2005 Fertility Clinic Success Rates and National Summary

The data for this national report come from the 422 fertility clinics in operation in 2005 that provided and verified data on the outcomes of all ART cycles started in their clinics. The 134,260 ART cycles performed at these reporting clinics in 2005 resulted in 38,910 live births (deliveries of one or more living infants) and 52,041 infants. Data provided by U.S. clinics that use assisted reproductive technology (ART) to treat infertility are a rich source of information about the factors that contribute to a successful ART treatment—the delivery of a live-born infant.

An Excel spreadsheet is available for the clinic's data for ART 2005 ( 662KB)

2004 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates
National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports

The 2004 report of pregnancy success rates is the tenth report to be issued under the Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act. The report includes a national overview that uses information from 411 U.S. fertility clinics to provide an in-depth picture of the type, number, and outcome of ART cycles performed in U.S. clinics. The report also includes individual clinic tables that provide ART success rates and other information from each clinic that submitted and verified its 2004 data and appendixes containing the results of data validation visits, technical notes, a glossary, and contact information for reporting and nonreporting clinics in the United States.

An Excel spreadsheet is available for the clinic's data for ART 2004 ( 646KB)

2003 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates
National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports

The 2003 report of pregnancy success rates is the ninth report to be issued under the Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act. The report includes a national overview that uses information from 399 U.S. fertility clinics to provide an in-depth picture of the type, number, and outcome of ART cycles performed in U.S. clinics. The report also includes individual clinic tables that provide ART success rates and other information from each clinic that submitted and verified its 2003 data and appendixes containing the results of data validation visits, technical notes, a glossary, and contact information for reporting and nonreporting clinics in the United States.

An Excel spreadsheet is available for the clinic's data for ART 2003 ( 590KB)

2002 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates
National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports

An Excel spreadsheet is available for the clinic's data for ART 2002 ( 594KB)

2001 Assisted Reproductive Technology Success Rates
National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports

An Excel spreadsheet is available for the clinic's data for ART 2001 ( 589KB)

Download the complete  2000 ART Report (PDF2,189KB). Bookmarks and thumbnails are available within the PDF file.

ART 2000/1 (pages 1– 79 (PDF 843 KB)

Acknowledgement
Preface
Commonly Asked Questions About This Report
Introduction to the 2000 National Report
Section 1: Overview
Section 2: ART Cycles Using Fresh, Nondonor Eggs or Embryos
Section 3: Art Cycles Using Only Frozen Nondonor Embryos
Section 4: Art Cycles Using Donor Eggs
Section 5: ART Cycles Using Gestational Carriers
Section 6: ART Trends, 1996–2000
Introduction To Fertility Clinic Tables
Sample Clinic Tables
How to Read a Fertility Clinic Table
2000 National Summary

 ART 2000/2 (pages 80 – 200 (PDF 1,073KB)

2000 Fertility Clinic Tables, Alabama— Hawaii

 ART 2000/3 (pages 201 – 354 (PDF 698KB)

2000 Fertility Clinic Tables, Idaho— New York

  ART 2000/4 (pages 355 – 463 (PDF 770KB)

2000 Fertility Clinic Tables, North Carolina— Wisconsin

  ART 2000/5 Appendixes 465– 508 (PDF 183KB)

Appendix A: How to Interpret a Confidence Interval
Appendix B: Glossary of Terms Used in This Report
Appendix C: ART Clinics 2000
                  Nonreporting ART Cycles for 2000, by State

An Excel spreadsheet is available for the clinic's data for ART 2000 ( 514KB)

Download the complete  1999 ART Report (PDF 2,043KB). Bookmarks and thumbnails are available within the PDF file.

For slower Internet connections, download these smaller files to obtain the entire report.

ART 99/1 (pages 1– 57 336 KB)
Preface, Commonly Asked Questions About This Report, Introduction to the 1999 National Report, Section 1:Overview, Section 2: Art Cycles Using Fresh, Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, Section 3: Art Cycles Using Only Frozen (Nondonor) Embryos, Section 4: Art Cycles Using Donor Eggs, Introduction to Fertility Clinics Tables, Sample Clinic Tables, How to Read a Fertility Clinic Table, 1999 National Summary. 

  ART 99/2 (pages 59 – 170 502KB)
1999 Fertility Clinic Tables, Alabama— Hawaii.

  ART 99/3 (pages 171 – 317 649KB)
1999 Fertility Clinic Tables, Idaho— New York.

  ART 99/4 (pages 318 – 428 529KB)
1999 Fertility Clinic Tables, North Carolina— Wisconsin.

  ART 99/5 Appendixes (209KB)
Appendix A: How to Interpret a Confidence Interval, Appendix B: Glossary of Terms Used in This Report, Appendix C: Reporting ART CLinis for 1999, by State, Nonreporting ART Cycles for 1999, by State.

An Excel spreadsheet is available for the clinic's data for ART 1999 ( 515KB)

Download the complete 1998 ART Report (PDF 2,292KB)

For slower Internet connections, download these smaller files to obtain the entire report.

ART 98/1 (pages 1– 49 439KB)
Preface, Commonly Asked Questions About This Report, Introduction to Fertility Clinic Tables, Important Factors to Consider When Using These Tables to Assess a Clinic, How to Read a Fertility Clinic Table, 1997 National Summary Table.

  ART 98/2 (pages 50 – 158 526KB)
1998 Fertility Clinic Tables, Alabama— Hawaii.

  ART 98/3 (pages 159 – 299 682KB)
1998 Fertility Clinic Tables, Illinois— New York.

  ART 98/4 (pages 300 – 414 529KB)
1998 Fertility Clinic Tables, North Carolina— Wisconsin.

  ART 98/5 Appendices (286KB)
How to Interpret a Confidence Interval, Glossary of Terms Used in This Report,  ART Clinics That Reported 1998 Data for Publication, by State, and  Nonreporting ART Clinics for 1998, by State.

An Excel spreadsheet is available for the clinic's data for ART 1998 ( 545KB)

Assisted Reproductive
Technology Success Rates
National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports

Download the Entire 1997 ART Report 412-page (2,169K)

ART 97/1 pages i–42  (193K) Preface, Commonly Asked Questions About This Report, Introduction to Fertility Clinic Tables, Important Factors to Consider When Using These Tables to Assess a Clinic, How to Read a Fertility Clinic Table, 1997 National Summary Table.

ART 97/2 pages 43–152 (458K) 1997 Fertility Clinic Tables, Alabama— Illinois.

ART 97/3 pages 153–266 (929K)  1997 Fertility Clinic Tables, Illinois— New York.

ART 97/4 pages 267–377 (479K) 1997 Fertility Clinic Tables, New York— Wisconsin.

ART 97/5 Appendix (108K) How to Interpret a Confidence Interval, Glossary of Terms Used in This Report,  ART Clinics That Reported 1997 Data for Publication, by State, and  Nonreporting ART Clinics for 1997, by State.

An Excel spreadsheet is available for the clinic's data for ART 1997 ( 457KB)

---

Assisted Reproductive
Technology Success Rates
National Summary and Fertility Clinic Reports

The complete report may be printed by downloading the 1996 ART Report (PDF 2047KB).

For slower Internet connections, download three smaller files for the entire report:

1 (PDF 322 KB) Table of Contents, Introduction, 1996 National Report, Introduction to Fertility Clinic Tables, Factors to Consider, How to Read..., 1996 National Summary Table

ART96/2 (PDF 735 KB) Fertility Clinic Tables for Alabama—Missouri

ART96/3 (PDF 873 KB). Fertility Clinic Tables for Nebraska—Wisconsin, Appendix

An Excel spreadsheet is available for the clinic's data for ART 1996 ( 334KB)

The report is printed in three volumes by U.S. region: Eastern, Central, and Western.

Volume 1—Eastern United States 1995 ART Report (768 KB)
Volume 2—Central United States 1995 ART Report (704 KB)
Volume 3—Western United States 1995 ART Report (627 KB)

An Excel spreadsheet is available for the clinic's data for ART 1995 ( 285KB)

Page last reviewed: 7/31/08
Page last modified: 12/12/07
Content source: Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion