Skip Navigation
acfbanner  
ACF
Department of Health and Human Services 		  
		  Administration for Children and Families
          
ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News   |   HHS Home

  Questions?  |  Privacy  |  Site Index  |  Contact Us  |  Download Reader™Download Reader  |  Print Print      

<
Administration on Developmental Disabilitiesskip to primary page content

Appendix B

Ineffective Approaches,
As Specifically Reported By Respondents

State Councils Vocational Rehabilitation Mental Health;

MR/DD1

agencies

Employers Job Agencies
Sheltered workshops.
Grants: when payments are made before services are rendered.
Program-based approach, rather than person centered planning concept.
Too much paperwork; bureaucracy got in the way.
Unwillingness of the employer to "carve out" an appropriate job for the person with a developmental disability.
Large conferences.
Work crews (these should only be used as a last resort).
Offering too many financial incentives.
Tax credit paperwork is difficult.
High pressure jobs with stress and heavy production schedules.
Local coalitions cease when funding stops.
Persons with severe disabilities require more than "natural supports."
Lack of transition services.
Overanxious expectations.
Inadequate screening. Poor fit between person and job.
Treat the person as "charity."
Training without job development.
Use of vocational assessment tools and tests.
Employer not taking the time to train.
Poorly organized small businesses with unsafe working conditions.
Don't oversolicit businesses.
Begging for jobs.
Non-supportive parents.
Poor job matching.
Placing a person before they are ready.
Meaningless jobs.
Granting money to groups.
Pre-vocational training models.
Harsh treatment, reprimands.
Lack of individual attention. "One size fits all" thinking.
Segregated worksites.
 
Local advisory groups tend to fall apart.
Inventing/ making up work to keep the person busy.
Jobs which involve a lot of change or which demand mastery of many tasks.
Persons with severe disabilities need more than just "natural supports."
 
Slotting.
 
Jobs at less than minimum wage.

 



State Councils


Vocational Rehabilitation
Mental Health;

MR/DD1

agencies





Employers




Job Agencies

Sheltered workshops.

Large conferences.

Local coalitions cease when funding stops.

Treat the person as "charity."





Don't oversolicit businesses.



Meaningless jobs.

Segregated worksites.



Persons with severe disabilities need more than just "natural supports."

Grants: when payments are made before services are rendered.



Work crews (these should only be used as a last resort).

Persons with severe disabilities require more than "natural supports."

Training without job development.



Begging for jobs.



Granting money to groups.

Program-based approach, rather than person centered planning concept.

Offering too many financial incentives.



Lack of transition services.





Use of vocational assessment tools and tests.

Non-supportive parents.

Pre-vocational training models.



Local advisory groups tend to fall apart.

Slotting.

Too much paperwork; bureaucracy got in the way.



Tax credit paperwork is difficult.

Overanxious expectations.





Employer not taking the time to train.

Poor job matching.

Harsh treatment, reprimands.

Inventing/ making up work to keep the person busy.

Unwillingness of the employer to "carve out" an appropriate job for the person with a developmental disability.

High pressure jobs with stress and heavy production schedules.

Inadequate screening. Poor fit between person and job.



Poorly organized small businesses with unsafe working conditions.

Placing a person before they are ready.

Lack of individual attention. "One size fits all" thinking.

Jobs which involve a lot of change or which demand mastery of many tasks.

Jobs at less than minimum wage.

1Mental Retardation/Developmental Disabilities agencies

Source: OEI Survey, 1999