| Patents > Search Colections > MPEP > 2248 Petition From Denial of Request [R-5] - 2200 Citation of Prior Art and Ex Parte Reexamination of Patents |
|
|
|
Go to MPEP - Table of Contents
2248 Petition From Denial of Request [R-5] - 2200 Citation of Prior Art and Ex Parte Reexamination of Patents
2248 Petition From Denial of Request [R-5]
37 CFR 1.515 Determination of the request for ex parte reexamination.
*****
(c) The requester may seek review by a petition to the Director under § 1.181 within one month of the mailing date of the examiner's determination refusing ex parte reexamination. Any such petition must comply with § 1.181(b). If no petition is timely filed or if the decision on petition affirms that no substantial new question of patentability has been raised, the determination shall be final and nonappealable.
PROCESSING OF PETITION UNDER 37 CFR 1.515(c)
After a request for reexamination has been denied, jurisdiction over the reexamination proceeding is retained by the **>Central Reexamination Unit (CRU)<, to await the possibility of a petition seeking review of the examiner's determination refusing reexamination. If a petition seeking review of the examiner's determination refusing reexamination is not filed within one (1) month of the examiner's determination, the *>CRU< will then process the reexamination file as a concluded reexamination file. See MPEP § 2247 and § 2294.
If a petition seeking review of the examiner's determination refusing reexamination is filed, it is forwarded (together with the reexamination file) to the Office of the *>CRU< Director for decision. Where a petition is filed, the *>CRU< Director will review the examiner's determination that a substantial new question of patentability has not been raised. The *>CRU< Director's review will be de novo. Each decision by the *>CRU< Director will conclude with the paragraph:
This decision is final and nonappealable. >See 35 U.S.C. 303(c) and< 37 CFR 1.515(c). No further communication on this matter will be acknowledged or considered.
If the petition is granted, the decision of the *>CRU< Director should include a sentence setting a 2-month period for filing a statement under 37 CFR 1.530; the reexamination file will then be returned to the **>Special Program Examiner (SPRE)< of the art unit that will handle the reexamination for consideration of reassignment to another examiner.
Reassignment will be the general rule. Only in exceptional circumstances where no other examiner is available and capable to give a proper examination, will the case remain with the examiner who denied the request. **
Under normal circumstances, the reexamination proceeding will not be reassigned to a * primary examiner or assistant examiner who was involved in any part of the examination of the patent for which reexamination is requested. Only where unusual circumstances are found to exist may the *>CRU< Director make an exception to this practice and reassign the reexamination proceeding to an examiner involved with the examination of the patent. For example, if the original examiner of the patent and the examiner who issued the denial are the only examiners with adequate knowledge of the relevant technology, the *>CRU< Director may permit reassignment of the reexamination proceeding to the examiner that originally examined the patent.
The requester may seek review of a denial of a request for reexamination only by petitioning the Director of the USPTO under 37 CFR 1.515(c) and 1.181 within 1 month of the mailing date of the decision denying the request for reexamination. Additionally, any request for an extension of the time period to file such a petition from the denial of a request for reexamination can only be entertained by filing a petition under 37 CFR 1.183 with appropriate fee to waive the time provisions of 37 CFR 1.515(c).
After the time for petition has expired without a petition having been filed, or a petition has been filed and the decision thereon affirms the denial of the request, a partial refund of the filing fee for requesting reexamination will be made to the requester. ( 35 U.S.C. 303(c) and 37 CFR 1.26(c)). A decision on a petition under 37 CFR 1.515(c) is final and is not appealable.
37 CFR 1.515(c) applies only where reexamination is denied; it does not apply to a grant of reexamination where either the patent owner or the requester is not satisfied with one or more findings made in a decision granting reexamination. Except for the limited exception described in MPEP § 2246, no petition may be filed requesting review of a decision granting a request for reexamination, even if the decision grants the request >as to a specific claim< for reasons other than those advanced by the requester**. No right to review exists **>as to that claim, because it< will be reexamined in view of all prior art during the reexamination under 37 CFR 1.550.
The Inventors Assistance Center is available to help you on patent matters.Send questions about USPTO programs and services to the USPTO Contact Center (UCC). You can suggest USPTO webpages or material you would like featured on this section by E-mail to the webmaster@uspto.gov. While we cannot promise to accommodate all requests, your suggestions will be considered and may lead to other improvements on the website. |
|
|
Go to MPEP - Table of Contents
=online
business system 
=fees 
=forms
=help 
=laws/regulations 
=definition
(glossary)