamination of Patents |
|
|
|
Go to MPEP - Table of Contents
2267 Handling of Inappropriate or Untimely Filed Papers [R-5] - 2200 Citation of Prior Art and Ex Parte Reexamination of Patents
2267 Handling of Inappropriate or Untimely Filed Papers [R-5]
The applicable regulations ( 37 CFR 1.501(a), 1.550(e)) provide that certain types of correspondence will not be considered or acknowledged unless timely received. Whenever reexamination correspondence is received, a decision is required of the Office as to the action to be taken on the correspondence based on what type of paper it is and whether it is timely.
The return of inappropriate submissions complies with the regulations that certain papers will not be considered and also reduces the amount of paper which would ultimately have to be scanned into the record.
I. DISPOSITION OF PAPERS
Where papers are filed during reexamination proceedings which are inappropriate because of some defect, such papers will either be returned to the sender or forwarded to one of three files, the "Reexamination File" (paper file or IFW file history), the "Patent File" (paper file or IFW file history), or the "Storage File" (paper file). Any papers returned to the sender from >the Central Reexamination Unit (CRU) or< a Technology Center (TC) must be accompanied by a letter indicating signature and approval of the >CRU or< TC Director.
The "Storage Files" will be maintained separate and apart from the other two files at a location selected by the >CRU or< TC Director. For example, the >CRU or< TC Director may want to locate the "Storage File" in a central area in the >CRU or< TC as with the reexamination clerk or in his or her room.
II. TYPES OF PAPERS RETURNED WITH DIRECTOR OF THE USPTO OR >CRU/<TC DIRECTOR'S APPROVAL REQUIRED
Filed by Owner A. Premature Response by Owner- § 1.530 (a), § 1.540 Where the patent owner is NOT the requester, any response or amendment filed by owner prior to an order to reexamine is premature and will be returned and will not be considered. § 1.550 (g) B. Paper Submitted on Behalf of Third Party - Submission filed on behalf of a third party will be returned and will not be considered. Where third party paper is submitted as part of a patent owner response, see MPEP § 2254 and § 2266 .
Filed by Requester A. No Statement Filed by Owner - § 1.535 If a patent owner fails to file a statement within the prescribed limit, any reply by the requester is inappropriate and will be returned and will not be considered. B. Late Response by Requester - § 1.535 , § 1.540 Any response subsequent to 2 months from the date of service of the patent owner's statement will be returned and will not be considered. C. Additional Response by Requester- § 1.550 (g) The active participation of the reexamination requester ends with the reply pursuant to § 1.535 . Any further submission on behalf of requester will be returned and will not be considered.
Filed by Third Party § 1.501 , § 1.565 (a) Unless a paper submitted by a third party raises only issues appropriate under 37 CFR 1.501 , or consists solely of a prior decision on the patent by another forum, e.g., a court (see MPEP § 2207 and § 2286 or presentation of a paper of record in a litigation (see MPEP § 2282 )), it will be returned to an identified third party or destroyed if the submitter is unidentified.
Where a paper is to be returned based on the above criteria, or other appropriate reasons, and the paper is not accompanied by a petition under 37 CFR 1.182 or 1.183, the >CRU or< TC Director will return the paper. Where a petition under 37 CFR 1.182 or 1.183 has been filed, the reexamination proceeding should be forwarded to the Office of Patent Legal Administration for decision.
III. TYPES OF DEFECTIVE PAPERS TO BE LOCATED IN THE "REEXAMINATION FILE"
Filed by Owner A. Unsigned Papers - § 1.33 Papers filed by owner which are unsigned or signed by less than all of the owners (no attorney of record or acting in representative capacity). B. No Proof of Service - § 1.248 Papers filed by the patent owner in which no proof of service on requester is included and proof of service is required may be denied consideration. C. Untimely Papers - § 1.530 (b), § 1.540 Where owner has filed a paper which is untimely, that is, it was filed after the period set for response, the paper will not be considered.
Filed by Requester A. Unsigned Papers - Papers filed by requester which are unsigned will not be considered. B. No Proof of Service - § 1.510 (b)(5)§ 1.33 , § 1.248 Papers filed by requester in which no proof of service on owner is included and where proof of service is required may be denied consideration. IV. PAPERS LOCATED IN THE "STORAGE FILE"
§ 1.501 Citations by Third Parties § 1.550 (h) Submissions by third parties based solely on prior art patents or publications filed after the date of the order to reexamine are not entered into the patent file but delayed until the reexamination proceedings have been concluded. See MPEP § 2206 . Proper timely filed citations by third parties (i.e., filed prior to the order) are placed in the reexamination file.
The Inventors Assistance Center is available to help you on patent matters.Send questions about USPTO programs and services to the USPTO Contact Center (UCC). You can suggest USPTO webpages or material you would like featured on this section by E-mail to the webmaster@uspto.gov. While we cannot promise to accommodate all requests, your suggestions will be considered and may lead to other improvements on the website. |
|
|
Go to MPEP - Table of Contents
=online
business system 
=fees 
=forms
=help 
=laws/regulations 
=definition
(glossary)