OFFICE OF
THE INSPECTOR GENERAL

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

EFFECTIVENESS OF THE YOUNG
CHILDREN'S EARNINGS RECORDS
REINSTATEMENT PROCESS   

October 2006               A-03-05-25009

 AUDIT REPORT

Mission

We improve SSA programs and operations and protect them against fraud, waste, and abuse by conducting independent and objective audits, evaluations, and investigations. We provide timely, useful, and reliable information and advice to Administration officials, the Congress, and the public.

Authority

The Inspector General Act created independent audit and investigative units, called the Office of Inspector General (OIG). The mission of the OIG, as spelled out in the Act, is to:

Conduct and supervise independent and objective audits and investigations relating to agency programs and operations.
Promote economy, effectiveness, and efficiency within the agency.
Prevent and detect fraud, waste, and abuse in agency programs and operations.
Review and make recommendations regarding existing and proposed legislation and regulations relating to agency programs and operations.
Keep the agency head and the Congress fully and currently informed of problems in agency programs and operations.

To ensure objectivity, the IG Act empowers the IG with:

Independence to determine what reviews to perform.
Access to all information necessary for the reviews.
Authority to publish findings and recommendations based on the reviews.

Vision

By conducting independent and objective audits, investigations, and evaluations, we are agents of positive change striving for continuous improvement in the Social Security Administration's programs, operations, and management and in our own office.

MEMORANDUM

Date:     October 20, 2006                                                                                          Refer To:

To:       The Commissioner

From:     Inspector General

Subject: Effectiveness of the Young Children's Earnings Records Reinstatement Process

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to assess the effectiveness of the Young Children's Earnings Record (YCER) reinstatement process in resolving suspended earnings, reducing the size of the Earnings Suspense File (ESF), and detecting potential fraud.

BACKGROUND

As part of the Annual Wage Reporting process, the Social Security Administration (SSA) validates the names and Social Security numbers (SSN) on wage reports submitted by employers and self‑employment income (SEI) reported by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) against the Numident file.  Earnings items that cannot be matched to SSA records are posted to the ESF—a file of unmatched items.  SSA
maintains two ESFs—one for wages reported by employers and one for SEI reported by the IRS.  For example, as of October 2005, the wage ESF had accumulated about $520 billion in wages and approximately 255 million wage items for Tax Years (TY) 1937 through 2003 that could not be posted to individuals’ earnings records.

In 1992, SSA began checking the date of birth (DoB) on the Numident for the reported SSN to determine whether the earnings reported by employers and SEI belong to children.  If the DoB on the Numident indicates that numberholders are under age 7, their earnings are placed in the ESF and assigned a YCER indicator.  The earnings are saved to an investigate file, which is transmitted to a contractor so notices can be printed and mailed to employers, employees, or self-employed individuals to assist SSA with reinstating the earnings.  

SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY

To meet our objective, we sampled YCER items from the TY 2002 investigate file, which contained 40,461 earnings items.  We selected 300 sample items for review—250 earnings items where the SSNs appeared 1 to 4 times in the investigate file and 50 SSNs where the SSNs appeared 5 or more times in the investigate file.  Below we focus on the 250 earnings items, ranging between $22 and $71,700, from the total population of 38,013 earnings items.  See Appendix G for the results of our 50 sample items.  

RESULTS OF REVIEW

Our review of the TY 2002 YCER investigate file found that while the YCER reinstatement process was effective in suspending those earnings that appeared suspect, the process was not effective in resolving and reinstating suspended items to the correct earnings record.  We found that of 250 sample YCER earnings items included in the investigate file, 72 percent were not reinstated to individuals’ earnings records.  The majority of these YCER items appeared to involve potential SSN misuse.  In addition, while SSA reinstated the remaining 28 percent of the earnings items from the investigate file, our review determined that about one out of four reinstatements were questionable because they may have also involved potential SSN misuse.  As a result, individuals may use these questionable reinstatements to qualify for future SSA benefits.  We also found that 8 of the top 25 employers reporting YCER earnings items related to industries that do not normally hire children under age 7, such as agriculture and temporary employment.  Furthermore, since SSA’s employee verification services do not require employers to submit employees’ DoB, employers may not be informed that the verified SSNs belong to children under age 7.

Table 1: Status of the 250 Sample YCER Items

UNRESOLVED EARNINGS ITEMS

Our review of 250 sample earnings items totaling approximately $1.3 million in earnings revealed that 180 of the 250 sample earnings items, or 72 percent, were not reinstated to numberholders’ earnings records.  The suspended earnings items totaled approximately $1.1 million in earnings.  Among the suspended earnings items, we believe that 9 out of 10 items represent SSN misuse, while the remaining items may represent legitimate work activity.

Potential SSN Misuse Among Suspended Items

Of the 250 sample earnings items, 180 items had not been resolved and were still in the ESF.  Of these unresolved earnings items, 163 items appeared to involve others using the numberholders’ SSNs for employment.  The 163 items represented approximately $1 million in earnings.  If we project these 163 questionable items to our population of about 38,000 items, we estimate that approximately 25,000 YCER items related to about $158 million in earnings involved potential SSN misuse.

The 163 sample items appeared suspect due to the age of the child at the time they supposedly worked for employers that do not normally hire children under age 7.  The numberholders ranged in age from less than 1 year to 6 years old when they supposedly worked for employers in industries such as restaurant, construction, and agriculture.  For example, a 2-year old enumerated in 2000 had approximately $72,000 in earnings reported for TY 2002 from a meat processing company located in Illinois.  The meat processing company had other reporting problems during TY 2002.  For example, the employer reported 89 wage items to SSA, of which 19 wage items, or 21 percent, were posted to the ESF.

For example in our April 2005 report, we noted SSN misuse was widespread among employers in the service, restaurant, and agriculture industries.

-- IMAGE OMITTED IN THIS TEXT-ONLY VERSION --

Moreover, we found that for 30 of the 163 suspended sample items, the reported names did not appear to be the same person in SSA’s Numident file.  We believe these name discrepancies could indicate that potential SSN misuse was involved.  Although it is possible that someone accidentally used the numberholders’ SSNs, it is more likely that someone deliberately misused the numberholders’ identity.  For the 30 items, we found the following name discrepancies:

• For 28 cases, the first name did not match the Numident records.  In 10 of these cases, the reported names matched the names of the numberholders’ parents shown on the Numident file.  Therefore, it is possible that the parents misused their own children’s SSNs for employment.
• For 1 case, the first and last name did not match the Numident record.
• For 1 case, the last name did not match the Numident record. 

Additional Questionable Earnings Reported by Employers

SSA’s YCER reinstatement process prevented many questionable earnings that may have related to SSN misuse from being posted to children’s earnings records.  However, when these same children reached age 7 and older, questionable items were posted to their records.  Our review of the SSA Numident showed that 69 of the 163 children with questionable earnings attained age 7 during TYs 2003 or 2004.  Of these 69 numberholders, 19 had questionable earnings successfully posted to their earnings record by the same employers after they reached age 7.  

For example, in TY 2002 a shipping container maintenance and repair company located in California reported $30,500 for a 6-year old that was not reinstated to the child’s earnings record.  However, in TYs 2003 and 2004, when the child was age 7 and 8, the company reported $41,000 and $37,000 in earnings that were posted to the child’s record.   

Items Related to Legitimate Work Activity

Of the 180 suspended earnings items, 17 items totaling approximately
$55,000 appeared to relate to legitimate work activity.  However, it appears the items were not reinstated because employers and/or the parents of the numberholders did not respond to SSA’s YCER notices.  Specifically, we found the following:

• For 11 items, employers that appeared to be the parent of the numberholders reported the earnings.  The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) allows parents to hire their children for employment at any age. 
• For 4 items, SEI was reported for numberholders who had a history of working in the entertainment industry.
• For 1 item, a company in the entertainment industry reported the earnings item.
• For 1 item, the earnings item was reported by an Indian tribe that mistakenly reported non-employment income on a W-2.  This employer realized the mistake and submitted a corrected W-2 to resolve the discrepancy.

RESOLVED EARNINGS ITEMS 

may have been related to SSN misuse, while the remaining 52 items appeared to be validly reinstated YCER items.

Questionable Reinstatements

Of the 70 reinstated items, we found that 18 earnings items totaling approximately $105,000 in earnings appeared questionable because SSA did not follow appropriate procedures or the earnings were reported by employers that do not normally hire children under age 7.  If we project the 18 questionable items to the population of about 38,000 items included in the investigate file, we estimate that about 2,700 YCER items related to approximately $16 million in earnings were questionable reinstatements. 

The questionable earnings may be used to determine whether the numberholders qualify for future Social Security benefits.  Additionally, since the numberholders were children they may not learn about the questionable earnings until they receive their first annual Social Security Statement at age 25, approximately 19 years after the earnings are reported to SSA.

We found that 15 of the 18 earnings items were reinstated by field offices (FO) and headquarters staff.   We determined that 12 of the 15 questionable items were processed by 2 FOs in Region IX.  According to the managers at these FOs, their staffs were working a special project to reinstate YCER items reported by employers in the entertainment industry.  They agreed that the 12 sample items did not meet that criterion since the items were reported by employers in the agriculture and construction industries, or related to unsubstantiated self-employment.  For example, SSA reinstated to a 5-year old’s earnings record about $19,100 in earnings reported in TY 2002 by a meat processing company located in North Carolina.  The company reported 4,306 wage items, of which 1,173 wage items, or 27 percent, were posted to the ESF.  Moreover, 144 of the suspended items for this company had YCER indicators.

Furthermore, the managers stated that their FOs may have mistakenly reinstated other YCER items for TY 2002 as part of the special workload project.  For example, one manager stated that her office reinstated over 500 SEI items for TY 2002.  For these items, the office verified that the reported names matched the Numident, but neither contacted the numberholders nor a third party to verify that the earnings were valid. Both managers agreed to locate the other reinstatements and take corrective action, where appropriate.

Valid Reinstatements

Of the 70 reinstated sample items, 52 items representing $97,000 in earnings appeared to be valid reinstatements.  These items were reported by employers in the entertainment and retail industries as well as by employers that appeared to be the parent of the numberholders.  For example, a payroll company located in California that specialized in the entertainment industry reported about $1,000 in TY 2002 for a 6-year old.  The child had an additional $800 in earnings posted to his record for TY 2002 from three additional payroll companies that specialized in the entertainment industry.  These reinstatements appeared valid because they were reported by employers that normally hire children under age 7. 

TOP EMPLOYERS REPORTING YCER ITEMS

The top 25 employers in the YCER investigate file reported approximately 4,800 YCER items representing about $12.3 million in earnings that were included in the TY
2002 investigate file.  These 25 employers accounted for 12 percent of the YCER items and about 6 percent of the total earnings.  Sixteen of the top employers were in the entertainment and retail industries and these employers generally hire children in occupations such as acting and modeling.  As noted earlier, one of the employers was an Indian tribe that mistakenly reported non-employment earnings using Forms
W-2 instead of the Form 1099 Miscellaneous (see Table 2). 

Table 2:  Top 25 Employers that Reported YCER Items in TY 2002

Note:   (1) This employer was an Indian tribe that mistakenly reported non-employment income on a           W-2.  The employer submitted corrected W-2s to resolve the discrepancies.
(2)  This figure does not total 100 percent due to rounding.

reported by numberholders’ family members.  Furthermore, the ESLOs were well aware of the eight employers because these employers appear on the national listing of employers who submit 100 or more suspended wage items.  The list is used by the ESLOs to contact the employers to assist them with wage reporting problems.  The 8 employers would have been included on the listing for TY 2002 because they had reported 400 to 35,000 suspended items. 

Moreover, for three of the eight employers, the YCER items represented at least 2 percent of their reported payroll.  We contacted one of the three employers, a poultry processing company located in North Carolina, and the representative stated that her company did not employ children.  Further, she acknowledged that the company had received YCER notices and their policy was to provide the requested information that was included in their payroll records.  Lastly, she stated that her company did not routinely request to review the employee’s Social Security card to verify the SSN actually belongs to the employee, as instructed in the YCER notice.  Therefore, the company was not complying with SSA’s instructions included in the YCER notices.

USE OF EMPLOYEE VERIFICATION SERVICES

SSA offers several verification services to employers to verify the identity and work authorization status of their employees.  However, since SSA’s employee verification services do not require employers to submit employees’ dates of birth, employers may not be informed that the verified SSNs belong to children under age 7.  SSA verification programs include:

• Employer Verification Service (EVS) for Registered Users—an electronic and paper-based program available to all employers to ensure their employees names and SSNs are valid “before” the employer submits their W-2s to SSA; and
• Social Security Number Verification Service (SSNVS)—an online program that enables employers and submitters to verify employees’ names and SSNs with information in SSA’s records.

EVS for Registered Users and SSNVS do not require employers to enter an employee’s DoB, as it is an optional field.  Therefore, employers that only enter the required information, in this case the name and SSN, would not be timely informed that the verified SSNs belong to children under age 7.  If a YCER indicator was added to the verification service, employers that used the service could be informed prior to submitting the earnings items to SSA that the verified SSNs belong to children under age 7 (whether or not the employer provides a DoB).  Moreover, the indicator could be a useful tool to help reduce the size of the ESF as well as reduce the number of YCER notices that are generated.

SSA already provides such feedback through a separate verification service.  SSA has a joint effort with the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to assist employers with verifying newly-hired employees’ authorization to work in the United States.   Employers using the Basic Pilot are more likely to detect that a child’s SSN is being misused because the DoB is a required element for verification.    

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Overall, while the YCER reinstatement process prevented many YCER items that appeared to involve SSN misuse from being posted to numberholders’ earnings record, it was not always effective in reinstating YCER items to the correct earnings record.  We also found that about one of four reinstatements appeared questionable.  Furthermore, SSA could improve its employee verification services to notify employers of potential SSN misuse when they hire individuals using children’s SSNs. 

To improve the effectiveness of the YCER process, we recommend SSA:

1. Review and correct the reinstated earnings that we identified as questionable.
2. Ensure SSA staff receives additional guidance and training in the YCER reinstatement process to ensure that YCER earnings items are reinstated appropriately.
3. Consistent with the Agency’s disclosure policies, modify EVS for Registered Users and SSNVS to detect SSNs for children under age 7 to provide appropriate notice to employers and potentially reduce the number of future YCER notices.

AGENCY COMMENTS

SSA concurred with our recommendations.  The Agency’s comments are included in Appendix I.

Patrick P. O’Carroll, Jr.

Appendices

APPENDIX A – Acronyms

APPENDIX B – Young Children’s Earnings Record Reinstatement Process

APPENDIX C – Young Children’s Earnings Record Notices Sent to Employers

APPENDIX D – Composition of the Tax Year 2002 Investigate File

APPENDIX E – Scope and Methodology

APPENDIX F – Sampling Methodology

APPENDIX G – Results of 50 Sample Social Security Numbers

APPENDIX H – Employee Verification Programs

APPENDIX I – Agency Comments

APPENDIX J – OIG Contacts and Staff Acknowledgments

Appendix A - Acronyms

Effective with the Tax Year (TY) 1991 Annual Wage Reporting process, the Social Security Administration (SSA) began checking the date of birth (DoB) on the Numident for the reported Social Security number (SSN).  If the DoB indicated that the numberholder is a child age 6 or younger during the year, the earnings are identified as a Young Children's Earnings Record (YCER) item and placed into the Earnings Suspense File (ESF)—a file of unmatched earnings items.  The YCER items are saved to an investigate file used to verify whether the earnings actually belong to the child.

The investigate file is sent to the Wilkes-Barre Data Operation Center (WBDOC) to be converted to a mailer file and then transmitted to a vendor who generates notices that are sent to employers, employees, and self-employed individuals.  The SSA-L3231 notice is sent to employers requesting identifying information about their employees.  The employer responses are mailed to the WBDOC for review.  If the employer states that the employee’s SSN, name, and DoB agree with SSA’s records, the earnings are reinstated to the employee’s earnings record.  If the employer states the employee’s name and SSN are the same as SSA’s records, but the DoB is different, a notice (SSA‑L3232) is sent to the employee advising him or her to contact a local SSA field office (FO) to correct the discrepancy.  If the employer does not return the form or states that the individual was not an employee, a notice is sent to the purported employee with the earnings, asking him or her to contact a local FO.  Unresolved items remain in the ESF.

If self-employment earnings are reported, a notice (SSA-L3241) is sent to the individual instructing him or her to contact a local FO.  If the self-employed individual contacts an SSA FO and provides evidence to support that the earnings belong to him or her, the earnings are removed from the ESF and posted to the person’s earnings record.  Otherwise, the items remain in the ESF.

-- IMAGES OMITTED FROM THIS TEXT-ONLY VERSION --

Appendix D - Composition of the Tax Year 2002 Investigate File

The Tax Year (TY) 2002 Young Children’s Earnings Record (YCER) investigate file included 40,461 earnings items representing approximately $219 million in earnings.  The amount of earnings ranged from $.60 to $412,394.  Further, the 40,461 suspended earnings items related to 30,102 individuals.  We found that 21,977 employers reported 38,615 YCER items and 1,846 items were reported for self‑employed individuals.  The number of earnings items reported for each individual ranged from 1 to 14 earnings items.  Ninety-four percent of the individuals had 1 to 4 earnings items posted to the investigate file and 6 percent had 5 to 14 earnings items posted, as shown in Figure D-1.

-- IMAGE OMITTED FROM THIS TEXT-ONLY VERSION --

Appendix E - Scope and Methodology

To meet our objective, we performed the following steps:

• Reviewed prior Social Security Administration (SSA) Office of the Inspector General reports related to the Earnings Suspense File (ESF) and inaccurate earnings reporting.

• Reviewed applicable Federal laws and regulations, as well as SSA policies and procedures for maintaining individual earnings records and contacting employers with suspended earnings.

• Visited the Wilkes-Barre Data Operations Center to perform a walk-through of the Young Children's Earnings Record (YCER) reinstatement process and reviewed available workload data to determine the overall effectiveness of the YCER process.

• Obtained and analyzed the Tax Year (TY) 2002 YCER investigate file.  The file contained 40,461 earnings items totaling about $219 million in earnings.  Selected two samples from the TY 2002 investigate file for review (see Sampling Methodology in Appendix F).

• Reviewed SSA’s Numident file, Master Earnings File (MEF), ESF, and Earnings Modernization 2.8 program to determine the following:

• Age of the numberholder;
• Earnings were reinstated; and
• Reason for reinstatements.

• Selected a random sample of 1,100 items from SSA’s TY 2002 Decentralized Correspondence Mailer File, which contained 9,529,889 wage items where the names/SSNs on the wage items did not match SSA’s records.  We determined whether the sample wage items were reported using SSNs assigned to children under age 7.  Our sample methodology, and projections, can be found in Appendix F.

• Contacted the regional Employer Service Liaison Officers for information about employers that contributed a significant number of items to the YCER investigate file.  We also contacted a few employers that submitted a significant number of YCER items.

• Contacted two Field Office managers in Region IX that reinstated a significant number of questionable YCER items to determine how these items were processed.

We found that YCER data was sufficiently reliable to meet the objectives of our review.  Our work was conducted at SSA's Data Operations Center in Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, Mid-Atlantic Social Security Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Headquarters in Baltimore, Maryland.  We conducted our fieldwork between January 2005 and July 2006.  The SSA entities responsible for the maintenance of the ESF are the Office of Central Operations within the Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Operations and the Office of Earnings, Enumeration and Administrative Systems within the Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Systems.  Our review was conducted in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. 

Appendix F - Sampling Methodology

Below we provide our projections associated with the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) Tax Year (TY) 2002 Young Children’s Earnings Record (YCER) investigate file.  We also projected the number of children’s Social Security numbers (SSN) reported to SSA under a name that does not match SSA’s records.  These items were recorded in the Decentralized Correspondence (DECOR) Mailer File.

Young Children’s Earnings Record

The TY 2002 YCER investigate file contained 40,461 earnings items representing approximately $219 million in earnings.  We divided the population into two groups for analysis since multiple earnings items were associated with the same SSN.  The first subset represents 38,013 earnings items where the same SSN was associated with 4 or fewer earnings items.  We selected for review 250 sample items totaling $1.3 million in earnings.

Note:  The projections were made at a 90-percent confidence level.

Note:  The projections were made at a 90-percent confidence level.

Decentralized Correspondence

The purpose of the DECOR process is to contact employees and employers to resolve SSN and/or name discrepancies on wage items stored in the Earnings Suspense File (ESF).  Details related to the suspended wage items are placed within the DECOR Mailer File, which is sent to a contractor who prints the DECOR letters and mails them to the appropriate parties.  For TY 2002, SSA mailed approximately 9.5 million DECOR letters, relating to about $60.4 billion in wages, to employees and employers.  Approximately 7.6 million DECOR letters were sent to employees and another 1.9 million letters were sent to employers. 

We selected for review 1,100 sample wage items from the TY 2002 DECOR mailer file.    Based on our sample results, we estimate that for TY 2002, the ESF included approximately 606,000 children’s SSNs with suspended wages where the reported names did not match SSA’s records.

Note:  The projections were made at a 90-percent confidence level.

We selected for review 50 Social Security numbers (SSN) included in the Tax Year (TY) 2002 Young Children’s Earnings Record (YCER) investigate file that were used to report 5 to 11 earnings items.  The 50 sample SSNs were associated with 308 earnings items totaling about $928,000.  We reviewed these items separately because of the increased risk of SSN misuse for multiple earnings items reported for children in the same TY.  Of the 50 sample SSNs, we found the following:

Unresolved Items:  We found that 38 of the 50 SSNs, or 76 percent, related to earnings that were not reinstated to the numberholders’ earnings records.  These 38 SSNs were associated with 227 earnings items totaling approximately $713,000 in earnings.  We also determined that earnings associated with all 38 SSNs appeared suspect because of the age of the numberholders at the time they worked for employers that do not normally hire children under age 7 and the number of earnings items reported for the same SSN.  Although it is possible someone accidentally used the numberholders’ SSNs for employment, it is more likely that someone deliberately used the numberholder’s identity for employment.

Resolved Items:  The remaining 12 of the 50 SSNs, or 24 percent, related to earnings reinstated to the earners’ records.  The 12 SSNs were associated with 81 earnings items that had at least 1 item that was reinstated to the numberholder’s earnings record.  In total, there were 32 earnings items reinstated to the numberholders’ earnings record representing about $100,000 in earnings.  The remaining 49 items, totaling $115,000, were not reinstated.  Of the 12 SSNs with 32 reinstated earnings, we found the following:

• For 9 SSNs associated with 10 earnings items totaling about $28,000, the   reinstatements appeared questionable based on the age of the numberholders at the time they worked for employers that do not normally hire children under age 7.  These employers were in industries such as the agriculture, temporary employment, restaurant, and food industries.

• For 2 numberholders with 15 items totaling about $61,000 in earnings, the numberholders’ parents used their SSNs for employment and then had the earnings reinstated to their own earnings account.  The 15 earnings items were reported for TYs 1991 to 2002.  In the first case, both the father and numberholder shared the same first and last name.  In the second case, the father, who was a noncitizen, had earnings reported for TYs 1991 to 1998 reinstated to his own earnings record after being enumerated in 2002.
  
• For 1 numberholder with 7 earnings items totaling about $11,000 it appeared that SSA’s SWEEP edit routine erroneously reinstated the earnings to a 3-year old’s earnings record.  SWEEP is an electronic matching routine that uses name changes from the Numident file and additional reinstatements to reinstate items from the ESF.  In this case, the numberholder’s name did not appear to have changed nor were there any items reinstated to the numberholder’s record.    
  

Appendix H - Employee Verification Programs

The Social Security Administration (SSA) has a number of programs to assist employers with the wage reporting process.  Below we discuss some of the various programs, such as (1) Employee Verification Service (EVS) for Registered Users, (2) Social Security Number Verification Service (SSNVS), and (3) the Basic Pilot.

Employee Verification Service and Social Security Number Verification Service

EVS for Registered Users and SSNVS are SSA’s two primary verification programs made available to employers to verify employees’ names and Social Security numbers (SSN).  EVS and SSNVS are available to employers to ensure their employees’ names and SSNs are valid before the employer submits their Wage and Tax Statements (Form W-2) to SSA.  Employers must register to gain access to these programs.

Under EVS for Registered Users, requests can be submitted on magnetic media (tape, cartridge, or diskette) or paper.  For each employee record to be verified through the registered user process, employers must submit three required elements: employee’s SSN, last name, and first name.  Employers can also provide optional data as well, such as date of birth (DoB) and gender.  Through EVS, SSA confirms whether the name, SSN, DoB, and gender of an employee matches SSA’s records.  Further, SSA discloses death responses to employers when the wage earner’s record indicates that they are deceased.

SSNVS, which was implemented nationwide in June 2005, is an online service that enables employers and submitters to verify whether employees’ names and SSNs matches the information in SSA’s records.  Employers can either verify up to 10 names and SSNs (per screen) online and receive immediate results or upload batch files of up to 250,000 names and SSNs and usually receive results the next Government business day.

Basic Pilot

The Basic Pilot is an SSA and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) joint program whereby employers verify the employment eligibility of newly-hired employees.  This voluntary program helps employers determine whether an individual is eligible to work in the United States.  The President signed the Basic Pilot Program Extension and Expansion Act of 2003 (Public Law Number 108-156) on December 3, 2003.  This law extended the operation of the Basic Pilot for an additional 5 years (to a total of 11 years) and expanded the operation to all 50 States no later than December 1, 2004. 

As discussed with SSA staff, the Basic Pilot involves using the information in Government databases (SSA databases and, if needed, DHS databases) to determine the employment eligibility of new hires.  The SSN and Alien Registration Number (“A” Number) or I-94 Arrival/Departure Number (I-94 Number) are used for these checks.  The employer must complete the DHS-issued Employment Eligibility Verification Form (Form I-9) for each employee and then enter elements of this data into the Basic Pilot system within 3 days of hiring, including the employee’s SSN, name, DoB, and whether the new hire indicated he/she was a U.S. citizen and, if not, enter the “A” Number or I-94 Number. 

The system first checks the information entered against SSA’s database to verify the name, SSN, and DoB of all newly-hired employees, regardless of citizenship.  When the Numident shows the U.S. as the place of birth for the newly-hired employee or a code indicating the number holder is a U.S. citizen, the Basic Pilot automated system confirms employment eligibility.  If the Basic Pilot system cannot confirm employment eligibility based on the information in SSA’s database or an “A” Number or I-94 Number was entered, the Basic Pilot system automatically checks the data against DHS’ database. 

Appendix I - Agency Comments

MEMORANDUM       

We appreciate OIG’s efforts in conducting this review.  Our comments on the draft report’s recommendations are attached.

Please let me know if you have any questions.  Staff inquiries may be directed to
Ms. Candace Skurnik, Director, Audit Management and Liaison Staff, at extension 54636.

Attachment:
SSA Response

COMMENTS ON THE OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL’S (OIG) DRAFT REPORT, “EFFECTIVENESS OF THE YOUNG CHILDREN’S EARNINGS RECORDS REINSTATEMENT PROCESS” (A-03-05-25009)

Thank you for the opportunity to review and provide comments on this draft report.

Recommendation 1

Review and correct the reinstated earnings that OIG identified as questionable.

Comment

We agree.  We will review the cases identified and take the necessary corrective actions within 6 months of receipt of the records.

Recommendation 2

Ensure SSA staff receives additional guidance and training in the Young Children’s Earnings Record (YCER) reinstatement process to ensure that YCER earnings items are reinstated appropriately.

Comment

We agree.  We will issue a reminder to staff responsible for reinstating YCER items.  The reminder will include the proper procedures to be followed when processing a YCER case and should be released by the end of calendar year 2006.

Recommendation 3

Consistent with the Agency’s disclosure policies, modify the Employer Verification Service for Registered Users and the Social Security Number (SSN) Verification Service to detect SSNs for children under age 7 to provide appropriate notice to employers and potentially reduce the number of future YCER notices.

Comment

We agree.  The Agency’s current disclosure policy would allow for the date of birth information to be shared with employers consistent with their wage reporting responsibilities.  We will consider the cost effectiveness of systematic changes based on other pending stewardship-related activities.

Appendix J - OIG Contacts and Staff Acknowledgments

OIG Contacts

Walter Bayer, Director, Philadelphia Audit Division, (215) 597-4080

Cylinda McCloud-Keal, Audit Manager, (215) 597-0572

Staff Acknowledgments

In addition to those named above:

Mildred Soto, Auditor-in-Charge

Damon Mahoner, Auditor

Frank Trzaska, Senior Auditor

Richard Devers, IT Specialist

For additional copies of this report, please visit our web site at www.socialsecurity.gov/oig or contact the Office of the Inspector General’s Public Affairs Specialist at (410) 965-3218.  Refer to Common Identification Number
A-03-05-25009.

DISTRIBUTION SCHEDULE

Commissioner of Social Security                                                                                                  
Office of Management and Budget, Income Maintenance Branch                                             
Chairman and Ranking Member, Committee on Ways and Means                                          
Chief of Staff, Committee on Ways and Means                                                                           
Chairman and Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Social Security                          
Majority and Minority Staff Director, Subcommittee on Social Security                                    
Chairman and Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Human Resources                    
Chairman and Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Budget, House of Representatives           
Chairman and Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Government Reform and Oversight          
Chairman and Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Governmental Affairs                      
Chairman and Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives         
Chairman and Ranking Minority, Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies, Committee on Appropriations,
   House of Representatives                                                                                                           
Chairman and Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Appropriations, U.S. Senate         
Chairman and Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education and Related Agencies, Committee on Appropriations, U.S. Senate                                        
Chairman and Ranking Minority Member, Committee on Finance                                            
Chairman and Ranking Minority Member, Subcommittee on Social Security and Family Policy      
Chairman and Ranking Minority Member, Senate Special Committee on Aging                    

Social Security Advisory Board

Overview of the Office of the Inspector General
The Office of the Inspector General (OIG) is comprised of our Office of Investigations (OI), Office of Audit (OA), Office of the Chief Counsel to the Inspector General (OCCIG), and Office of Resource Management (ORM).  To ensure compliance with policies and procedures, internal controls, and professional standards, we also have a comprehensive Professional Responsibility and Quality Assurance program.

Office of Audit
OA conducts and/or supervises financial and performance audits of the Social Security Administration’s (SSA) programs and operations and makes recommendations to ensure program objectives are achieved effectively and efficiently.  Financial audits assess whether SSA’s financial statements fairly present SSA’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flow.  Performance audits review the economy, efficiency, and effectiveness of SSA’s programs and operations.  OA also conducts short-term management and program evaluations and projects on issues of concern to SSA, Congress, and the general public.

Office of Investigations
OI conducts and coordinates investigative activity related to fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement in SSA programs and operations.  This includes wrongdoing by applicants, beneficiaries, contractors, third parties, or SSA employees performing their official duties.  This office serves as OIG liaison to the Department of Justice on all matters relating to the investigations of SSA programs and personnel.  OI also conducts joint investigations with other Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies.

Office of the Chief Counsel to the Inspector General
OCCIG provides independent legal advice and counsel to the IG on various matters, including statutes, regulations, legislation, and policy directives.  OCCIG also advises the IG on investigative procedures and techniques, as well as on legal implications and conclusions to be drawn from audit and investigative material.  Finally, OCCIG administers the Civil Monetary Penalty program.

Office of Resource Management
ORM supports OIG by providing information resource management and systems security.  ORM also coordinates OIG’s budget, procurement, telecommunications, facilities, and human resources.  In addition, ORM is the focal point for OIG’s strategic planning function and the development and implementation of performance measures required by the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993.

-- FOOTNOTES FOLLOW --