ARTHRITIS CONFERENCE Meuhleback Hotel Kansas City, Kansas January 19 - 20, 1975 Workshop Co-Moderators Sunday, Jan. 19 A - 1 Physician Education Warren Katz, M.D. Russell T. Schultz, M.D. A - 2 Allied Health Education Marjorie C. Becker, Ph.D. Robert Godfrey, M.D. A - 3 Patient Education Frank E. Emery, M.D. William G. Sale, M.D. A - 4 Demographic Factors 0. Lynn Deniston E. L. Angie Hebbeler A - 5 Arthritis Services Gene V. Ball, M.D.. John L. Magness, M.D. A - 6 Service Deployment Raymond E. H. Pa-tr@'Idge, M.D. Donald L. Riggin Monday, Jan. 20 B - 1 Program Documentation F. Richard Conver,.,, Carl H. Eisenbeisl B 2 Special Report Opportunities Ivan F. Duff, M.!). John L. Kline B - 3 Care Delivery Initiatives Roy L. Cleere, II.D. C. 11. Wilson, Jr., M.D. B - 4 Program Continuity Ephraim P. Eng.Lei-aan, M.D. Paul D. Ward PHYSICIAN EDUCATION Guides and Instructions Workshop: A-1 Room: Music Room Sunday Jan. 19, 1975 Co-Moderators: Warren Katz, M.D. Russell T. Schult7, M.D. Chief of Rheumatology Oklahoma University Medical College of Pennsylvania College of Medicine The Co-Moderators should designate a Recorder of the workshop to record the discussion. Workshop Products: 1. An oral report, not to exceed 15 minutes,,at the Plenary session Sunday afternoon. 2. A written report which briefly reflects the salient natures points emphasized, and perspective of the workshop discussion. This report will be incorporated in the Conference Report, and will also be provided to all attendees Sundav eveninp- as back- ground for the Monday workshops. The written report should be delivered to the staff in the Conference administration room (Private Dining Room No. 5) as soon as possible, So,.ne ictat on facilities will be available there, if needed, Discussion Aids: The workshop discussion (and the resulting report) should strive to describe the subject activities presently underway under the pilot arthritis program, the potentials under the orant initiative, how to realize the potentials, and extensions which should be pursued from the grant program base. The workshop discussion Lo elicit such information might include: levels and scope of physician education generally undertaken under the pilot arthritis program; salient problems; potential solutions; methods and techniques to strengthen education effect; the potential affect of different education focus8es on treatment and care delivery needs; differentiation beuween short term, and long term education objectives in terms of developing arthritis program; curricula being used under varying circumstances; feasible documentation to record pilot arthritis program physician education activities; potential sources of documentation format; recommendations about physician education information collection, and utilization; etc. ALLIED HE TH EDUCATION Guides and Instructions Workshop: A-2 Room: Tower 22 Sunday, Jan 19, 1975 C6-Moderators: Mar orie C. Becker R.P.T.,, Ph.D. Robert Godfrey, M.D. University Hospital Univ. of Kansas School Ann Arbor, Michigan of Medicine Kansas City, Kansas The Co-Moderators should designate aRecorder of the workshop to record the discussion. Workshop Products: 1. An oral report, not to exceed 15 minutes, at the Plenary session Sunday afternoon. 2. A written report which briefly reflects the salient nature points emphasized and perspective of the workshop Discussion. This report will be incorporated in the Conference rc@port, and S-u,,"-y @VI=LL@LL6 @O iJU@k- ground for the Monday workshops. The written repor,t should be delivered to the staff in the conference administration room (Private Dining Room No. 5) as soon as possible. Some dictation facilities will be available there, if needed. Discussion Aids: The workshop discussion ' (and the resulting report) sl-lould strive to describe the subject activities presently underway under the pilot arthritis program, the potentials under the grant initiative, how to realize the potentials, and extensions which should be pursued from the grant program base. The workshop discussion to elicit such information might include: levels an,d scope of allied health education generally undertaken under the pilot arthritis program; salient problems; potential solutions; methods and techniques to strengthen education effect;-curricula being utilized under varying circuTp..3tances; the potential for allied health education and employment in terms of increased physician flexibility, and improved access to care; needs potential, and sources for criteria and standards; feasible document- ation to record allied health education accomplish through the pilot arthritis program; sources of documentation format; recommendations about allied health education information collection, and utilization; etc. PATIENT EDUCATION Guides and Instructions Works@: A-3 Room: Private Dining Room No. 4 Sunday., Jan. 19, 1975 Co-Moderators: Frank E. Emery, M.D. William G. Sale, M.D. University of Texas Medical Vanderbilt University Branch at Galvestor School of Medicine The Co-Moderators should designate a Recorder of the workshop to record the discussion. Workshop Products: 1. An oral report, not to exceed 15 minutes, at the Plenary session Sunday afternoon. 2. A written report which briefly reflects the salient nature points emphasized and perspective of the workshop discussion. This report will be incorporated in the Conference report, and will also be provided to all attendees Sunday evening as back- ground for the Monday workshops. The written repor-t should be delivered to the staff in the conference administration room (Private Dining Room No. 5) as soon as possible. Some dictation facilities will be available there, if needed. Discussion Aids: The workshop discussion (and the resulting report) should strive to describe the subject activities presently underway under the pilot arthritis program, the pot entials under the grant initiative, how to realize the potentials, and extensions which should be pursued from the grant program base. The workshop discussion to elicit such information might include: levels an-d scope of patient education being undertaken under the pilot arthritis program; who is providing the education; what problems are encountered; what sources of support are available, or potentially available for patient education activities; how thoroughly are these being utilized; are new methods or techn que being employed - what are they; what if any distinctions exist respec- tively with respect to availability, quality, and site of patient education; what is the potential for expanded, quality patient educa- tion; what documentation of patient education activities in the pilot arthritis program is feasible; etc. DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS Aids and Instructions Workshop: A - 4 Room: Private Dining Room 3 Sunday, January 19, 1975 Co - Moderators O.' Lynn Deniston Mrs. E. L. Hebbeier University of Michigan Director Ann-Arbor, Michigan Ohio Valley Regional Medical Program The Cb-moderators should designate a Recorder of the workshop to make notes on the discussion. Workshop Products: 1. An oral report, not to exceed 15 minutes, at the Plenary session Sunday afternoon. 2. A written report which briefly reflects the salient naturef points emphasized, and perspective of the workshop discussion. This report will be incorporated in the Conference Report, and will also be pro- vided to all attendees Sunday evening as background for the Monday workshops. The written report should be delivered to the staff in the Conference administration room (Private Dining Room No. 5) as soon as possible. Some dictation facilities will be available there, if needed. Discussion Aids: The workshop discussion (and the resulting report) should include such matters as: need for, and appropriate uses of demographic infor- mation; general principles and methods of demographic information accumulation and processing; the extent of demographic information which might be obtaine from the pilot arthritis program; available sources of assistance with respect to demographic questions; the impact of demographic factors on the deve opment of arthritis services., and care delivery systems. ARTHRITIS SERVICES Aids and Instructions Workshop: A-5 Room: Junior Ballroom Sunday, January 19, 1975 Co-Moderators Gene V. Ball, M.D. John L. Magness, M.D. Professor of Medicine Project Director University of Alabama Medical School Dakota Hospital The Co-Moderators should designate a Recorder of the workshop to record the discussion. Workshoo Products: 1. An oral report, not to exceed 15 minutes, at the Plenary session Sunday afternoon. 2. A written report which briefly reflects the salient natu're, points will also be provided to all attendees Sunday evening as background for the Monday workshops. The written report should be delivered to the staff in the Conference administration room (Private Dining Room No. 5) as soon as possible. Some dictation facilities will be available there, if needed. Discussion Aids: The workshop discussio n (and the resulting report) should strive to describe activities presently underway under the pilot arthritis program, potentials of activities receiving grant support, how to realize the potentials, and ways to sustain grant-supported and related progress. The workshop discussion to elicit such information might include: the scope of comprehensive arthritis services; the extent to which comprehensive programs exist, or are being reasonably approached; priority needs, and best' response which can be made through optimal utilization of existing facilities; a definition of a center of excellence; priority service development needs which are presently susceptible to effective improvement with existing resources. 'SERVICE DEPLOYMENT Aids and Instructions Workshop: A-6 Toom: Private Dining Room I Sunday, January 19, 1975 Co-Moderators Raymond E. H. Partridge, M.D. Donald Riggin New England Medical Center Hospital Executive Director Boston, Massachusetts Arkansas Chapter Arthritis Foundation The Co-Moderators should designate a Recorder of the workshop to record the discussion. Workshop Products: 1. An oral report,.not to exceed 15 minutes, at the Plenary session Sunday afternoon. 2. A written report which briefly reflects the salient nature, points emphasized, and perspective of the workshop discussion. This report W@.L.L a.LSU be Pi'UV.LUeU LU aii attendees bunaay evening as background for the Monday workshops. The written report should be, delivered to the staff in the Conference administration room (Private Dining Room No. 5) as soon as possible. Some dictation facilities will be available there, if needed. Discussion Aids: The workshop discussion (and resulting report) should include such elements as: the general pattern of existing arthritis services; additions or extensions being provided through the pilot grant program; the general profile of current arthritis service organization and deployment; the impact on service deployment of medical resources, geography, demography, or other factors; effective relationships of central and extension services; circumstances which inhibit effective service deployment, and how they can be overcome; priorities in service deployment; opportunities for service deployment to integrate resources, and improve quality of and access to caret PROGRAM DOCUlvll':NTAT'ON W ho . B-1 Guides and Instructions Room: Music Room 20, 1975 Monday, January co-Moderators Jr., M.D. F. Richard ConveXy Carl H - Eisenbeis, University Hospital Medical Director San Diego, California St. Margaret Memorial Hospital The Co-Moderators should designate a Recorder of the workshop to record the discussion. Worksh p Products: An oral report of about 15 minutes at the Monday afternoon Plenary nd presents or session which outlines the workshop discussion, a , or recommendations regarding Sur t ation. Program Document the salient nature, points e report briefly presenting 2. A writt n erspective of the workshop discussioi-,, including emphasized,. and p recommendations to the Plenary meeting - The written (or dictated) workshop report should be delivered to the staff in the conference administration room (Private Dining Room No. 5) as soon as The rs depart. y case, before the Co-Moderato possible, but in an workshop report will be incorporated into a Conference Report. Discussion, -Ami@d-s-: Can the pilot arthritis program be documented? How? By what recommended process, and schedule? By whom? What problems, or opportunities present with respect to overall, summary. documentation; selected Pubject documentation? What are the main cial efforts should be made toward program elements for which spe documentation? How -should documented information be reported? How can program assessments be made, and reported? By whom? SPECIAL REPORT OPPORTUNITIES Guides and Instructions Workshop: B-2 Room: Colonial Ballroom Monday, January 20, 1975 Co-Moderators Ivan F. Duff, M.D. John Kline Professor of Internal Medicine Executive Director University Hospital N. C. Chapter Ann Arbor, Michigan Arthritis Foundation Workshop Products: 1. An oral report of about 15 minutes at the Monday afternoon Plenary session which outlines the workshop discussion, and presents or suggests conference positions, or recommendations regarding Program Documentation. 2. A written report briefly presenting the salient nature, points @A@J PAICL@a/,VLA, @IkA PC.L'Z>PUL;LLVe Ul LLI(CworKsnop discussion, inciucing recommendations to the Plenary-meeting. The written (or dictated) workshop report should be delivered to the staff in the conference administration room (Private Dining Room No. 5) as soon as possible, but in any case, before the Co-Moderators depart. The workshop report will be incorporated into a Conference Report. Discussion Aids: (NOTE: the workshop on Program Documentation will address problems, opportunities, and et6ments of documentifig the overall pilot arthritis grant program.) What are the special studies being conducted under grant support-which should be reported? Who should do this? How? How will the information be disseminated? What are the -study elements which should generally be assessed, and reported in all, or most instances? What special reports might be developed from other grant program areas? How can such reporting be organized? Who should do it? How? CARE DELIVERY INITIATIVES Guides and Instructions Workshop: B-3 Room: Private Dining Room 4 Monday, January 20, 1975 Co-Moderators Roy L. Cleere, M.D., M.P.H. C. H. Wilson, M. D. Administrator Grady School of Medicine Regional Arthritis Progrwn. Atlanta, G6orgia Denver, Colorado Workshop Products: 1. An oral report of about 15 minutes at the Monday afternoon Plenary session which outlines the workshop discussion, and presents or suggests conference positions, or recommendations regarding Program Documentation. 2. A written report briefly presenting the salient nature, points emphasized, and perspective of the workshop discussion, including recommendations to the Plenary meeting. The written (or dictated) workshop report should be delivered to the staff in the conference administration room (Private Dining Room No. 5) as soon as possible, but in any case, before the Co-Moderatoi-S depart. The workshop report will be incorporated into a Conference Report. Discussion Aids: What has been the prevailing pattern of arthritis care delivery? What are the strengths/weaknesses inherent in the pre- vailing patterns? What is the impact of the grant program on the patterns? What are the most promising efforts being made with respect to care extension, quality, and patient access to car-,) What other potential benefits mi'hf be realized? What can be done 9 to sustain the most beneficial care delivery developments under- way? How? By whom? PROGRAM CONTINUITY Guides and Instructions Workshop: B-4 Room: Tower 22 Monday, January 20, 1975 Co-Moderators Ephraim P. Engleman, M.D. Paul D. Ward San Mateo, California Executive Director California Committee on Regional Medical Programs Workshop Products: 1. An oral report of about 15 minutes at the Monday afternoon Plenary session which outlines the workshop discussion, and presents or suggests conference positions, or recommendations regar ing Program Documentation. 2. A written report briefly presenting the salient nature, points emphasized, and perspective of the workshop discussion, including File J. !,-AICL.L Y LiLe@Lili6. -L.'tl-- VV L ittcti %,U.L Ui.-tatv,@j workshop report should be delivered to the staff in the conference administration room (Private Dining Room No - 5) as soon as possible, but in any case, before the Co-Moderators depart. The workshop report will be incorporated into a Conference Report. Discussion Aids: What funding sources are now being utilized to support arthritis programs? What are the differences in the programs being supported by different funds? Which of these funding sources will continue? Which will terminate? What new funding sources may emerge? What kinds of program activities can earn revenue? Which (and how) can these be broadened, or be more effectively pursued? Are arthritis program emphases being shaped for optimal attraction of all available sources of support? How can this be improved? How should arthritis programs gear up for future funding opportunities? How will optimal provider (delivery) program factors be assured in the context of "gearing up'17