Finland will overhaul its private-sector, earnings-related pension system in January 2005 to encourage later retirement and to address demographic uncertainties. However, there is broad agreement that the reform will be insufficient to cope with rising pension costs brought on by low fertility rates and rising life expectancy.
Finland's old-age pension system is composed of the national pension and compulsory earnings-related pensions. The national pension guarantees a minimum income to residents who are not entitled to an earnings-related pension and to those who receive a relatively small earnings-related benefit.
The earnings-related pension system is a partially funded pay-as-you-go arrangement, with funds managed by a large number of private pension institutions. It is jointly financed by employer and employee contributions, and benefits are based on the number of years in employment, the accrual rate, and the pensionable wage. Voluntary pensions do not play a major role in providing retirement income in Finland.
The following new financial incentives and program changes will fully affect earnings-related pensions accruing from 2005:
The Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) projects that Finland's old-age dependency ratio will rise faster than that of any other OECD country. The population aged 65 and older, as a proportion of the population aged between 20 and 64, is projected to increase from 23 percent to 45 percent in 2030 and thereafter to level off at slightly less than 50 percent during the decade 2040 to 2050. The OECD has recently reported that without reform, Finland's share of gross domestic product (GDP) devoted to old-age pensions will grow from 8 percent in 2000 to about 13 percent by 2050. Both the International Monetary Fund and the OECD have urged that additional reforms be taken.
The French government will accept a lump-sum payment of €7.7 billion (US$9.8 billion), or 0.4 percent of France's GDP, from the state-owned utility companies Electricité de France (EdF) and Gaz de France (GdF) in exchange for linking their largely unfunded pension plans to the national system. This payment will enable the French government to reduce its budget deficit from the current 3.8 percent of GDP to 2.9 percent of GDP in 2005.
Although the government's deal with the state-owned utilities may have improved its short-term financial situation, it may undermine its long-term fiscal outlook. Today, the country spends about €32.7 billion, or 27 percent of all public-service expenditures, on pensions. It is expected that France's aging population will cause a dramatic increase in pension outlays in the near future. Next year alone, public spending on pensions will increase by €2 billion.
EdF's 112,000 French employees have received very generous pension promises that the government will now have to cover. According to a special report in The Economist, the French parliament estimated that EdF's unfunded pension liabilities equaled €50 billion last year.
France is not alone in using pension assets from state-owned companies to reduce deficits. Last year Portugal assumed control of its underfunded postal pension fund and is currently considering taking over the assets and liabilities of three more state-owned companies: Caixa Geral de Depósitos, a financial institution, and Aeroportos de Portugal and Navegação Aérea de Portugal, both of which operate the country's airports. Similarly, Germany, which has been in violation for several years of the 3 percent cap on budget deficits established by the European Union's Stability and Growth Pact, has announced after much debate that it would assume control of the pension assets and liabilities of its state-owned companies, Deutsche Telekom and Deutsche Post.
The Pensions Commission, an independent body established to evaluate the national pension system and private savings in the United Kingdom, released its first report, Pensions: Challenges and Choices, on October 12. Although the Commission Chairman, Adair Turner, has pointedly avoided making any recommendations, the report suggests that the current pension system has contributed to extremely low levels of private savings and concludes that society and individuals will have to make unpleasant choices regarding the future of the country's retirement policies. The report concludes that, if retirees are not to be poorer on average in relation to the rest of society, either tax contributions must increase or savings must rise, or people will have to work longer.
The United Kingdom's retirement system is very complex. At its center is the basic state pension. For retirees whose retirement income falls below a certain level, a system of means-tested benefits provides additional income, not unlike Supplemental Security Income in the United States. In 1978, all employees, except the self-employed, were brought under a compulsory, wage-based pension system called the State Earnings-Related Pension Scheme (SERPS). In 2002, SERPS was replaced by the State Second Pension, which is more generous toward workers with low earnings. Employees may also contract out of the State Second Pension by contributing an equal amount to a funded pension system such as a defined benefit or defined contribution account. In an attempt to encourage private savings, in 1999 the government introduced tax-preferred individual savings accounts. However, the enormous variety of providers and plans, each with different governing rules, has hampered their popularity.
This retirement system has for many years been the envy of continental Europe, since public expenditures for pensions have been projected to decline as a percentage of GDP over the next 50 years. However, the Pensions Commission now suggests that the success of the United Kingdom's retirement system may have been exaggerated. Projections are low because they do not take into account the growing cost of the means-tested benefits or new data on the demographic projections for the United Kingdom.
The state pension benefits currently replace approximately 37 percent of an average earner's final salary compared with slightly more than 42 percent in the United States. Although the balance of retirement pensions in the United Kingdom had been provided by the State Second Pension or employer-based defined benefit pension plans, many of these plans have been underfunded, and an increasing number are now closed to new members. Some may soon close to current members, because of the winding up of plans. Employers are replacing defined benefit plans with less generous defined contribution plans.
The Pension Commission is in consultation with various experts and interest groups. It will release its recommendations next summer following parliamentary elections.
Argentina's 11 private pension-fund management companies (AFJPs) have agreed to restructure the equivalent of US$16 billion of defaulted government bonds by swapping them for newly created inflation-linked bonds. President Kirchner signed a decree on October 7 after several failed attempts to come to an agreement during the past few years. However, since the country's other creditors have not yet accepted the latest offer by the AFJPs, the final status of the agreement between the government and the AFJPs is unclear.
Under the October agreement with the AFJPs, the government will issue higher-yield, short-term "Boden" bonds in exchange for US$2.3 billion in lower-yield treasury notes (Letes) that the AFJPs were forced to buy in 2001. The Boden bonds will mature between 2008 and 2014 and will begin semiannual payments in March 2011. Approximately US$13 billion in defaulted bonds will be swapped for new bonds with a 42-year maturity date. In addition, for at the least the next 5 years, the AFJPs will be allowed to set a higher than market value for their portfolios to protect them from major losses, especially for workers who are likely to retire in the next several years.
The defaulted bonds date back to Argentina's economic crisis that culminated in late 2001. At that time, in an effort to avoid defaulting on its foreign debt, the government required the AFJPs to swap their bond holdings for lower-yielding, longer-term bonds. The government also forced the pension funds to convert US$2.3 billion in certificates of deposit to treasury notes. In January 2002, the government defaulted on its debt and devalued its currency.
At the same time, to boost workers' take-home pay, the government temporarily reduced workers' mandatory contributions to an individual account from 11 percent of earnings to 5 percent. Currently the rate is 7 percent, but that is scheduled to be raised to 9 percent on July 1, 2005, and restored to 11 percent on October 1, 2005. Employers do not contribute to workers' individual accounts.
It is unclear how Argentina's system of some 9.8 million individual retirement accounts will be affected by the government's default and subsequent debt restructuring. However, it is assumed that the long-term effects will be negative because of the lowering of the contribution rate coupled with the lost value of the higher-yield bonds and the compound interest that would have been earned. The Argentine peso's appreciation over the past 2 years has raised individual account assets to about US$16 billion, or 13.5 percent of GDP, from US$11.5 billion, or 11.3 percent of GDP, in 2002. But, it is important to note that these figures represent book rather than actual market value.
The AFJP's defaulted debt represents about 16 percent of Argentina's US$100 billion total debt. President Kirchner believes that the agreement with the AFJPs will help convince the country's other creditors to accept a separate plan, but, to date, some 500,000 bondholders worldwide have not accepted Argentina's latest offer.