U.S. Centennial of Flight Commission home page

Landsat 1 (ERTS) mosaic of Southern California, 1974

Landsat 1 mosaic of Southern California, June 1974.

Landsat 7

Landsat 7 satellite.

SPOT 1, 2, and 3

SPOT 1, 2, and 3.

SeaWiFS is carried aboard the satellite OrbView-2

SeaWiFS is carried aboard the satellite OrbView-2, providing important information about the oceans and the life within them.

Quickbird image of Washington, D.C.

Quickbird image of the Washington Monument. Image courtesy of DigitalGlobe, www.digitalglobe.com

Radarsat image of Antarctica

For 18 days during the Southern Hemisphere spring of 1997, a NASA-launched Canadian satellite called RADARSAT collected pieces of a puzzle that will help scientists study the most remote and inaccessible part of the Earth - Antarctica. Scientists now have the puzzle pieces put together, forming the first high-resolution radar map of the mysterious frozen continent.

Operational Remote Sensing Satellites


The field of remote sensing took shape during the 1960s as an outgrowth of aerial photography. New instruments, forming images in the infrared as well as in visible light, produced “false color” photos in which forests and farms appeared red rather than green. They contained astonishing amounts of information, and William Pecora, director of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), took the lead in pushing for a spacecraft that could cover the entire world with such images.


The first of them, Landsat 1, reached orbit in 1972, with four more following during the next dozen years. Their photos showed where crops were infected with diseases such as leaf blight. Geologists saw complete fault zones at a glance. Hydrologists monitored the snowpack in mountains and forecast the availability of water. Land use planners studied the spread of suburbs. In South America, Landsat photos led to the first accurate maps of much of that continent. In California, a single analyst took only a week to inventory 25 separate crops across the entire state, noting how much of each was being grown.


Landsat was a program of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). In 1979, President Jimmy Carter transferred it to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), which already operated the Nation's weather satellites. In 1983 President Ronald Reagan directed NOAA to place the program in the hands of a private corporation. The Land Remote-Sensing Commercialization Act of 1984, enacted by Congress, gave guidelines for this transfer. However, a problem quickly emerged: the need for federal subsidies.


Within the national economy, the information from Landsat had a value as great as $10 billion per year. This was quite enough to justify a remote-sensing program with an annual budget in the hundreds of millions, to cover the cost of developing new instruments and spacecraft. But the main source of income for such a program appeared to lie in sales of photos and images, which could bring in as little as $6 million per year. Studies showed that subsidies of up to $500 million were therefore required, to be spread over several years.


The Reagan administration did not like subsidies and cut the offer to $250 million. On this basis, only one company remained willing to bid for NOAA's Landsats, and it took over the program. This was Eosat, a joint venture between the satellite manufacturer Hughes and the electronics firm RCA. This firm was to operate Landsats 4 and 5, which had reached orbit respectively in 1982 and 1984; build two new satellites, Landsats 6 and 7; and hold exclusive rights to market photos and other data.


Events soon showed that while individual analysts placed great value on the Landsat images, no one in Washington had the influence to win support for the program at high levels of government. Even at reduced levels, the subsidy payments proved hard to come by. Eosat did what it could—quadrupling the price of its photos, collecting fees from overseas stations that received the satellite data—but still found itself surviving on a financial shoestring. Work on Landsat 6 went ahead, slowly, but the company limped from one financial crisis to the next.


By contrast, the French had no qualms about subsidies. Their government launched the SPOT program, the Satellite Pour l'Observation de la Terre, in 1978 and in 1982, established the firm of SPOT Image, to market its photos. The first spacecraft flew to orbit in 1986 and quickly showed that its photos had superb quality. In Washington, the Pentagon had issued rules to prevent Landsat images from having military value, but these regulations did not apply in France. News organizations soon found that SPOT was ready to serve as a reconnaissance satellite for use by the press.


Meanwhile, as Eosat stumbled along, it became increasingly clear in Washington that the market for a commercial Landsat still was far from ripe. A new law, the Land Remote-Sensing Policy Act of 1992, repealed the 1984 law and returned Landsat to the government. Matters came to a head in October 1993 when Landsat 6 failed in its launch attempt, underscoring the need for Landsat 7.


Decisions during 1994 sorted out the responsibilities. Eosat continued to operate Landsats 4 and 5 and retained the right to sell their photos. NASA took responsibility for building Landsat 7, with NOAA agreeing to operate this spacecraft in orbit. The USGS took over the task of marketing its data, while maintaining an archive of photos for sale to customers.


In this fashion, the 1992 law laid solid groundwork for Landsat 7, which reached orbit in 1999. By then it had company. The 1992 law arranged for the licensing of true commercial remote-sensing satellite systems, which took shape during subsequent years. Lockheed was the first company to obtain such a license, winning federal approval for its Ikonos satellite in 1994. Other systems followed: Orbview of Orbital Sciences, Quickbird for the firm of DigitalGlobe.


These spacecraft have saved money by being lighter than Landsat 7's 4,780 pounds (2,168 kilograms). Several of them have also broadened their markets by providing photos with a sharpness that the Central Intelligence Agency might have envied. The Ikonos craft have used both approaches. Its license endorsed a Lockheed plan for resolution of one meter; that is, the ability to show objects as small as one meter in the photos. Ikonos 1, with one-third the weight of Landsat 7, flew to orbit in September 1999. Its color images of Manhattan, taken from an altitude of 423 miles (681 kilometers), were so crisp that they showed cars on the city's highways.


Orbital Sciences has pursued a step-by-step approach. Its first satellite, Orbview 1, went into orbit in April 1995. It was a weather satellite that returned black-and-white images. Orbview 2, in August 1997, was a true remote-sensing craft with only one-seventh the weight of Landsat 7. Its photos covered broad swaths of land and sea, but lacked detail. However, Orbview 3, currently planned for launch, is to match Ikonos by providing its own one-meter resolution.


Quickbird, which flew in October 2001, currently is doing even better. Its photos show detail as small as two feet in size. Its images can cover more than three times the area of North America in the course of a year, while its spacecraft weighs less than half as much as Landsat 7.


Other nations have built their own operational remote-sensing satellites. Canada's Radarsat, launched in 1995, forms its images by using radar instead of visible light. It thereby operates at night as well as in the daytime, while its radar beams pierce through clouds. An Argentinian spacecraft, the Scientific Applications Satellite or SAC-C, carries remote-sensing equipment along with other instruments. Launched in November 2000, its tasks include determination of the migration route of the Franca whale.


In Asia, South Korea has pursued a program resembling that of Orbital Imaging. That country started in 1992 and 1993 with two small spacecraft, each weighing about a hundred pounds. The program, called Uribyol or Our Star, has doubled its weight with its third satellite, which flew in 1999. This project is important; it shows how small a remote-sensing spacecraft can be while still returning useful data.


Moreover, China and India have not only built their own remote-sensing craft but have orbited them using their own launch vehicles. The Indian Remote Sensing program has been particularly active, flying its first spacecraft in 1988, aboard a Soviet rocket and continuing since 1994 with India's own Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle. The newest craft, called Oceansat, flew in 1999, and only a few months later, surveyed the damage done by a powerful typhoon.


China has entered this field more recently, but its Ziyuan craft flew successfully in 1999 and 2000. In contrast to the lightweight satellites of South Korea, these tip the scale at more than a ton and a half. Both reached orbit aboard a new rocket of the Chinese-built Long March series.


Remote sensing began in the United States and France, but today an increasing number of nations in the Third World are involved in these programs. Brazil cooperated with China in building Ziyuan 1, Brazil also is developing its own launch vehicle. A spacecraft for Thailand, the Thai Microsatellite, resembles the early Uribyol craft of South Korea and flew in 1998. Such nations are unwilling to purchase photos from America or France; they want images that are all their own.


-T.A. Heppenheimer


References and Further Reading


Colwell, Robert. “Remote Sensing of Natural Resources.” Scientific American (January 1968): 54-69.

Ezell, Linda Neuman. NASA Historical Data Book, Volume III, 1969-1978. NASA SP-4012. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1988. Available at http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4012/vol3/sp4012v3.htm

Hammond, Allen. “Remote Sensing.” Science (April 29, 1997): 511-516.

Logsdon, John, editor. Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in the History of the U.S. Civil Space Program, Volume III, Using Space. NASA SP-4407. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1998.

Mack, Pamela. Viewing the Earth. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1990.

Marshall, Eliot. “A Spy Satellite for the Press?” Science (December 4, 1987): 1346-48.

__________. “Space Cameras and Security Risks.” Science (January 27, 1989): 472-73.

Rumerman, Judy A., compiler. NASA Historical Data Book, Volume VI: 1979-1988. NASA SP 2000-4012. NASA History Office, Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 2000. Available at http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4012/vol6/cover6.html

“Toward Global Monitoring.” Special Section. Astronautics & Aeronautics (September 1973): 32-68.

Waldrop, M. Mitchell. “Imaging the Earth.” Science (March 26,1982): 1600-1603.

__________. “Imaging the Earth.” Science (April 2, 1982): 40-41.

__________. “What Price Privatizing Landsat?” Science. (February 11, 1983): 752-754.

__________. “White House Slashes Landsat Subsidy.” Science. (September 21,1984): 1373.


“Commercial Space Act of 1997.” http://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/project/hr1702.html

“French SPOT Satellite Guide.” http://www.csrsr.ncu.edu.tw/english.ver/service/resource/spot/spot.html

“Land Remote Sensing Policy.” http://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/project/15USCch82.html

“Landat 7.” U.S. Geological Survey. http://landsat7.usgs.gov/

“Landat 7 Gateway.” http://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/

“Landat 7 Press Kit.” http://landsat.gsfc.nasa.gov/announcements/landsat7.pdf

“Landsat Program.” http://geo.arc.nasa.gov/sge/landsat/landsat.html

“Remote Sensing: Introduction and History.” http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Library/RemoteSensing/


Educational Organization

Standard Designation  (where applicable

Content of Standard

International Technology Education Association

Standard 3

Students will develop an understanding of the relationships among technologies and the connections between technology and other fields of study.

International Technology Education Association

Standard 4

Students will develop an understanding of the cultural, social, economic, and political effects of technology.

National Council for Geographic Education

Standard 1

How to use maps and other geographic representations to acquire and process information.