Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs
![red dividing line](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20080920124858im_/http://exchanges.state.gov/education/images/templates/redpixel.gif)
EDUCATIONAL PARTNERSHIPS PROGRAM
Home
> Educational Partnerships
Program > Resources
for Project Directors > Project
Administration
Reporting Requirements Handout
III. Reporting Schedule and Requirements (FY 03):
The Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 requires Federal agencies
to report the
impact of the U.S. government funded grants. Therefore, your reports should
focus on the
results of program activities and how they support program goals. For
each objective of the project, identify indicators, which link results
to the objective. Comments should reflect your observations and analysis
of the implementation of your project by your institution as well as your
partner institution. We encourage you to submit anecdotal narratives in
the reports to provide specific examples of institutional and personal
developments.
Two hard copies of the following reports should be sent to the Bureau
of Educational and Cultural Affairs (ECA) Grants Division at the address
listed here.
Please include your grant agreement number in all correspondence.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS: CONTENT GUIDELINES
A. PLANNING REPORTS, due 30 days after grant
is awarded (if additional time is needed, please contact your program
officer).
For the first year of the project, outline specific activities that will
be implemented during the first year of the project and describe how these
activities will support your project objectives. Indicate if there are
any changes from the original proposal. Changes in direction or emphasis
require Department of State approval. Provide short curriculum vitae
for proposed participants not included in the original proposal. Provide
phone, fax numbers, and e-mail addresses for project directors if different
from information supplied in the proposal.
B.1. ANNUAL REPORTS,due at the end of each
grant year, excluding the final year. The annual report should begin with
a one-page Executive Summary outlining the primary achievements and challenges
of the year and should include a statement indicating how much grant
funding was spent during the year. Provide an updated program plan
(see following section for content suggestions) and financial plan for
the upcoming year. Throughout the project -- provide updated contact information
and CVs for proposed participants not mentioned in the original proposal.
Overview
The following applies to the annual reports and the final report, summarizing
project activities. At the beginning of the report, provide a summary
of the major activities. Include the following:
- The number of U.S. and of foreign participants who traveled and the
approximate length of visits during the grant period to date. Specify
who traveled to and from the United States. (Provide additional information
on the faculty and staff actively involved in the project who did not
travel.)
Name
|
Gender
|
Dates of travel
|
Faculty or Department
|
Travel objective
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accomplishments
Provide a detailed account of the link between activities and project
goals/objectives. Please emphasize how the project activities help
to institute and sustain desired changes. The following are categories
of activities and examples of indicators typical for many partnerships.
You should not be limited by these categories or examples. Please include
a discussion or analysis of these activities, describing why they did
or did not go as planned and their impact on the project. You are encouraged
to provide anecdotal information from participants to illustrate and
demonstrate the impact of the project.
- Faculty development (e.g., increased expertise in the field, expanded
professional networks and professional development opportunities, implementation
of new methodologies or technologies). Please establish the connections
between professional development opportunities and institutional impact.
- Curriculum development (e.g., students are enrolled in new courses
or the content of existing courses is strengthened, syllabi are developed,
case studies or simulation games are introduced);
- Collaborative research involving faculty from both partners (e.g.
articles submitted for publication in juried [peer review] journals);
- Educational materials (e.g., textbook development, CD-ROM acquisition,
expanded library resources, materials developed/tailored for local conditions,
faculty and/or student access to computers increased);
- Outreach (e.g., consultations with government policy makers or officers
of private
organizations, presentations to community groups, or professional conferences).
If as a result of outreach other sources of funding become available
to support project objectives, please describe amounts and source of
funds;
- Web-page development (e.g., project research or activities available
in Internet, classroom activities.) If the project has developed a website,
please provide the address;
- Distance education programs available (explain how many classes or
workshops are occurring);
Trip reports
Please include trip reports written by exchange participants as attachments
to the annual reports. These first hand reports are shared with Department
of State staff and are useful in describing specific project activities
and individual perspectives. Please note that it is often useful to
provide guidelines to participants about what is expected from trip
reports. Simple listings of activities or meetings are not as useful
as discussions about the significant aspects or outcomes of these meetings
or activities.
B.2 FINAL REPORT, due 90 days after the
grant ends. Summarize and update the categories suggested in the annual
reports, and also include the following:
- Additional Support: Did the project attract any support from additional
sources (especially sources outside the U.S. Government)?
- Ongoing activities: Describe plans for interaction between the partner
institutions after the expiration of the grant. Are there institutional
agreements in place for continuing linkage activities? Is the collaboration
expanding to other institutions of higher education?
- Institutional Benefits: Describe how the partnering institutions benefited
from project activities and provide information on any unanticipated
impact and on-going activities.
C. PROJECT EVALUATION, to be included with
all reports after the first annual report.
Provide a three-page summary of the most significant results of the
project, in the categories suggested. Supporting documentation should
support your conclusions. Indicate who carried out the evaluation, what
reports were prepared, and the substance of the findings.
Provide the following additional information:
1. Activities/impact:
-- Did you use the evaluation plan outlined in the proposal, or some
other method to evaluate the results of your activities?
-- Summarize the findings of your evaluation plan. In which category(ies)
listed under section III B "Annual Reports," did you achieve
the most significant results? How did these results support the project
goals?
-- How many faculty members participated in curriculum development?
What did they produce? What were the results?
-- What new programs were instituted as a result of this project?
-- What new activities, as a result of this grant, were carried out
by the U.S. institution? What new activities were carried out by the
foreign partner institution? What project activities were not carried
out? Why or why not?
-- What courses were given as part of the project? How many students
took these courses? Were they credit or non-credit courses? Will they
be repeated?
-- Did the project include distance education? If yes, what system did
you employ? How effective was it?
-- What types of communication and interaction did the participants
have with their partner colleagues and departments? Were there opportunities
for cross-departmental collaboration?
-- What were the project's research topics? What papers or presentations
resulted? (Please list them.)
-- What outreach activities were there? With what size audience(s)?
What type of audience(s) were these? What topics were addressed?
-- What were the unanticipated impacts and activities? (I.e. unanticipated
impacts and activities might include initiating a student exchange or
receiving funds from non?U.S. Government sources to support activities
related to the project goals).
-- What were some of the obstacles faced? Were they overcome? If so,
how?
-- Was the climate for the project supportive or difficult?
-- What has been the impact of the grant on your institution? On your
partner institution? What was not achieved?
2. Afterthoughts and recommendations: With the benefit of hindsight,
what would you have done differently? What advice would you give to
new project directors? What advice regarding development of future RFGPs
or grants management would you give to the Educational Partnerships
Program administrators at the Department of State?
3. Attach any evaluation forms from your partner institution or
program participants, if available.
4. Attach any reports from an outside consultant or other evaluator,
if available. The report should give the consultant's views as to
the degree to which project objectives have been achieved by each participating
U.S. And foreign institution over the course of the project. The identification
of best practices relating to project administration is also encouraged,
as is the discussion of unforeseen difficulties.
D. FINANCIAL REPORT, due with the
annual reports.
Interim - A report reflecting expenditures against each item
of expenditure set forth in Section C. of Article III shall be submitted
annually in accordance with the format suggested in the "Terms
and Conditions for the Administration of United States Department of
State Assistance Wards" (Rev. 9/99) This report must be certified
by the Recipient's Chief Fiscal Officer or an officer of comparable
rank.
Final - a. A report reflecting expenditures against each items
of expenditure set forth in Section C. of Article III shall be submitted
within 90 days after the expired date of this Agreement in accordance
with the format suggest in the "Terms and Conditions for the Administration
of United States Department of State Assistance Wards" (Rev. 9/99)
This report must be certified by the Recipient's Chief Fiscal Officer
or an officer of comparable rank.
b. All international travel charged to this Agreement must be on an
American flag carrier. If travel was on a foreign flag carrier, a statement
justifying the use of a foreign flag carrier, which meets one of the
exceptions cited in the "Fly America Act," must be included
with the financial report. (See "Terms and Conditions for the Administration
of Assistance Awards by the United States Department State" (Rev.
09/99) included with this agreement.) Travel on foreign flag carriers,
which does not meet one of the exceptions of the Act will be disallowed.
Back to the top
![red dividing line](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20080920124858im_/http://exchanges.state.gov/education/images/templates/redpixel.gif)
|