Environment + Technology
Type Size  -  +
September 12, 2008, 8:00 am

Paint it white: Cool roofs save cash and carbon

Green Wombat often highlights high tech when it comes to tackling global warming and energy independence. But a new study from the University of California’s Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory shows that simply installing white roofs on homes and commercial buildings - to reflect the sun’s rays rather than absorb them - can reduce air-conditioning costs by 20% and could save $1 billion a year in energy outlays in the United States.

Switch to cool sidewalks and roads and the savings rise to $2 billion annually, according to the study by scientists Hashem Akbari and Surabi Menon and California Energy Commissioner Art Rosenfeld to be published in the journal Climate Change.

The scientists calculated that a global white roofs and roads effort would offset 44 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions, or more than a year’s worth of carbon, and help stablize future C02 emission increases.

“The 44 Gt CO2-equivalent offset potential for cool roofs and cool pavements would counteract
the effect of the growth in CO2-equivalent emission rates for 11 years,” according to the authors.

Such emission reductions, of course, can be securitized into tradable carbon credits, which the study estimates would be worth $1.1 trillion. Regulated carbon market exist in places like Europe but securities based on cool roofs have not yet been created.

A global cool roofs agreement could avoid the pitfalls of Kyoto-style accords, the scientists note.  “Installing cool roofs and cool pavements in cities worldwide does not need delicate negotiations between nations in terms of curbing each country’s CO2 emission rates.”

It’s one of those low-tech, commonsense solutions to both energy use and global warming - one used for thousands of years in the regions like the Mediterranean; those picturesque villages overlooking the sea are white-washed for a reason.

In California, commercial buildings with flat roofs have been required to cool it since 2005. But one of the biggest hurdles in the U.S. to doing the white thing may be homeowner associations that dictate everything from the color of your mailbox to where you place your rubbish bin. The vast majority of homes in California either have standard black shingle roofs or Spanish-style red tiles. A proposal to paint those roofs white will likely incite architectural outrage.

But there’s another, albeit much more expensive solution, to hot roofs: Cover them with solar panels.

photo: California Energy Commission

Many commercial property roofs are already close to being white, and have been so for 50 years or more. They frequently use lightly-colored gravel over tar, or asphalt shingles with embedded gravel. Thet defunitely are not black. Check out some google earth views of your nearby metro area.

The best thing is to deploy solar panels on the rooftops of 1-2 story buildings (where the rooftop absorbs most heat), and use low-e windows (mirror-like) on tall buildings (where the rooftop area is a small fraction of the building’s total surface area)

Posted By Greg Ebert, Portland OR : September 16, 2008 3:38 pm

Dan in Cincinatti–Patrick is right. White is the absense of color in pigments. You combine blue, red and yellow paint and you get black. In light white is all the colors combined.

Posted By Daniel, Beth;ehem, Pa : September 16, 2008 3:28 pm

Seems to be Dan is pretty sharp… there are apparently some folks who forgot 7th grade science class ’round here.
Switch to cool sidewalks and roads and the savings rise to $2 billion annually - Right out of the story… seems like someone is advocating it by tossing in a large, but unmeasured, dollar amount to it.

Posted By MacManus, Prior Lake, MN : September 16, 2008 2:49 pm

Patrick in Cincinnati: Your right. I’m not a scientist. I’m an engineer. It surely, though, sounds like you’re neither. To answer your question, no I don’t go blind when I see white cars. The fact that they are a multi-surfaced object helps to diffuse the sunlight. Obviously, you’ve never been on a white membrane roof in California or Florida. I have. The surface is FLAT. Do you know what that means? The surface reflects light very well. Ever walk outside into a field of fresh snow on a sunny day. I bet you squinted at the very least.

“White is the absence of color”??? Again showing you are not a scientist nor engineer. White is actually comprised of every wavelength of light in the visible spectrum. Black is the absence of color. Out of all the actual colors, by definition (since white is all colors combined) white is the best reflector (mirrors, of course, aren’t colors, they just reflect light with near 100% efficiency.

Anyway, Patrick, I was just indicating that if we painted our roads white, like the scientists in the story advocate, the roads would be awfully bright on the days designed to reflect heat. Pay attention.

Posted By Dan, Indianapolis, IN : September 16, 2008 1:04 pm

TVW in Columbus: Apparently you didn’t read the above article. They mention “The scientists calculated that a global white roofs and roads”. One can infer from what they said that they mean they want white roads (whiter than concrete?). I’m just responding to the story as written.

Posted By Dan, Indianapolis, IN : September 16, 2008 12:55 pm

What is needed is a push, prod or shove, to the building industry to adapt ‘earth friendly’ building practices.

Perhaps a Government sponsored green building organization could consult with all builders on new practices to incorporate.

The planet can’t wait for the builders and paying public to adapt on their own. ANd with the downturn in the housing industry, what better time to implement.

Posted By John - Fairfax, VA : September 16, 2008 12:30 pm

what about some inches of soil and grass on the roof to keep the heat out in summer and inside in wintertimes?

Posted By x,r,ok : September 16, 2008 12:20 pm

“Where’s the environmental advantage in having car wrecks littering the highways because no one can see?

Dan apparently your not one of the brilliant scientists. Do you go blind when you see white cars? Probably not… actually chrome/silver reflects more (hence mirrors). White is the absence of color… and just doesn’t absorb the kind of heat other colors do… but its not the strongest reflector either.

Posted By Patrick, Cincinnati oh : September 16, 2008 11:48 am

Dan in Indiana: I don’t see the correlation between a white roof and a car wreck. No one advocated that we paint asphalt white. What’s the sense in that? Why not just switch to concrete roads? Besides the benefit in reflecting heat, the durability is greater than asphalt. Get out of your flying car and come back down to earth.

Posted By TVW, C-bus, OH : September 16, 2008 11:35 am

What about the additional heating costs in the winter????

Posted By Rob, fairfax, va : September 16, 2008 10:45 am

Carbon credits are a joke. White roof or green (as in plant) in the south. Either black or green (as in plant) for the north. Plant covers are most ideal with many benefits known and more not recognized by MOST. HOA rules should be overridden for the sake of the enviroment. Don’t you people ever get it? You slow ss sheep need a swift kick in the ss. Again.

Posted By Obvious Robert, Chas, SC : September 16, 2008 10:22 am

I see a red door and I want it painted black No colors anymore I want them to turn black …

Posted By Galileo Galilei University of Padua.Padua ILLINOIS : September 16, 2008 8:05 am

Have any of these “brilliant” scientists who said we should have white roofs and ASPHALT been on a white roof on a sunny day? You can barely see with sunglasses ON. Where’s the environmental advantage in having car wrecks littering the highways because no one can see?

Posted By Dan, Indianapolis, IN : September 16, 2008 7:44 am

Many houses in Portugal especially in the south along the coast already have white roofs - most probably for a few hundred years. Pavements are also made from white cobbled stones (with black patterns). I believe Greece also has white roofs. I think it is time the US catches up to the rest of the world. Portugal already had the largest solar power plant, tidal power and one of the fastest growing wind farms (they own Horizon in the US). The US definitely needs to invest more in alternative fuels…not waste money in wars in oil rich countries.

Posted By Portugal : September 16, 2008 5:41 am

i has not a idea but with making that in summer white and in winter with dark solar cell would even be more energy saving and too energy and to gicve a state support about that too would be good
f.

Posted By frank bremen germany : September 16, 2008 2:42 am

Owens corning makes a composite shingle in Shasta White which I have on my outbuilding and Aspen Gray, which is white and gray shades, which I have on my house.

Posted By Sue, Seattle, WA : September 15, 2008 4:41 pm

Larry: “Wouldn’t this make you use more energy in the winter to heat your home?”
Heat loss through the roof is generally insignificant. It’s the windows that get you.

Posted By Luke Somers, Philadelphia, PA : September 15, 2008 4:02 pm

Wouldn’t this make you use more energy in the winter to heat your home? There are always trade offs.

Posted By Larry, Philadelphia PA : September 15, 2008 3:38 pm

in response to billy, white roofing products are already and have been available for a long time. They are just not popular especially for homes. White rubber membrane roofing for flat top roofs can be bought now. White rubberized paint can be applied to black roof as well. White Composite shingles are available at Home Depot and Lowes and any other Hardware store. If they don’t carry it you just have to ask. It’s easier to find in the south. So basically it won’t cost any more energy than is currently used. Consumers just need to make the choice to use the white materials. I don’t know why this is big news to anyone. White reflects light and keeps things cool. Black absorbs heat and makes things hot. I think I learned that in elementary school.

Posted By Scott - Boston. : September 15, 2008 1:48 pm

In response to Billy from Charlotte, NC, since the roofs are white they will reflect back the suns ray in the form of short wave radiation which does not contribute to global warming. It is the absorbed heat that is radiated as long wave radiation that excites CO2 and other gases in the atmosphere which causes global warming. These roofs simply mimic snow caps and glaciers which reflect the suns light, the loss of which is causing a self feeding cycle in global warming.

Posted By Ben Lafayette, IN : September 15, 2008 1:40 pm

About 6 months ago I painted my shingled roof with a white roofing paint and the results are amazing. It used to be that after 8:30am I could not go into the attic because of the heat, but now I could literally sit in there and have a picnic at 2:00pm. I have no doubt that I’m saving big on my cooling costs.

Posted By Lyndhurst Bodden, Cayman Islands : September 15, 2008 12:57 pm

I agree with the writter HOA’s have a lot of say in this aspect and are not going to change easily. This why I choose not to live in one.

Posted By Jay, Norco, California : September 15, 2008 12:46 pm

Most of the roofs use tar based shingles. I have not heard of white tar. I am sure they can find an easier way to make cooler roofs. But till then planting more trees will have a better effect.

Posted By RK, Windsor, Ontario : September 15, 2008 12:34 pm

There is no question that white roofs are effective at reducing energy costs, particularly in cooling climates. While this approach to using reflective surfaces to save energy and reduce the heat island effect is sound, it is encountering significant resistance from the aesthetic perspective in the steep slope residential community.

Fortunately, there has been a considerable amount of research done by both the Florida Solar Energy Center and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory to show that ventilated roof systems such as concrete and clay tile are just as effective at reducing heat gain into the structure and maintain their effectiveness indefinitely whereas white roofs invariably lose their effectiveness as they age and become soiled.

In much the same manner that dual-glazed windows reduce heat loss, these ventilated systems offer a more practical alternative that still allows the building designer some freedom in color selection although light-colored roofs will still improve the performance and help reduce the heat island effect.

Posted By Jerry Vandewater, Thousand Oaks, CA : September 15, 2008 12:31 pm

Where is the common sense? How much energy will be needed for 100 million homes to paint their roofs white. Someone has to make the paint, transport it, and a crew to come out and paint your roof? Won’t this extra carbon emmission offset any savings from a cool roof?

Now that everyone has a cooler house, how are we supposed to cool the atmosphere now that its been heated up with all these white roofs? No reduction in carbon emmissions will offset all this extra heat going into our atmosphere.

Posted By billy, charlotte, nc : September 15, 2008 11:58 am

There are currently no manufacturers that create white asphalt shingles. Will someone please fill this need?

Posted By Steve Gorman, Falls Church, VA : September 15, 2008 11:53 am

I live in the northeast. What about all the energy I save in the winter because I have a dark roof?

Posted By Paul Cascio, Bristol, CT : September 15, 2008 11:53 am

And if you coat the roof and exterior walls of the buildings with photocatalyst from a company called Green Come True, then we never have to use petroleum based cleaning products ever to keep them clean. This will significantly contribute to the global warming crisis.

Posted By Pete, Los Angels, CA : September 15, 2008 11:46 am

If we built a big umbrella to shade the earth we could save money in the summer as well. But what about my tan??

This is another useless study that trys to justify its point by including everyone doing it. Even if it was a good idea, it is very unlikely that more than 5% would waste the time doing it. And would it cost just as much to repaint roofs and residewalk and repave roads and maintain.

Posted By James washington, dc : September 15, 2008 11:20 am

The reason you see a parapit wall on roofs in most Mediterranean and tropical countries is to ward off that glare caused by white painted roofs! Just look around and you will find solutions! This idea is nothing new. Just noticed by the western scientists.

Posted By Nadeem, St.Louis, MO : September 15, 2008 10:39 am

And if you add ceramic to the paint or get the ceramic already mixed at the factory the cooling effect is even higher.

Posted By Pablo, West Palm Beach, FL : September 14, 2008 12:56 pm

Another University study years ago researched the benefits of adding attic insulation. Among other things that they found: They made a record of what color roofs the houses were and found that white roofs saved about 22% in the summer time for air conditioning savings, but cost 4% in the winter time for extra heating. So white roofs result in a good amount of energy savings.

Posted By Sam, Philadelphia, PA : September 12, 2008 9:43 pm

You would have to consider the glare that white or metallic roofs would have. Perhaps one doesn’t think of this in flat areas where every building is at the same elevation, but many places are hilly, mountainous, or have taller buildings amidsts shorter buildings.

I’m looking out the window now and imagining all the currently dark-colored roofs as white. Some of the buildings are already white so I have an immediate visual comparison. Yikes, this hurts my eyes and it’s not even that sunny right now.

On another note, I used to live in a house with double-paned windows which provides a tremendous amount of extra insulation, which means both keeping the heat out when it’s hot outside and keeping the heat in when it’s cold outside. Now I live in a house with single-pane windows and the difference is very noticeable. It is a simple physics concept of transfer of heat energy through convection versus conduction.

Posted By grace, san francisco, ca : September 12, 2008 8:52 pm

“Green” live roofs could be more expensive and they require water, and water do not come cheap in some areas. Gray water could be used in those cases. Green cover may need some enhanced structural support, but that depends on the design of the roof garden and what type of plants are grown.

Paints are way cheaper, and using highly reflective or light colored hues would certainly help by reflecting the light back into space. Large snow covered areas have been lost forever, and those should be supplemented, and painting white on roofs is a good start.

Posted By Marion Tamse, Rancho Cordova, CA : September 12, 2008 7:10 pm

While going to a manufactured white colored roofs and “white” pavements may _help_, the better solution would be to get back to GREEN cover.

Stones/cement convert solar energy into heat and will absorb and hold that heat, creating heat islands. This is a fact of life. Bull-dozing everything in site and paving it creates artificial heat-sinks (heat islands).

Plants convert the sunlight into plant material, oxygen, and nutrients instead of into heat.

If you want to make “green” roofs, then make GREEN roofs. If you want to reduce heat build up in the cities(reducing emissions from electic plants by reducing the need for air conditioning), then plant parks, put planters on side-walks, encourage soddies/turf roofs or even better, roof gardens.

Posted By Marc, Chantilly, VA : September 12, 2008 6:10 pm

How about painting with high gloss metallic gold or silver? The reflectivity of those are way much better than white paint, and they would look “golden” or “silvery” rich.

I agree that the best to use are solar panels, only if they become very cheap.

Posted By JoeReal : September 12, 2008 5:00 pm
CNNMoney.com Comment Policy: CNNMoney.com encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, libelous, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. Please note that CNNMoney.com may edit comments for clarity or to keep out questionable or off-topic material. All comments should be relevant to the post and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNNMoney.com the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying information via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNNMoney.com Privacy Statement.
Todd WoodySilicon Valley these days is all about making the green by being green. A senior editor for Fortune in San Francisco and a veteran environmental and technology journalist, Todd Woody writes about green tech as climate change drives new business models, technologies and opportunities. Before joining Fortune, Todd was an editor at Business 2.0, and the business editor of the San Jose Mercury News. Previous posts included senior writer and senior editor at The Industry Standard magazine, freelance writer for Wired magazine in Australia and a senior writer and environmental reporter at The Recorder, a San Francisco legal daily. He's one of the few people on earth who have seen the rare northern hairy-nosed wombat in the wild.
Subscribe to Green Wombat: RSS feed | email newsletter
* : Time reflects local markets trading time.† - Intraday data delayed 15 minutes for Nasdaq, and 20 minutes for other exchanges.• Disclaimer
Powered by WordPress.com.