NLM Gateway
A service of the U.S. National Institutes of Health
Your Entrance to
Resources from the
National Library of Medicine
    Home      Term Finder      Limits/Settings      Search Details      History      My Locker        About      Help      FAQ    
Skip Navigation Side Barintended for web crawlers only

ANTIVIRAL EFFICACY, METABOLIC CHANGES AND SAFETY OF ATAZANAVIR (ATV) VERSUS LOPINAVIR/RITONAVIR (LPV/RTV) IN COMBINATION WITH TWO NRTIs IN PATIENTS WHO HAVE EXPERIENCED VIROLOGICAL FAILURE WITH PRIOR PI-CONTAINING REGIMEN(S): 24-WEEK RESULTS FROM BMS AI424-043.

Nieto-Cisneros L, Zala C, Fessel WJ, Gonzalez-Garcia J, Cohen C, McGovern R, Adler E, McLaren C; IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment (2nd : 2003 : Paris, France).

Antivir Ther. 2003; 8 (Suppl.1): abstract no. 117.

Hospital Regional No. 1 Gabriel Mancera, Del Valle, Mexico

BACKGROUND: ATV is a potent once-daily azapeptide PI with a distinct resistance profile, demonstrated safety and efficacy in naive and experienced patients, and a lipid profile superior to marketed PIs. OBJECTIVE: Compare efficacy, lipid profile and safety of non-boosted ATV with LPV/RTV regimens in ARV-experienced patients with virologic failure on a PI-containing regimen. METHODS: Multinational, open-label, controlled study in ARV-experienced patients randomized (1:1) to ATV 400 mg QD or LPV/RTV 400/100 mg BID with two NRTIs. RESULTS: Three hundred patients randomized, 290 treated. Week 24 results demonstrated significant virological responses for both regimens with a greater decrease in RNA for LPV/RTV vs ATV (mean changes from baseline (SE), HIV RNA (log10 c/ml) -2.11 (0.09), -1.67 (0.08); CD4 (cells/mm3) 121 (14), 94 (13). A post-hoc analysis showed decrease in RNA was comparable between regimens in patients without nucleoside mutations at baseline. Mean lipid changes from baseline (LDL-C, total-C, HDL-C, triglycerides) were lower for ATV (-6%, -2%, +12%, -2%) vs LPV/RTV (+5%, +17%, +18%, +55%). Adverse events (AEs) were comparable between regimens and were consistent with known safety and tolerability profiles of the study drugs. Serious AEs were infrequent. CONCLUSIONS: Significant reductions in HIV RNA and robust increases in CD4 cell counts were observed in this PI-failing, ARV-experienced population. While non-boosted ATV demonstrated less antiviral efficacy than the boosted LPV/RTV regimen, ATV had a more favourable lipid profile. ATV may be an option for some ARV-experienced patients, e.g., where lipid management is a priority.

Publication Types:
  • Meeting Abstracts
Keywords:
  • Anti-HIV Agents
  • Antiviral Agents
  • CD4 Lymphocyte Count
  • Cell Cycle Proteins
  • Clinical Protocols
  • HIV
  • HIV Infections
  • HIV Protease Inhibitors
  • Humans
  • NBN protein, human
  • Nuclear Proteins
  • Oligopeptides
  • Pyridines
  • Pyrimidinones
  • Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
  • Ritonavir
  • atazanavir
  • lopinavir
  • virology
Other ID:
  • GWAIDS0022804
UI: 102262428

From Meeting Abstracts




Contact Us
U.S. National Library of Medicine |  National Institutes of Health |  Health & Human Services
Privacy |  Copyright |  Accessibility |  Freedom of Information Act |  USA.gov