Biography
    Honors
Committees
E-Mail Me
Office Locations


Academy Nominations
Congressional Law
     Enforcement Program
DC Tour Information
Federal Grants
Flag Requests
Government Links
Help with a Federal Agency Internship Program
Kids Page
Outreach Program


Votes/Legislation
Cameron Gulbransen Kids
     Transportation Safety Act
Environment
Freedom, Privacy,and Civil
     Liberties
Housing
Internet Tax Ban
Medicare Vision Rehabilitation
     Services Act
Portsmouth Naval Shipyard
Small Business
Social Security Reform
Special Education Funding
Veterans


Columns
C-SPAN
Floor Statements
Photo Gallery
Press Kit
Press Mailing List
Press Release Archive
Radio Clips
Video Clips


Privacy Policy

Home

 

A 1970s energy plan won’t work

By Senator John Sunnunu

6/29/08


As the price of oil hovers near $140 per barrel, talking heads fill the airwaves with dramatic statements about America’s energy future. The talk seems endless, and strangely, commentators all seem to think that we have never dealt with these questions before. I may be the youngest member of the United States Senate, but even I remember the oil spikes of 1973, 1980, and 1991. Time and circumstances may have changed, but families and small businesses in New Hampshire feel it just the same. Higher prices for heating oil, gas, and propane drain budgets and hurt the economy. This challenge, like those past, can and must be overcome.

While the date has changed, the proposals from the far left have not: Increase energy taxes, start a lawsuit, ignore the potential of nuclear power, and above all, oppose all new production of American oil and gas. We can do better – we must do better – than just looking back to failed policies of Jimmy Carter and the 1970’s. The path forward lies in a balanced approach: conservation, alternative energy, and domestic production – not extremism from one side or the other.

There is no “magic bullet” that will instantly resolve our energy crisis. Future technologies such as hydrogen fuel cells should be pursued and funded by both the private sector and government programs such as the National Science Foundation. We must remember, however, that research represents a potential for new technology and economic opportunity – not a guarantee. As the market develops new technologies, we need to act now with common sense steps in three key areas that we know will bring benefits tomorrow and for years to come:

  • Smart energy policy begins with conservation. Energy saved each day and over the long-term makes a significant difference. Today, our economy uses 45 percent less energy to produce a dollar’s worth of goods and services than in 1977. We need to build on this success, and keep moving forward by improving the fuel efficiency of cars and trucks. Legislation signed into law last December will do just that. For the first time in 32 years, Congress increased average fuel economy standards for cars and SUV’s – from 25 miles per gallon today to 35 miles per gallon by 2020. Congress should also push the federal government, the largest single consumer of energy in America, to make sound conservation choices.

  • We must also invest aggressively in alternative energy sources with a proven performance record. Wind, solar, hydroelectric, biomass, and geothermal systems are more competitive than ever. They account for nearly 10 percent of energy production in the United States, and there is no reason we can’t double this performance during the next 5 years. I have cosponsored legislation to extend and strengthen the tax credits available for alternatives, and will continue to insist that they be part of our national supply network. Renewables generate less pollution, expand energy diversity, and given New Hampshire’s commitment to sustainable forestry, can strengthen the local economy.

  • And finally, politicians need to take their heads out of the sand when it comes to energy production. How can we hope to reduce our dependence on Middle East oil if we refuse to allow new American energy exploration? Whether miles offshore or deep underground, we have the technology to access these resources with greater environmental protection than ever before. By opposing any new energy exploration or production here at home, the political left ensures that high energy prices will be a permanent part of our future.

    Questions about speculation and price manipulation in the energy futures market must also be addressed. Regulations should be strengthened to improve transparency, set clear limits on positions a trading firm may take, and provide additional funding to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to effectively oversee and prosecute potential violations.

    But new rules and better oversight will not repeal the laws of supply and demand. Today, more than ever, America must implement common sense policy that will make a difference for years to come: Lower demand through conservation, expand supply choices with alternative energy, and reduce dependence on Middle East imports by producing energy here at home.

    Real progress will not take place overnight. Wind farms, nuclear power plants, biomass facilities, and oil and gas platforms all take time to build. But delaying action today will only delay the benefits of a more diverse energy network: more stable prices, and greater energy independence for America.


  •  

     

    BERLIN
    60 Pleasant Street
    Berlin, NH 03570
    (603) 752-6074
    FAX (603) 752-6423

    CLAREMONT
    50 Opera House Square
    Claremont, NH 03743
    (603) 542-4872
    FAX (603) 542-6582
    MANCHESTER
    1589 Elm Street
    Suite 3
    Manchester, NH 03101
    (603) 647-7500
    FAX (603) 647-9352
    NASHUA
    170 Main Street
    Nashua, NH 03060
    (603) 577-8960
    FAX (603) 577-8965
    PORTSMOUTH
    One New Hampshire Avenue
    Suite 120
    Portsmouth, NH 03801
    (603) 430-9560
    FAX (603) 430-0058
    WASHINGTON, DC
    111 Russell Senate Office Building
    Washington, DC 20510
    (202) 224-2841
    FAX (202) 228-4131