![]() |
1999 - 2003
The most significant development in U.S. drug trafficking and abuse in the period 1999-2003 was the array of synthetic drugs that became popular, particularly among young people. The most significant development in U.S. drug trafficking and abuse in the period 1999-2003 was the array of synthetic drugs that became popular, particularly among young people. Foremost among these laboratory-produced drugs was Ecstasy, a combination stimulant and hallucinogen sold in tablet form. It was touted as a “feel good” drug with an undeserved reputation for safety. In 2000, it was estimated that about two million tablets were smuggled into the United States every week. Other synthetic drugs like methamphetamine remained popular and continued to hit small-town, rural America particularly hard. Still other synthetic drugs with chemical sounding names like GHB, Rohypnol, GBL, and 1,4 BD were used both voluntarily as a way to get high, but even more tragically, concentrated doses of the drugs were slipped into the drinks of unsuspecting people, who then became victims of sexual assault. Another challenge drug law enforcement faced in the late 1990s was the growing diversion of legal prescription drugs into the illegal market. In 1998, 2.5 million Americans admitted abuse of prescription drugs. By 2001, that had almost doubled to 4.8 million. OxyContin, a powerful prescription analgesic, became heavily abused. DEA implemented a National Action Plan to combat diversion and abuse of that drug.
More traditional drugs such as cocaine, heroin, and marijuana, which are produced from agricultural products, continued on the drug scene as well. Marijuana remained the most popular drug of choice across the country, and cocaine—while use was down significantly since its peak in the mid-1980s—was the second most commonly used illicit drug in the United States. Heroin saw a surge in trafficking and use, particularly on the East Coast, where high-purity Colombian heroin dominated the market. According to the 2001 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse, during the 1990s heroin incidence rates rose to a level not reached since the 1970s. By 2000, there were 146,000 new heroin users in the country. DEA worked in partnership with its international counterparts to target the most significant drug trafficking organizations to disrupt supply. Colombian drug trafficking organizations continued to dominate the international cocaine trade. However, unlike their cartel predecessors, the Colombian cocaine trafficking groups of the late 1990s and early 2000s typically specialized in one aspect of the cocaine industry, with no one group of traffickers dominating all aspects of the illicit trade. DEA continued its productive working relationship with the Colombian National Police and dismantled several major cocaine and heroin trafficking groups based in Colombia. In Mexico, with the election of President Vicente Fox in 2000 and his administration’s unprecedented commitment to ending the unchallenged reign of drug trafficking cartels there, DEA’s relationship improved greatly with its Mexican counterparts, and inroads were made into Mexico-based cartels. Likewise, DEA forged productive relationships with European law enforcement to deal with the smuggling of Ecstasy since that drug was produced almost exclusively in Europe. DEA took on additional responsibilities in the aftermath of the September 11th, 2001, terrorist attacks on America. The FBI reassigned hundreds of agents from narcotics investigations to counterterrorism activities. As a result, DEA reallocated resources to meet changing needs. DEA joined the fight against terror by continuing conspiracy drug investigations and cutting off a funding source for terrorists through drug profits. The Office of National Drug Control Policy launched a major ad campaign to make Americans aware of the connection between drugs and terror. In addition to its drug interdiction activities, DEA strengthened prevention, education, and treatment initiatives at the local level through DEA’s Demand Reduction program and other initiatives. DEA instituted a number of programs like the Mobile Enforcement Team II (MET) program and the Integrated Drug Enforcement Assistance (IDEA) program to offer comprehensive help to local communities in establishing strong, coordinated anti-drug strategies. While the vast majority of Americans supported DEA’s efforts and the national anti-drug strategy, a well-financed and vocal legalization lobby spent huge amounts of money to encourage a greater tolerance for drug use. A number of states passed referendums to permit their residents to use drugs for a variety of reasons, particularly the use of marijuana for supposed medicinal purposes. The citizens who voted in these referenda often relied on the misinformation presented by the sponsors of expensive campaigns to legalize drugs. DEA initiated an anti-legalization campaign as a way to counter that information and publicize the many successes of current drug policy. National Conference on Drugs, Crime, and Violence in Mid-Sized Communities (1999)DEA hosted the National Conference on Drugs, Crime, and Violence in Mid-Sized Communities on February 23, 1999. The focus of the Conference was to seek solutions and draw attention to the drug crisis that had rapidly permeated mid-sized communities nationwide. Survey results from delegates showed that cocaine and marijuana were the two most prevalent drugs affecting small cities and rural areas. However, one quarter of the participants noted that methamphetamine was a major concern. The conference allowed participants to share information and learn from the experiences of other cities and communities that had faced the problems of drug trafficking and drug-related violence. DEA Opens New Justice Training Center (1999)
First envisioned in the mid-1970s, the new Justice Training Center (JTC) opened on April 28, 1999, at the FBI Academy in Quantico, Virginia. The JTC is a 185,000 square foot building that contains a 250-bed, double occupancy dormitory, an assortment of classrooms (including practical training areas for fingerprinting, interviewing, and wiretap capabilities) and offices, a cafeteria, and an international training room equipped with simultaneous translation equipment. Prior to the opening of the JTC, DEA shared facilities with FBI. (See 1998 JTC entry for full history of the center.) The JTC is used for DEA Basic Agent training, Basic Diversion Investigator training, Basic Intelligence Research Specialist training, Basic Forensic Chemist training, In-Service training, Certification training, specialized training, and supervisory, management, and executive level training. The JTC is also used to conduct drug training seminars for state and local law enforcement personnel, and through the use of specially equipped classrooms, conduct international drug training seminars for foreign law enforcement officials. Opening of the DEA Museum (1999)
Regional Enforcement TeamsEarly in 1999, DEA created the Regional Enforcement Team (RET) program to address the threat of drug trafficking groups using established networks of compartmentalized cells to facilitate their illegal activity. While in the past these organizations had typically maintained their operations in larger cities, pressure from law enforcement led to their movement into smaller locations throughout the United States. The RET Program consists of four teams of agents, analysts, and support staff that are responsible for addressing increased rates of drug abuse, trafficking, and violent crime in these smaller locations. There were 18 RET deployments from 1999 to early 2003. In that time, 36 drug trafficking organizations were dismantled, more than 500 people were arrested and more than 22,000 pounds of drugs were seized. Mobile Enforcement Teams
From 1999 to 2003, DEA deployed MET Teams to 380 locations nationwide. Communities across the country felt a significant impact in areas where MET Teams were deployed. As of 2003, MET Teams arrested more than 15,000 people and took more than 10,000 pounds of illegal drugs off the streets. In Virginia’s Shenandoah Valley, the MET Team targeted two trafficking organizations. One group was responsible bringing wholesale quantities of methamphetamine from Mexico for delivery to distributors throughout the Shenandoah Valley for distribution, while the other brought in crack cocaine from New York City. Both organizations were dismantled, and the work of the MET Team is likely to impede future drug trafficking in the area. Mobile Enforcement Team II Program (1999)In 1999, DEA initiated the Mobile Enforcement Team (MET) II program as a follow-up program to communities where DEA’s MET teams had deployed. MET teams were groups of specially trained DEA agents sent to communities at the request of law enforcement to help remove violent drug trafficking organizations. The MET II program’s goal was to ensure that successful law enforcement operations were reinforced by a vigorous community effort to prevent the reemergence of drug-related violent crime. DEA, with financial assistance from the Bureau of Justice Assistance and technical support from the National Crime Prevention Council, provided cutting-edge regional training to communities where MET teams had been deployed. Each community sent a team of up to five members that included local and state elected officials; judicial and law enforcement officers; city, school, and program administrators; community activists; representatives of the business and faith communities; and other key decision makers. In 1999, the program was piloted in three regional sessions to leaders of 40 MET communities. In 2000, DEA held four regional sessions to 42 community teams and another four sessions to 37 MET communities in 2001. The program’s goals were met by community leaders committing to developing and employing broad-based strategies for improving citizen safety and equipping these leaders to plan and implement prevention programs. majority of communities trained through the MET II program conducted far more prevention activities than prior to the training. By 2001, the MET II program evolved into the Integrated Drug Enforcement Assistance (IDEA) program. Operation Ramp Rats I and II (1999)In August and September 1999, DEA’s Miami Division concluded two successful airport-based investigations of ramp workers (“ramp rats”) who used their positions relating to baggage handling, cleaning, fueling and servicing airplanes to smuggle drugs. The investigations disrupted large-scale smuggling of heroin and cocaine into the United States along with the distribution of drugs, weapons, and explosives throughout the country. In addition, Miami Dade County instituted immediate security measures at Miami International Airport, making it more difficult to smuggle contraband through the area. Operation Juno (1999)Operation Juno was a significant and innovative investigation targeting money laundering operations. It began after the seizure of approximately 386 kilograms of liquid cocaine, which had been found concealed and shipped in frozen fish from Cartagena, Colombia in July 1995. It had been shipped under the name of Colapia S.A., a Colombian company whose U.S. distribution center was based in Atlanta. During the investigation of Colapia, it was revealed that the Atlanta owner was a partner with a prominent Cali, Colombia, narcotics trafficker. In 1996, DEA and the Internal Revenue Service began a pro-active undercover money laundering “sting” investigation named Operation Juno. Based in suburban Atlanta, with a company called “Airmark”, DEA and the IRS gained permission from the Attorney General to oprn a legitimate stockbrokerage firm that served to validate the undercover money laundering operation.The owner of Colapia S.A. referred the Operation Juno stockbrokerage firm to other drug trafficking organizations in need of financial and money laundering services. Operation Juno targeted those drug trafficking organizations by offering financial services to launder their drug proceeds. Those proceeds, which were in U.S. dollars, were sold on the Colombian black market peso exchange market via a third-party money exchanger in Colombia. Once the Colombian pesos were deposited into the designated bank accounts, the money laundering contract with the narcotics traffickers was fulfilled. A total of 55 arrests were made in the U. S. during the investigation. Civil seizure warrants were also brought against 59 domestic bank accounts worldwide and approximately $26 million in drug proceeds were targeted for seizure. Additionally five Colombian nationals were indicted. Attempted Cop Murder-Drug Ring Investigation (1999)In 1999, DEA, Fairfax County, Virginia Police, and the Maryland State Police completed a 3-year investigation of a drug trafficking, money laundering, and “cop killing” criminal group. Since at least 1994, Sergio Barrios and Gregory McCorkle were involved in a conspiracy to distribute cocaine in the Washington, D.C. area. In December 1995, McCorkle was driving his frequent route from New York to DC, when Maryland State Police Trooper David Hughes arrested him for possession of one kilogram of cocaine. Shortly after his arrest, McCorkle plotted to kill Trooper Hughes in an attempt to have the case dismissed. On August 27, 1996, an associate of McCorkle’s shot a trooper as he drove his car into the Hughes’ family driveway. The person he shot and wounded was Trooper Michael Hughes, the brother of the trooper who arrested McCorkle, who was also a Maryland State Trooper. Through a complex investigation supported by the DEA-supervised Intelligence Group of the Washington-Baltimore HIDTA, the task force was able to successfully link Barrios and McCorkle to the attempted murder. In May 1997, they and nearly twenty others were incarcerated for a variety of drug charges, and several were convicted of attempted murder. The investigation continued until the arrest of McCorkle’s drug supplier in 1999. The task force that investigated the murder-drug ring, including three DEA agents, later received the nation’s prestigious Top Cop award and were recognized at a White House ceremony with President Clinton and Attorney General Reno. David Hughes later became a DEA Special Agent. MexicoBetween 1999 and 2003, Mexico remained the key transit country for cocaine en route to U.S. markets, as well as a significant source country for heroin, marijuana, and methamphetamine destined for the United States. Among the most important changes that occurred in Mexico between 1999 and 2003 was the July 2000 election of President Vicente Fox-Quesada, ending the 70-year rule of a single political party in Mexico. President Fox ran on a platform of restoring public security and putting an end to corruption. The Fox administration made some significant progress towards those extremely ambitious goals by restructuring the Attorney General’s office to reduce corruption and taking action against leaders of significant drug trafficking organizations. Mexican police and the military had effected the arrests of significant drug traffickers within virtually every major drug trafficking organization operating in Mexico. As a result of this renewed dedication to fight drug trafficking, the level of cooperation in the counterdrug area reached unprecedented levels. Information sharing between DEA and the Government of Mexico was extremely productive and brought about very positive results in joint enforcement operations. By 2003, DEA’s relationship with its counterparts in the Government of Mexico was better than ever. Operation Impunity I and II (1999-2000)In September 1999, the Amado Carrillo-Fuentes drug trafficking organization suffered a big hit when DEA and its counterparts arrested three of its major cell heads and 90 of its members. The arrests disabled all facets of their organization—the group’s headquarters in Mexico, the U.S. cell heads, the drug and money transportation systems, and the local distribution groups. As a result of Operation Impunity, 12,434 kilos of cocaine and more than 4,800 pounds of marijuana were seized, along with $19 million in U.S. currency and another $7 million in assets. The Amado Carrillo-Fuentes organization had operated without fear of capture or prosecution in the United States, believing that only their low-level operatives were at risk. Operation Impunity effectively demonstrated that even the highest level drug traffickers based in foreign countries could not conduct drug operations inside the U.S. with impunity. Operation Impunity II continued to target the Amado Carrillo-Fuentes organization and concluded in December 2000 with the arrest of 155 individuals, the seizure of 5,490 kilograms of cocaine, 9,526 pounds of marijuana, and $11 million in U.S. currency. Those arrested faced a variety of federal charges for their involvement in smuggling thousands of pounds of cocaine and marijuana from Mexico across the Southwest Border into Texas. Some of the defendants arrested during Operation Impunity II were organization leaders who replaced those arrested in the previous investigations. The three phases (Operation Limelight in 1996 was the first phase) clearly demonstrate the tenacity of some trafficking organizations and the need for law enforcement to continuously investigate groups that are large and well-established. ColombiaBy the mid-1990s, Colombian law enforcement began targeting leaders of the Cali cartel based on extensive investigation by DEA. The arrests or surrenders of six top Cali leaders during the summer of 1995 marked the beginning of the decline of the Cali cartel. Although some elements of the Cali cartel continued to play an important role in the world’s wholesale cocaine market, they no longer dominated the international cocaine trade. Following the dismantling of the Cali cartel, experienced traffickers who had been active for years, but who worked in the shadow of the Cali drug lords, seized the opportunity and increased their role in the drug trade. However, unlike their cartel predecessors, the Colombian cocaine trafficking groups of the late 1990s and early 2000s were decentralized and typically specialized in one aspect of the cocaine industry. No one group of traffickers dominated all aspects of the trade because, with the reintroduction of extradition in Colombia in December 1997, the major Colombian traffickers were increasingly willing to allow their foreign criminal associates (in particular, Mexican and Dominican transportation groups) to play an expanded international role in the cocaine trade. The strategic objective of these Colombian drug lords was to further conceal their own overt criminal acts in the United States or Europe that would be the basis for extradition. The main Colombian trafficking groups primarily were based in two regions in Colombia. One was the Northern Valle del Cauca region located near Colombia’s west coast. The second area was Colombia’s north coast. While traffickers in these regions operated more independently than the Medellin and Cali cartels, they nevertheless remained very powerful. By working with their counterparts in Mexico, these drug traffickers were responsible for most of the world’s cocaine production and wholesale distribution. Operation Millennium (1999)In October 1999, a major joint DEA-Colombian National Police (CNP) investigation called Operation Millennium resulted in the arrest of two of the most powerful drug traffickers in the world—Alejandro Bernal-Madrigal, also known as Juvenal, and Fabio Ochoa. Bernal-Madrigal was the head of the most significant Colombian narcotics transportation organization and had taken the cocaine transportation function to unprecedented heights. Evidence obtained during this investigation demonstrated that Bernal-Madrigal’s organization was responsible for transporting between 20-30 tons of cocaine per month from Colombia to the United States via Mexico, primarily in containerized cargo. Fabio Ochoa was one of the top leaders of the Medellin cartel. He was imprisoned in 1991, released in 1996, and continued his trafficking operations with Bernal-Madrigal and others after his release. Beginning in May 1998, DEA worked with CNP to investigate the drug trafficking activities of Bernal-Madrigal. The investigation focused on authorized electronic intercepts of Bernal-Madrigal and the leaders of other Colombian drug trafficking organizations. At one point during the investigation, CNP in conjunction with DEA was managing 66 simultaneous authorized electronic intercepts on principal targets. These intercepts revealed the inner workings of the cocaine industry and focused on the most significant drug traffickers and their respective organizations in both Colombia and Mexico. In Operation Millennium, Bernal-Madrigal and 30 of his top criminal associates, including Ochoa, were arrested. In September 2001, Ochoa was extradited to the United States after a long battle to remain in Colombia. He was the 30th Colombian national and 13th Operation Millennium defendant to be extradited to the United states since the reintroduction of extradition in 1997. More than 1,500 Colombian prosecutors and CNP officials participated in Operation Millennium, which, according to the CNP, was one of the largest law enforcement actions undertaken by the Government of Colombia against drug trafficking. Extradition of Caracol (2000)
On June 6, 1998, Caracol was arrested in Barranquilla, as a result of an ongoing joint investigation between DEA’s Barranquilla Resident Office and the CNP. After his arrest, Caracol immediately was flown to Bogota, Colombia, where he was held on murder, kidnapping, and terrorism charges. He was extradited to the United States in August 2000. On March 13, 2003, Caracol pleaded guilty to participating in a narcotics trafficking conspiracy that smuggled tens of thousands of kilograms of cocaine into New York and other cities. His plea was announced on the morning he was to go on trial in Federal District Court in Manhattan after losing a crucial appellate ruling. Retiring CNP Director Serrano Honored (2000)
General Serrano joined the CNP in 1963 as a second lieutenant and advanced steadily through the ranks until becoming Director in 1995. The accomplishments of CNP under General Serrano debilitated major international drug traffickers and affected the drug trade worldwide. Under his command, the CNP declared war on drug cartels and joined forces with the DEA in dismantling the infamous Cali organization. Other CNP accomplishments under Serrano include the arrests of Jose Santacruz-Londono, Pacho Herrara, Henry Loaiza-Ceballos, and Juan Carlos Ramirez-Abadia. Cooperation between DEA and CNP continued as new independent drug organizations were created. One of the most significant was Operation Millennium, in October 1999, that dismantled the “Juvenal” transportation organization, which had been supplying between 20 and 30 tons of cocaine per month to the United States and Europe.
|
![]() A press conference of recent maritime seizure where 15 countries, DEA, U.S. Coast Guard and U.S. Customs participated. |
Operation Conquistador and its preceding operation, Colombus, both used UNICORN to facilitate the exchange of information among counterdrug agencies in the Caribbean area and source countries. Conquistador combined the efforts of 26 countries and embodied the overall objective of developing effective regional strategies to disrupt drug trafficking organizations and criminal organizations. Executed by the DEA’s Caribbean Field Division with assistance from the U.S. Coast Guard and ATF in March 2000, the operation resulted in the arrest of over 2,000 people and the seizure of almost 5,000 kilograms of cocaine, 362 metric tons of marijuana, and 3,370 dosage units of dangerous drugs.
Operation Colombus, was a multi-national regional enforcement effort focused on air, land and maritime interdiction; eradication; and airstrip denial. The operation, targeting the operations of Caribbean-based drug trafficking groups, had unprecedented arrest and seizure statistics for the region. Involving Colombia, Venezuela, Panama and the island nations of the Caribbean, the investigation brought about over 1,000 arrests and the seizure of 900 kilograms of cocaine and nine kilograms of heroin.
Operation UNICORN led to the development of Regional Intelligence Centers throughout Mexico, Colombia, and the Dominican Republic. This concept and the global exchange of information eventually spread to 36 countries, including those in Eastern and Western Europe. Using the groundwork laid in UNICORN, at least four major drug trafficking organizations targeted by the international law enforcement community were dismantled.
![]() A press conference to announce the successes of joint operations with the Caribbean, Mexico, Central and South America. |
In November 2000, DEA concluded Operation Liberator, a multi-national regional operation focused in the Caribbean and South America that also achieved success due to UNICORN. The operation, consisting of three weeks of raids, was intended to disrupt trafficking in the Caribbean and South America region, consolidate counterdrug efforts in the Caribbean transit zone, continue development of a regional strategy, and develop a cohesive environment among source and transit countries in the area. The effort, which was led by DEA with the collaboration of 36 countries, brought about the arrest of several leaders of drug trafficking organizations, one of whom was thought to ship two tons of Colombian cocaine into the United States each month.
![]() Above: Patrick Hurley mans exhibit at Georgia Tech in Atlanta explaining DEA careers and efforts to reduce the demand for drugs. Below: DEA Explorer Post 9910 sponsored by the New York Division shows off t-shirts designed for the event. ![]() |
Since 1980, DEA Demand Reduction Coordinators (DRCs) have worked with Law Enforcement Explorers throughout the country to assist youth interested in “exploring” law enforcement as a profession. This partnership continued through the late 1990s and early 2000s. In some cases, DEA sponsored the Explorer Post. DRCs provided training in the area of narcotics enforcement, community involvement, and general drug abuse issues. The Demand Reduction Section participated in the bi-annual Law Enforcement Explorer Conference as well as in Explorer Leadership Training sessions held at both the DEA and FBI Academies during the summer. The Law Enforcement Explorer Program was additionally a recruitment program, since many Explorers become either police officers or federal agents.
|
Operation Green Clover was a one-year investigation of an Ecstasy trafficking
organization that was a primary source of the drug in Colorado that concluded
in August 2001. Named after the green clover logo on their Ecstasy pills, DEA
and its law enforcement partners arrested 55 individuals in Colorado and California
and seized 85,000 Ecstasy tablets as well as significant amounts of other drugs.
Operation Green Clover was an important investigation not only because it dismantled
a significant trafficking organization, but also because it was one of the
first to call public attention to the dangers of Ecstasy use. The investigation
had been sparked by the death of Brittney Chambers, who died on her 16th birthday
in Colorado after taking one Ecstasy pill that had been distributed by the
organization. Brittney’s mother participated in the Operation Green Clover
press conference and later opened a teen center to promote drug awareness and
alternatives to drug use for teens in Colorado.
Year | Foreign Office Opened |
---|---|
1999 | Beijing, China |
2000 | Hanoi, Vietnam |
2002 | Tashkent, Uzbekistan |
2003 | Kabul, Afghanistan |
In October 2001, DEA dismantled a major methamphetamine and Ecstasy drug laboratory in Escondido, California. This takedown, dubbed Operation Triple X for the logo on the organization’s Ecstasy tablets, resulted in 20 arrests and seizures of 48,000 Ecstasy tablets, 1 pound of methamphetamine, 48 kilos of 3,4-Propene (which produce 500,000 Ecstasy tablets) 700 pounds of Camphor oil (which produce one million Ecstasy tablets), 45 gallons of GBL (used to produce GHB), other precursor chemicals and laboratory equipment, and $429,000 in U.S. currency. This case was important because the vast majority of Ecstasy in the United States was produced in labs in Europe; the lab seized in Operation Triple X was one of the most significant Ecstasy labs ever dismantled in this country.
Operation Landslide, an organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force (OCDETF) investigation, resulted in 38 U.S. arrests and five Mexican arrests in November, 2001. Drug seizures from this operation totaled over 770 pounds of heroin, 34 pounds of methamphetamine and three kilograms of cocaine. Thanks to Operation Landslide, U.S.-based drug trafficking cells operating in San Francisco, San Jose, and Los Angeles were revealed.
Initially targeted toward lower distribution cells in the greater Boston area, Operation Perfect Storm identified sources of supply for the Boston trafficking cells. These groups were operating out of New York, New Jersey, and Florida and were already being targeted by federal authorities on unrelated investigations. This multi-agency law enforcement effort resulted in the arrests of at least 144 defendants, the seizure of over 2,700 kilograms of cocaine, 17 kilograms of heroin, and $3 million in cash.
On Tuesday, September 11th, 2001, America was attacked by terrorists who hijacked
commercial airplanes and crashed them into both towers of the World Trade Center
in New York City and the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia. A third hijacked
plane—believed to be headed for either the White House or the Capitol—crashed
in rural Pennsylvania. More than 3,000 Americans died in the attack. The terrorists
were part of Osama bin Laden’s al Qaeda terrorist network, based in Afghanistan.
The DEA Headquarters building—which directly overlooks the Pentagon—was immediately impacted. Many employees witnessed the plane hitting the Pentagon, and the headquarters building shook from the impact. The building was secured, and employees were immediately evacuated. The Washington Division office maintained a command center. Agents and Intelligence Research Specialists were detailed to the FBI to assist in following up on investigative leads, and other agents were detailed to support the FBI’s efforts at the Pentagon crash site and help with evidence collection. Testing was also conducted to verify the safety of the headquarters building.
In New York, DEA’s office, approximately 40 blocks from the World Trade Center, was secured, and it was determined that all employees were safe. Some agents were immediately deployed to the FBI Command Center, and the enforcement group located at conjunction with Customs, established perimeter security at the airport’s Building 75, which housed various Federal agencies. The New York office also helped with the apprehension and detainment of five individuals suspected to have participated in the attack as they attempted to travel outbound from JFK. The office also supplied technical equipment to help in the search and rescue operation as well as telephone lines to assist in Title III interceptions. DEA further assisted in intelligence gathering, translation of foreign documents, execution of search warrants, and provision of temporary office space.
DEA’s Aviation Division also significantly contributed to rescue and recovery efforts. From September through January, the Aviation Division completed a variety of missions, which included transporting personnel, equipment, and critical blood supplies, as well and providing airborne video and Forward Looking Infrared (FLIR) camera systems. This equipment included technology to detect signals given off by electronic devices such as cell phones. The FLIR camera systems were used to assist the New York City Fire Department by providing thermal imaging technology to determine “hot spots” within the World Trade Center buildings so they could determine where to deploy fire fighting equipment and extinguish underground fires located near subterranean fuel storage tanks.
When Attorney General Ashcroft asked for volunteers from Department of Justice agencies to serve as Air Marshals, over 1,000 DEA Special Agents offered their help within hours of the request. More than 250 DEA Special Agents served as Air Marshals. For 7 months following the attack to increase in-flight security.
As a result of the terrorist attacks, increased security measures were put into place at DEA facilities, such as x-ray screening of visitors, restrictions on vehicles entering the property, and revised occupant emergency plans. Overseas, DEA’s office in Peshawar, Pakistan, was evacuated, and DEA’s Islamabad, Pakistan, office was reduced to essential staff. Security measures at all overseas DEA facilities were upgraded.
Shortly following the 9/11 attacks, there were anthrax exposures throughout the country, which prompted more security measures in DEA, particularly with mail handling operations. Fortunately, no DEA facilities tested positive for anthrax exposure.
The drug trade and terrorists have been connected for centuries as various rulers and terrorist organizations have used the vast profits from the drug trade to arm, equip, and train members of their violent groups. However, it was the terrorist attacks on September 11th, 2001, that brought that connection to the attention of the American public. Drug money contributed in part to the ability of the al Qaeda organization to carry out the 9/11 attacks.
DEA defines narco-terrorism as a subset of terrorism, in which terrorist groups participated directly or indirectly in the cultivation, manufacture, transportation, or distribution of controlled substances and the monies derived from these activities. A third of the international terrorist organizations identified by the State Department are linked to illicit drug activities. For example, in South America, Colombia’s two major insurgent groups—the FARC and the ELN—as well as the right wing AUC, are linked to drug trafficking. In Peru, the Shining Path—a terrorist organization—most likely extracts a revolutionary tax from the cocaine base operators.
While DEA does not specifically target terrorists, the agency targets and tracks down drug traffickers and drug trafficking organizations involved in terrorist acts. For example, in January 2002, DEA announced the successful conclusion of Operation Mountain Express III, which targeted suppliers of pseudoephedrine, the chemical essential to making methamphetamine. The operation yielded the seizure of more than 30 tons of pseudoephedrine and arrests of more than 370 people in 12 cities. Many arrested were citizens of Middle Eastern countries who were sending their sizable drug profits back to the Middle East. The DEA investigated the flow of money, and there were indications that some of the money funded terrorist organizations such as Hezbollah and Hamas.
In Afghanistan, the former ruling Taliban built its financial base from heroin trafficking. They used it as a major source of funding by taxing opium production, lab operations, and the movement of drugs. U.S. intelligence confirmed a connection between the Taliban and international terrorist Osama bin Laden and the al Qaeda organization. In addition, DEA’s intelligence indicated that bin Laden was involved in the financing and facilitation of heroin trafficking activities. Afghanistan was a major source country for the cultivation, processing, and trafficking of opiate products, producing over 70 percent of the world’s supply of illicit opium in 2000.
On December 4, 2001, DEA hosted a ground-breaking symposium entitled “Target America: Traffickers, Terrorists, and Your Kids” to call attention to the link between drug trafficking and terrorism. The symposium, held at DEA Headquarters, was moderated by Robert Novak, the long-time syndicated columnist and TV political commentator. Hosted by the AFFNA DEA Museum Foundation , a 6-member panel of experts discussed the significant and complex relationships between terrorism and drug trafficking before a full house of invited guests—including Members of Congress and their staff representatives—and DEA employees. Following the event, Mr. Novak wrote a column featuring the event and DEA’s important role in the war against terrorism.
Operation Containment is an intensive, multi-national, law enforcement initiative that was congressionally mandated and is led by DEA. It began in 2002 and was ongoing in 2003. It involves 19 countries from Central Asia, the Caucases, Europe, and Russia. The goal is to implement a coordinated post-Taliban heroin counternarcotics strategy to deprive international terrorist groups of some of their financial basis for their activities. While each country had unilaterally or jointly conducted similar interdiction operations in the past targeting Afghanistan heroin transporters, Operation Containment is the first coordinated, large-scale operation.
Working to diminish the availability of heroin and morphine base along the Balkan and Silk Road trafficking routes, the operation focuses on interdiction at specific land, air, and sea border checkpoints, intelligence sharing, database connectivity, and collective targeting of drug traffickers and organizations. The operation eliminates duplication of efforts and effectively allocates limited counterdrug law enforcement resources throughout the region. The operation also targets other illicit commodities such as precursor chemicals, weapons, ammunitions, and currency that could be used by terrorist organizations to finance their operations.
Operation Containment also included re-opening the DEA office in Kabul, Afghanistan (which had been closed for security reasons in 1980) and expanding existing offices in Asian and European cities. DEA’s communications intercept and intelligence capabilities also grew in support of agencies conducting counterterrorism investigations in the United States.
Operation Containment continued into 2003, and has proven to be one of the most successful drug interdiction initiatives to be undertaken on a multi-regional basis. During a mid-2002 blitz operation, 1,705 kilos of heroin were seized, with an estimated value between US $28 million and US $51 million. Also seized were 5,329 kilos of marijuana, 355 kilos of opium, 2,013 poppy plants, as well as significant amounts of cocaine, weapons, cigarettes, and amphetamines. The operation was responsible for collecting much information on terrorist activities in the region.
Just as important, Operation Containment laid the groundwork for closer cooperation among the countries for future operations—the mutual participation of 19 countries in a common operational and intelligence sharing action had not been undertaken before. It is significant that the Russians and Chinese traveled to Turkey for operational planning, the Pakistanis and Indians who were at conflict with one another put their differences aside, as did the Turks, Macedonians, and Greeks to achieve the common goal of depriving violent terrorists of drug-derived funds.
![]() |
|
As a continuation of the effort to educate Americans about the historic and strong link between terrorists and drug trafficking, DEA opened a new exhibit at the Headquarters Museum called “Target America: Traffickers, Terrorists, and You.” The exhibit is housed in a new 1,500 square foot addition to the DEA Museum. Administrator Hutchinson opened the exhibit at a ceremony on September 3, 2002, and was joined by former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Attorney General John Ashcroft, and ONDCP Director John Walters.
![]() Sean Fearns, DEA Museum Director, envisioned the exhibit as one that will travel to museums all over the United States. The first stop will be the Dallas Science Museum, with an opening in September 2003, then to Chicago, Detroit, and New York with other cities to follow. |
The exhibit opens with a sculpture composed of rubble and artifacts from the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and it uses the events of September 11th as a starting point for the historic story of the connection between the violent drug trade and terror from the Silk Road in the 11th century to the present. Interactive kiosks allow visitors to follow the trafficking of drugs, the movement of money, and the use of terrorism worldwide. Photo essays and artifacts detail the impact of drugs and terrorism, show individuals and groups responsible for terrorist acts, examine America’s response to drugs and terrorism, and present visitors information on getting active with an anti-drug message in their communities to allow them to deny funding to terrorists.
The exhibit stayed at the DEA Museum through August 2003, then began a nationwide tour with planned stops in New York, Chicago, Detroit, Dallas, and Los Angeles.
On March 31, 2002, Turkish Jandarma officials, accompanied by Istanbul Resident Office personnel, arrested15 individuals and seized 7.4 tons of morphine base. The morphine base was discovered beneath piles of hay during the search of a warehouse located in Hendick, Turkey, approximately 120 miles east of Istanbul. This seizure marked the culmination of five days of arrests and searches executed by the Jandarma in conjunction with DEA, targeting a multifaceted organization led by Attila Ozyildirim. This organization was involved in the production, transportation, and distribution of multi-hundred kilograms quantities of morphine base and heroin. Intelligence indicated that Ozyildirim and his associates maintained strong connections with other significant Turkish traffickers as well as sources of supply in Afghanistan and Iran.
Although large shipments of morphine base and heroin are common in Turkey, according to the Jandarma, this was the largest seizure of morphine base ever in the country. In addition, it was one of the largest seizures of opiates in Europe. During all of 2000, according to the U.S. Department of State, Turkish authorities seized approximately 1.7 metric tons of morphine base. This single seizure is almost six metric tons larger than the annual total for 2000. Given the 1:1 ratio for the conversion of heroin from morphine base, this amount of morphine base would have provided a significant amount of heroin to the European market.
In March 2002, the Department of Justice indicted for the first time members of a known terrorist organization on drug trafficking charges. Three members of the Colombian narco-terrorist group Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarios de Colombia (FARC), were indicted on charges of conspiracy to manufacture cocaine, then transport and distribute it in the United States. The FARC is a Colombian Marxist terrorist organization whose stated goal is to overthrow the Colombian Government. The U.S. State Department called the FARC the most dangerous international terrorist group based in the Western hemisphere. The organization is heavily engaged in drug trafficking.
In December 2000, DEA’s Bogota office opened an investigation of Tomas Molina-Caracas, the commander of the FARC’s 16th Front. He was using territory in a sparsely populated area in eastern Colombia controlled by the 16th Front to manufacture and export multi-ton quantities of cocaine. Molina and the 16th Front completely controlled a small village and its airstrip as a center for the collection and exportation of cocaine. By 2000, Molina was manufacturing and exporting between one and three tons of cocaine per month, the majority of which was shipped to the United States and Europe.
During 1999 and 2000, Molina began purchasing large quantities of weapons and military equipment for the FARC. Some of the transactions were direct trades of weapons for cocaine, and at other times, arms were purchased with cash derived from the sale of drugs. By early 2002, DEA had enough evidence to seek an indictment against key members of the Molina organization. In March 2002, the indictment was unsealed charging Molina, two other members of the FARC, a Colombian cocaine lab operator, and three Brazilian traffickers with conspiracy to produce and export cocaine knowing and intending that it be smuggled into the United States.
In June 2002, Carlos Bolas—one of those FARC members indicted in March on drug charges—was arrested by Surinamese authorities using a false Peruvian passport. Bolas appeared before a magistrate in Suriname, and knowing that he was wanted in the U.S. on drug trafficking charges, Surinamese authorities expelled him and turned him over to U.S. authorities. On June 19, Bolas was transported to the Washington D.C. area where he was arraigned in U.S. District Court.
Administrator Hutchinson explained the significance of Bolas’ arrest by saying, “This arrest takes our fight against narco-terrorism to a new level. For the first time we have not only indicted a member of a terrorist organization involved in drug trafficking, but we have also arrested him. This means that narco-terrorists will be held accountable to the justice system and to the rule of law in both United States and Colombia.”
Attorney General John Ashcroft announced the indictment of leaders of the Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia (AUC), also known as the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia, on Sept 24, 2002, on charges of trafficking over 17 tons of cocaine into the United States and Europe beginning in early 1997. The indictment was based on a 2 ½- year DEA investigation that gathered witness testimony as well as evidence from Colombia, Spain, Portugal, Chile, and Puerto Rico.
The AUC is a right-wing paramilitary group in Colombia listed on the State Department’s Foreign Terrorist Organization List. The AUC operates in most regions of Colombia and is principally funded by drug trafficking. The organization is estimated to have more than 8,000 paramilitary fighters with operations that vary from multi-ton cocaine distributions to the U.S. and Europe, to assassinations, and involvement in guerrilla combat units. According to the Colombian authorities, in 2002, the AUC was responsible for 2,601 deaths and 182 kidnappings and is considered by international human rights groups and the U.S. Department of State to be responsible for 70 percent of the human rights violations in Colombia.
Carlos Castano-Gil was Commander in Chief of the AUC until he resigned in May 2001 to become a member of the AUC’s Political and Military Directorate. However, he retained the title of Commandante of the Autodefensas Campesinas de Cordoba and Uraba (ACCU), the largest paramilitary group that fell under the AUC umbrella. For several years, multiple sources of information cited Castano as one of the most powerful drug traffickers in Colombia.
During an interview broadcast on September 8, 2002, Castano expressed his willingness to surrender to Colombian and United States authorities should he be indicted on narco-trafficking charges by the United States. After the announcement of the indictment on September 24, Castano reiterated this stance and said that he planned to surrender to authorities pending the further review of the charges by his lawyer in the United States Castano also stated that he could no longer remain in a position of authority in the AUC and the ACCU because of the damage that these charges would do the organization’s credibility. As of early 2003, Castano had neither surrendered to authorities nor given up his leadership position.
In a separate DEA/FBI investigation, two other commandants of the AUC were arrested in Costa Rica on November 6, 2002, for their involvement in a multi-million dollar cocaine-for-arms deal. In March 2003, DEA and Colombian authorities conducted the takedown of Operation Pegasus II. This case targeted a large drug trafficking organization with close ties to the AUC Bloque Libertadores del Sur.
The small, but vocal minority of drug legalization advocates who had been pushing for decriminalization and outright legalization of drugs for a number of years continued unabated in the late 1990s and early 2000s. These groups, such as the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, focused on the state ballot initiative process as a way to achieve their goals. These organizations are financially backed by several multi-millionaire sponsors and have the means to launch all-out, ill-informed publicity campaigns. While they were successful in a number of states, by 2002, community coalitions across the country were beginning to make marked gains in opposing these legalization initiatives.
During his tenure at DEA, Administrator Hutchinson engaged in three public debates about drug legalization. He viewed them as important opportunities to deliver a positive, anti-drug message and help educate Americans about the dangers of drug legalization and drug use. His first debate was one month after taking office when he was pitted against New Mexico Governor Gary Johnson—a proponent of legalized drugs. It was the first time a DEA Administrator formally debated the issue of drug legalization in a public forum. National Public Radio (NPR) hosted the event entitled “Directing America’s Drug War: Which Way to a Safer Society” on September 10, 2001, at the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque.
Before a packed house of hundreds of students and citizens as well as numerous protesters, Administrator Hutchinson and Governor Johnson debated the issue and took questions from the audience for 2 hours. Mr. Hutchinson emphasized a balanced anti-drug strategy that encompasses education and treatment in addition to law enforcement. He pointed out the many successes in the fight against drugs and offered areas where the country could do better. The debate was broadcast at a later date on NPR.
Administrator Hutchinson and Governor Johnson continued the debate in November 2001 at Yale University’s Law School. Mr. Hutchinson discussed the history of illegal drugs, pointing out that the country had legalization in the 19th century, and it was a failure. He also discussed the connection between drugs and terrorism.
In April 2002, Fordham University’s School of Law hosted a debate entitled “America’s Oldest War: The Efficacy of United States Drug Policy.” This time, Administrator Hutchinson debated Graham Boyd, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union. The debate focused largely on the issue of marijuana as medicine, with Mr. Hutchinson arguing that safe and effective medicines must be determined by science and the regulatory process, not by referenda sponsored by the legalization lobby.
Repeated attempts by proponents of marjiuana legalization
in the late 1990s to remove marijuana from Schedule I of the CSA, thereby
effectively legalizing
the drug, were definitively curtailed with the April 2001 publication in
the Federal Register of DEA’s denial of the Jon Gettman/High Times magazine
petition to reschedule marijuana. In January 2001, the Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) returned a scientific and medical evaluation on
this petition and recommended that marijuana and THC continue to be subject
to control
under Schedule I of the CSA. In its decision, HHS clearly reaffirmed that
marijuana has a high abuse potential and is not approved for medical use.
![]() Above: Special Agent Lowell J. Maxey and Special Agent/Pilot Brian D. Winnell. |
However, in response to national interest in the potential therapeutic use of marijuana for treating the symptoms of a variety of illnesses, DEA registered eight researchers to study the effects of smoked marijuana. These registrations were granted upon close and thorough review of study protocols by an independent review board and panels from HHS and the Food and Drug Administration. By early 2003, neither the medical community nor the scientific community had found sufficient data to conclude that smoked marijuana was the best approach to dealing with these important medical issues. The most comprehensive, scientifically rigorous review of studies of smoked marijuana was conducted by the Institute of Medicine, an organization chartered by the National Academy of Sciences. In a report released in 1999, the Institute did not recommend the use of smoked marijuana, but did conclude that active ingredients in marijuana could be isolated and developed into a variety of pharmaceuticals.
One of those was Marinol, which was brought to market in the 1980s after DEA granted researchers authorization to work with marijuana. Marinol is a prescription drug containing synthetic THC, which has been found to relieve the nausea and vomiting associated with chemotherapy for cancer patients and to assist with loss of appetite with AIDS patients. Unlike smoked marijuana—which contains more than 400 different chemicals, including most of the hazardous chemicals found in tobacco smoke—Marinol was proven safe, and its therapeutic value was supported by clinical evidence.
On February 12th, 2002, DEA Agents confiscated more than 8,000 marijuana plants and made several arrests at a San Francisco cannabis club, known as the Harm Reduction Center. The operator, Kenneth Hayes, was cultivating large quantities of marijuana in San Francisco and Sonoma County and was also participating in smuggling of high-grade Canadian marijuana into the Bay Area.
The arrests received considerable publicity and press coverage in relation
to California’s medical marijuana law. The cannabis club was affiliated
with the City and County of San Francisco to provide “medical” marijuana
to “patients.” Additionally, one of the arrestees was Edward Rosenthal,
longtime contributing editor of High Times and Cannabis Culture magazines and
the author of several “how to” books on marijuana cultivation.
The investigation determined that the cannabis club was engaged in marijuana trafficking in violation of federal law. While the club claimed to distribute marijuana to sick people, it was in fact selling marijuana to anyone. Four operators were charged federally with cultivation, conspiracy, and maintaining a location for drug manufacturing.
Two pled guilty, and as of early 2003, are awaiting sentencing. The third defendant, Rosenthal, went to trial, and his case resulted in a guilty conviction. The fourth, Hayes, sought asylum in Canada.Coincidentally, on the same day of the cannabis club raids, Administrator Hutchinson spoke before a sold-out audience at San Francisco’s Commonwealth Club, a prestigious public affairs speech forum. San Francisco, caught between conflicting state and federal laws concerning medical marijuana had long been home to intense debate regarding drug laws. Mr. Hutchinson’s visit and the cannabis club arrests prompted public protests from San Francisco residents and elected officials.
When Administrator Hutchinson arrived to deliver his speech, over 200 protestors had gathered outside the Commonwealth Club. Chanting “DEA, go away,” and waving banners, protestors expressed their disapproval of the marijuana arrests. Simultaneously, protest groups launched a “web attack” against the DEA website. They attempted to shut down the DEA site by visiting it repeatedly. The site received 30,000 hits at once, but service was not disrupted. “In many ways, this debate is a good thing,” said Administrator Hutchinson of his not-so-warm welcome. “If nothing else, it shows everyone how important this issue is and it helps the DEA get our message across. DEA must follow the law-we don’t judge what is use and what is abuse. We judge what is legal and what is illegal.”
To get DEA’s message out about why drug legalization would be a catastrophic failure and why marijuana should not be legalized for medicinal or recreational use, DEA’s Public Affairs office initiated an informational campaign. An entire section on anti-legalization was created on the website, which included many materials about the subject. One of the most comprehensive was “Speaking Out Against Drug Legalization,” a 25-page booklet that logically laid out the top ten facts on legalization. It detailed national, international, and local statistics and examples of failed prior legalization experiments and also discussed the many successes of current drug policy.
DEA’s Demand Reduction section also began a new, pro-active emphasis on outreach and coalition-building. The agency reached out to other anti-drug and pro-law enforcement organizations already organized and on the ground—those who interacted with the media and public on a regular basis and those who were intimately involved in their communities. The Demand Reduction section’s mission was to pro-actively engage the support of these coalitions. The number of neighborhood anti-drug coalitions in this country was huge, but largely unorganized. DEA made it a goal to help those groups develop a better network of communication to both build local, state, and national support for the fight against drugs, and build local, state, and national support for the DEA.
The results of the grass roots movement supporting current drug policy paid immediate dividends. In the fall of 2002, drug decriminalization or legalization initiatives were on the ballot in several states. The legalization lobby was behind these initiatives and had greatly assisted with funding, signatures, and wording of the initiatives. Widespread passage was expected, but because of a strong grass roots movement by parents, anti-drug coalitions, and law enforcement, four of the six initiatives failed—showing the American public’s support for drug enforcement. The results were:
Arizona: 57% of voters killed a plan (Proposition 203) that would have made state law enforcement the broker for medicinal marijuana.
Nevada: 61% of voters opposed a proposal that would have allowed anyone to possess up to 3 ounces of marijuana.
Ohio: 67% opposed a proposal (Issue 1) that would have allowed nonviolent drug offenders to seek treatment instead of serve jail time.
South Dakota: 62% of voters defeated an industrial hemp initiative.
Washinton DC: 78% of voters approved an initiative that would offer drug rehabilitation instead of prison for some nonviolent offenders.
San Francisco: 63% approved a measure to have the city study growing and dispensing marijuana for medical purposes.
From 1999 to 2003, methamphetamine abuse had become a national problem as this drug epidemic spread eastward. Its use was initially mainly confined to the West and Midwest, but has now surfaced in other areas, especially the Southeast. Florida in particular has seen an increase in abuse and clandestine laboratory production. In 1999, law enforcement seized 22 methamphetamine labs in Florida, but by 2002, that had increased to 109. Similarly, 30 meth labs were seized in Alabama in 1999; by 2002, that had risen to 198.
In last five years, there has been a dramatic increase in then number of small, toxic methamphetamine labs in rural communities. While the meth trade is still dominated by Mexico–based traffickers producing the drug in larger “super labs” on the West Coast, the increase in small labs has been significant. The growing numbers of small, dangerous clandestine laboratories has strained communities and state and local police forces. Effective and safe clean-up of these labs is very costly and drains community resources and manpower. In response to this new pressure on local law enforcement, DEA is working with the COPS program to provide state and local clan lab clean-up training to increasing numbers of police officers.
Traffickers’ methods of producing methamphetamine and obtaining pseudoephedrine, a chemical necessary to make meth, have changed in recent years. The growing numbers of small labs led to an increase in the use of the over-the-counter “blister packs” of cold and allergy medication as a source of pseudoephedrine. The medications are packaged in such a way that they would be impractical as a source of supply for a super labs where massive quantities of the drug are made. But they have been used more and more by small lab operators.
Canada emerged as a source of supply for pseudoephedrine after DEA’s Operation Mountain Express I & II effectively stopped the illegal pseudo trade within the United States. Discussions between the United States and Canada led to tighter restrictions on pseudo production and transportation in Canada.
In 2002, a new meth threat began to emerge – meth in tablet form, called “yaba,” that comes from Southeast Asia. Yaba accounted for only a small percentage of meth used in the United States by 2003, but law enforcement is concerned about its increasing potential for abuse since its appearance is similar to the popular drug Ecstasy.
In August 2000, DEA Special Agents stunned the methamphetamine production underworld, arresting more than 140 individuals in eight cities with a promise of more arrests to follow. The arrests marked the first of three phases of Operation Mountain Express. The operation combated the production of methamphetamine by targeting those who produced and illegally distributed pseudoephedrine, a chemical essential to the manufacture of methamphetamine.
Phase One of the operation yielded arrests in Los Angeles, Denver, Fort Lauderdale, Orlando, San Diego, Portland, Houston, and Lodi, California. In addition, DEA suspended chemical registrations of 10 companies, 770 chemical registrations were surrendered, and 29 wholesale chemical companies closed. The arrested defendants faced federal charges for their involvement in a loosely structured national network that trafficked in pseudoephedrine. In the late 1990s, pseudoephedrine (pseudo) had become widely used in the production of methamphetamine because of its ready availability in over-the-counter cold and allergy medications. The operation focused on the transfer of pseudo produced for legal purposes to those who used it illegally to produce meth.
![]() IA Melissa Conway and SA Sean Stephen King examine more of the Mt. Express seizures. |
![]() SA Efren G. Lapuz and INS Pat Comey at the Carlesbad Resident Office. |
Operation Mountain Express continued with phase two, using information gained in phase one of the operation to identify registrants (physicians or pharmacists who are authorized to handle controlled substances) who were involved in the illegal diversion of pusedo and to cancel their registrations. The rogue registrants were not subject to criminal prosecution, but were prohibited from working with controlled substances.
Operations Mountain Express I & II effectively shut down the illegal pusedo trade within the United States. Traffickers began to look for sources of supply in Canada and the illegal trade and transport between Canada, and the U.S. grew. Operation Mountain Express III was created when DEA pursued this new pseudo trafficking market in Canada. Intelligence indicated that traffickers were purchasing large amounts of pseudo in Canada and then returning to the U.S. with the product, often via the Ambassador Bridge in Detroit. As a result, Detroit and nearby Chicago became hubs of pusedo distribution. From these points, pusedo was transported to California and distributed to meth “super labs” where it was converted to methamphetamine by Mexico-based drug traffickers.
The successful conclusion of Operation Express III was announced by DEA Administrator Asa Hutchinson, U.S. Customs Commissioner (and former DEA Administrator) Robert Bonner, and IRS Deputy Commissioner Bob Wenzel. Operation Mountain Express III ended on January 10, 2002, when DEA Special Agents, assisted by the U.S. Customs Service, Internal Revenue Service, and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police arrested 54 traffickers, in addition to the 67 previously arrested as part of the investigations.
Operation Mountain Express did unprecedented damage to the methamphetamine trade. In 2001, there were a total of 6,000 pounds of meth seized by the DEA; the three phases of Operation Mountain Express resulted in the seizure of nearly 30 tons of pseudoephedrine, which could produce 37,000 pounds of meth. The operations also yielded 371 arrests and the seizure of 269 pounds of meth, 151 vehicles, 13 weapons, and nearly $17.5 million. DEA also tightened regulatory controls over DEA-registered chemical handlers. Legislative initiatives were also undertaken to address weaknesses in the regulatory framework. Additionally, the investigation traced large amounts of profit being sent to individuals in the Middle East, who had possible ties to terrorist organizations.
In the early 2000s, DEA co-sponsored methamphetamine summits across the country in partnership with the National Crime Prevention Council and local communities. These summits were training conferences at which a state, county, or city developed a strategic plan for reducing methamphetamine use and trafficking in the area. The summits brought together hundreds of people from the community who were involved in different aspects of the methamphetamine problem: law enforcement, social workers, school officials, local officials, prevention experts, treatment providers, parents, and environmental firms. The goal was to coordinate these various groups and mobilize resources to prevent and reduce the proliferation of meth and meth labs. Meth summits were held in Sacramento, California in 2000; in Bellevue, Washington in 2001; and in Indianapolis, Indiana; Little Rock, Arkansas; Lexington, Kentucky; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; and Hawaii County, Hawaii in 2002.
In the spring of 2002, Administrator Hutchinson launched a nationwide tour to call attention to the country’s growing methamphetamine problem. The campaign, called “Meth in America: Not in Our Town” began in May and continued through July 2000. DEA took the tour to 32 states over the course of the 3 months. Many of the stops were smaller states that were struggling with the social and financial impact of the drug.
At each site, Administrator Hutchinson held press conferences in conjunction with state and local officials, and often the tour was combined with scheduled meth summits. The focus was the meth problem in that community and the resources and options available to help combat the problem. Administrator Hutchinson emphasized the federal response to methamphetamine trafficking, but also cited the many innovative actions communities were taking to combat the problem. He also cited the many community coalitions that were impacting the meth problem. The tour received much national and local attention and raised overall awareness of the meth problem and sparked discussions on solutions.
Since 1980, the Environmental Protection Agency’s hazardous waste regulations
have required generators of hazardous waste to properly manage their waste.
DEA along with state and local law enforcement agencies, become the “generator” of
hazardous waste when clandestine drug laboratories—which are generally
methamphetamine labs—are seized. As the generator, law enforcement bears
the responsibility for ensuring that the wastes from clandestine laboratories
are managed in compliance with all applicable health, safety, transportation,
and environmental requirements.
The DEA Laboratory System established a program in 1990 to address environmental concerns from the clean up of clandestine drug laboratories. The amount of waste material and chemicals from a clandestine drug laboratory varies from a few pounds to several tons, depending on the size of the laboratory and its manufacturing capabilities. Wastes can be highly toxic, flammable, corrosive, reactive and, in some cases, radioactive. These wastes can cause injury and death to laboratory operators, and can cause fires and explosions that can contaminate the interior of homes, apartments, motels, etc.
In some instances, these wastes have been indiscriminately dumped into pits, streams, lakes, septic tanks, and along the roadside.
Cleaning up a seized clandestine drug laboratory can be a complex, dangerous,
and expensive undertaking. The DEA hazardous waste program has been successful,
however, in promoting the safety of law enforcement personnel and the public,
protecting the environment, and minimizing the agency’s liability. Through
the use of nation-wide contracts, DEA’s program promoted the safety of
law enforcement personnel and the public by using highly qualified companies
with specialized training and equipment to perform the removal of the wastes
at the seized laboratory. Using these contractors reduces the risk of injury
to law enforcement personnel and the public from the clean up of the seized
laboratory.
The program has become increasingly more efficient as DEA gained more experience in cleaning up clandestine drug laboratories. The average cost per cleanup in the FY1991-1992 time frame was $17,000. While the number of clandestine drug laboratory cleanups rose, the average cost per cleanup continued to go down. Through contract improvements and DEA’s contract management experience, the costs of a removal were subsequently reduced to approximately $4,000 in FY2000 and to less than $3,300 in FY2002.
New hazardous waste contracts became effective in FY2003. The new contracts
include many time and cost saving tools to help address the field’s concerns
and the dramatic increase in workload. The new contracts are expected to significantly
improve the response time by increasing the number of Contract Areas from 29
to 44 and requiring response facilities in each. The greater competition created
by smaller Contract Areas and new cost reduction factors should result in additional
cost savings for the government, while maintaining strict environmental compliance
standards. In addition, the new contracts contain provisions for weekly pickups
from containers in states that establish a container storage program and have
entered into a Letter of Agreement with DEA to provide this service. DEA began
discussions regarding a pilot container program with several states in FY2002
to determine the feasibility and degree of cost savings associated with the
approach.
The Arellano Felix Organization (AFO), often referred to as the Tijuana Cartel, was considered one of the most powerful and violent drug trafficking organizations in Mexico. At the height of its power, the AFO was responsible for the transportation, importation, and distribution of multi-ton quantities of cocaine, marijuana, and large quantities of heroin and methamphetamine into the United States from Mexico—primarily from Tijuana into San Diego and Los Angeles.
DEA offices in Mexico and the United States, most notably Tijuana, San Diego, and Los Angeles, relentlessly pursued the principal members of this organization in an effort to bring about their downfall. The most prominent members of the AFO were brothers Benjamin, Eduardo, Ramon, and Francisco Javier Arellano Felix; Ismael Higuera Guerrero; Jesus Labra Aviles; Manuel Aguirre Galindo; and Ismael Higuera- Guerrero. Jesus Labra Aviles, long considered the financial mastermind of the organization, was arrested in Mexico City in March 2000 by the Government of Mexico with the support of DEA’s Tijuana office. This was followed by the arrest of major AFO Lieutenant Ismael Higuera-Guerrero two months later in May 2000. He, too, was arrested by the Mexican Government in coordination with DEA’s Tijuana office.
Higuero-Guerrero had been the most blatant member of the AFO directing operations in Tijuana for years.
At the beginning of 2002, AFO was dealt two huge blows: First, its infamous and brutal enforcer and assassin Ramon Arellano Felix was killed in a street fight with drug trafficking competitors and Mexican police, then, a month later, the AFO’s overall Chief of Operations, Benjamin Arellano-Felix, was arrested in Puebla, Mexico, by the Mexican Military.
On April 10, 2002, Operation Crossfire, a bi-lateral anti-corruption investigation conducted in collaboration with federal Mexican Government officials, resulted in the arrest of 42 active federal, state, and local law enforcement officers from Mexicali, Tijuana, and Ensenada. These arrests included the Tijuana Chief of Police, heads of the State Judicial Police in Tijuana, Tecate, and Mexicali; and the Assistant State Attorney General. All of them were assisting the Arellano-Felix Organization.
Reports of drug smuggling tunnels increased significantly in late 2002 and
early 2003. Traffickers may have increased their use of subterranean smuggling
in light of increased border security, either real or perceived. Mexican
drug trafficking organizations had used tunnels as a smuggling method since
at least 1990. All of the narco-tunnels seized were in California (in the
San Diego-Tijuana area) and Arizona (Douglas, Naco, and Nogales). At least
13 tunnels were discovered. Narco-tunnels ranged in sophistication from a
16-inch PVC pipe; to tunnels dug off of drainage systems; to well-engineered
tunnels equipped with electricity, ventilation, and rails.
DEA, in cooperation with Mexico’s Policia Federal Preventiva, discovered one of the most significant drug smuggling tunnels on February 27, 2002. It was approximately 4 feet by 4 feet, more than 800 feet long, and 20 feet underground. It was equipped with its own ventilation system, lighting, and rails on which an electronic cart moved drugs. The Mexican entrance was hidden behind a fireplace in a home near Tecate, Mexico, and the U.S. exit was concealed under a stairway in a home in Boulevard, California. About 300 pounds of marjuana were seized from inside the tunnel. Ownership of the tunnel was attributed to the Jose Albino Quintero-Meraz organization.
![]() |
San Ysidro U.S. Border Patrol agents investigating a lead
found a cargo truck with 3,3337.7 pounds of marijuana which led to the
discovery of a tunnel leading to a manhole and a storm drain located behind
the parked truck.
DEA S/A Darren Lee, DEA G/S Pedro Pena, U.S.B.P. Agent Greg Torres, and U.S. Customs Agent Taekuk Cho. |
Technology has created new methods to locate tunnels.
In late 2001, Administrator Hutchinson launched a new initiative that grew out of the MET II program called the Integrated Drug Enforcement Assistance (IDEA) program. IDEA combined law enforcement action with strong community efforts to find solutions to the problems that often cause drug abuse and create a welcoming environment for drug traffickers. IDEA was considered innovative because, while many programs focused only on law enforcement or only on treatment, IDEA brought diverse community groups together to work out problems. Instead of MET II’s regional approach, it focused on one community at a time. IDEA addressed not only drug problems, but also the underlying issues that are the root of drug use and trafficking.
DEA and state and local law enforcement identified drug trafficking targets and executed enforcement operations. Concurrent to drug enforcement action in a community, the IDEA program provided communities with long-term support in developing and implementing prevention and treatment programs. The goal was to partner law enforcement with community coalitions. Summits were held at each site to bring together large numbers of community-based organizations, businesses, faith-based organizations, parks and recreation departments, schools, drug courts, law enforcement, and community leaders to form new and lasting partnerships and identify problems and long-term solutions. Once enforcement efforts were complete, IDEA encouraged that 15% of law enforcement seized assets be directed to community prevention, education, and treatment programs.
In 2001 and 2002, three sites piloted the program. They were: North Charleston, South Carolina, Allentown, Pennsylvania, and Portsmouth, Virginia. Three additional sites were added later in 2002 and 2003: Springfield, Missouri, Mobile/Prichard, Alabama, and Pueblo, Colorado. DEA provided a full-time Special Agent to each site to work with experts in crime prevention, alternative judicial systems such as drug courts, restorative justice initiatives, drug testing, and law enforcement training. Administrator Hutchinson established an IDEA National Advisory Council comprising law enforcement, judiciary, government officials, substance abuse, and crime prevention experts to consult with DEA on program design, implementation, and evaluation. To support the IDEA program and emphasize demand reduction activities on the whole, Administrator Hutchinson committed to doubling the number of Demand Reduction Coordinators across the country.
The IDEA program was ongoing at all six sites in 2003, and all reported significant arrests and seizures from law enforcement efforts and encouraging results in the prevention, education, and treatment areas. IDEA communities reported increased participation in community drug programs, better identification of funding sources for anti-drug efforts, stronger and better organized community coalitions, greater awareness of the community’s drug problems, and more enthusiasm in solving the drug problems. While IDEA’s funding was eliminated in DEA’s 2003 budget due to tightening fiscal concerns relating to national security, DEA continued to provide non-monetary support to IDEA communities through its Demand Reduction Coordinators and local offices so that successes could continue.
Drug treatment courts are specialized community courts designed to help stop the abuse of drugs, alcohol, and related criminal activity. Non-violent offenders who have been charged with simple possession of drugs are given the option to receive treatment instead of a jail sentence. A judge oversees each case from the beginning and traces progressions and lapses through random drug testing and monitoring attendance to treatment sessions. If a participant fails to meet the minimum requirements set forth by the court, immediate sanctions are imposed. For determined individuals, completion of the program might bring about dismissal of charges, a reduced sentence, a lesser penalty, or a combination of these.
Drug courts have seen rapid growth since their inception in 1989—by 2003, there were about 700 nationwide. Administrator Hutchinson was a champion of drug courts during his tenure at DEA. He visited several drug courts across the country to encourage and support participants and spoke at many graduation ceremonies. Drug courts were a centerpiece of his message that, to make progress in the fight against drugs, it was necessary to heal the addicted—to restore their lives and make them productive citizens again and help reduce the demand for drugs in this country.
Two Israeli Ecstasy traffickers were extradited to Miami in August 2002, marking the first time that Israeli citizens were extradited to the United States on drug charges. The two men, Meir Ben David and Josef Levi, were indicted in October 2000 in Miami for conspiracy to import Ecstasy and possession with intent to distribute Ecstasy into the Southern District of Florida. The investigation, initiated by DEA’s Fort Lauderdale office in 1998, revealed that Ben David and Levi were part of an Israeli organized crime syndicate responsible for smuggling large quantities of Ecstasy from Europe into the United States. Ben David coordinated shipments of Ecstasy from Europe into the United States using body couriers and parcel couriers. Levi assisted the organization by distributing Ecstasy at various nightclubs throughout South Florida as well as to other Israeli Ecstasy traffickers. During the course of the investigation, hundreds of kilograms of Ecstasy were documented as being imported into the United States by this organization.
In late 2002, DEA began Operation X-Out, a multi-faceted, 12-month initiative that focused on identifying and dismantling organizations that were producing and distributing Ecstasy and predatory drugs in the United States and abroad. DEA committed to invest more resources in Ecstasy and predatory drug investigations and increase these kind of investigations from 5% of DEA’s total cases to at least 10%. Airport interdiction task forces were increased at certain airports and new tasks forces were created in cities like New York and Miami that were primary entryways for the drugs. Also created within DEA was a task force that focused on Internet drug trafficking.
Operation X-Out also included an awareness campaign to educate students, parents, educators, and the health and law enforcement communities about the dangers of Ecstasy and predatory drugs. DEA held press conferences and town hall meetings across the country that focused on enforcement and prevention efforts at the local level. The first was held in November 2002 in San Diego, where Administrator Hutchinson launched Operation X-Out and called attention to the growing problem of Ecstasy and predatory drug abuse. The press conference was followed by a town hall meeting attended by about 300 educators, health experts, students, rape crisis centers, and concerned citizens who discussed solutions to the problem in their community. Similar events were held during 2003 throughout the country, with a particular emphasis on college campuses.
As of early 2003, the following seizures were the largest made in the country. The millions of tablets involved showed the huge extent to which Ecstasy was being smuggled into the country by international drug trafficking organizations and the drug’s tremendous popularity in the United States.
![]() 1.2 million ecstasy tablets seized in New York inside a diamond cutting apparatus. |
1. In July 2000, DEA and the U.S. Customs Service seized approximately 2.1 million Ecstasy tablets at the Los Angeles International Airport. The tablets, labeled as clothing, arrived on an Air France flight from Paris concealed in an airfreight shipment. Several individuals, who were responsible for overseeing and coordinating this shipment, were arrested. DEA later connected these individuals to a significant Israeli trafficking organization that was responsible for importing multi-kilogram quantities of Ecstasy into the United States. (seeOperation Red Tide)
2. The second largest seizure was made by the New York Police Department when they seized 1.6 million Ecstasy tablets from two Israeli nationals at a Manhattan apartment. The pills had an estimated street value of $40 million and were sold in 100,000 tablet quantities to mid-level distributors in the area.
3. The third largest Ecstasy seizure occurred in conjunction with arrests made in October 2002 by DEA New York. DEA arrested three Israeli nationals in connection with a seizure of 1.4 million Ecstasy tablets with an estimated value of $42 million. The investigation began by DEA’s Belgium office where they received information from Belgian law enforcement about the tablets, which were bound for New York. It was the second largest seizure in Europe.
In DEA’s early years, the concept of internet communications would have seemed like a sci-fi fantasy. But by 2003, in an age when websites are the main sources for finding or providing information, DEA kept up with the demand for a thorough and informative webpage. When DEA’s website, www.dea.gov first went on-line in 1996, it contained just a few web files of information—in 2003, the website contained 2,500 files that addressed every aspect of the agency and its mission. The website featured: recent news stories that changed almost daily, current drug facts and statistics, recruiting and training information, and photos of major fugitives. In late 2002, the website expanded to include webpages for each of DEA’s divisions. Individual divisions used their sites to promote local drug news and reach out to their communities.
DEA became adept at using the DEA.gov as a way to reach out to the public, to community, schools, the media, and our law enforcement partners. When the site was first created, it had one million visitors. By 1998, the number of visitors had grown to 18 million. In 2002, after a major over-haul of the site and increased efforts to publicize it, the DEA.gov received 100 million visitors. This staggering growth represented continued increase in public interest in the DEA and the agency’s improved capability to provide important information to the American people.
In September 2001, the popular DEA in-house publication, DEA World, was distributed electronically for the first time. Switching to an electronic format allowed for quicker and much more frequent publication of the news-magazine and ensured that everyone in DEA would have easy access to it.
The new publication featured many of the same types of stories as the older print version but was much more timely and current. DEA World was published on Webster, the internal computer network, and each issue had the appearance of a miniature website. Soon after the first electronic newsletter was released, entries for the new publication poured in from all over the field. Employees were eager to share their local news with the global DEA community. Stories in a typical issue featured successful cases, awards won by employees, community service events, and information about employee services.
This new communication tool serves as a way for employees around the world to stay in touch with each other and to share the agency’s news and accomplishments.
In a first-of-its kind investigation, Operation Webslinger targeted predatory drugs such as GHB and its derivatives, GBL and 1,4 Butanediol (1,4 BD), sold over the Internet. This operation was also groundbreaking because e-mail addresses and web page communications of Internet drug traffickers were identified for Title III interceptions. While not the first time this method of intercept was used, Operation Webslinger was one of the earliest to use Internet intercepts on a national and international scale. These Internet intercepts revealed key information about the traffickers’ operations, including their sources of supply and the amount of drugs they were selling. Perhaps most important was these intercepted Internet communications proved the sites were selling the chemicals not as the industrial solvent as advertised, but for human consumption—which is key to prosecuting traffickers under the drug analog statutes.
In September 2002, DEA successfully concluded this operation with the eventual arrest of 175 individuals in more than 100 cities across the United States and Canada. Those arrested were sources of supply, midlevel brokers, and users. DEA and law enforcement partners dismantled four nationwide distribution rings of these drugs, which are used both to induce a high and in the commission of sexual assault. DEA seized approximately 25 million dosage units of predatory drugs and more than $1 million in assets. The operation had an immediate impact on Internet drug sales, with users complaining in chat rooms they were no longer able to purchase these drugs.
A savvy, flexible drug operation involving Alaskan traffickers was the target of Operation Arctic Heat. These traffickers did business all over the United States, including New York and Los Angeles. In November 2002, DEA Agents arrested more than 60 individuals and seized more than 160 kilograms of cocaine, $2 million in cash, and $35,000 in counterfeit money. Seizures also took place in Anchorage, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Salt Lake City, Chicago, and Grand Junction. This drug operation also targeted money laundering and movement of drug proceeds and worked on an extensive embezzlement scheme designed to “smurf” money out of the United States and into the Dominican Republic.
With urging and support from DEA and other international drug liaison officers, Lebanon re-engaged their opium poppy and cannabis eradication initiatives in 2002. In February 2002, the Lebanese Internal Security Forces, assisted by the Lebanese military and the Syrian military, eradicated approximately 7 million square meters of opium poppy in the Bekaa Valley. In August 2002, approximately 9 million square meters of cannabis were eradicated in the Bekaa. DEA Specials Agents, along with other drug enforcement liaison officers, were invited to witness the eradication initiatives. Being in the Bekaa Valley for a DEA Agent was likened to finding the Holy Grail for an archeologist. This eradication initiative was expected to have a significant impact on the availability of heroin and marijuana in Western Europe in 2003.
On February 24, 2003, DEA successfully completed Operations Pipedreams and Head Hunter, a nationwide sweep of major drug paraphernalia distributors and businesses.The coordinated operations netted 55 individuals across the country and seized $150,000 cash. As a result of this operation, 11 Internet sites were taken offline and redirected. Targeted companies sold half of the nation’s supply of drug paraphernalia and accounted for more than a quarter of a billion dollars in retail drug paraphernalia sales annually. Using both traditional retail stores and Internet websites, the distributors were one-stop shops for drug dealers and users, selling everything from miniature scales, pipes, bongs, cocaine freebase kits, and cutting agents to dilute processed drugs in their raw form. Approximately 115 tons of drug paraphernalia with an estimated wholesale value of $15-20 million were removed from the sites as well.
Critical to the success of Operation Pipedreams was the use of Internet intercepts on e-commerce sites and e-mail accounts to track the money and domestic and international shipments of drug paraphernalia. Operation Pipedreams was conducted by DEA offices in Des Moines, Iowa; Boise, Idaho; and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
On March 14, 2003, Mexican officials brought the reign of Osiel Cardenas-Guillen to an end. He was arrested at a residence in Matamoros, Tamaulipas, Mexico, following a fierce firefight with Mexican police. Before his arrest, Cardenas was the head of a drug trafficking organization that controlled large-scale marijuana and cocaine trafficking through the smuggling corridor between Matamoros, Mexico and Brownsville, Texas. Cardenas had numerous resources that enabled him to maintain 15 to 25 heavily armed bodyguards at all times, protection and support from all levels of Mexican law enforcement, and technical assistance from the Mexican phone company.
Through the combined efforts with the Government of Mexico, the DEA, FBI, and U.S. Customs, the Cardenas reign on the Northeastern Mexico corridor came to a halt. This investigation, called “Operation Golden Grips” was an important arrest because it sent a message to traffickers that violence and intimidation did not protect them from law enforcement.
The catalyst of this operation was the November 1999 assault and attempted kidnapping of 2 U.S. Federal agents and a confidential source. During the assault, Cardenas and 12 to 15 members of his organization, armed with assault rifles, surrounded a vehicle occupied by the agents and attempted to kidnap them and a confidential source who was in the car. Only after an extensive discussion between one of the agents and Cardenas were the agents allowed to leave the scene and travel directly to the border. The agents were followed to the border by members of the Cardenas organization.
On March 21, 2003, DEA announced two final rules that address the legal status of products derived from the cannabis plant. These cannabis products, also known as “hemp” prode ucts, often contain the hallucinogenic substance tetrahydrocannabinols (THC). THC is the primary psychoactive chemical found in the cannabis (marijuana) plant.
These rules set forth what products may contain “hemp.” Under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), THC is a Schedule I controlled substance. Schedule I consists of those controlled substances that have not been approved as medicine by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The CSA provides that anything that contains “any quantity” of a Schedule I hallucinogenic controlled substance is, itself, a Schedule I controlled substance, unless it is an FDA-approved drug product. Thus, the CSA prohibits human consumption of any non-FDA-approved product that contains any amount of THC.
In some cases, a Schedule I controlled substance may have a legitimate industrial use. The CSA allows for industrial use of Schedule I controlled substances, but only under highly controlled circumstances. The rules announced by DEA create an exemption in the law that removes all CSA regulatory restrictions for legitimate industrial products made from cannabis plants. Exempted industrial products include paper, rope, and clothing (which contain fiber made from the cannabis plant), animal feed mixtures, soaps, and shampoos (which contain sterilized cannabis seeds or oils extracted from the seeds). DEA is exempting these types of industrial cannabis products from control because they are not intended for human consumption and do not cause THC to enter the human body.
The rules prohibit cannabis products containing THC that are intended or used for human consumption (foods and beverages). This approach is consistent with the long-standing rule under federal law disallowing human consumption of Schedule I controlled substances outside of FDA-approved research. The rules became effective April 21, 2003.
The International Drug Enforcement Conference (IDEC) was established in 1983 in an effort to institutionalize regional cooperation among executive-level drug law enforcement officials from South, Central, and North America, as well as the Caribbean. IDEC is an “operationally oriented conference.” In the earlier years, IDEC served as a forum to discuss country-specific enforcement problems and programs, and later to topical-related issues. The principal purpose of the yearly conference was to share drug-related intelligence and develop an operational strategy to successfully attack trafficking organizations at every link in the drug chain. IDEC XX was the first conference that included new members as well as observers from Asia, Europe, and Russia.
IDEC XVII: 1999, Washington, D.C., United States “Identifying and Attacking Major Trafficking Organizations”
IDEC XVIII: 2000, Buenos Aires, Argentina "Multi-Regional Investigations and Operations Targeting Major Traffickers"
IDEC XIX: 2001, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic "Mult-Regional Investigations and Operations Targeting Major Traffickers and Their Organizations"
IDEC XX: 2002, Santa Cruz, Bolivia "Combating Major International Drug Trafficking Organizations Through Global Co-operation and Partnership"
IDEC XXI: 2003, Panama, Panama City "International Counternarcotics and Terrorism"
Many problems associated with drug abuse are the result of legitimately manufactured
controlled substances being diverted from their lawful purpose into illicit
drug traffic. By 2003, the number of people who abuse prescription drugs each
year roughly equals the number who abuse cocaine—about 2 to 4 percent
of the population. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, abuse of prescription
drugs was a growing problem.
In 1998, 2.5 million Americans admitted abuse of prescription drugs. By 2001, that had almost doubled to 4.8 million.
The problem of prescription drug diversion was brought to the attention of many Americans because of the abuse of OxyContin that began in the late 1990s. OxyContin is a twelve-hour controlled release formulation of the Schedule II drug oxycodone, a powerful analgesic. The drug was introduced in 1996 and experienced exponential growth, becoming the number one controlled pharmaceutical in terms of sales by the year 2000. This rapid growth was accompanied by similar increases in diversion and abuse. The number of people reporting use of OxyContin for non-medical purposes at least once in their lifetime increased from 221,000 in 1999 to 399,000 in 2000 to 957,000 in 2001.
OxyContin was being diverted through fraudulent prescriptions, over-prescribing, theft and illegal sales, and “doctor shopping”—the practice of going to different doctors until one prescribes the narcotic the patient seeks. The drug had become a target for diverters and abusers due to the large amounts of active ingredients and the ability of abusers to easily compromise the controlled release mechanism. Simply crushing a tablet negates the timed effect of the drug, enabling abusers to swallow, inhale or inject the drug for a powerful morphine-like high. The Drug Abuse Warning Network reported that emergency room mentions for oxycodone, the active ingredient in OxyContin, were more than 100 percent higher in 2000 than in 1998.
OxyContin abuse appears to have begun in rural areas of the eastern United States, then spread to suburban and urban areas in many parts of the country. Numerous communities experienced an upswing in crime as a direct result of the OxyContin problem. Additionally, medical examiners reported overdose deaths associated with the abuse of oxycodone, the active ingredient in OxyContin.
In response to this escalating abuse and diversion, DEA embarked on a comprehensive OxyContin Action Plan that was implemented in FY 2001. This was the first DEA plan to target a specific brand of controlled substance. It focused on enforcement and regulatory investigations targeting key points of diversion. This plan brought the problem of diversion and abuse of OxyContin to the attention of numerous federal, state and local agencies; advisory committees; and to the general public through meetings, presentations, interviews, Demand Reduction and Internet sites.
The Action Plan had a significant impact. There was a four-fold increase in DEA OxyContin cases opened in FY 2001 over FY 2000. Arrests made in conjunction with OxyContin investigations rose seven fold from FY 2000 to FY 2001. OxyContin cases opened in FY 2001 and 2002 totaled 305, and arrests for the same period totaled 351.
For years, the issue of adequate pain management was a source of controversy in the medical community. DEA’s role enforcing the Controlled Substances Act and regulating the most powerful narcotics used in the treatment of pain was viewed by some as inhibiting pain medication availability, when, in fact, both diversion control and pain management constitute health issues.
Recognizing the need to reconcile differences and work together to ensure optimum pain treatment as well as drug diversion control and drug abuse prevention, the Office of Diversion Control developed consensus on the issue with 21 prominent health organizations. The result was a joint statement entitled “Promoting Pain Relief and Preventing Abuse of Pain Medications: A Critical Balancing Act.” Emphasizing that patients’ ability to receive proper care, including pain management, should not be hindered by drug abuse prevention efforts, the statement pledges cooperation between the health care community and law enforcement, and states: “The roles of both health professionals and law enforcement personnel in maintaining this essential balance between patient care and diversion prevention are critical.”
The Office of Diversion Control continues with its efforts to strike a balance regarding the use of narcotics to effectively treat pain. On-going relationships have been developed with renowned pain specialists and medical groups to develop educational materials for physicians and investigators concerning both diversion and acceptable medical practices. These efforts were essential and continued into 2003 as DEA confronted complex drug policy issues.
By the late 1990s and early 2000s, the worldwide web had become a ready source of pharmaceuticals including controlled substances. Many of these sales are suspect because they circumvent the doctor/patient relationship that is necessary for the legitimate prescribing of controlled substances. Realizing that this easily accessible outlet greatly increased the potential for the abuse and diversion of controlled substances, DEA needed to combat this problem in its early stages of development. However, searching the Internet for possible diversion activities was beyond the reach of Diversion Investigators, so it was evident that an integrated, focused, data-mining activity was necessary to identify, collect, and analyze this data.
To meet this need the Office of Diversion Control initiated the On-line Investigations Project. The purpose of the project is to develop a state-of-the-art computer system, maintain a data warehouse to store data collected from the worldwide web, and develop an information management system to manage the collection of web site text, image, and other relevant data from the worldwide web. The project will correlate information, detect patterns through link analysis and uncover trends by sifting through large amounts of data stored in the warehouse to provide constant and timely leads to the field. The On-line Investigations Project is expected to advance the investigative tools available to Diversion Investigators and have a dramatic impact on the ability to conduct investigations on the worldwide web to detect the diversion of controlled substances.
Illicit drug production is dependent upon the availability of legally produced, internationally sourced and marketed precursor and/or essential chemicals that have widespread industrial applications. The responsibility for dealing with issues of drug/chemical trafficking is shared by all nations. The ability to prevent chemicals from being diverted from legitimate commerce to clandestine drug manufacture is a powerful weapon in the global struggle against the spread of illegal narcotics and synthetic drugs. As a result, and in response to a resolution of the United Nations General Assembly Special Session, the Office of Diversion Control, together with regulatory and enforcement counterparts world wide, embarked on several informal, multilateral chemical control and enforcement initiatives. These initiatives showed marked success in preventing and detecting diversion of key chemicals used in the illicit production of cocaine, heroin, and amphetamine-type stimulant chemicals. These initiatives seek to identify, intercept, and prevent diversion attempts; identify criminals; gather intelligence on traffickers’ diversion methods; take appropriate administrative, civil and/or criminal action; and obtain intelligence on chemical trafficking trends and shipping routes.
The first such initiative, Operation Purple, targets potassium permanganate, an oxidizing agent used in the clandestine cocaine process. Developed together with Germany, Operation Purple brought together the potassium permanganate producing, major importing, and illicit cocaine source countries. The operation tracked every shipment of potassium permanganate from the producing country through any transit countries, and ultimately, to the end-user. The success of this operation—the prevention of diversion of tons of the chemical, identification of “rogue” chemical companies and suspect individuals, gathering of intelligence on trafficker diversion methods, improved regulatory control of the chemical—led to two subsequent chemical targeting initiatives, Operation Topaz and Project PRISM.
Operation Topaz is an international initiative aimed at preventing the diversion of AA, a chemical utilized by traffickers in the illicit production of heroin. Topaz began on March 1, 2001, and is a cooperative effort by drug law enforcement and regulatory officials from 40 countries and regions, as well as the International Narcotics Control Board, ICPO/ Interpol, European Commission, and the World Customs Organization. Based on the premise that the prevention of the diversion of certain industrial chemicals to the clandestine production of illicit drugs is a critical element of any drug enforcement effort, Operation Topaz was developed as a long term monitoring program of AA.
Project PRISM aimed to assist Governments in developing and implementing operating procedures to more effectively control and monitor trade in amphetamine-type stimulants (ATS) precursors in order to prevent their diversion. Project PRISM targets multiple chemicals used in the clandestine production of ATS, including ephedrine and pseudoephedrine for illicit production of amphetamine and methamphetamine, and safrole and methylenedioxyphenyl-2-propanone for production of MDMA and its analogs.
All of these initiatives have resulted in a broad level of international agreement regarding the actions that must be taken to prevent chemical diversion, thereby impacting clandestine, illicit drug production.
![]() |
Dr. Eddie Sfeir-Byron, Bolivian Drug Czar and Vice Minister for Social Defense, along with Bolivian officials witnessing destruction of 344 pounds of cocaine and 17 metric tons of coca leaf seized by DEA and Bolivan authorities. |
As the nation’s primary agency charged with enforcing the controlled substances laws and regulations of the United States, DEA invested in strategic and operational information sources at the Federal, State, local, and even foreign levels. The National Forensic Laboratory Information System (NFLIS), a DEA program that systematically collects drug analyses results and other associated information from state and local forensic laboratories nationwide, is enhancing DEA resources for carrying out its core mission. NFLIS has proved to be an effective information source for better understanding and monitoring our nation’s drug problems. It improves DEA’s ability to track national, regional, and local drug abuse trends, including providing timely and geographically specific information on emerging drug problems. NFLIS can also be used to identify specific drug characteristics including commonly reported abused drugcombinations.
One of the key advantages of NFLIS is that it collects forensic laboratory data verified by chemical analysis that has the highest degree of validity.
Sponsored by the Office of Diversion Control, NFLIS is the only database available in the U.S. that provides actual and estimate nationwide and regional scientifically validated data on drugs associated with law enforcement activity. Initiated in 1997 to provide reliable data for drug scheduling, NFLIS has grown into a fully operational system with interest from other DEA offices and government agencies. By 2003, 32 out of 50 state laboratory systems and 48 out of 72 local laboratories participated in the NFLIS; over 800,000 drug analyses results were collected during 2001. Participation in NFLIS was totally voluntary, but the ultimate goal is to enlist all of the approximately 300 forensic laboratories.
During 1998 to 2003, the Aviation Division recognized the ever increasing role aviation support was in obtaining DEA enforcement objectives. The Division implemented long-term strategic plans in order to provide more effective and efficient service. A component of these plans was an effort to modernize and standardize the fleet.
Older, maintenance–intensive aircraft were replaced with new Cessna 206 surveillance aircraft, Pilatus PC-12 cargo aircraft, and Eurocopter A-Star helicopters. Standardization was reflected in the acquisition of Beech Super King Air cargo aircraft, which replaced other aging turboprops.
The Aviation Division applied the same upgrade policy to its technology by purchasing new day/night video surveillance cameras to replace less dependable, less capable equipment. In 2003, the Division created a state-of-the–art Aviation Communications Center capable of tracking and flight-following all OA assets through the use of high frequency radio, very high frequency radio, and satellite communications. The Center facilitates the maximization of Aviation asset usage and produces cost savings by eliminating the requirement for contractor-flight following.
The Division expanded its representation and support assets in the Caribbean and poised itself for future mission expansion worldwide with the acquisition of a Learjet 60 aircraft. This aircraft significantly increased mission profiles and represented an asset that is capable of global deployment.
From 1999 to 2003, DEA’s Training Division continued its mission to ensure
that DEA employees were provided the technical and professional competencies
and ethical and leadership skills to accomplish the DEA mission. This training
took place at DEA’s new Justice Training Center, which opened in April
of 1999 in Quantico, Virginia.
One of the most significant developments at the DEA Training Academy was the
establishment of the new Clandestine Laboratory Tactical Training School in
Fiscal Year 2000. The course is needed because of the increase in the number
of clandestine laboratory seizures throughout the country, with the corresponding
escalation of problems confronting state and local agencies that are called
to the scene of these laboratories. Often referred to as “chemical time-bombs,” these
labs present unique dangers to users, neighbors, law enforcement, and the surrounding
environment. Often, it is state or local police who first encounter these laboratories
and must ensure that they are investigated, dismantled, and disposed of appropriately
and safely.
The class is designed for Special Agents and narcotics officers who are involved in clandestine laboratory raids, but had limited tactical training and experience. Their training included the full use of issued equipment including air purifying respirators and self-contained breathing apparatus.
The DEA Basic Clandestine Laboratory Certification School is the most widely recognized law enforcement sponsored clandestine lab training course that met OSHA standards. The Unit also conducted an Advanced Site Safety Officer school for DEA and state and local officers. This school is designed to certify attendees as Clandestine laboratory Site Safety Officers, an OSHA requirement for every clandestine Laboratory site. Advanced assessment and investigative techniques are taught at this school.
From 1999 to 2003, DEA continued its mission to conduct and sponsor counternarcotics training to thousands of foreign law enforcement counterparts. Since 1969, DEA and its predecessor agencies trained officials in more than 243 countries. DEA continued its participation at the four International Law Enforcement Academies, including one in San Jose, Costa Rica, scheduled for opening later in 2003. These academies have been successful in increasing the professionalism of participants through the exchange of law enforcement techniques and investigative strategies and in strengthening transnational crime fighting.
DEA’s secure, centralized computer network, Firebird, which standardizes investigative reporting, case file inventories, administrative functions, and electronic communications, was successfully deployed to approximately 97% of DEA’s offices (domestic and foreign) by 2003. This was accomplished in part by the Small Firebird Initiative that provided full Firebird functionality to those DEA offices where the installation of the Firebird desktop was either cost prohibitive or a security issue. Only those offices with security or facilities related issues did not have Firebird connectivity. In addition, Firebird technical refreshment of all division network and shared servers was completed and the replacement of workstations was initiated.
DEA was the first component in the Department of Justice to electronically transmit information through the Department’s Joint Automated Booking System (JABS) to the FBI’s Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS) through the Firebird Booking Station (FBS). FBS provides rapid identification of individuals under arrest or detention through automation of the booking process and electronic access to IAFIS, with an average response time of 30 minutes; it minimizes duplication of data entry during booking; and it promotes data sharing of arrest records among Department law enforcement agencies and other authorized parties through an interface with the Nationwide JABS.
Investigative Management Process and Case Tracking (IMPACT), an automated case management system, was developed to support DEA Special Agents, Intelligence Analysts, and Diversion Investigators in their daily case management activities. IMPACT was designed to improve mission performance and achieve greater operational efficiency in the establishment, recording, accessibility, and analysis of information pertaining to DEA investigations. In 2003, IMPACT was deployed as a pilot to the Phoenix and Miami Divisions with over 800 field users.
DEA transitioned to a full, on-line Electronic File Room. All Investigative Reports from 2002 forward and millions of earlier records are available for full text search from the desktop of any DEA office with access to Firebird or SFI.
Communication capabilities were improved through the use of Internet technologies and new trusted dial-up communication capabilities. A Web Architecture was developed and used to publish the Administrator’s Newsletter, providing improved access to information available on the DEA Website. In addition, by 2003, DEA was using the DOJ/FBI sponsored Law Enforcement Online (LEO) secure dial-up network to provide trusted access to and among federal and state law enforcement organizations.
DEA implemented a Centralized Call Data Delivery system for intercepted cellular pen register data for the field. This system enables each division to obtain cellular call data without the need to establish a dedicated connection to individual cellular companies, thus generating substantial cost savings to DEA.
In 1999, the Office of Forensic Sciences’ laboratory system was reaccredited
by the American Society of Crime Laboratory Directors/Laboratory Accreditation
Board (ASCLD/LAB). The first accreditation was completed in 1994. This accomplishment
was significant because DEA laboratories were recognized as conforming to national
and international technical and operational standards. The areas of forensic
drug analysis, fingerprint examination and Source Determination Program analysis
(tablet and capsules toolmark examinations) were the technical specialties
accredited by ASCLD/LAB.
In 2000, the Office of Forensic Sciences held a Strategic Planning Conference at the Justice Training Center in Quantico, Virginia. Attendees focused on analyzing the needs and expectations of the DEA Laboratory System’s many customers and developing ways to meet them. Specific goals, objectives, and strategies to improve service, strengthen the organizational structure, utilize technology more effectively, and to obtain additional facilities and resources were identified. The resulting Strategic Plan helped the laboratory system position itself over the next five years to meet future expected, and unexpected, challenges in the coming decade.
The International Drug Profiling Conference (IDPC) convened in December 2002 and was the first-ever forensic science conference to bring delegates together to define and standardize “drug profiling” to meet the enforcement and intelligence requirements of international drug law enforcement. The IDPC was comprised of delegates from the United States, Australia, Great Britain, Finland, Sweden, Germany, Japan, Switzerland, Hong Kong, the United Nations Drug Control Program, and The Netherlands. The first IDPC ended with an agreement among delegates that they would set realistic and achievable goals that could be implemented internationally. By consensus, the first two goals the delegates chose to pursue were the development of drug profiling databases and the development of programs dealing with the profiling of heroin and Amphetamine Type Substances.
During 2002 and 2003, DEA replaced four of its aging laboratory facilities—three regional laboratories and the Special Testing and Research Laboratory. The four new state-of-the-art laboratories are located in Dallas, Texas; Dulles, Virginia; Largo, Maryland; and Vista, California. These newly constructed multimillion-dollar modern laboratories are capable of providing a full line of analytical support to drug law enforcement agents.
In 2003, through the support of DEA’s Executive Management, several changes were implemented that were identified as critical needs in the Laboratory System’s FY2000-2005 Strategic Plan. The changes included reorganizing the Office of Forensic Sciences to create a Quality Assurance Manager position and a second Associate Deputy Assistant Administrator position at Headquarters. The reorganization also affected the laboratories by creating an Associate Laboratory Director position in each laboratory and by creating a new Digital Evidence Laboratory for the forensic examination of digital evidence.
DEA’s
commitment to supporting its drug investigations in the 21st Century achieved
a major milestone with the February 2003 establishment of a Digital
Evidence Laboratory within its Office of Forensic Sciences. In the short period
of just nine years, DEA built a world class digital forensic program from what
first started out as a small engineering program, that is capable of handling
the full range of digital evidence including computers, servers, Personal Digital
Assistants, Global Positioning System navigational
devices, satellite phones, two-way pager devices, and cell phones. This new
laboratory provides needed forensic support at the field level to acquire digital
evidence
from drug investigations thereby leaving no stone unturned. The elevation of
the digital evidence function to a laboratory status organizational level reflects
the present and future importance that this relatively new forensic science
plays in DEA investigations in the new millennium.
The mission of the Scientific Working Group for the Analysis of Seized Drugs (SWGDRUG) is to recommend minimum standards for the forensic examination of seized drugs and seek their international acceptance. SWGDRUG is a cooperative effort between the DEA’s Office of Forensic Sciences and the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) to address the following:
¨
Recommend minimum standards for forensic drug analysts’ knowledge,
skills, and abilities.
¨ Promote the professional development of forensic drug analysts.
¨ Provide a means of information exchange within the forensic drug analyst
community.
¨ Promote the highest ethical standards of practitioners in all areas of
forensic drug analysis.
¨ Recommend minimum standards for drug examinations and reporting.
¨ Establish quality assurance recommendations.
¨ Seek international acceptance of SWGDRUG minimum standards.
The SWGDRUG core committee is comprised of representatives from federal laboratories and regional forensic science associations in the United States, the European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENFSI), the United Nations Drug Control Program, Australia, Great Britain, Japan, Canada and Germany. A forensic science educator and a representative from an internationally recognized standards writing organization also participate on the committee. The SWGDRUG process evolved since 1997 to be recognized as one of the most successful scientific working groups in the world.
DEA’s first sub-regional laboratory became operational in FY 1997 in
support of the Midwest High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA). This laboratory
was established to bring analytical and support services closer to the source
of illicit drug activity—clandestine manufacture of methamphetamine.
In 1999, the laboratory was relocated from the Food and Drug Laboratory in
Kansas City, Kansas, to the Kansas City Regional Crime Laboratory in Kansas
City, Missouri.
In Fiscal Year 1999, DEA opened a second sub-regional laboratory in San Juan, Puerto Rico. This laboratory provides analytical and support services to the Caribbean Division as well as other federal agencies within the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. This laboratory is collocated with the Food and Drug Administration Laboratory.
In Fiscal Year 2000, DEA took delivery of a 38-foot mobile laboratory. Equipped with a fume hood, bench space, support infrastructure, and appropriate analytical instrumentation, the laboratory is capable of operation by either shore-power through a 100 amp, 200 volt shore line or an on-board diesel generator. In early 2001, the mobile laboratory was deployed to Tucson, Arizona, where two chemists provided additional forensic support along the Southwest Border of the United States. In late 2002, the mobile laboratory was moved to El Paso, Texas to provide much needed forensic laboratory support in that region.
The 35th Anniversary Issue of Microgram was published in 2002. This periodical has progressed from a sporadically published “communication” from the Bureau of Drug Abuse Control and Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs in the late 1960s to the dawn of electronic posting by the DEA in the 21st century. By 2003, over 1,400 offices around the world received Microgram each month.
In FY 2002, the Office of Forensic Sciences determined that there was a need to convert Microgram into two separate publications entitled Microgram Bulletin and Microgram Journal. Microgram Bulletin includes all the material previously included in Microgram, except scientific articles. Additional and/or expanded information was also incorporated into Microgram Bulletin. Microgram Journal is a quarterly journal dedicated solely to the publication of scientific articles on the detection and analysis of suspected controlled substances for forensic/law enforcement purposes. It was the intent of the Editor and the Office of Forensic Sciences that Microgram Journal become a premier scientific journal in this discipline.
Additionally, starting with the January 2003 issues, the Bulletin and the Journal moved from a law enforcement restricted status to an open, unclassified status, and both were posted on DEA’s Internet website.
DEA’s Inspection Division is responsible for maintaining the integrity of DEA and providing security for its employees. DEA’s integrity system is comprised of three primary components within the Inspection Division: the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), the Office of Inspections, and the Office of Security Programs.
Technological upgrades and resource enhancements were acquired, enabling the Inspection Division to more effectively and efficiently carry out its mandate. The vulnerability of our infrastructure was made evident by the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. The challenges posed by terrorism and new technology available to criminals were matched by DEA’s security apparatus.
DEA remained committed to ensuring the integrity and professionalism of its employees and thoroughly investigated all credible allegations of employee misconduct. In October 2000, OPR opened a field office in Dallas, Texas. DEA’s presence along the Southwest Border and the power and influence of drug trafficking organizations that operate in this area necessitated the expansion of OPR there.
The Office of Inspections, through the annual Division Inspection Program (DIP) and the three-year cyclical on-site inspection process, ensures that managers maintain the highest-level of operational, financial, and organizational integrity, as well as compliance with internal and external controls, policies and procedures, Federal laws, and sound auditing practices. IN investigates all shooting incidents related to DEA Special Agents and DEA-sponsored State and Local Task Force Law Enforcement personnel to determine the circumstances involved and accountability of an incident. Due to a major IN organizational realignment and the establishment of the DIP and cyclical on-site processes, IN assisted managers in identifying issues that improved operational and financial efficiency and effectiveness in all DEA program areas and offices.
The most dramatic changes in the Inspection Division were in the Office of Security Programs (IS). This office experienced significant growth in recent years. By the end of 1997, the office had a staff of 28 employees. As of spring 2003, the staff had expanded six-fold to 189 employees and contractors. The office is now divided into three sections: Information Security, Physical Security, and Personnel Security—each headed by a Supervisory Special Agent.
IS provides a wide variety of continuing security services and equipment to the entire agency and also inspects and issues compliance orders to headquarters, domestic and foreign offices with regard to security and safety. Furthermore, with the expansion, IS offers more specialized, technically forward services and operations.
As of 2003, IS has several initiatives in progress, including an aggressive reinvestigation program and intrusion detection system. This system has auditing capabilities to monitor the utilization of computer systems, which enhances early detection of integrity-related issues.
Killed in the Line of Duty | |||
![]() |
Royce D. Tramel Died on August 28, 2000 DEA Special Agent Tramel was assigned to the Dallas Office. He was struck by a car and killed. |
![]() |
Alice Faye Hall-Walton Died on March 1, 2001 Diversion Investigator Hall-Walton was assigned to the Dallas office. She was killed in an automobile accident. |