July 17, 2007
Contact: Robin Winchell (202) 225-4031
WASHINGTON, D.C. - U.S. Rep. Charlie
Melancon (D -LA) testified today at a
Congressional hearing on the severe need for affordable homeowner's insurance
in coastal Louisiana.
Since Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, premiums in south Louisiana have skyrocketed and many
homeowners have had their policies cancelled. As private insurance
companies have pulled out of coastal Louisiana,
more and more homeowners have had to turn to the state-sponsored "insurer of
last resort," which by law charges above-market premiums. During the
hearing, Rep. Melancon shared the stories of several of his constituents in
south Louisiana
who have been hit with huge premium increases or had their policies cancelled
altogether.
"We in Congress must act quickly to solve this insurance
crisis so that middle class families - the backbone of our economy - can
continue to afford to live in coastal communities," Rep. Melancon said.
"Multi-peril insurance, like that proposed in Mr. Taylor's bill, would go a
long way in addressing some of the insurance problems highlighted by Katrina
and Rita."
Rep. Melancon testified before a
subcommittee of the House Financial Services Committee, which was holding a
hearing on H.R. 920, the Multi Peril Insurance Act of 2007. The bill
calls for a major expansion of the federal National Flood Insurance Program to
allow NFIP policyholders to purchase windstorm coverage directly from the
federal government, in addition to flood insurance. Rep. Melancon is a
co-sponsor of the legislation, which was introduced by Rep. Gene Taylor of Mississippi, whose home
was destroyed by Hurricane Katrina. A fact sheet on H.R. 920 can be read here.
Rep. Melancon concluded, "I
thank Mr. Taylor for leading the fight to reform homeowners insurance and end
the wind vs. water debate once and for all. Families in coastal
communities deserve to have the assurance that when they take the responsible
action of insuring their home, they will be able to rebuild if a disaster
strikes."
Rep. Melancon's full statement
before the subcommittee follows.
# # #
Madam Chairwoman,
In August of 2005, America
watched as Katrina destroyed over 200,000 homes in Southeast Louisiana, and
then saw even more destruction just a few weeks later as Hurricane Rita ripped
apart Southwest Louisiana and took with it
almost 25,000 more homes.
After the Gulf
Coast suffered through
two of the worst natural disasters in this country's history, our people were
forced through the indignity of another battle - with their insurance
companies. Private homeowner's insurance policies covered damage caused
by wind, but not damage from flooding or storm surge. Because it can be
difficult to prove whether the winds or the water from a hurricane caused a
home's damage, many Katrina and Rita victims found that their insurance
companies denied or low-balled their claims, leaving them to rely solely on
payouts from the National Flood Insurance Program, which had to make
outrageously high payments at taxpayer expense. Thousands of homeowners
took their insurance companies to court before they got the insurance payouts
they were owed from years of faithfully paying their homeowner's
premiums. Today, almost two years after the storms, some are still
waiting for a check so they can rebuild their homes.
At the same time, insurance companies have been hastily
pulling out of coastal areas like south Louisiana,
canceling policies and refusing to write new ones. More and more people
in south Louisiana are being forced to turn to
Louisiana's
state-sponsored "insurer of last resort" for homeowner's insurance, paying
premiums that are above market rates. While Louisiana's strong consumer protection laws
protect many homeowners who have had insurance policies for at least three
years from being dropped by their insurance companies, they are by no means the
lucky ones. Even those who did not file claims after the 2005 hurricanes
are now being hit with skyrocketing premium increases, often as much as
two or three times what they paid before the storms.
The district in Louisiana I
represent is almost entirely in the hard-to-insure part of the state, and every
day I get calls, emails and letters from constituents begging Congress to do
something about the insurance crisis in south Louisiana. Here is just a sampling of
the them [HOLD UP LETTERS].
Roy Barrios of Lafourche Parish wrote me saying that
Allstate recently cancelled his homeowner's insurance policy and he now will
have to pay three times as much for coverage from Louisiana's insurer of last resort. He
was only two months shy of being covered by Louisiana's consumer protection laws that
would have kept his policy from being cancelled, although he noted that
Allstate is still happy to renew his more-profitable car insurance
policy.
Similarly, Todd Ramirez of Thibodaux, Louisiana,
told me his annual premium increased in one year from $1188 to $4165 - almost
300%.
Jeanette Tanguis of Houma,
Louisiana, said her premium
increased $200 PER MONTH. In a letter to me she wrote, "Having spent most
of my life living in Terrebonne Parish, it never occurred to me that I would be
forced to move from the place I love and have called home for most my
life. Unfortunately, my family and I are being forced to make this sad
decision." These are only a few of the many stories I hear from
people who are being forced to leave their homes and communities.
We in Congress must act quickly to solve this insurance
crisis so that middle class families - the backbone of our economy - can
continue to afford to live in coastal communities. Multi-peril insurance,
like that proposed in Mr. Taylor's bill, would go a long way in addressing some
of the insurance problems highlighted by Katrina and Rita.
By bundling wind and water coverage into one plan,
multi-peril insurance would cover home damaged by hurricanes, regardless of
whether winds or flooding caused the damage. Not only will this provide
homeowners with peace of mind, it will indirectly save them money because they
will be able to avoid costly and time-consuming legal battles like those waged
after Katrina and Rita, when many homeowners had to hire lawyers and engineers
for independent assessments. A multi-peril insurance policy will also
create more efficiency in adjusting claims, and homeowners will receive their
payments much faster than under the current two-policy system.
Finally, a multi perils homeowner's insurance program will
reign in insurance premium costs because rates would be required to be
actuarially sound. Also, a multi-peril NFIP can make premiums in coastal
communities manageable by spreading risk among a much larger pool of
policyholders. With over 50% of Americans living within 50 miles of the
coast, a national multi-peril insurance program would have plenty of
prospective customers.
It is time to recognize that market failures exist.
The federal government recognized this reality when it created crop insurance,
which now supports a healthy domestic agricultural industry that can feed
American families. The inability of private insurance markets to handle
catastrophic losses became evident after Katrina and Rita, and the sharp
decline in the availability of affordable homeowners insurance is crushing our
rebuilding efforts along the Gulf
Coast.
I thank Mr. Taylor for leading the fight to reform
homeowners insurance and end the wind vs. water debate once and for all.
Families in coastal communities deserve to have the assurance that when they
take the responsible action of insuring their home, they will be able to
rebuild if a disaster strikes.
# # #
Contact: Robin Winchell (202) 225-4031
|