Northeast Groundfish

The fishery management plan governing the groundfishery in federal waters off the northeastern United States is developed through the New England Fishery Management Council in cooperation with NOAA's National Marine Fisheries Service. The plan measures are implemented by the NMFS Northeast Regional Office. The NMFS Northeast Fisheries Science Center conducts substantial research and analyses important for evaluating groundfish stock and fishery conditions. Refer to this page for newly available NMFS scientific, technical, and other information related to this important species complex.

Groundfish Science & Stock Status Trawl Survey Performance

Management

Press Releases/Media Advisories
SAW/SARC  
Groundfish Science & Stock Status: Reports and Peer Reviews

Reports

2005

2004

2003

2002


Amendment 13 Groundfish Science Review
February 2003

Development of Amendment 13 required substantial updates and revisions to methods for estimating population status and dynamics, and to our understanding of the statutory requirements for stock rebuilding and ending overfishing. During the development of this information, the NEFSC also discovered that the research trawl gear used aboard the NOAA R/V Albatross IV was not properly rigged over several survey cruises. This raised questions about whether data from these surveys could to be incorporated into the overall assessment or the plan. The Center conducted a series of assessment methods updates, benchmark stock assessments, and an analysis of the utility of survey data collected with the improperly rigged trawl gear. Then, an external peer review panel was convened to evaluate the results.

Documentation of what was reviewed and the reviewer reports are posted below.


Review of Amendment 13 A13 DEIS Economic and Socioeconomic Sections
January 2004

When the draft EIS (DEIS) for Amendment 13 to the Northeast Multispecies Fishery Management Plan (the groundfish plan) was made available, there were many questions about its conclusions regarding short-run and long-run effects of contemplated actions both overall, and on various fishing communities.

NOAA Fisheries Service agreed with those who called for additional steps to ensure that these analyses are adequate and robust. Thus, an additional peer review of these sections in the draft document has been arranged. For more on this, see William Hogarth's testimony to the Senate Subcommittee on Oceans, Fisheries, and Coast Guard (October 22, 2003), particularly the section entitled "Economic Impacts of the Amendment 13 Options." (See "Other Relevant Documents," below.)

To complete the external review as quickly and thoroughly as possible, NOAA Fisheries Service developed terms of reference and a list of qualified professionals who were not involved in development or evaluation of the Amendment, and selected three independent reviewers who will finished their work in January 2004.

Documentation of what was reviewed and the reviewer reports are posted below.

Trawl Survey Performance

Trawl Survey Design for the R/V Bigelow

Resolving issues related to improper rigging of trawl gear during 2000-2002, affecting eight resource surveys

NEFSC Activities
Analyses of effects Sections 3, 4, and appendices
Summary of Peer Review of conclusions

Management
Press Releases/Media Advisories

Science and Stock Status

Trawl Survey Performance

Management

 

www.nefsc.noaa.gov
Search
Link Disclaimer
webMASTER
Privacy Policy
(Modified Aug. 27 2007)