go B&B ImFoRmikriom IMA=E MAkmA%mmmE@ 300 "Ipdcc Mman@s sou ^no UlmfmCOR 04AKLMORM, MA 94c ZC'77Z 10 U MA 0 CMC 1) 249-01 1 0 Alabama Pegional Medical Program PM 00028 JULY/AUGIJST 1974 RF,,VIBIL Application: This application requests $861,856 for the support of 16 new proposals. These proposals were approved and priorities assigned (page 53) by RAC after having been subjected to the full review cycle including submission to the GiP (a) and (b) agencies for review and coment. All of the proposals pertain to the goals and objectives of @Hl (Page 21-)). A major thrust of this application; priorities 1 through 5, requests $256,450 to support a consortium of activities toward providing care for the critically ill neAborn. Each of the proposals was prepared locally in conjunction with local resources and needs., but in collaboration with the state plan.t DRMP/ OD/7-15-74 JULY CO,,@TIITIEE RECO@@IENDkTIO',NT Critique: 0 4i 0 cn cn CD tn r- CD (z) m Lr) co -H m C) m C) cn m C,4 r- r- C) Lr) r- Lr) 00 c) Le) t-) Ea Lt) m CD t cn r, Cn C4 M C) r, Ln OC) Lr) 0 -ri C. C:) oo o ci oo Lr) Lo M C'4 C4 %D kO Lr) r- C,4 OC) 0% ko 00 U) c-4 C,4 r-A C) C4 CY) C4 %D Lr) r-4 c-4 cq :ic 0 V) ol o 0, tn m LA o tn w co 0 01 10 10 10 t- ut o 'O m :) & & 0 & t- tn C4 (n 'O Ln tA cr 0 -4 0 & (:) t- tA O. LA %O ui o 00 te% LA in 0% N ('4 o o 0. w% co m cn N 4 Ct) t,4 M 'o U-% Ct) o 0 0 o o o 0 0 e4 C) LLJ LU tct 'O O C%4 in ce :) o. t- o, " Gr 0 Ui z w "4 a tA 0 I- -(D0 co 0 LA C3 C, M 0 N 10 4 (n 0 ui ui LA m O (n 14 m I- C) a, 0 ce =) 10 co C4 cn rn 14 10 LA in (N cq CY 0. It LI t- in N o M O 't in L" 10 O I- t m m N cn N Ho @sA 0 LL t- IL z It z a LLJ 4 uj z C) o 44 ui 2: 2! z 0 tu LU ce co CIC 0- C3 o LU u ui Z ui tD 0 z LL Z z x w -i 3: 0 ui x: a. . 0 (.9 -4 0 0. k- w z a: tu CD in tn ui "4 C) 0 -i 3: of ui 0 X a. cn z UJw w >- cc z 0- X LL tn -< 0 0 w L) LLJ m cn U. z U-1 uj tu x a. eq Z > Lu z z -4 L!i (-I > t- z x ui LU u LU P" LU tn ul ui cri C3 Z z z CK ui t-4 I- x C) C:) rL t- tn I- z w 1-4 ck: ! ":(4 -i m I- 0 L6 ui c U) < Z -c -C -t z z L) z t- LD I- co ul -i a. ui < CZ ce 0 -i tr < u ui > < :D C4 uj z -t rz =) I- :D w ce. 0 a- > us Cf _j i z ce -C ui z C3 t4 L-) t- I- U. cc 0- a. 7- C) M 4 tA 01 tn U.% in L.1 10 tire CO 10 t- C3 O I . CL 0 a 0 0, Ulk cc (a ui 4-10 tn 0 cli co 00 M cn -i CD m Cl) (ON 0 -H 00 'D C;3 in r4 la N co 14 C4 0 10 N LA (D 0 (n Ul% co o It m 00 cn q 0 ol U) m ul r- 0, c, 0 o o O 0 Cy 03 u-S 11 m o 10 It 0, tn co Iq 10 Ln ol tn 0 in LU tn -4 LA 4 &4 (n (n N cn N tn la 0 t'4 0 0 C,4 U% 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 LLJ tlu In cc a 00 en 10 40 ul P4 z ce In 0 a N 10 10 (4 10 10 (4 tm 0 a 0 0 u (A cq -1 co o o m It 0 C), tn 0 fn 0 N Le% C) m 0 0 LU tu 0 10 I- ol 00 10 ol tn I- tn ol 0 0 10 O O 0 LA 4 co w =) & . . 0. LA" ol N @ I- ; ? ui tn U) UN O r4 P4 m 10 m N cn tA 14 (4 z a C13 z 0 U. I- z -t ujz t- c 10 LU 0u ui cr_ -J Cd w a. 3c 0 z i3 ti L3 LU an C!: w cc I- a z 0. us w LU x ul LU L) (i tu z 13 L) z V) z LLI Lt. 0. LLI w 2: cc ce x x V) LU 1-4 U) P4 0 a. ce L) ix i- z VI cc LU (4 ui L!i < u ui ul m: t,4 z u LU z U. 'Lu z -x < < cc co w LL u z x z -7 z z (1) ul z u -i tD I- I I 1 ol LLJ LL m: cr> V) z 14 U. V) > w -i -i w o 0 LU cc 0 I- 0. w C) LU ce r_ m o. < CZ C) -Z -i t- u -J w ce LU_ ui CD < " " C-) ti = " &, I c u x w t- u u ce a. PI :c I =) o C4 V) U) V) ;j V) V) 0 0 0 :: " (n 5- 1 -i CC < 1-4 LU 0 U U U rL 7.' -C 0 :u cd Ln LL. LL -i C:) z c 0 > = = . Z tn U. -i -C a- LU X Z LU tu ui w z U. t- ui rz 0 im a. V) o CL W cf: x -C V) V) c -i -i in 7- z cc co co < > -J w -C 0 LU LLJ tii 0 CD V) < :3c tL 4-1 :E X M t- T. :3c 3: -r cc cc. 0 3: ce 2: a tn tn 10 co a,0 14 N (A tn 0 0 0 0 0 -i 14 14 14 -1 11 r4 4 q -4 4 .4 P4 .4 1 .4 in U3 U) 4-i0 00 t m co "4 M r-i N C-) U) Lt) Ce) 0 -H CY') P- r-i (L) 00 C,4 0 r-q ON 3c co Ul% 10 10 at 0 co ol K tn In 10 V4 0 CY 0 0% r- to 'O 0 0 u tn r4 tn 10 W LU 4-i In LU z iz ;4 *a Li% (4 o tn co It N ol W LLJ tn P4 Q) M CY 0 -D w r- 00 C:l LLJ 14 cn t tr it C3 fa z C3 U- I- a. C3 2c L) LLJ C) LU us 0 10 0 C4 ix En 0. 0 -i ui x -i LU 0 :c tu LL La U) w a C) -.4 0 (.0 i LU 2: -C 44 LU , i LY (:D cc z z I 0- (i ce 0 t- -C z z 0 14 w Lil LU 0- LL ui co C3 cn 04 (D ui CL. &.4 ce C:3 0 CL ZE g ce Z I < 0 CL 0. .4 0 z N N N N z _j ui z C3 a. z Lli cl t IONAL ]vEDICAL PROGPAM ALAB@IA REG RM 00028 MAY/JUNE 1974 REVIEW Request: $2,648,439 Committee Recommendation: $2,028,389 Overall Assessment by Individual Reviewers: Above,Average Critique: The present Director has had extensive experience with the Alabama Regional @ledical Program; vacancies that have occurred an the staff have been filled very promptly with qualified people and in spite of the threatened national phase-out of RNP, both the Review Co @ ttee and the Regional Advisory Group have remained active. The membership of the RAG-is adequately represented bv providers and consumers from each of the region's 10 CHP 'lb" age@cies. Also, the Director of the "all agency is a RAG member. The region has been very successful in attracting local suppor't for the continuation of its programs. "The program presented, both proposed and ongoing, are timely relevant, and appear to be viable.'.' The reviewers believed Alabama has achieved a viable outreach program and has prioritized its objectives. Although it is not unique to this region, the Alabama Regional Medical Program is continuing to attempt to equalize its minority representation on program staff, project staff and its committee memberships. The reviewers arrived at the reduction in th e recommended funding level (from $2,648,439 requested to the recommended $2,028,389) by considering some of the programs, both continuing and new, to be of a low priority in a one year time-frame. For example, the Tr@hoblastic Disease request, the requests for Cervical Cancer Screening anT the Imunoflouresce'nce for Renal Biopsie-s were considered of low priority. At this stage of evelopment, the reviewers believed the project request for Audio-Visual ertensive Assistance in Educating @ s should not be funded and that the request of $151,000 for PSRO sliouid be reduced by $100,000. JULY/AUGUST REVIEW Estimated Request as of @y 1974 I.lm (SCOB/6-5-74) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NATIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL:- June 13-14, 1974. Council concurred with Committee recommendation. DRMP FUNDING DECISION: $1,927,314 (SCOB/RMPS/7-2-74)