NLM Gateway
A service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health
Your Entrance to
Resources from the
National Library of Medicine
    Home      Term Finder      Limits/Settings      Search Details      History      My Locker        About      Help      FAQ    
Skip Navigation Side Barintended for web crawlers only

An evaluation of antiretroviral HIV/AIDS treatment in a Rio de Janeiro public clinic.

Carmody E, Diaz T, Starling P, Rocha Beruthdos Santos AP, Sacks H; International Conference on AIDS.

Int Conf AIDS. 2002 Jul 7-12; 14: abstract no. B10599.

Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, United States

BACKGROUND: The Brazilian public health system has implemented free, universal access to anti-retroviral therapy (ARVs) for HIV-infected patients (PTs). To evaluate this system, we did a pilot study to: 1) Describe ARV combinations used, 2) Determine whether ARVs were prescribed according to Brazilian guidelines, and 3) Determine the proportion of PTs who lacked medications for >1 month in the year. METHODS: Year 2000 data were abstracted from all medical records of adult PTs initiating HIV/AIDS treatment in a Rio de Janeiro public clinic in early 2000 (n=67). Results were analyzed with frequency analyses and chi2 tests. RESULTS: The sample was 41.8% female with a mean age of 34.8 years. 81% had AIDS (n=54); sample mean baseline CD4 and viral counts were 276 cells/mm3 and 237517 copies/ml respectively. Delays between clinic request and notation of CD4 and viral counts averaged 64 and 86 days respectively. 88.1% of PTs were prescribed ARVs (n=59). Most frequent initial regimens were zidovudine (AZT) and didanosine (DDI) (27.1%, n=16), and AZT, DDI, and nevirapine (16.9%, n=10). No combinations were prescribed that were contraindicated in Brazilian guidelines. However, 23.9% of PTs (n=16) received regimens designated as inadequate for their CD4 level, mainly those with CD4<350 on dual nucleoside therapy. 25% did not have medications for >1 month at least once during 2000 (n=17), due both to PTs not returning to refill medications and to drug shortages. Lacks tended to be associated with number of drugs in regimen (p=.16, chi2 test), but not with patient sex, age, registration date, or CD4 level. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest good adherence to national treatment guidelines. Discrepancies between therapy and clinical measures may be due to delays in receiving CD4/viral counts. Better access to lab facilities, increased patient follow-up and greater drug availability would improve program success.

Publication Types:
  • Meeting Abstracts
Keywords:
  • AIDS Vaccines
  • Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
  • Adult
  • Ambulatory Care Facilities
  • Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active
  • Brazil
  • Didanosine
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Female
  • HIV Infections
  • HIV Seropositivity
  • Humans
  • Nevirapine
  • Pilot Projects
  • Zidovudine
  • drug therapy
  • methods
  • therapy
Other ID:
  • GWAIDS0018441
UI: 102255939

From Meeting Abstracts




Contact Us
U.S. National Library of Medicine |  National Institutes of Health |  Health & Human Services
Privacy |  Copyright |  Accessibility |  Freedom of Information Act |  USA.gov