Scientific evidence is lacking for patients choosing among treatments for narrowed kidney arteries

Increasing numbers of patients with narrowed renal (kidney) arteries are undergoing vessel-widening angioplasty and placement of a tubular stent, but the latest scientific evidence does not show a clear advantage of that treatment over prescription drug therapy, according to a new review funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). The review, titled Comparative Effectiveness of Management Strategies for Renal Artery Stenosis, is the newest in a series of Comparative Effectiveness Reviews produced by AHRQ's Effective Health Care Program.

Narrowed kidney arteries – a condition known as renal artery stenosis (RAS) – are the most common cause of correctable high blood pressure. The progressive condition reduces the supply of blood to the kidneys. In most cases, the problem is caused by atherosclerosis, the gradual build-up of fat-containing plaque. RAS may occur alone or in combination with high blood pressure and chronic kidney disease. It is found in about 30 percent of patients with coronary artery disease and up to 50 percent of seniors or people who have diffuse atherosclerotic vascular diseases.

RAS patients have three treatment options: angioplasty, which reopens the narrowed artery with a small balloon; angioplasty in combination with a stent, a metal mesh tube placed inside the artery; or therapy with drugs, such as angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs), calcium channel blockers, and/or beta blockers. Some doctors also recommend statins to lower cholesterol, or antiplatelet medicines, such as aspirin. Patients treated only with drugs, which may need to be taken for a lifetime, can experience diminished kidney function due to RAS. That can lead to sickness and death, and these patients may be at increased risk of heart disease. However, it is unclear whether angioplasty leads to better outcomes for most patients.

While many RAS patients are treated with drugs, a growing number of RAS patients are opting for angioplasty. Medicare data show that angioplasty more than doubled from 7,660 in 1996 to 18,520 in 2000. The average charge of RAS angioplasty done in the hospital was $27,800 in 2004, according to data from AHRQ's Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. The procedure, like any surgery, carries risks of complications or even death. In addition, the durability of benefits of angioplasty with or without a stent is unclear.

AHRQ's new review of published studies, completed by the Agency's Tufts–New England Medical Center Evidence-based Practice Center, has concluded:

A summary and full report of the Comparative Effectiveness of Management Strategies for Renal Artery Stenosis are available at the Effective Health Care Web site at http://www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov. Printed copies of the executive summary (AHRQ Publication No. 07-EHC004-1) are also available from the AHRQ Publications Clearinghouse.


Return to Contents
Proceed to Next Article