News Releases
GSA Design Awards 2002 Honor Excellence;Reflect Diversity in Public Architecture, DesignGSA #9999 February, 11, 2003
Among the winners are a: "As you can see in this year's design-award winners, GSA is helping to shape what we believe future generations will see as an enduring gift to the nation, a treasured legacy of federal architecture�100-year, iconic buildings representing the best of design, and emblematic of our national spirit," said F. Joseph Moravec, Commissioner of GSA's Public Buildings Service. A ceremony celebrating the awards and honoring those involved in the projects will be held in Washington on March 27, the day the winning projects go on display at the National Building Museum in Washington. Of Our Time: 2002 GSA Design Awards will continue through October 19. The biennial GSA Design Awards program was re-instituted in 1990. In this cycle, entries were judged in 17 categories: Architecture; Architecture on the Boards; Art in Architecture and Art Conservation; Child Care Centers; Construction Excellence; Craft; Engineering, Technology and/or Energy Conservation; First Impressions; Graphic Design; Historic Preservation, Restoration, and/or Renovation, Interior Design, Landscape Architecture, Lease Construction, Security and Openness; Sustainability, Urban Planning, and Workplace Environment. "The extraordinary range of project attitudes and approaches impressed the jury," said Boston architect Moshe Safdie, chairman of the jury that chose the winners. "This was important because it demonstrated that GSA's Design Excellence Program is a process that attracts and embraces an exciting range of philosophies and viewpoints and avoids preconceived design ideas or a formula approach. This diversity led to lively discussions concerning public architecture and design and their impacts on society. Overall, we tended to honor buildings that effectively addressed urban design challenges and maintained a strong sense of openness. We also admired projects that were environmentally responsible." In addition to Safdie, the other jurors were: Gerald Anderson, Fort Gaines, Ga.; Deborah Berke, New York City; Richard Brayton, San Francisco; Susan Child, Boston; Wendy Feuer, New York City; Tracy Hart, St. Louis, Mo.; Ralph Johnson, New York City; Ethel Kessler, Bethesda, Md.; Raymond Messer, Houston; Elizabeth Moule, Pasadena, Calif.; Mary Oehrlein, Washington, D.C.; William Stanley, Atlanta, Ga., and Joe Valerio, Chicago. The review of 105 entries yielded these awards: Architecture Citation Jury Comment: Simple and dignified, yet dynamic, this building pleasantly infuses natural daylight into offices, labs and public spaces alike.
Citation Jury Comment: The combination of wood siding and corrugated metal gives the structure a regional mood and modern legibility.
Citation Jury Comment: A highly rational plan with fluid, sculptural massing. This combination of order and artistry is an appropriate new symbol for the courts.
Citation Jury Comment: This project takes landscape design as seriously as architecture. The workplace maximizes light and views to create a pleasurable place to spend the day.
Citation Jury Comment: The border between the United States and Mexico is made visible in the steel cladding and linear form of this building. Generous use of glass symbolizes our country's open society.
Citation Jury Comment: Technology and nature are juxtaposed to create a powerful presence while providing a good workplace environment within.
Citation Jury Comment: A team of experts came up with innovative solutions to the complex problems of rescuing these plaster models.
Citation Jury Comment: Structural upgrading and architectural cladding preserve a landmark while creating a modern, attractive, and energy-efficient building.
Honor Award Jury Comment: Well organized and beautifully detailed, the space is a handsome home for a Federal agency that sponsors world-class architecture throughout the country. The material palette, while understated, exudes richness.
Citation Jury Comment: Glass panels combining patriotic imagery and memorable quotations make the courthouse more welcoming and better connected to its public purpose. It is easy to imagine a visitor being inspired by this space.
Citation Jury Comment: This design shows that a small project can make a big impact when handled creatively. It supports the GSA's efforts to both enhance the workplace and give something back to the larger community.
Honor Award Jury Comment: This stunning series exemplifies graphic design at its best. The format, typography, and photography let the architecture come to the forefront. Guidelines provide an excellent direction for perpetuating this series.
Citation Jury Comment: The classical format and scale of these posters commands attention. High-quality printing and stunning photography make each design a gem. Jacob Weinberger U. S. Courthouse Booklet Citation Jury Comment: This charming keepsake successfully tells the story of the building's history and preservation. The designer honors the past with a high-quality piece for the building's future. Sandra Day O'Connor U. S. Courthouse Tenant Guide Citation Jury Comment: Large, complex buildings often need to be explained to their users�what to do in an emergency, where to find the bicycle storage. The graphic design of this tenant guide achieves the same precision and rigor found in the architecture of the courthouse.
Citation Jury Comment: Even before the emergence of government-sanctioned standards for sustainable design, this project incorporated a wide range of environmentally sensitive features. The campus is a prototype that has influenced state and national guidelines for "green" design.
Honor Award Jury Comment: Strong use of color, materials, and lighting exude richness and warmth appropriate to a restaurant. The design points the way to new uses for Federal landmarks and urban infill sites. Historic Preservation, Restoration, Renovation Honor Award Jury Comment: This exceptional restoration maintains the maximum amount of historic fabric while integrating current security and programmatic requirements. The project has been a catalyst for the preservation of other historic buildings in Old San Juan.
Citation Jury Comment: A sensitive adaptation of an historic building for modern use. The restoration and renovation of this U.S. Courthouse is a model for recycling Federal property in city centers.
Citation Jury Comment: The success of this project�to complete an unfinished fa�ade�is that it's invisible. The new design appears to be an integral part of the original 1930s construction.
Citation Jury Comment: New elements successfully combine contemporary architecture with the character of the original building. The use of glass throughout the addition is superb.
Honor Award Jury Comment: Innovative cost-saving ideas make this complicated project a model of value engineering. The contractor did an amazing job of pre-planning the construction to minimize disturbance to tenants.
Honor Award Jury Comment: A strong partnering and value engineering process allowed for change orders while keeping the project on schedule and under budget. Well-coordinated phasing allowed for tenant occupancy during construction.
Honor Award Jury Comment: Completed early and under budget, this courthouse shows how cost-effective construction can be. Exemplary workmanship, user satisfaction, and neighbor-friendly design elements contribute to its success.
Last Reviewed 6/24/2005
|