Skip to ContentsU.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration FHWA Home Feedback
 Asset Management
  
FHWA > Infrastructure > Asset Management > Case Studies > New Mexico > How did New Mexico Get There?
<< Previous Contents Next >>

Transportation Asset Management Case Studies - Highway Economic Requirements System-State

The New Mexico Experience


3. How did New Mexico Get There?


Even with all of the refinements to the pilot software, NMDOT still found HERS-ST lacking in terms of report options, an an issue that has been addressed with subsequent program updates. Undaunted, NMDOT's planners began manipulating HERS-ST data and generating their own customized reports.

Creating these documents required in-depth study of the nuances of HERS-ST and creation of multiple layers of formulas in various Excel spreadsheets. NMDOT's Transportation Fact Sheet, for example, takes the improvement costs calculated by HERS-ST by funding period, by rural and urban designation, and by functional class and multiplies the improvement costs times the benefit-cost ratio generated by the program to compute total user benefits. NMDOT's goal in preparing this report was to present the basic information on engineering needs and projects with a benefit-cost ratio of 1.0 or greater in a concise, straightforward manner.

And NMDOT's outside-the-box thinking didn't stop there. When the State was looking at expanding a 235-mile stretch of US 54 to support two lanes of traffic in each direction, it employed HERS-ST to consider a four-lane option and analyze factors such as vehicle miles traveled (VMT), vehicle hours traveled (VHT), delay times and so forth. Utilizing Regional Economic Models, Inc. (REMI) Policy Insight/TranSight methodology in conjunction with the HERS-ST data, the State was able to determine that the benefits of the proposed expansion would be to commercial freight carriers and travelers to Texas rather than to New Mexico residents!

Finally, NMDOT showed its commitment to HERS-ST by supporting the planning division's involvement with the HERS-ST developers' group. That group meets two to three times a year to evaluate comments and work on software changes and priorities.

Table 1: One of NMDOT's customized HERS-ST reports. New Mexico Department of Transportation Transportation Fact Sheet Twenty-Year Highway Needs and User Benefits of Improvements: Benefit/Cost Basis in $1,000s

March 2005: 2003 HPMS Dataset: State-Owned Roads Only: No Rural Minor Collectors or Local Roads Included Analysis by FHWA's Highway Economic Requirements System-State Version (HERS-ST)
URBAN NEW MEXICO (Years) Interstate Needs Interstate User Benefits Principal Arterial Needs Principal Arterial User Benefits Minor Arterial Needs Minor Arterial User Benefits Collector Needs Collector User Benefits TOTAL Needs TOTAL User Benefits

1st Five

738,228

3,772,345

613,573

7,092,904

95,719

727,464

132,121

1,167,950

1,579,643

12,763,515

2nd Five

457,520

1,843,806

41,384

112,978

10,009

45,141

13,272

48,443

522,187

2,046,973

3rd Five

610,930

2,455,939

123,767

373,776

18,338

37,043

2,006

15,205

755,044

2,884,268

4th Five

847,282

2,762,139

108,574

398,467

8,019

24,699

26,713

101,509

990,590

3,288,759

TOTAL

2,653,960

10,834,229

887,298

7,978,125

132,085

834,346

174,112

1,333,107

3,847,464

20,983,515


<< Previous Contents Next >>
This page last modified on 02/16/07

FHWA | Infrastructure | Asset Management | Feedback
FHWA