spacer
  Home | About CDC | Press Room | Funding | A-Z Index | Centers, Institute & Offices | Training & Employment | Contact Us
spacer
spacer CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Home Page spacer
CDC en Español
spacer
 
spacer
Health & Safety TopicsPublications & ProductsData & StatisticsConferences & Events
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
  DLS Content
space
arrow DLS Home
space
arrow Best Practices
space
arrow CLIA
space
arrow Genetics
space
arrow Institutes
space
arrow International
space
arrow MASTER
space
arrow Monitoring
space
arrow MPEP
space
arrow NLTN
space
arrow Publications
space
arrow Quality Conferences
space
arrow Training
space

  Other DLS Resources
space
arrow Resource Links
space
spacer spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
Multi-level Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Resources (MASTER)
spacer
spacer
MASTER Home
 
  Questions & Answers:  December  2001
Pasteurella multocida susceptibility testing Questions and Answers
How would susceptibility testing be performed on an isolate of Pasteurella multocida obtained from a brain abscess?

Answer:

Infections caused by Pasteurella multocida are usually treated empirically with penicillin, ampicillin, or amoxicillin. Because rare isolates from humans produce beta-lactamase, susceptibility testing using an MIC method, such as broth microdilution, could be helpful in identifying resistant strains. Since NCCLS has not defined a method for testing or reporting results for P. multocida, only MIC results without interpretation should be reported. It is not clear which, if any, of the current interpretive criteria for ampicillin or penicillin would be suitable for identifying emerging resistance to penicillin in P. multocida. According to recent data, the MIC90 for penicillin for P. multocida is 0.25 µg/ml (meaning 90% of isolates encountered would have penicillin MICs at or below 0.25 µg/ml). Based on interpretive criteria for staphylococci, pneumococci, or enterococci, a result of 0.25 µg/ml would indicate a resistant, intermediate, or susceptible result, respectively. Thus, MIC results alone, perhaps with a recommendation for an Infectious Disease consult, are best. Secondary agents that might be prescribed include fluoroquinolones, extended-spectrum cephalosporins, or chloramphenicol.

The following articles provide additional information:

  1. Goldstein, E. J., D. M. Citron, C. V. Merriam, Y. Warren, and K. Tyrrell. 2000. Comparative in vitro activities of ABT-773 against aerobic and anaerobic pathogens isolated from skin and soft-tissue animal and human bite wound infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 44:2525-9.
     
  2. Naas, T., F. Benaoudia, L. Lebrun, and P. Nordmann. 2001. Molecular identification of TEM-1 beta-lactamase in a Pasteurella multocida isolate of human origin. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 20:210-3.
     
  3. Gilbert, D.N., R.C. Moellering, and M.A. Sande (eds). 2001. The Sanford Guide to Antimicrobial Therapy, 2001. 31st ed. Antimicrobial Therapy, Inc., Hyde Park, VT.

This page last reviewed: 7/12/2004
spacer
spacer
spacer
spacer
  Home | Policies and Regulations | Disclaimer | e-Government | FOIA | Contact Us
spacer
spacer
spacer Safer, Healthier People
spacer
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333, U.S.A
Tel: (404) 639-3311 / Public Inquiries: (404) 639-3534 / (800) 311-3435
spacer FirstGovDHHS Department of Health
and Human Services