| | Exhibit 300 (BY2009) - Information Technology Infrastructure, Centers for Disease Control and PreventionPART ONE
OVERVIEW
- 1. Date of Submission:
- 2008-02-04
- 2. Agency:
- 009
- 3. Bureau:
- 20
- 4. Name of this Capital Asset:
- CDC Information Technology Infrastructure
- 5. Unique Project Identifier:
- 009-20-02-00-01-1152-00
- 6. What kind of investment will this be in FY2009?
- Operations and Maintenance
- 7. What was the first budget year this investment was submitted to OMB?
- FY2002
- 8. Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment, including a brief description of how this closes in part or in whole an identified agency performance gap.
- CDC's IT infrastructure provides the foundation which enables CDC to perform it's critical mission of public health monitoring, research, communications, resource management, and surveillance. The goal is to provide service that is designed, deployed, operated and managed to meet the needs of CDC's public health mission. It must be flexible enough to respond to increased levels of service and rapid deployment of IT infrastructure for public health emergencies and support the day to day business functions. CDC with OMB approval has "restructured" CDC's Information Technology Service Office (ITSO). ITSO operates as a single enterprise office structured as a Restructured Organization (Formerly referred to as High Performing Organization (HPO)).ITSO is a consolidation of all IT infrastructure management and operations into a single organization reporting to the CDC Chief Information Officer and operating as a HPO in line with competitive sourcing policy exempt from a standard or streamlined competition for a period of five years (FY05- FY09) as long as all Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are met or exceeded. Supporting 13,500 IT infrastructure users of CDC data and services, this investment include all CDC IT infrastructure services and costs. Infrastructure functions include acquisition, installation, and support of the following: Desktop workstations, Directory services, E-mail , Tier-one helpdesk, Infrastructure software, Internet/, IT security, Networking, Remote access, Server support , Telecommunications, Videoconferencing. Other alternatives evaluated include (1) continuation of the previous CDC infrastructure management distributed among 18 CDC programs in over 36 geographic locations; (2) consolidation of all IT infrastructure management and operations into a single organization without additional aggressive business process re-engineering. The current "restructured organization" continues to outperform the other alternatives. As of 3rd quarter FY07, all KPIs for cost efficiency, staffing efficiency, service offerings, and service quality have been exceeded. This investment was approved by the CDC TRB and CDC ITIRB in June 2006. This initiative is steady state; has conducted the first operational analysis; and as a result of the analysis will remain in steady state. This initiative supports HHS Goal 8: Achieve excellence in management practices and PMA Initiatives, Expanded Electronic government and Competitive Sourcing.
- 9. Did the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee approve this request?
- yes
- 9.a. If "yes," what was the date of this approval?
- 2007-06-26
- 10. Did the Project Manager review this Exhibit?
- yes
- 11.a. What is the current FAC-P/PM certification level of the project/program manager?
- Senior/Expert-level
- 12. Has the agency developed and/or promoted cost effective, energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable techniques or practices for this project.
- yes
- 12.a. Will this investment include electronic assets (including computers)?
- yes
- 12.b. Is this investment for new construction or major retrofit of a Federal building or facility? (answer applicable to non-IT assets only)
- no
- 13. Does this investment directly support one of the PMA initiatives?
- yes
- If yes, select the initiatives that apply:
Initiative Name |
---|
Competitive Sourcing | Expanded E-Government |
- 13.a. Briefly and specifically describe for each selected how this asset directly supports the identified initiative(s)? (e.g. If E-Gov is selected, is it an approved shared service provider or the managing partner?)
- Competitive Sourcing is supported by OMB approval of ITSO as a Restructured Organization (HPO) which provides exemption from a standard competition for 5 years (FY05-09). Using a combination of contractor and government staff, a 38% cost savings and 26% reduction in FTEs have been realized. Expanded e-Gov is supported by providing the IT foundation for infrastructure functions; quality services while assuring transparency and accountability for our customers; and reducing operating costs.
- 14. Does this investment support a program assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)?
- no
- 15. Is this investment for information technology?
- yes
- 16. What is the level of the IT Project (per CIO Council's PM Guidance)?
- Level 2
- 17. What project management qualifications does the Project Manager have? (per CIO Council's PM Guidance)
- (1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment
- 18. Is this investment identified as high risk on the Q4 - FY 2007 agency high risk report (per OMB memorandum M-05-23)?
- no
- 19. Is this a financial management system?
- no
- 19.a.1. If yes, which compliance area:
- Not Applicable
- 20. What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2009 funding request for the following? (This should total 100%)
Area | Percentage |
---|
Hardware | 25 | Software | 11 | Services | 64 | Other | 1 |
- 21. If this project produces information dissemination products for the public, are these products published to the Internet in conformance with OMB Memorandum 05-04 and included in your agency inventory, schedules and priorities?
- n/a
- 22. Contact information of individual responsible for privacy related questions.
Name | Alice M. Brown | Phone Number | 770-488-8223 | Title | IT Security Project Manager | Email | AMBrown1@cdc.gov |
- 23. Are the records produced by this investment appropriately scheduled with the National Archives and Records Administration's approval?
- no
- 24. Does this investment directly support one of the GAO High Risk Areas?
- no
SUMMARY OF SPEND
- 1. Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by completing the following table. All amounts represent budget authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places. Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated Government FTE Cost, and should be excluded from the amounts shown for Planning, Full Acquisition, and Operation/Maintenance. The total estimated annual cost of the investment is the sum of costs for Planning, Full Acquisition, and Operation/Maintenance. For Federal buildings and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy, environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be included in this report.
All amounts represent Budget Authority
Note: For the cross-agency investments, this table should include all funding (both managing partner and partner agencies).
Government FTE Costs should not be included as part of the TOTAL represented. Cost Type | Py-1 & Earlier -2006 | PY 2007 | CY 2008 | BY 2009 |
---|
Planning Budgetary Resources | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | Acquisition Budgetary Resources | 0.500 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | Maintenance Budgetary Resources | 356.467 | 56.415 | 54.870 | 54.540 | Government FTE Cost | 18.445 | 19.655 | 20.530 | 21.560 | # of FTEs | 377 | 195 | 190 | 190 |
- 2. Will this project require the agency to hire additional FTE's?
- no
- 3. If the summary of spending has changed from the FY2008 President's budget request, briefly explain those changes.
- No change.
PERFORMANCE In order to successfully address this area of the exhibit 300, performance goals must be provided for the agency and be linked to the annual performance plan. The investment must discuss the agency's mission and strategic goals, and performance measures (indicators) must be provided. These goals need to map to the gap in the agency's strategic goals and objectives this investment is designed to fill. They are the internal and external performance benefits this investment is expected to deliver to the agency (e.g., improve efficiency by 60 percent, increase citizen participation by 300 percent a year to achieve an overall citizen participation rate of 75 percent by FY 2xxx, etc.). The goals must be clearly measurable investment outcomes, and if applicable, investment outputs. They do not include the completion date of the module, milestones, or investment, or general goals, such as, significant, better, improved that do not have a quantitative measure.
- Agencies must use the following table to report performance goals and measures for the major investment and use the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding Measurement Area and Measurement Grouping identified in the PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator for each of the four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is available at www.egov.gov. The table can be extended to include performance measures for years beyond FY 2009.
Row | Fiscal Year | Strategic Goal Supported | Measurement Area | Measurement Grouping | Measurement Indicator | Baseline | Planned Improvement to the Baseline | Actual Results |
---|
1 | 2006 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Mission and Business Results | Information Management | # of new or expanded service offerings | NA | +2 | 3 | 2 | 2006 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Processes and Activities | Costs | cost per user supported | $6772/user | $6839/user | $5439/user | 3 | 2006 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Customer Results | Service Efficiency | # users supported per ITSO staff | 66.4 users/ITSO staff | 68.1 users/ITSO staff | 71.9 users/ITSO staff | 4 | 2006 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Customer Results | Delivery Time | % of services that achieve SLA timeliness goals | 70% | 80% | 92.9% | 5 | 2006 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Technology | Reliability | % of time is available in accordance with SLA | 99.8% | 99.8% | 99.94% | 6 | 2007 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Mission and Business Results | Information Management | # of new or expanded service offerings | +2 | +2 | +6 | 7 | 2007 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Processes and Activities | Costs | cost per user supported | $6839/user | 6908/user | $5729/user | 8 | 2007 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Customer Results | Service Efficiency | # users supported per ITSO staff | 68.1 users/ITSO staff | 69.8 users/ITSO Staff | 73.9/users/ITSO staff | 9 | 2007 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Customer Results | Delivery Time | % of services that achieve SLA timeliness goals | 80% | 85% | 83.6% | 10 | 2007 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Technology | Reliability | % of time is available in accordance with SLA | 99.8% | 99.93% | TBD | 11 | 2008 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Mission and Business Results | Information Management | # of new or expanded service offerings | +2 | +2 | TBD | 12 | 2008 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Processes and Activities | Costs | cost per user supported | $6908/user | $6977/user | TBD | 13 | 2008 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Customer Results | Service Efficiency | # users supported per ITSO staff | 69.8 users/ITSO staff | 71.7 users/ITSO staff | TBD | 14 | 2008 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Customer Results | Delivery Time | % of services that achieve SLA timeliness goals | 85% | 90% | TBD | 15 | 2008 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Technology | Reliability | % of time is available in accordance with SLA | 99.8% | 99.8% | TBD | 16 | 2009 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Mission and Business Results | Information Management | # of new or expanded service offerings | +2 | +2 | TBD | 17 | 2009 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Processes and Activities | Costs | cost per user supported | $6977/user | $7047/user | TBD | 18 | 2009 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Customer Results | Service Efficiency | # users supported per ITSO staff | 71.7 users/ITSO staff | 71.7 users/ITSO staff | TBD | 19 | 2009 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Customer Results | Delivery Time | % of services that achieve SLA timeliness goals | 90% | 95% | TBD | 20 | 2009 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Technology | Reliability | % of time is available in accordance with SLA | 99.8% | 99.8% | TBD | 21 | 2010 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Mission and Business Results | IT Infrastructure Maintenance | # of new or expanded service offerings | +2 | +2 | TBD | 22 | 2010 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Processes and Activities | Costs | cost per user supported | $7047/user | $7047/user | TBD | 23 | 2010 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Customer Results | Service Efficiency | # users supported per ITSO staff | 71.7 users/ITSO staff | 71.7 users/ITSO staff | TBD | 24 | 2010 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Customer Results | Delivery Time | % of services that achieve SLA timeliness goals | 95% | 95% | TBD | 25 | 2010 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Technology | Reliability | % of time is available in accordance with SLA | 99.8% | 99.8% | TBD | 26 | 2011 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Mission and Business Results | Information Management | # of new or expanded service offerings | +2 | +2 | TBD | 27 | 2011 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Processes and Activities | Costs | cost per user supported | $7047/user | $7047/user | TBD | 28 | 2011 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Customer Results | Service Efficiency | # users supported per ITSO staff | 71.7 users/ITSO staff | 71.7 users/ITSO staff | TBD | 29 | 2011 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Customer Results | Delivery Time | % of services that achieve SLA timeliness goals | 95% | 95% | TBD | 30 | 2011 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Technology | Reliability | % of time is available in accordance with SLA | 99.8% | 99.8% | TBD | 31 | 2012 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Mission and Business Results | Information Management | # of new or expanded service offerings | +2 | +2 | TBD | 32 | 2012 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Processes and Activities | Costs | cost per user supported | $7047/user | $7047/user | TBD | 33 | 2012 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Customer Results | Service Efficiency | # users supported per ITSO staff | 71.7 users/ITSO staff | 71.7 users/ITSO staff | TBD | 34 | 2012 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Customer Results | Delivery Time | % of services that achieve SLA timeliness goals | 95% | 95% | TBD | 35 | 2012 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Technology | Reliability | % of time is available in accordance with SLA | 99.8% | 99.8% | TBD | 36 | 2013 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Processes and Activities | Costs | # of new or expanded service offerings | +2 | +2 | TBD | 37 | 2013 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Customer Results | Service Efficiency | cost per user supported | $7047/user | $7047/user | TBD | 38 | 2013 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Customer Results | Delivery Time | # users supported per ITSO staff | 71.7 users/ITSO staff | 71.7 users/ITSO staff | TBD | 39 | 2013 | Effective Management of Human Capital/Information Technology/Resources | Technology | Reliability | % of services that achieve SLA timeliness goals | 95% | 95% | TBD |
Enterprise Architecture In order to successfully address this area of the business case and capital asset plan you must ensure the investment is included in the agency's EA and Capital Planning and Investment Control (CPIC) process, and is mapped to and supports the FEA. You must also ensure the business case demonstrates the relationship between the investment and the business, performance, data, services, application, and technology layers of the agency's EA. - 1. Is this investment included in your agency's target enterprise architecture?
- yes
- 2. Is this investment included in the agency's EA Transition Strategy?
- yes
- 2.a. If yes, provide the investment name as identified in the Transition Strategy provided in the agency's most recent annual EA Assessment.
- CDC Information Technology Infrastructure
- 3. Is this investment identified in a completed (contains a target architecture) and approved segment architecture?
- no
- 4. Identify the service components funded by this major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, content management, customer relationship management, etc.). Provide this information in the format of the following table. For detailed guidance regarding components, please refer to http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/egov/.
Component: Use existing SRM Components or identify as NEW. A NEW component is one not already identified as a service component in the FEA SRM.
Reused Name and UPI: A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no, identify the reused service component funded by the other investment and identify the other investment using the Unique Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53 submission.
Internal or External Reuse?: Internal reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency within a department is reusing a service component provided by another agency within the same department. External reuse is one agency within a department reusing a service component provided by another agency in another department. A good example of this is an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations across the federal government.
Funding Percentage: Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount used for each service component listed in the table. If external, provide the funding level transferred to another agency to pay for the service. Row | Agency Component Name | Agency Component Description | Service Type | Component | Reused Component Name | Reused UPI | Internal or External Reuse? | Funding % |
---|
1 | Digital Signature Management | Defines the set of capabilities that guarantee the unaltered state of a file. | Security Management | Digital Signature Management | | | No Reuse | 5 | 2 | Identification and Authentication | Defines the set of capabilities that support obtaining information about those parties attempting to log on to a system or application for security purposes and the validation of those users. | Security Management | Identification and Authentication | | | No Reuse | 5 | 3 | Access Control | Access Control - Support the management of permissions for logging onto a computer, application, service, or network; includes user management and role/privilege management. | Security Management | Access Control | | | No Reuse | 3 | 4 | Video Conferencing | Defines the set of capabilities that support video communications sessions among people who are geographically dispersed. | Communication | Video Conferencing | | | No Reuse | 3 | 5 | System Resource Monitoring | Defines the set of capabilities that support the balance and allocation of memory, usage, disk space and performance on computers and their applications. | Systems Management | System Resource Monitoring | | | No Reuse | 5 | 6 | Email | Defines the set of capabilities that support the transmission of memos and messages over a network. | Collaboration | Email | | | No Reuse | 10 | 7 | Data Exchange | Defines the set of capabilities that support the interchange of information between multiple systems or applications; includes verification that transmitted data was received unaltered. | Data Management | Data Exchange | | | No Reuse | 5 | 8 | Network Management | Defines the set of capabilities that monitor and maintain a communications network in order to diagnose problems, gather statistics and provide general usage. | Organizational Management | Network Management | | | No Reuse | 15 | 9 | Call Center Management | Defines the set of capabilities that handle telephone sales and/or service to the end customer. | Customer Relationship Management | Call Center Management | | | No Reuse | 5 | 10 | Voice Communications | Defines the set of capabilities that provide telephony or other voice communications | Communication | Voice Communications | | | No Reuse | 10 |
- 5. To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas, Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this IT investment.
FEA SRM Component: Service Components identified in the previous question should be entered in this column. Please enter multiple rows for FEA SRM Components supported by multiple TRM Service Specifications.
Service Specification: In the Service Specification field, Agencies should provide information on the specified technical standard or vendor product mapped to the FEA TRM Service Standard, including model or version numbers, as appropriate. Row | SRM Component | >Service Area | Service Category | Service Standard | Service Specification (i.e., vendor and product name) |
---|
1 | Network Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Network Devices / Standards | 62.5 micron multi-mode fiber | 2 | Network Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Network Devices / Standards | ACF/NCP V7R5 | 3 | Video Conferencing | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Network Devices / Standards | Allied network media converter | 4 | Network Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Network Devices / Standards | ATM Switch, Cisco | 5 | Email | Service Access and Delivery | Access Channels | Wireless / PDA | Blackberry | 6 | Access Control | Component Framework | Presentation / Interface | Static Display | BlueZone Access Server | 7 | System Resource Monitoring | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Support Platforms | Platform Dependent | CA90S | 8 | Data Exchange | Service Access and Delivery | Access Channels | Collaboration / Communications | Captaris RightFax | 9 | Network Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Network Devices / Standards | Category 6 cable | 10 | Access Control | Component Framework | Security | Supporting Security Services | Check Point Firewall | 11 | Network Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Network Devices / Standards | Cisco Catalyst Operating System | 12 | Access Control | Component Framework | Security | Supporting Security Services | CISCO Firewall services module | 13 | Network Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Network Devices / Standards | Cisco IOS | 14 | Network Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Network Devices / Standards | Cisco Network switch | 15 | Access Control | Component Framework | Security | Supporting Security Services | Cisco PIX Firewall | 16 | Access Control | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Network Devices / Standards | Cisco Universal Access Server | 17 | Email | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Network Devices / Standards | Citrix Systems | 18 | Data Exchange | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Database / Storage | Storage | EMC Centera | 19 | Identification and Authentication | Component Framework | Security | Supporting Security Services | GSI LANguard | 20 | Network Management | Component Framework | Security | Supporting Security Services | IIS Internet Scanner vulnerability analysis | 21 | Network Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Wide Area Network (WAN) | Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) - Core Aspects of Frame Protocol for Use with Frame Relay Bearer Service | 22 | Video Conferencing | Service Access and Delivery | Access Channels | Other Electronic Channels | IPTV | 23 | System Resource Monitoring | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Software Engineering | Software Configuration Management | Microsoft Systems Management Server | 24 | Email | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Support Platforms | Platform Dependent | Microsoft Windows 2003 Server | 25 | Network Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Support Platforms | Platform Independent | NetCool Service Management | 26 | Network Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Support Platforms | Platform Independent | NetIQ | 27 | Network Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Support Platforms | Platform Dependent | NetOp | 28 | Voice Communications | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Network Devices / Standards | Nortel Communciation Server 1000E | 29 | Voice Communications | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Network Devices / Standards | Nortel PBX | 30 | Call Center Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Support Platforms | Platform Independent | Peregrine | 31 | Video Conferencing | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Video Conferencing | Polycom Viavideo | 32 | Video Conferencing | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Video Conferencing | Polycom Video Conference Switch | 33 | System Resource Monitoring | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Support Platforms | Platform Dependent | RMF | 34 | Digital Signature Management | Component Framework | Security | Certificates / Digital Signatures | RSA SecurID Key Fobs | 35 | Network Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Support Platforms | Platform Dependent | Server, Configuration Management | 36 | System Resource Monitoring | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Support Platforms | Platform Dependent | Server, Event Log Management | 37 | Network Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Wide Area Network (WAN) | SONET, Bellsouth | 38 | Data Exchange | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Database / Storage | Storage | Storage, EMC | 39 | System Resource Monitoring | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Network Devices / Standards | Switch, Server Monitoring | 40 | Network Management | Service Access and Delivery | Service Transport | Supporting Network Services | T1 | 41 | Network Management | Service Access and Delivery | Service Transport | Supporting Network Services | T3 | 42 | Data Exchange | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Peripherals | Tape Drive, 9940B, StorageTek | 43 | Data Exchange | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Peripherals | Tape Drive,1600/6250 bpi, IBM | 44 | Data Exchange | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Peripherals | Tape, Automated Library | 45 | Network Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Network Devices / Standards | Visara Concentrator | 46 | System Resource Monitoring | Component Framework | Security | Supporting Security Services | Watchfire AppScan | 47 | Network Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Network Devices / Standards | Wireless Networking Infrastructure, 3ETI | 48 | Network Management | Service Platform and Infrastructure | Hardware / Infrastructure | Network Devices / Standards | Wireless, Common Carrier |
- 6. Will the application leverage existing components and/or applications across the Government (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)?
- yes
- 6.a. If yes, please describe.
- This investment leverages: Federal Health Architecture (FHA), IT Infrastructure Optimization Line of Business, Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6). Yes, this investment will host existing applications across the Government, specifically HHS applications such as EHRP, UFMS (which aligns with the Presidential initiative for financial management), standard HHS Tier-1 Helpdesk, HHS.Net, and standard HHS E-mail system. The IT infrastructure will support or will integrate with all of these applications by providing the hardware/software platforms necessary to process the application, develop the applications, or process the applications. Additionally, as an OMB approved Restructured Organization (HPO), the infrastructure must function and is functioning as efficiently as possible. Further, this initiative complies with teh Federal Health Architecture, leveraging the Consolidated Health Informatics standards, the IT Infrastructure Line of Business standards, and the IT Security Line of Business and Nist security standards. Effective use of government funding is demonstrate by our ability to reduce the cost per customer supported and the ability to continue to expand service offerings, to maintain service timeliness and availability as our annual budget decreases.
PART THREE
RISK You should perform a risk assessment during the early planning and initial concept phase of the investment's life-cycle, develop a risk-adjusted life-cycle cost estimate and a plan to eliminate, mitigate or manage risk, and be actively managing risk throughout the investment's life-cycle.
Answer the following questions to describe how you are managing investment risks. - 1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?
- yes
- 1.a. If yes, what is the date of the plan?
- 2007-07-13
- 1.b. Has the Risk Management Plan been significantly changed since last year's submission to OMB?
- no
COST & SCHEDULE
- 1. Was operational analysis conducted?
- yes
- 1.a. If yes, provide the date the analysis was completed.
- 2007-06-30
- What were the results of your operational analysis?
- Performance was acceptable as determined meeting or exceeding all by key performance indicators (KPIS) and indicated no reason to discontinue steady state. ITSO's Restructuring initiative (HPO) established a series of performance metrics with KPIs and additional performance measures that are used to ensure designated quality, availability, and timeliness of services while achieving operational efficiencies. The Restructuring Initiative established a foundation for a comprehensive service level agreement (SLA) for the range of services. The SLA covers the major services offerings categories: Application Server Hosting, Customer Service, E-Mail, Directory Services, IT Infrastructure Security, Mainframe, Networking PC Hardware/software, Remote Access Telecommunications and Videoconferencing. The accountability of the initiative is based on the KPIs which include: Cost per customer/year; Customers supported/ITSO staff; Provision of new/expanded service offerings; Customer satisfaction; Service timeliness; and Service availability. The 3rd quarter FY07 report shows all KPIs exceeded the goals. Cost per customer/year: Goal=$6601, Actual=$5686; Customers supported/ITSO staff: Goal=68.1, Actual=73.5; Provision of new/expanded service offerings: Goal=+2, Actual=+6; Customer satisfaction (% of customers indicating good or excellent service provided): Goal=70%, Actual=83.6%; Service timeliness (%of services that achieve SLA timeliness goals): Goal=80%, Actual=100%; and Service availability (1-(person-hrs outage/total person-hours)): Goal=99.8%, Actual=99.93%.
|
|
|