Analysis: Lawmakers say Korea deal must
have guarantees
By Deb Riechmann
Associated Press
Friday, April 25,
2008
WASHINGTON - From the
right and the left, President Bush faces criticism over his approach toward
North Korea after the White House belatedly disclosed U.S. intelligence
findings that the communist regime was helping build a Syrian nuclear reactor _
at the same time it was promising to fully disclose its own nuclear activities.
Conservatives said
the revelations proved North
Korea can never be trusted. Democrats and
Republicans roughed up the administration for waiting so long to speak up about
the Syrian reactor, which was destroyed by Israeli jets in a hushed mission on
Sept. 6, 2007.
Both sides said the
newly released intelligence raised the bar for making sure that any deal the U.S. and its partners make with North Korea's
Kim Jong Il comes with a
tough anti-cheating warranty.
It's unclear what
will happen next in the diplomatic dance with North Korea.
Syria denounced the
reactor claims, saying the U.S.
was waging a campaign of false allegations. So far, North
Korea hasn't said anything about whether it lent Syria a hand in
building it.
There's concern that North Korea might be angry about the disclosure
in Washington
and leave the negotiating table, ending Bush's hopes
for reaching a pact before he leaves office. Others tracking the nuclear
standoff with North Korea
said the intelligence could actually lay the groundwork for a deal that the United States, China,
Japan, South Korea and Russia
are trying to reach with Pyongyang.
Democratic Sen. Joe
Biden of Delaware,
chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said any agreement needs
"vigorous verification," but said the newly disclosed information
only underscores the need for pursuing the talks.
His counterpart in
the House, California Democrat Howard Berman,
said the U.S. should
continue pressing North
Korea to make good on its promise to declare
its nuclear programs and "ensure that the North Koreans do not stray from
it."
On the conservative
side, John Bolton, the former U.S.
ambassador to the United Nations who has been critical of U.S. policy on North Korea, said: "I think
this should drive the stake through the six-party talks. It shows why the North
Koreans can't be trusted, why you need intrusive verification of anything they
say."
The administration
said it held off publicly disclosing the intelligence because it wanted some
time to pass to lessen the chance that Syria
would retaliate against Israel
for its attack on what the Syrians said was only an unused military facility.
Breaking its silence on Thursday, the White House said North Korea assisted Syria's secret nuclear program and
that the destroyed facility was not intended for "peaceful purposes."
Rep. Pete Hoekstra of
Michigan, the top Republican on the House
Intelligence Committee, said Bush's failure to keep Congress informed would
make it harder to get congressional support for its dealings with North Korea.
"It's bad management and terrible public policy to go for
eight months knowing this was out there and then drop this in our laps six
hours before they go to the public," he said. "I think it really
jeopardizes any type of the agreement they may come up with" regarding North Korea.
The White House's
four-paragraph statement covered the landscape of political opinion.
It called the Syrian
reactor a "dangerous and potentially destabilizing development for the
region and the world," and insisted that Syria "come clean before the
world regarding its illicit nuclear activities." It said North Korea's
hand in building the reactor was a "dangerous manifestation" of its
nuclear weapons program and proliferation activities.
The White House,
however, said it remained committed to the talks and to making sure that North Korea
does not engage in proliferation activities again.
"We will work
with our partners to establish, in the six-party framework, a rigorous
verification mechanism to ensure that such conduct and other nuclear activities
have ceased," White House press secretary Dana Perino
said in a statement.
U.S. officials argue that
the disclosed intelligence won't undermine the six-party talks, but will
provide leverage to officials trying to get an accurate accounting of North Korea's
nuclear and proliferation activities.
In recent weeks, U.S. and North
Korean diplomats have worked out a deal to get the talks back on track, but its
precise terms have remained unclear. In general, the North could produce a less
detailed public accounting about any proliferation activities its been involved
in as well as disclose details about its program to develop weapons from highly
enriched uranium.
Nuclear experts
tracking the talks say they think that Christopher Hill, the lead U.S. negotiator in the talks, has compiled enough
information about North
Korea's uranium enrichment activities to
make the claim that that program is dead.
On proliferation,
they speculate that the new disclosure about the Syrian reactor might give the
reclusive North Korean regime a way to acknowledge its past involvement in
spreading nuclear technology or expertise to Syria or other nations. And, by
showing the world that the Syrian facility has been destroyed, the
administration can claim that past North Korean-Syrian cooperation is no longer
a threat.
Bolton said he doesn't know
the administration's negotiating strategy, but suspects Bush would want some
deal to emerge from the six-party talks in a hurry.
"I think when
people fully appreciate the magnitude of North Korea's duplicity, they'll
see that there's no point in pursuing these talks any further," he said.